This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Non-randomized Protocols and Methods (ehealth) (571) Electronic/Mobile Data Capture, Internet-based Survey & Research Methodology (841) Longitudinal and Cohort Studies in Public Health (313)

Published on in Vol 9, No 1 (2020): January

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/14535, first published .
Screening University Students for Health Checks With an Electronic Health Questionnaire in Finland: Protocol for a Retrospective, Register-Based Cohort Study

Screening University Students for Health Checks With an Electronic Health Questionnaire in Finland: Protocol for a Retrospective, Register-Based Cohort Study

Screening University Students for Health Checks With an Electronic Health Questionnaire in Finland: Protocol for a Retrospective, Register-Based Cohort Study

Authors of this article:

Susanna Paldanius1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Noora Seilo1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Kristina Kunttu4 Author Orcid Image ;   Reija Autio5 Author Orcid Image ;   Minna Kaila6, 7 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (4) Tweetations (2) Metrics

    Protocol

    1Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

    2Science Centre, Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Tampere, Finland

    3Tampere City Student Health Care, Tampere, Finland

    4Finnish Student Health Service, Helsinki, Finland

    5Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

    6Public Health Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

    7Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

    *these authors contributed equally

    Corresponding Author:

    Susanna Paldanius, MD

    Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology

    Tampere University

    PL 100

    Tampere, 33014

    Finland

    Phone: 358 443220385

    Email: susanna.paldanius@tuni.fi


    Background: Health questionnaires and health checks are an established part of preventive health care services in Finland. However, only very limited research of these has been conducted. The Finnish Student Health Service (FSHS) provides primary health care services to all bachelor’s and master’s degree university students (approximately 134,500 students) in Finland. FSHS’s statutory health examination process of university entrants includes an electronic health questionnaire (eHQ) and, based on the students’ eHQ responses, a subsequent health check if necessary. To our knowledge, no previous studies have been published on the use of questionnaires for screening students for general health checks.

    Objective: The general aim of the study is to evaluate the health examination process of university entrants. The objectives are to determine how students’ self-reported health in the eHQ and participation in the health examination process are associated with graduation, mental health problems, and the use of student health care services.

    Methods: This is an ongoing, nationwide, retrospective, register-based cohort study with a 6-year follow-up. The study population is the cohort of university entrants (N=15,723) from the 2011-2012 academic year. These students were sent the eHQ, which consisted of 26 questions about health, health habits, social relations, and studying. Based on the eHQ responses, students were referred to one of the following interventions: (1) a health check, (2) an appointment other than a health check (eg, physiotherapy), or (3) electronic feedback to support a healthy lifestyle, when the other interventions were not necessary. Multiple comparisons will be made within these groups using logistic regression. The primary outcome variables are graduation, having a mental health problem, and attending a health check. The use of FSHS health care services will be studied with the cluster analysis method. The data have been obtained from three nationwide registers: the eHQ register, the medical records of FSHS, and the Higher education achievement register. The data have been linked using personal identity codes.

    Results: As of August 2019, the data collection and processing are complete and the statistical analyses are in progress. Preliminary results are expected in autumn 2019. Further publications are expected in 2020, and two PhD theses are expected to be completed by the end of 2022.

    Conclusions: Studying practical procedures in primary health care is highly important for resource allocation and the development of evidence-based processes. This study will be the first to assess the usage of a health questionnaire in screening students for health checks. The findings of this study will contribute to the field of preventive health care. The main practical implication is the development of the FSHS’s health examination process. We hypothesize that participation in the health examination process enhances academic achievement and the detection of university students’ mental health problems early on in their studies.

    International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/14535

    JMIR Res Protoc 2020;9(1):e14535

    doi:10.2196/14535

    Keywords

    electronic health questionnaire; health check; screening; students; student health services; digitalization; register study; preventive health services 


    The well-being of university students has raised concerns [1,2]; the awareness of students’ mental health problems, especially, has grown [3-5]. In Finland, health questionnaires and health checks are essential preventive measures for the early detection of health concerns in student health care [6,7]. However, only very limited research has been conducted on these measures [8-10]. In general, the evidence on the effects of health checks is inconclusive, both in the student and the general populations [8,11-15].

