Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Monday, March 11, 2019 at 4:00 PM to 4:30 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Advertisement

Currently submitted to: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Jul 30, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 2, 2019 - Sep 27, 2019
(currently open for review)

Transperineal Laser Ablation treatment for LUTS due to Benign Prostatic Obstruction: a prospective in vivo pilot study protocol

  • Rob van Kollenburg; 
  • Luigi van Riel; 
  • Paul Bloemen; 
  • Jorg Oddens; 
  • Theo de Reijke; 
  • Harrie Beerlage; 
  • Daniel Martijn de Bruin; 

ABSTRACT

Background:

Standard surgical treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) all use a transurethral approach. Drawbacks are the need for general or spinal anaesthesia, and complications such as haematuria, strictures and cloth retention. Therefore, a minimal invasive technique under local anaesthesia is desired to improve patient safety. Recently, SoracteLiteTM transperineal laser ablation (TPLA) has been introduced as a novel minimal invasive treatment for BPO. The system used is unique because four laser sources are independently available. This 1064nm diode laser induces coagulative necrosis. Moreover, TPLA is unique because it has a transperineal approach and can be performed under local anaesthesia in an outpatient setting.

Objective:

The primary objective of this study is to determine safety and feasibility of TPLA treatment for men with LUTS due to BPO and fit for standard surgery. The secondary objectives are to determine functional outcomes by flowmetry and patient reported outcome measures, side effects, and tissue changes observed on imaging.

Methods:

This study is a prospective, single centre, interventional pilot study, IDEAL stage 2a and will include 20 patients. Eligible patients are men ≥40 years of age, with a prostate volume of 30 – 120 cc, urodynamically proven bladder outlet obstruction and a peak urinary flow of 5 – 15 mL/sec. All patients undergo transperineal laser ablation of their prostate under local anaesthesia using the EchoLaser system. Depending on the prostate volume, two to four laser fibres are placed bilaterally into the prostate. Patient follow-up consists of uroflowmetry, patient-reported outcome measures and imaging by contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Total follow-up is 12 months following treatment.

Results:

Presently, recruitment of patients is ongoing. Publication of first results is expected by early 2020.

Conclusions:

Transperineal laser ablation offers the potential to be a novel minimal invasive technique for treatment of LUTS due to BPO in men fit for standard desobstruction. This study will evaluate the safety and feasibility of TPLA and report on functional outcomes and tissue changes observed on imaging following TPLA treatment. Clinical Trial: Clinical trials: TPLA for BPO; NCT03653117; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03653117 This trial is registered in the Dutch Toetsingonline trial registration system, number: NL66057.018.18 (https://www.toetsingonline.nl/)


 Citation

Please cite as:

van Kollenburg R, van Riel L, Bloemen P, Oddens J, de Reijke T, Beerlage H, de Bruin DM

Transperineal Laser Ablation treatment for LUTS due to Benign Prostatic Obstruction: a prospective in vivo pilot study protocol

JMIR Preprints. 30/07/2019:15687

DOI: 10.2196/15687

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/15687


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.