JMIR Research Protocols
Protocols, grant proposals, registered reports (RR1)
Editor-in-Chief:
Amy Schwartz, MSc, Ph.D., Scientific Editor at JMIR Publications, Ontario, Canada
Impact Factor 1.5 More information about Impact Factor CiteScore 2.4 More information about CiteScore
Recent Articles

Globally, researchers have documented an emergence of public health approaches within palliative care, leading to the development of compassionate communities, a movement that seeks to build community capacity to support individuals at the end of life and those affected by death and loss. Compassionate communities emphasize a social model of care that complements formal palliative services by reducing suffering, enhancing well-being, and empowering community members through collective action. The Compassionate City Charter broadens this scope to include civic institutions, outlining recommendations for adoption within workplaces and educational settings. However, empirical evidence examining the adoption of compassionate practices within workplace contexts remains limited.

Depression and anxiety frequently emerge during late adolescence and young adulthood; however, many conventional and app-based interventions struggle to sustain engagement. Virtual reality (VR) exergaming, music-based activities, and social interaction each show promise for supporting young people’s mental health, but their combined therapeutic value remains insufficiently tested.

Nonprofit organizations that serve the pediatric oncology community play a crucial role in disseminating quality information that can inform and support people living with childhood cancer, those that work in the field, and others who make key decisions or policies. These registered organizations can be challenging to locate, as the internet is flux with information and resources of varying quality, misinformation, and disinformation. There remains limited understanding of the knowledge mobilization landscape of these organizations in Canada.

Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers worldwide, with a 5-year survival rate exceeding 90%. Despite advances in treatment, survivors frequently experience persistent cancer- and treatment-related symptoms that negatively impact their quality of life. Body-oriented interventions (BOIs) have demonstrated effectiveness in symptom management; however, systematic reviews focused exclusively on BOIs for women who survived breast cancer (WSBC) remain limited. This systematic review protocol outlines the methodology for evaluating the scientific evidence on the effects of BOIs on cancer- and treatment-related symptoms in WSBC.

Globally, approximately 8.6% of people will meet criteria for alcohol use disorder (AUD) in their lifetimes, with 2.2% meeting criteria for AUD in the past 12 months. In the United States, AUD prevalence is even greater, with 13.9% meeting criteria in the past 12 months. Effective treatments for AUD exist, although most people receive help through mutual support groups (ie, Alcoholics Anonymous [AA]). However, AA and other mutual support programs may not be desirable for all individuals, particularly those who do not seek abstinence-based approaches. Treatments that support reductions in drinking have been shown to be as effective as abstinence-based treatments in reducing alcohol-related harms, and may be more appealing to a broader range of people. Mindfulness-based interventions may be particularly effective in supporting long-term recovery, whole-person health, and functioning for those with abstinent and nonabstinent recovery goals.

No preview text available.

No preview text available.

Resting metabolic rate (RMR) prediction equations used today often rely on the consideration of binary sex. Significant intrasex variability and a lack of data on diverse populations raise concerns about these equations’ validity and generalizability. Existing systematic reviews have focused on specific populations like individuals with obesity or athletes, but none have systematically examined the demographic characteristics of participants used to derive these equations. Our central hypothesis is that the accuracy of RMR prediction is influenced by the demographic alignment between the equation’s derivation population and the individual. We present a systematic review protocol to critically evaluate the literature and participant demographic profiles that underpin current RMR prediction equations.

With a growing range of treatment options for non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), the emergence of longitudinal patient-reported quality-of-life data, and an aging population managing the treatment burden of coexisting conditions, there is an increasing need for shared decision-making processes and tools to support urologists and patients in navigating complex treatment decisions. What remains unknown is how shared decision-making is currently incorporated into NMIBC treatment decisions and which factors inform key decisions in NMIBC.

Noncommunicable diseases, particularly diabetes, pose a growing global burden, with India disproportionately affected. India also has a rich repository of traditional medical systems—Ayurveda, yoga and naturopathy, Unani, Siddha, Sowa Rigpa, and homeopathy (AYUSH)—collectively governed under the Ministry of Ayush. These systems adopt a personalized and integrative approach to diabetes management, addressing glycemic control alongside metabolic and lifestyle factors. Despite growing use and evidence for AYUSH interventions, standardized evaluation methods remain limited.

Frontline professionals are routinely exposed to acute and cumulative occupational stressors that are associated with an elevated risk of psychological distress, burnout, and trauma-related difficulties. Digital mental health interventions offer scalable and flexible approaches to supporting psychological well-being in high-demand occupational environments. However, there remains limited empirical evidence regarding the feasibility and cultural adaptation of trauma-informed digital interventions across diverse international contexts.
Preprints Open for Peer Review
Open Peer Review Period:
-
Open Peer Review Period:
-