    Finland has a strong tradition of offering preventive health care services to its residents (see Multimedia Appendix 1) [16]. Student health care is a part of this statutory preventive health care provision (see Textbox 1) [7]. The promotion of the health and study ability of the students at the level of individuals and communities forms a central part of student health care services (see Multimedia Appendix 2) [17].

    The Finnish Student Health Service (FSHS) provides student health care services to all bachelor’s and master’s degree university students in Finland (approximately 134,500 students) [18,19]. FSHS has provided health checks to all university entrants since the 1970s. However, in the beginning of the 21st century, universal health checks were identified to be an area for development due to low participation rates. As a solution, FSHS developed a two-stage health examination process. The process included an electronic health questionnaire (eHQ) and, based on the students’ eHQ responses, a subsequent health check if necessary. The eHQ includes 26 questions about health, health habits, social relations, and studying (see Multimedia Appendix 3). Providing a digitalized health questionnaire to all university entrants instead of universal health checks was believed to increase the number of students reached. Further, the process was aimed to facilitate identification of students with health problems and to target health checks to these students.

    The two-stage health examination process was developed by following the ideology of the plan-do-study-act cycle [20]. Feasibility of the eHQ was tested in 2005 [9]. A pilot study of the process was conducted in 2008 [21]. Based on the results of these studies, the eHQ was further developed. The health examination process was implemented nationally in 2009. The data collected over time now enable studying the process again.

    To our knowledge, no previous studies have been published on the use of a questionnaire for screening students for general health checks. However, multiple studies exist about different questionnaires that are used to detect specific symptoms [22-24] or to evaluate health behavior and social conditions [25-28] in student populations. The eHQ aims to provide an overview of the health and well-being of university entrants rather than to identify specific conditions.

    The general aim of this study is to evaluate the health examination process of FSHS. The specific research questions are as follows:

    1. Is responding to the eHQ and attendance at the health check associated with completing a bachelor’s or master’s degree in the 6-year follow-up?
    2. How are mental health problems associated with completing a bachelor’s or master’s degree in the 6-year follow-up?
    3. How are responding to the eHQ and attendance at the health check associated with the use of FSHS’ health care services?
    4. How are university entrants’ responses to the eHQ questions associated with:
      1. completing a bachelor’s or master’s degree?
      2. health check attendance?
      3. mental health problems?
      4. the use of FSHS health care services?

    Student health care services of university students according to the Finnish Health Care Act [7].

    • Triennial checks on health and safety in educational institutions and welfare promotion among learning communities
    • The monitoring of students’ health, welfare, and fitness to study, including a health questionnaire during the first year of study leading to a health check if necessary
    • The provision of health and medical care services for students, including mental health and substance abuse services, advice on sexual health, and oral health care
    • Early identification of any special needs and tests required by students, support, and, if necessary, referral to further tests or treatment
    Textbox 1. Student health care services of university students according to the Finnish Health Care Act [7].

    To the best of our knowledge, this type of health examination process will be studied for the first time. We hypothesize that the health examination process enhances university students’ academic achievement and the early detection of mental health problems.


    Design

    This is a nationwide, retrospective, register-based cohort study with a 6-year follow-up (see Figure 1). The study population is the cohort of Finnish university entrants from the 2011-2012 academic year (N=15,723). Data from three nationwide registers have been linked and will be analyzed in order to answer the research questions.

    ‎
    Figure 1. The study timeline. eHQ: electronic health questionnaire; FSHS: Finnish Student Health Service; VIRTA: higher education achievement register.
    View this figure

    Study Population

    As stated, the study population is comprised of university entrants who enrolled in the 2011-2012 academic year (N=15,723). According to Statistics Finland, 2.7% (N=145,800) of the Finnish population were studying for a bachelor’s or master’s degree in one of the 13 universities in 2012 (see Table 1); 19% of men and 26% of women in the 19-21-year-old age class had entered a university [29]. In 2017, the median time to complete a bachelor's degree was 3.8 years and the median time to complete a master’s degree, including a bachelor’s degree, was 5.9 years [30].

