Accessibility settings

JMIR Research Protocols

Protocols, grant proposals, registered reports (RR1)

Editor-in-Chief:

Amy Schwartz, MSc, Ph.D., Scientific Editor at JMIR Publications, Ontario, Canada


Impact Factor 1.6 More information about Impact Factor CiteScore 2.8 More information about CiteScore

JMIR Research Protocols is a unique journal indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), MEDLINE, Sherpa Romeo, DOAJ, Scopus, Web of Science(WoS)/ESCI, and EBSCO, publishing peer-reviewed, openly accessible research ideas and grant proposals, and study and trial protocols (also referred to as Registered Report Stage 1 papers). 

It should be stressed however that most authors do not publish their protocols for "impact" or citations, rather to document their ideas to how to design experiments, to document their successful grant proposals, or to publish (and maybe brag a little about) their already funded protocols (which do not require additional peer-review). We offer this platform for scientists to publish peer-reviewed protocols for a very low APF, and unfunded protocols for a reasonable fee that includes peer-review. 

While the original focus was on eHealth studies, JRP now publishes protocols and grant proposals in all areas of medicine, and their peer-review reports, if available (preliminary results from pilot studies, early results, and formative research should now be published in JMIR Formative Research).

JRP is fully open access, with full-text articles deposited in PubMed Central.

Why should I publish my protocol? 

  • JRP publishes research protocols, grant proposals, pilot/feasibility studies and early reports of ongoing and planned work that encourages collaboration and early feedback, and reduces duplication of effort.
  • JRP will be a valuable educational resource for researchers who want to learn about current research methodologies and how to write a winning grant proposal.
  • JRP creates an early scientific record for researchers who have developed novel methodologies, software, innovations or elaborate protocols.
  • JRP provides a "dry-run" for peer-review of the final results paper, and allows feedback/critique of the methods, often while they still can be fixed.
  • JRP enhances rigor and demonstrates to reviewers of subsequent results papers that authors followed and adhered to carefully developed and described a-priori methods, rather than fishing for P-values (HARKing).
  • JRP facilitates and guarantees subsequent publication of results demonstrating that the methodology has already been reviewed, and reduces the effort of writing up the results, as the protocol can be easily referenced.
  • JRP is compatible with the concept of "Registered Reports" and since May 2018, published protocols receive an International Registered Report Identifier (What is a Registered Report Identifier?) and acceptance of the subsequent results paper is "in principle" guaranteed in any JMIR journal and partner journals - see What is a Registered Report?. We assign an IRRID (International Registered Report Identifier) to each published protocol, faciliating the linking between protocol and final study, and also indicating that results papers of studies are also "in principle accepted" for subsequent publication in other JMIR journals (or other members of the IRRID Registry Network) as long as authors adhere to their original protocol - regardless of study results (even if they are negative), reducing publication bias in medicine.
  • Authors publishing their protocols in JRP will receive a 20% discount on the article processing fee if they publish their results in another journal of the JMIR journal family (for example, JMIR for e-health studies, i-JMR for others).

Need more reasons? Read the Knowledge Base article on "Why should I publish my protocol/grant proposal"!

The journal is indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), MEDLINE, Sherpa Romeo, DOAJ, Scopus, Web of Science(WoS)/ESCI, and EBSCO.

JMIR Research Protocols received a 2025 Impact Factor of 1.6, ranking Q3 in Public, Environmental & Occupational Health and Health Care Sciences & Services. 

JMIR Research Protocols received a Scopus CiteScore of 2.8 (2025), placing it in the 68th percentile (210/669) as a second quartile (Q2) journal in the field of General Medicine.

Recent Articles

Alternative text does not exist
Scoping Review Protocols

Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) can help close persistent gaps in access to assessment, prevention, and treatment. Recent advances in generative AI, particularly large language models (LLMs), further expand this promise by enabling natural language understanding, personalization, and empathic interaction across assessment, support, and therapeutic contexts. However, significant evaluation challenges persist, including a lack of standardized constructs and validated instruments, which limit the comparability, reproducibility, and generalizability of the findings. No systematic synthesis currently documents the frameworks, methodologies, and tools used to evaluate LLMs in DMHIs, thereby hampering the development of a comprehensive evidence base to guide future evaluation efforts.

Alternative text does not exist
Scoping Review Protocols

Sexual and gender diverse populations experience inequities in health and health care access, as well as gaps in health professional education. Preregistration nursing and midwifery education represents a critical formative stage for developing inclusive and affirming practice; however, the integration of sexual and gender diversity within curricula remains variable and inconsistently described. Mapping how inclusive pedagogical practices address sexual and gender diversity in preregistration nursing and midwifery education will clarify current approaches and identify gaps in the literature.

Alternative text does not exist
Scoping Review Protocols

Increasing attention has been directed toward environmental and climatic exposures as potential factors influencing reproductive function and fertility-related outcomes. However, the available evidence is dispersed across populations, study designs, and exposures.

