Accessibility settings

JMIR Research Protocols

Protocols, grant proposals, registered reports (RR1)

Editor-in-Chief:

Amy Schwartz, MSc, Ph.D., Scientific Editor at JMIR Publications, Ontario, Canada


Impact Factor 1.5 More information about Impact Factor CiteScore 2.4 More information about CiteScore

JMIR Research Protocols  (JRP, ISSN 1929-0748) is a unique journal indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), MEDLINE, Sherpa Romeo, DOAJ, Scopus, Web of Science(WoS)/ESCI, and EBSCO, publishing peer-reviewed, openly accessible research ideas and grant proposals, and study and trial protocols (also referred to as Registered Report Stage 1 papers). 

JMIR Research Protocols received a Journal Impact Factor of 1.5 according to the latest release of the Journal Citation Reports from Clarivate, 2025.

With a CiteScore of 2.4 (2024), JMIR Research Protocols is a Q2 journal in the field of General Medicine, according to Scopus data.

It should be stressed however that most authors do not publish their protocols for "impact" or citations, rather to document their ideas to how to design experiments, to document their successful grant proposals, or to publish (and maybe brag a little about) their already funded protocols (which do not require additional peer-review). We offer this platform for scientists to publish peer-reviewed protocols for a very low APF, and unfunded protocols for a reasonable fee that includes peer-review. 

While the original focus was on eHealth studies, JRP now publishes protocols and grant proposals in all areas of medicine, and their peer-review reports, if available (preliminary results from pilot studies, early results, and formative research should now be published in JMIR Formative Research).

JRP is fully open access, with full-text articles deposited in PubMed Central.

Why should I publish my protocol? 

  • JRP publishes research protocols, grant proposals, pilot/feasibility studies and early reports of ongoing and planned work that encourages collaboration and early feedback, and reduces duplication of effort.
  • JRP will be a valuable educational resource for researchers who want to learn about current research methodologies and how to write a winning grant proposal.
  • JRP creates an early scientific record for researchers who have developed novel methodologies, software, innovations or elaborate protocols.
  • JRP provides a "dry-run" for peer-review of the final results paper, and allows feedback/critique of the methods, often while they still can be fixed.
  • JRP enhances rigor and demonstrates to reviewers of subsequent results papers that authors followed and adhered to carefully developed and described a-priori methods, rather than fishing for P-values (HARKing).
  • JRP facilitates and guarantees subsequent publication of results demonstrating that the methodology has already been reviewed, and reduces the effort of writing up the results, as the protocol can be easily referenced.
  • JRP is compatible with the concept of "Registered Reports" and since May 2018, published protocols receive an International Registered Report Identifier (What is a Registered Report Identifier?) and acceptance of the subsequent results paper is "in principle" guaranteed in any JMIR journal and partner journals - see What is a Registered Report?. We assign an IRRID (International Registered Report Identifier) to each published protocol, faciliating the linking between protocol and final study, and also indicating that results papers of studies are also "in principle accepted" for subsequent publication in other JMIR journals (or other members of the IRRID Registry Network) as long as authors adhere to their original protocol - regardless of study results (even if they are negative), reducing publication bias in medicine.
  • Authors publishing their protocols in JRP will receive a 20% discount on the article processing fee if they publish their results in another journal of the JMIR journal family (for example, JMIR for e-health studies, i-JMR for others).

Need more reasons? Read the Knowledge Base article on "Why should I publish my protocol/grant proposal"!

 

Recent Articles

Article Thumbnail
Systematic Review Protocols

Neck pain poses a significant and growing public health challenge, with rising prevalence among younger populations and negative impacts on both quality of life and socioeconomic costs. Clinical manifestations are diverse, including restricted movement, muscle spasms, headaches, and upper limb numbness. Although drug therapy is widely used, its long-term use is limited by adverse effects. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) exercises offer a promising alternative, but high-quality evidence directly comparing their efficacy and safety to oral medications is currently lacking.

Article Thumbnail
Non-Randomized Studies (funded, non-eHealth)

Negative symptoms (NS) such as anhedonia (reduced pleasure), avolition (reduced motivation), asociality (social withdrawal), blunted affect (diminished emotional expression), and alogia (poverty of speech) are associated with poor functional outcomes in psychiatric and neurological disorders and are an unmet treatment need. Current medication primarily targets positive or affective symptoms, leaving NS neurobiology unaddressed. A critical research gap exists in understanding whether these symptoms share a common biological architecture across different diagnoses or whether they emerge from distinct pathological pathways.