    The Finnish Student Health Survey has been conducted every 4 years since 2000 [31]. The survey indicates that Finnish university students are, in general, healthy. In 2016, 75% reported good or very good overall well-being [31]. However, mental health problems are a significant challenge in the Finnish student population. Every third student reported mental health problems in a 12-item general health questionnaire, and 7% were identified to be burnt out according to the study burn-out inventory [24,31].

    Table 1. University students in Finland in 2012 according to Statistics Finlanda.
    Students’ degree statusTotal, NFemale, n (%)Male, n (%)
    Studied either a bachelor’s or master’s degree144,27976,979 (53.35)67,300 (46.65)
    Started a bachelor’s degree15,2188624 (56.67)6594 (43.33)
    Started a master’s degree48742538 (52.07)2336 (47.93)

    aStatistics Finland provides publicly available statistical information.

    The Health Examination Process of the Finnish Student Health Service

    The health examination process of FSHS includes an eHQ sent to all university entrants and a subsequent health check if necessary (see Figure 2). The process produces data about students’ health and risk behaviors for FSHS. The data are used to develop student health care services and study environment.

    The purpose of the eHQ is to give an overview of students’ well-being and to identify students who have potential risk factors for study ability (see Multimedia Appendix 2). Students with potential risk factors are offered a chance for a health check conducted by a public health nurse. In the health check, the eHQ serves as a basis for discussion. In addition to being a screening tool, the eHQ is thought to be an intervention itself by motivating students to consider their health behavior.

    It has been suggested that to detect health problems associated with academic functioning, a health questionnaire in student health care should include questions about social support; general, physical, and psychological health; study-related issues; help-seeking behavior; and life events in the past [32]. The eHQ covers all these subjects except for past life events.

    ‎
    Figure 2. The health examination process of the Finnish Student Health Service (FSHS) in the 2011-2012 academic year.
    View this figure

    The eHQ consists of 26 questions about physical and mental health, social relations, and studying (see Multimedia Appendix 3). It includes questions about self-rated health, long-term diseases, and recurrent symptoms. Health habits, such as exercising, eating habits, sleeping, and substance abuse, including the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), are reported [33]. Mental health-related questions cover, for example, questions about usual state of mind and loneliness. Most of the questions are adapted from validated questionnaires or from Finnish population surveys. However, the eHQ as a whole has not been validated.

    The invitations to answer the eHQ were sent in clusters via email during the 2011-2012 academic year. To fill the eHQ, the students signed into a separate program protected by strong electronic identification [34]. The students who were referred to a health check were responsible for making the appointment themselves. Responding to the eHQ and attending the health check were voluntary for students. In the study, we will compare eHQ respondents with nonrespondents, and attendees to the health check with nonattendees, in terms of the research questions.

    The general goals of the health checks are defined by the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, whereas the content of the checks is undefined (see Figure 3) [6,17]. Therefore, FSHS has defined the content of the health checks for university students (see Figure 3).

    ‎
    Figure 3. The content of the health examination process defined by the Finnish Student Health Service (FSHS) and the goals of health checks in student health care according to the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.
    View this figure

    Data Sources

    The data have been obtained from three nationwide registers: the eHQ register, the medical records of FSHS, and the Higher education achievement register (VIRTA) owned by the Ministry of Education and Culture [35].

    The response data to the annual eHQ accumulate within the eHQ register, which is a separate part of the medical records of FSHS. The register is owned and managed by FSHS. The response data have been obtained for the 2011-2012 academic year.