Alternative text does not exist
Scoping Review Protocols

Recent advancements in digital health have enabled the development of technology-enhanced diabetes coaching programs that offer personalized, data-driven, and adaptive support. However, evidence on their implementation and impact is scattered and has not been comprehensively synthesized. Although numerous studies have informed intervention development using different theories and models, the diversity of these approaches creates a significant challenge in developing an evidence-based intervention that is adaptable and effective across different population groups.

Alternative text does not exist
Participatory Research Protocols and Proposals

Emerging adults (EAs), typically ranging from 18 to 29 years, navigate a transitional period marked by rapid developmental, social, and psychological change. Despite heightened vulnerability to mental health (MH) concerns during this stage, service systems are often fragmented, with gaps between adolescent and adult care streams that leave many EAs without developmentally appropriate support. In response, developing approaches such as transdiagnostic stratification, which structures care around shared symptom processes and informs treatment intensity, and digital measurement-based care (dMBC), based on routine patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), have gained traction but remain challenging to implement consistently. This reinforces the need for rapid learning health system (RLHS) approaches that leverage continuous data and feedback for ongoing improvement, as well as co-design (CD) methods that meaningfully integrate EA perspectives into service improvement.

Alternative text does not exist
Participatory Research Protocols and Proposals

HIV incidence among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) aged 15-24 years in Eastern and Southern Africa remains unacceptably high. Unprotected sex increases the risk of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections and unintended pregnancies, reflecting an unmet need for effective contraception among AGYW. Long-acting injectable preexposure prophylaxis (LAI-PrEP) and long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) offer effective, durable protection against HIV and unintended pregnancy. However, uptake and persistence remain suboptimal due to low awareness, fear of side effects, stigma, limited decision-making autonomy, and poor integrated reproductive health and HIV prevention services. Evidence on community-driven and behaviorally informed strategies to support integrated rollout and uptake of LAI-PrEP and LARC among AGYW in Uganda remains limited.

Alternative text does not exist
NIH funded proposals with peer-review reports (USA)

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is among the most common elective surgeries performed in the United States, and recent advances in perioperative care have shortened hospital stays and streamlined recovery. Yet, even brief periods of mechanical ventilation and anesthesia measurably weaken respiratory muscle function in the early postoperative period. Preoperative inspiratory strength training (IST) has been shown to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing major cardiothoracic surgery, but whether these benefits extend to shorter procedures such as TJA, where hospital stays are already brief, remains unknown.

Alternative text does not exist
RCTs - Protocols/Proposals (non-eHealth)

Early epidemiological studies suggested that pre- and postmenopausal women receiving estrogen therapy were less likely to develop severe disease or die from COVID-19 infection. Potential mechanisms include estrogen-mediated immunomodulation and 17β-estradiol–induced downregulation of angiotensin-converting enzyme type 2 (ACE2), the cellular receptor for SARS-CoV-2.

Alternative text does not exist
Scoping Review Protocols

Persistent disparities in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) remain across US residency programs despite recent accreditation requirements. In this context, DEI disparities refer to inequities in the representation, recruitment, advancement, and educational experiences of individuals from underrepresented and marginalized groups. Numerous specialty-specific studies have evaluated DEI content on residency program websites, but these studies differ in their methodologies, assessed content, and reporting practices. There is currently no comprehensive synthesis of how DEI content is presented across the different existing literature in multiple residency specialties. Therefore, a scoping review is needed to map the existing literature.

Alternative text does not exist
Participatory Research Protocols and Proposals

Despite increasing recognition of adolescents’ and young adults’ mental health needs, many young people continue to experience barriers in accessing timely, acceptable, and responsive mental health and psychosocial support (PSS) services. There is a need for contextually relevant and youth-responsive approaches that meaningfully engage young people, caregivers, and service providers in implementation strategy development. The study aims to co-design a mental health and PSS implementation strategy for adolescents and young adults in KwaZulu-Natal (KZN), South Africa, using a human-centered design (HCD) approach.

Alternative text does not exist
Systematic Review Protocols

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied in health care for clinical decision-making, education, and patient communication. However, bias in LLM outputs may exacerbate health care disparities and compromise trust. Despite rapid adoption, there is limited synthesis of how bias is identified, measured, and mitigated in medical applications of LLMs.

Alternative text does not exist
Systematic Review Protocols

Ethics of care lies at the heart of the nursing profession. Grounded in the work of Gilligan and Tronto, it emphasizes relationships and responsiveness to the needs of those receiving care. Although Tronto’s framework specifies 5 elements of care, no systematic synthesis has yet examined how each element is expressed through observable behavioral indicators in the nursing context.

Preprints Open for Peer Review

We are working in partnership with

  • Crossref Member
  • Open Access
  • Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association
  •  
  •  
  • TrendMD MemberORCID Member
  •  

This journal is indexed in

  • PubMed
  • PubMed CentralMEDLINE
  •  
  •  
  • ScopusDOAJDOAJ Seal
    Sherpa RomeoEBSCO/EBSCO Essentials

  • Web of Science - ESCI