This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Methods and Feasibility Studies (368) Research Instruments, Questionnaires, and Tools (541) mHealth for Data Collection and Research (914)

Published on in Vol 3, No 3 (2014): Jul-Sep

A Comparison of Tablet Computer and Paper-Based Questionnaires in Healthy Aging Research

A Comparison of Tablet Computer and Paper-Based Questionnaires in Healthy Aging Research

A Comparison of Tablet Computer and Paper-Based Questionnaires in Healthy Aging Research

Authors of this article:

Jason Fanning1 Author Orcid Image ;   Edward McAuley1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (30) Tweetations (2) Metrics

Journals

  1. Pittman J, Afari N, Floto E, Almklov E, Conner S, Rabin B, Lindamer L. Implementing eScreening technology in four VA clinics: a mixed-method study. BMC Health Services Research 2019;19(1) View
  2. Scott S, Albrecht L, Given L, Arseneau D, Klassen T. Feasibility of an Electronic Survey on iPads with In-Person Data Collectors for Data Collection with Health Care Professionals and Health Care Consumers in General Emergency Departments. JMIR Research Protocols 2016;5(2):e139 View
  3. Marcano Belisario J, Jamsek J, Huckvale K, O'Donoghue J, Morrison C, Car J. Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015;2015(7) View
  4. Hou J, Wu Y, Harrell E. Reading on Paper and Screen among Senior Adults: Cognitive Map and Technophobia. Frontiers in Psychology 2017;8 View
  5. van Mierlo T, Li X, Hyatt D, Ching A. Demographic and Indication-Specific Characteristics Have Limited Association With Social Network Engagement: Evidence From 24,954 Members of Four Health Care Support Groups. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(2):e40 View
  6. Almklov E, Afari N, Floto E, Lindamer L, Hurst S, Pittman J. Post-9/11 Veteran Satisfaction With the VA eScreening Program. Military Medicine 2020;185(3-4):519 View
  7. Mc Gee S, Höltge J, Maercker A, Thoma M. Evaluation of the revised Sense of Coherence scale in a sample of older adults: A means to assess resilience aspects. Aging & Mental Health 2018;22(11):1438 View
  8. Boateng G, Neilands T, Frongillo E, Melgar-Quiñonez H, Young S. Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer. Frontiers in Public Health 2018;6 View
  9. Kirrstetter A, Brenig C, Gengenbacher M, Meier B, Ott A, Theiler R. Erfahrungen bei der Messung der Ergebnisqualität in der interventionellen Schmerztherapie. Der Schmerz 2017;31(2):131 View
  10. Jayasinghe N, Moallem B, Kakoullis M, Ojie M, Sar-Graycar L, Wyka K, Reid M, Leonard J. Establishing the Feasibility of a Tablet-Based Consent Process with Older Adults: A Mixed-Methods Study. The Gerontologist 2019;59(1):124 View
  11. Oliveira R, Duarte A, Alves D, Furegato A. Development of the TabacoQuest app for computerization of data collection on smoking in psychiatric nursing. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem 2016;24(0) View
  12. Hassler K, Pearce K, Serfass T. Comparing the efficacy of electronic-tablet to paper-based surveys for on-site survey administration. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2018;21(4):487 View
  13. Jansen-Kosterink S, van Velsen L, Frazer S, Dekker-van Weering M, O’Caoimh R, Vollenbroek-Hutten M. Identification of community-dwelling older adults at risk of frailty using the PERSSILAA screening pathway: a methodological guide and results of a large-scale deployment in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health 2019;19(1) View
  14. Wofford J, Campos C, Jones R, Stevens S. Real-Time Patient Survey Data During Routine Clinical Activities for Rapid-Cycle Quality Improvement. JMIR Medical Informatics 2015;3(1):e13 View
  15. Meirte J, Hellemans N, Anthonissen M, Denteneer L, Maertens K, Moortgat P, Van Daele U. Benefits and Disadvantages of Electronic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Systematic Review. JMIR Perioperative Medicine 2020;3(1):e15588 View
  16. ter Stal S, Broekhuis M, van Velsen L, Hermens H, Tabak M. Embodied Conversational Agent Appearance for Health Assessment of Older Adults: Explorative Study. JMIR Human Factors 2020;7(3):e19987 View
  17. Mohd Anuardi M, Yamazaki A, Sato I. The effects of tablet and printed media on brain activation during a short-memory task. Procedia Computer Science 2020;176:1358 View
  18. Lussier M, Saillant K, Vrinceanu T, Hudon C, Bherer L. Normative Data for a Tablet-Based Dual-Task Assessment in Healthy Older Adults. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2021;36(7):1316 View
  19. Pittman J, Rabin B, Almklov E, Afari N, Floto E, Rodriguez E, Lindamer L. Adaptation of a quality improvement approach to implement eScreening in VHA healthcare settings: innovative use of the Lean Six Sigma Rapid Process Improvement Workshop. Implementation Science Communications 2021;2(1) View
  20. Evitts P, Fields K, Lande B. Metadeglutition? Rate of Aspiration-Related Events in Healthy Females Using a Novel Data Collection App. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups 2021;6(2):454 View
  21. Stephanie C, Mathieu A, Aurore M, Monique M. Outpatients’ perception of their preoperative information regarding their health literacy skills and their preoperative anxiety level. Medicine 2021;100(20):e26018 View
  22. Reijonen H, Bellman S, Murphy J, Kokkonen H. Factors related to recycling plastic packaging in Finland’s new waste management scheme. Waste Management 2021;131:88 View
  23. Castillo C. Six emotional stages of organisational change: Conceptualisation and scale development. Economics & Sociology 2022;15(1):253 View
  24. Short D, Fredericksen R, Crane H, Fitzsimmons E, Suri S, Bacon J, Musten A, Gough K, Ramgopal M, Berry J, McReynolds J, Kroch A, Jacobs B, Hodge V, Korlipara D, Lober W. Utility and Impact of the Implementation of Same-Day, Self-administered Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Assessments in Routine HIV Care in two North American Clinics. AIDS and Behavior 2022;26(7):2409 View
  25. Adalı T, Türkyılmaz A, Lepkowski J. Evaluating the Demographic and Health Surveys Mode Switch From PAPI to CAPI: An Experiment From Turkey. Social Science Computer Review 2022;40(6):1393 View
  26. Ongena Y, Haan M. Just you wait… and fill out this survey. Discussion of the methodological aspects of waiting room surveys. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology 2022;22(4):508 View
  27. Rosas R, Pimenta F, Leal I, Schwarzer R. FOODLIT-tool: Development and validation of the adaptable food literacy tool towards global sustainability within food systems. Appetite 2022;168:105658 View
  28. Albernaz L, Albernaz D, Zignani F, Santiago F, de Moura R, Barroso G, Reis e Silva A, Chi Y. A comparison of tablet-based and paper-based venous insufficiency epidemiologic and economic study quality of life/symptom questionnaire for assessment of chronic venous disease. Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease 2024;39(1):37 View
  29. Quaife M, Eakle R, Cabrera M, Vickerman P, Tsepe M, Cianci F, Delany-Moretlwe S, Terris-Prestholt F. Preferences for ARV-based HIV prevention methods among men and women, adolescent girls and female sex workers in Gauteng Province, South Africa: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment. BMJ Open 2016;6(6):e010682 View
  30. Karbasi N, Alavi S. Unveiling the potential of perceived authentic leadership to enhance followers’ moral intentions: a self-determination theory perspective. Management Research Review 2024 View