    The FSHS’s medical records include systematic documentation on the students’ medical history and care at FSHS. The study data include the following: (1) primary reasons for the encounters, (2) primary diagnoses, (3) number of encounters, and (4) profession of the health care professional involved in the encounter for the 2011-2017 period. The outcome variables mental health problem and health check attendance are derived from the medical records data. Mental health problems are identified based on the 10th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10) and the International Classification of Primary Care, Second edition (ICPC-2) classifications [36,37].

    VIRTA is the Higher education achievement register of the national data warehouse for higher education. The register includes, for example, records of graduations of all Finnish higher education institutions. The information about students’ graduations has been obtained for the 2011-2017 period. The outcome variable graduation was obtained from the VIRTA data.

    The data have been linked using Finnish personal identity codes. All Finnish citizens and permanent residents have personal identity codes administered by the Population Register Centre [38]. The code is individual to its holder and remains unchanged throughout the holder’s lifetime [38].

    Statistical Analyses

    To describe the data, the frequencies, percentages, and medians with interquartile ranges will be calculated. For the preliminary analysis, chi-square tests will be employed to detect the associations between the categorical variables. Further, the normally distributed data will be analyzed with t tests and analyses of variance. In the cases where data are not normally distributed, the Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskall-Wallis test for detecting the differences between the groups will be utilized. Multiple comparisons will be performed with the Bonferroni method.

    In research questions 1, 2, and 4 a-c, multiple logistic regression will be the main analysis method to account for the associations between explanatory and outcome variables. The outcome variables in the regression analyses will be graduation, having a mental health problem, and attending the referred health check. The main explanatory variables will be students’ responses to the eHQ. In addition, demographic factors (ie, age, sex, and field of study) will be accounted for.

    In research questions 3 and 4 d, the use of FSHS health care services will be analyzed with clustering analysis to detect the patterns of how the students are using the services. The patterns will then be analyzed with the explanatory variables in order to find the associations between service use and other variables.

    Comparisons in the study will be made between eHQ respondents and nonrespondents, health check attendees and nonattendees, graduates and nongraduates, and students who have and do not have mental health problems.

    The analyses will be carried out using IBM SPSS Statistics for iOS and Windows, version 25.0 or later (IBM Corp), and R, version 3.6.1 (The R Foundation), with suitable packages [39].


    Schedule

    As of August 2019, the data collection and processing are complete and statistical analyses are in progress. Preliminary results are expected in autumn 2019. Further publications are expected in 2020, and two PhD theses are expected to be completed by the end of 2022 (see Figure 1).

    Ethics and Governance

    The study is being conducted under the guidelines of the Finnish National Board on Research Integrity [40]. The study has been ethically reviewed by the Ethics Committee of the Tampere Region (reviews 2/2017 and 23/2017). The review was affirmative.

    The study has been evaluated and authorized by the Finnish National Institute of Health and Welfare, which authorizes the research use of confidential data in Finland (Dnro THL/1364/5.05.00/2017) [41]. The study has received permission from the FSHS to conduct research. All 13 Finnish universities have given permission for their part to use the Higher education achievement register. A risk assessment and data protection plan has been delivered to the Finnish office of the data protection ombudsman.


    This study is the first to assess the usage of a health questionnaire in screening students for health checks. In addition, the study explores the eHQ in identifying the students who have mental health problems and the effects of attending the health check.

    The strengths of the study are its high-quality nationwide register data with good coverage and the high percentage of completed questionnaires from the respondents. The register data enable the assessment of the whole cohort of university entrants with a relatively long follow-up. Conducting register-based studies in Finland is feasible due to the unique identity codes that enable data linkage between the registers and individual-level analyses [42].

    The limitations of register-based studies, in general, should be considered. Even though it has been found that Finnish administrative registers are of high quality, missing or incorrectly recorded data are always a possibility [42]. In this study, the medical records might include missing or false data due to the possibility of human error. In addition, it might also be counted as a limitation that the eHQ is not a validated questionnaire.