Article Thumbnail
RCTs - Protocols/Proposals (funded, already peer-reviewed, eHealth)

Sexual and gender minority (SGM) adolescents who can benefit from HIV testing due to their sexual behavior (eg, condomless anal or vaginal sex) report suboptimal HIV testing rates. However, interventions designed to increase HIV testing rates among SGM adolescents are lacking, and even when effective interventions exist, reaching SGM adolescents outside research settings can be a challenge. This hybrid type 1 study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Sharing Health Education Resources (SHER), a multimedia messaging service (MMS) intervention in increasing adolescent HIV testing rates and to address implementation challenges of reaching and engaging SGM adolescents in digital interventions in real-world settings.

Article Thumbnail
RCTs - Protocols/Proposals (funded, already peer-reviewed, non-eHealth)

Kenyan women experience a high burden from breast and cervical cancers. Screening can result in earlier diagnosis, but its uptake is extremely low. The proportion of women up to date with screenings per guidelines is low, implying that interactions between providers and women are reduced.

Article Thumbnail
Non-Randomized Studies (funded, eHealth)

In 2022, nearly 60,000 prostate cancer (CaP) cases were reported among Black men, who face an estimated lifetime risk of approximately 1 in 6, compared with 1 in 8 among White men. The disproportionate burden of CaP in Black men has been attributed to a combination of health-system factors, variations in care processes, and individual- or patient-level determinants. Addressing these multilevel contributors will require innovative strategies to advance prostate health equity.

Article Thumbnail
Scoping Review Protocols

The transition from clinical practice to research represents a significant yet under-studied career pivot for health care professionals. Despite the growing emphasis on research integration in health care careers and increasing numbers of clinicians pursuing advanced research degrees, the transition experience remains poorly understood. This protocol outlines a scoping review aimed at examining the nuanced experiences of clinicians moving between full-time clinical practice and research roles, exploring the challenges, adjustments, and impacts on professional identity, decision-making, and career trajectories.

Article Thumbnail
Systematic Review Protocols

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is an intermediate state between normal cognitive aging and dementia, with a global geriatric prevalence of 23.7%. Multisensory stimulation (MSS) has emerged as a promising approach to improve cognitive impairment. However, relevant research is heterogeneous, and the evidence has not yet been systematically synthesized.

Article Thumbnail
RCTs - Protocols/Proposals (funded, already peer-reviewed, eHealth)

A series of studies suggests that immersive virtual reality (IVR) can enhance perspective-taking and behavioral change by simulating real-world scenarios experienced from different points of view. IVR has emerged as a promising tool for the prevention of gender-based violence, including sexual harassment. However, evidence on the effectiveness of first-person embodiment–based interventions in fostering empathy and modifying gender-related attitudes remains limited.

Article Thumbnail
Formative Studies and eHealth/mHealth Development

Eligibility criteria are essential to clinical trial design, guiding recruitment, and ensuring patient safety and scientific rigor. However, criteria are often lengthy, heterogeneous, and inconsistently formatted, which hinders large-scale interpretation and slows patient-trial matching. Manual review is time-consuming and error-prone. Advances in natural language processing and large language models (LLMs) offer opportunities to standardize and analyze eligibility text at scale.

Article Thumbnail
RCTs - Protocols/Proposals (eHealth)

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening participation in Canada is lower than the national target, and interventions designed to increase screening participation are generally expensive and have limited impact. Social media can be used as an innovative strategy to increase participation in cancer screening, particularly Facebook (FB), as it is the most popular social media platform for the population eligible for CRC screening.

Article Thumbnail
Non-Randomized Study Protocols and Methods (Non-eHealth)

Neighborhood revitalization is a process through which land use rezoning and capital investment can spur new resources, such as access to healthful food and amenities for physical activity. While revitalization efforts may promote cardiovascular health, their benefits may not be distributed equally across sociodemographic groups.

Article Thumbnail
Non-randomized Protocols and Methods (ehealth)

Artificial intelligence (AI), including large language models (LLMs), is increasingly integrated into systematic review (SR) workflows. AI tools may accelerate searching, screening, data extraction, and reporting, but their effects on methodological quality, reporting completeness, transparency, and reproducibility remain uncertain. Existing evaluations largely examine isolated tasks, and inconsistent disclosure of AI use limits reproducibility and oversight.

Preprints Open for Peer Review

We are working in partnership with

  • Crossref Member
  • Open Access
  • Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association
  •  
  •  
  • TrendMD MemberORCID Member
  •  

This journal is indexed in

  • PubMed
  • PubMed CentralMEDLINE
  •  
  •  
  • DOAJDOAJ Seal
    Sherpa RomeoEBSCO/EBSCO Essentials

  •  
  •  
  • Web of Science - ESCI

  •  

  •  
  •