@Article{info:doi/10.2196/60860,
author="Toulany, Alene
and Khodyakov, Dmitry
and Mooney, Sarah
and Stromquist, Lisa
and Bailey, Katherine
and Barber, Claire EH
and Batthish, Michelle
and Cleverley, Kristin
and Dimitropoulos, Gina
and Gorter, Jan Willem
and Grahovac, Danijela
and Grimes, Ruth
and Guttman, Beverly
and H{\'e}bert, Mich{\`e}le L
and John, Tomisin
and Lo, Lisha
and Luong, Dorothy
and MacGregor, Laura
and Mukerji, Geetha
and Pidduck, Jacklynn
and Senthilnathan, Vjura
and Shulman, Rayzel
and Trbovich, Patricia
and Munce, Sarah EP",
title="Quality Indicators for Transition from Pediatric to Adult Care for Youth With Chronic Conditions: Proposal for an Online Modified Delphi Study",
journal="JMIR Res Protoc",
year="2024",
month="Sep",
day="10",
volume="13",
pages="e60860",
keywords="transition to adult care; adolescent health; chronic conditions; quality indicators; consensus; caregivers; adolescent; stakeholder engagement; patient engagement; Delphi",
abstract="Background: The transition from pediatric to adult care poses a significant health system--level challenge impeding the delivery of quality health services for youth with chronic health conditions. In Canada and globally, the transition to adult care is regarded as a top priority in adolescent health in need of readily applicable, adaptable, and relevant national metrics to evaluate and benchmark transition success across disease populations and clinical care settings. Unfortunately, existing literature fails to account for the lack of engagement from youth and caregivers in developing indicators, and its applicability across chronic conditions, primary care involvement, and health equity considerations. Objective: Our proposed study aims to establish a consensus-driven set of quality indicators for the transition to adult care that are universally applicable across physical, developmental, and mental health conditions, clinical care settings, and health jurisdictions. Methods: Using an integrated knowledge translation (iKT) approach, a panel comprising youth, caregivers, interdisciplinary health care providers, and health system leaders will be established to collaborate with our research team to ensure that the study methodology, materials, and knowledge dissemination are suitable and reflect the perspectives of youth and their families. We will then conduct an iterative 3-round Online Modified Delphi (OMD) study (n=160) to (1) compare and contrast the perspectives of youth, caregivers, health care providers, and health system leaders on quality indicators for transition; and (2) prioritize a key set of quality indicators for transition applicable across disease populations that are the most important, useful, and feasible in the Canadian context. Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM) multistage analytic approach, data from each panel and stakeholder group will be examined separately and compared to establish a key set of indicators endorsed by both panels. Results: The study is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Physicians Services Incorporated. Conclusions: This study will produce quality indicators to evaluate and inform action equitably to improve transition from pediatric to adult care for youth and their families in Canada. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/60860 ",
issn="1929-0748",
doi="10.2196/60860",
url="https://www.researchprotocols.org/2024/1/e60860",
url="https://doi.org/10.2196/60860",
url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38889353"
}