    It is valuable to study primary health care practice with respect to resource allocation and conducting evidence-based processes. The health examination process of FSHS consumes public resources and the need for resources will increase significantly in the near future. The services of FSHS will expand to also cover the students of universities of applied sciences (approximately 140,000 students) from the beginning of 2021. This means FSHS will provide student health care services for all higher education students in Finland (approximately 250,000 students). Hence, the number of students to whom the health examination process is provided will approximately double. It is essential to obtain evidence regarding FSHS’s processes to allocate resources effectively.

    The main practical implication of this study is the development of the statutory health examination process for higher education students in Finland. Students are especially interested in, and well capable of, using new digital applications. Therefore, the development of the health examination process will focus on digital solutions, for example, the robotization of the eHQ. This study provides information about the functionality of the process, which is needed for further digitalization. Furthermore, we believe the findings will support both health care and the university administration in understanding, more profoundly, the health and welfare requirements of university students.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors would like to thank public health nurse Ritva-Liisa Hannula for providing valuable information regarding the practical implementation of the health examination process. We would further like to thank development manager Elina Heilala for her significant efforts in the FSHS data collection.

    This research project is funded by The Social Insurance Institution of Finland and the City of Tampere. The Social Insurance Institution of Finland follows the progress of the project annually. The funders did not have any role in the study design; data collection; management, analyses, and interpretation of data; or the writing of this manuscript.

    Authors' Contributions

    SP and NS designed the study, collected and processed the data, and wrote the manuscript with equal contributions. KK and MK significantly contributed to the design of the study and revised the manuscript. RA significantly contributed to the statistical design and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

    Conflicts of Interest

    KK retired from FSHS in 2017; FSHS has not supported the study financially.

    ‎
    Multimedia Appendix 1

    The continuum of preventive health care services in Finland.

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 62 KB
    ‎
    Multimedia Appendix 2

    Study ability: the definition of the concept.

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 72 KB
    ‎
    Multimedia Appendix 3

    The electronic health questionnaire (eHQ) questions.

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 49 KB
    1. Stewart-Brown S, Evans J, Patterson J, Petersen S, Doll H, Balding J, et al. The health of students in institutes of higher education: An important and neglected public health problem? J Public Health Med 2000 Dec;22(4):492-499. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. Vaez M, Ponce de Leon A, Laflamme L. Health-related determinants of perceived quality of life: A comparison between first-year university students and their working peers. Work 2006;26(2):167-177. [Medline]
    3. Ibrahim AK, Kelly SJ, Adams CE, Glazebrook C. A systematic review of studies of depression prevalence in university students. J Psychiatr Res 2013 Mar;47(3):391-400. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Auerbach RP, Alonso J, Axinn WG, Cuijpers P, Ebert DD, Green JG, et al. Mental disorders among college students in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. Psychol Med 2016 Oct;46(14):2955-2970 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Bruffaerts R, Mortier P, Kiekens G, Auerbach RP, Cuijpers P, Demyttenaere K, et al. Mental health problems in college freshmen: Prevalence and academic functioning. J Affect Disord 2018 Jan 01;225:97-103 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Government Decree 338/2011: On Maternity and Child Health Clinic Services, School and Student Health Services and Preventive Oral Health Services for Children and Youth. Helsinki, Finland: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.   URL: https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/2011/en20110338.pdf [accessed 2019-04-30]
    7. Health Care Act (1326/2010). Helsinki, Finland: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health   URL: http://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/2010/en20101326_20131293.pdf [accessed 2019-04-30] [WebCite Cache]
    8. Kuokkanen M. Social Insurance [Sosiaalivakuutus]. 1974. The health checks of university students: Results and discussion [Article in Finnish].   URL: https:/​/www.​yths.fi/​filebank/​3588-Kuokkanen_M_Korkeakouluopiskelijoiden_terveystarkastukset_1974_Sosiaalivakuutus_pdf.​pdf [accessed 2019-11-28]
    9. Kunttu K, Huttunen T. Advance screening in two-stage health examination among first-year university students [Article in Finnish]. Finnish Medical Journal [Suomen Lääkärilehti] 2008;63(39):3216-3222.
    10. Ritakorpi M, Kaunonen M, Kaila M, Paldanius S, Seilo N. The nonresponse of university students to an electronic health questionnaire: Nonresponse analysis [Article in Finnish]. Journal of Social Medicine [Sosiaalilääketieteellinen Aikakauslehti] 2019 Feb 01;56(1):42-52. [CrossRef]
    11. Krogsbøll LT, Jørgensen KJ, Grønhøj Larsen C, Gøtzsche PC. General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2012 Nov 20;345:e7191 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Si S, Moss JR, Sullivan TR, Newton SS, Stocks NP. Effectiveness of general practice-based health checks: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract 2014 Jan;64(618):e47-e53 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Boulware LE, Marinopoulos S, Phillips KA, Hwang CW, Maynor K, Merenstein D, et al. Systematic review: The value of the periodic health evaluation. Ann Intern Med 2007 Feb 20;146(4):289-300. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Clark EM. A non-automated multiphasic health testing program in a student health service. Am J Public Health 1973 Jul;63(7):610-618. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Herbolsheimer H, DeYoung W, Braswell H, Gilloegly O. Periodic health examination of university students: Results of reevaluation. Arch Environ Health 1963 May;6:573-578. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Health Care in Finland. Helsinki, Finland: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health; 2013.   URL: http://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/69930/URN_ISBN_978-952-00-3395-8.pdf [accessed 2019-10-21]
    17. Publications of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health [Sosiaali- Ja Terveysministeriön Julkaisuja]. Helsinki, Finland: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health; 2006. Handbook on health care during studies [Book in Finnish].   URL: https:/​/julkaisut.​valtioneuvosto.fi/​bitstream/​handle/​10024/​71063/​Julk_2006_12_opiskeluterveydenhuolto_verkko.​pdf?sequence=1 [accessed 2019-11-28]
    18. Official Statistics of Finland (OSF). Helsinki, Finland: Statistics Finland; 2017. Appendix table 1. Students in universities and completed university degrees by level of education, fields of education (National classification of education 2016) and gender in 2017.   URL: http://www.stat.fi/til/yop/2017/yop_2017_2018-05-08_tau_001_en.html [accessed 2019-04-30] [WebCite Cache]
    19. Finnish Student Health Service. The FSHS in brief.   URL: https://www.yths.fi/en/fshs [accessed 2019-04-30] [WebCite Cache]
    20. Taylor MJ, McNicholas C, Nicolay C, Darzi A, Bell D, Reed JE. Systematic review of the application of the plan-do-study-act method to improve quality in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf 2014 Apr;23(4):290-298 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    21. Kunttu K, Westerlund H, Heilala E. Health Survey Based on Electronic Questionnaires: Otaniemi Pilot Assessment [Document in Finnish]. Helsinki, Finland: Student Health Care Foundation [Ylioppilaiden Terveydenhoitosäätiön]; 2009.   URL: http://www.yths.fi/filebank/3298-4_SATKYYN_perustuva_terveystarkastus_2009.pdf [accessed 2019-11-28]
    22. Du N, Yu K, Ye Y, Chen S. Validity study of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 items for Internet screening in depression among Chinese university students. Asia Pac Psychiatry 2017 Sep;9(3):1-11 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. Grässel E, Lampen-Imkamp S, Lehrl S, Kahl KG. Screening of emotional and somatic complaints in undergraduate medical students: A longitudinal study [Article in German]. Psychiatr Prax 2013 Jan;40(1):30-35. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Salmela-Aro K, Read S. Study engagement and burnout profiles among Finnish higher education students. Burn Res 2017 Dec;7:21-28. [CrossRef]
    25. Haile YG, Alemu SM, Habtewold TD. Insomnia and its temporal association with academic performance among university students: A cross-sectional study. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017:2542367 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Olashore AA, Ogunwobi O, Totego E, Opondo PR. Psychoactive substance use among first-year students in a Botswana University: Pattern and demographic correlates. BMC Psychiatry 2018 Aug 31;18(1):270 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. Vaez M, Laflamme L. Health behaviors, self-rated health, and quality of life: A study among first-year Swedish university students. J Am Coll Health 2003 Jan;51(4):156-162. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. Hauschildt K, Vögtle E, Gwosc C. EUROSTUDENT VI. Overview and Selected Findings: Social and Economic Conditions of Student Life in Europe. Bielefeld, Germany: wbv Media; 2018.   URL: https://www.eurostudent.eu/download_files/documents/EUROSTUDENT_VI_short_report.pdf [accessed 2018-11-28]
    29. Ministry of Education and Culture. Universities in Finland   URL: https://minedu.fi/en/universities [accessed 2019-04-30] [WebCite Cache]
    30. Vipunen. Helsinki, Finland: Education Statistics Finland [Opetushallinnon Tilastopalvelu] Median of examination time (years) [Document in Finnish].   URL: https:/​/vipunen.​fi/​fi-fi/​_layouts/​15/​xlviewer.aspx?id=/​fi-fi/​Raportit/​Tutkinnon%20suoritusajan%20mediaani.​xlsb [accessed 2019-04-30] [WebCite Cache]
    31. Kunttu K, Pesonen T, Saari J. Student Health Survey 2016: A National Survey Among Finnish University Students. Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Student Health Service; 2016.   URL: https://www.yths.fi/filebank/4310-KOTT_englanti_2016.pdf [accessed 2019-11-28]
    32. Boot CR, Donders NC, Vonk P, Meijman FJ. Development of a student health questionnaire: The necessity of a symbiosis of science and practice. Glob Health Promot 2009 Sep;16(3):35-44. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    33. Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption--II. Addiction 1993 Jun;88(6):791-804. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    34. Act on Strong Electronic Identification and Electronic Trust Services (617/2009). Helsinki, Finland: Ministry of Transport and Communications; 2009.   URL: https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/2009/en20090617.pdf [accessed 2019-04-30] [WebCite Cache]
    35. VIRTA Higher education achievement register and authoritative data flows. Confluence. 2016.   URL: https:/​/confluence.​csc.fi/​display/​VIRTA/​VIRTA+Higher+education+achievement+register+and+authoritative+data+flows [accessed 2019-04-30] [WebCite Cache]
    36. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems: 10th Revision (ICD-10). 5th edition. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2016.
    37. Kvist M, Savolainen T, editors. ICPC-2 International Classification of Primary Care. [Perusterveydenhuollon kansainvälinen luokitus]. 1st edition. Helsinki: Suomen Kuntaliitto; 2010:314.
    38. Population Register Centre. Helsinki, Finland: Population Register Centre Personal identity code.   URL: https://vrk.fi/en/personal-identity-code1 [accessed 2019-04-30] [WebCite Cache]
    39. The R Project for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: The R Foundation   URL: https://www.r-project.org/ [WebCite Cache]
    40. Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct in Finland. Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity; 2013.   URL: https://www.tenk.fi/sites/tenk.fi/files/HTK_ohje_2012.pdf [accessed 2019-11-28]
    41. Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare. Authorisation application.   URL: https://thl.fi/en/web/thlfi-en/statistics/information-for-researchers/authorisation-application [accessed 2019-10-21]
    42. Gissler M, Haukka J. Finnish health and social welfare registers in epidemiological research. Nor Epidemiol 2009 Oct 14;14(1). [CrossRef]

    ‎
    AUDIT: Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test
    eHQ: electronic health questionnaire
    FSHS: Finnish Student Health Service
    ICD-10: 10th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems
    ICPC-2: International Classification of Primary Care, Second edition
    VIRTA: higher education achievement register

    Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 02.05.19; peer-reviewed by Ö Dahlström, S Moore; comments to author 16.07.19; revised version received 24.10.19; accepted 12.11.19; published 29.01.20

    Copyright

    ©Susanna Paldanius, Noora Seilo, Kristina Kunttu, Reija Autio, Minna Kaila. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 29.01.2020.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.