Accessibility settings

JMIR Research Protocols

Protocols, grant proposals, registered reports (RR1)

Editor-in-Chief:

Amy Schwartz, MSc, Ph.D., Scientific Editor at JMIR Publications, Ontario, Canada


Impact Factor 1.5 More information about Impact Factor CiteScore 2.4 More information about CiteScore

JMIR Research Protocols  (JRP, ISSN 1929-0748) is a unique journal indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), MEDLINE, Sherpa Romeo, DOAJ, Scopus, Web of Science(WoS)/ESCI, and EBSCO, publishing peer-reviewed, openly accessible research ideas and grant proposals, and study and trial protocols (also referred to as Registered Report Stage 1 papers). 

JMIR Research Protocols received a Journal Impact Factor of 1.5 according to the latest release of the Journal Citation Reports from Clarivate, 2025.

With a CiteScore of 2.4 (2024), JMIR Research Protocols is a Q2 journal in the field of General Medicine, according to Scopus data.

It should be stressed however that most authors do not publish their protocols for "impact" or citations, rather to document their ideas to how to design experiments, to document their successful grant proposals, or to publish (and maybe brag a little about) their already funded protocols (which do not require additional peer-review). We offer this platform for scientists to publish peer-reviewed protocols for a very low APF, and unfunded protocols for a reasonable fee that includes peer-review. 

While the original focus was on eHealth studies, JRP now publishes protocols and grant proposals in all areas of medicine, and their peer-review reports, if available (preliminary results from pilot studies, early results, and formative research should now be published in JMIR Formative Research).

JRP is fully open access, with full-text articles deposited in PubMed Central.

Why should I publish my protocol? 

  • JRP publishes research protocols, grant proposals, pilot/feasibility studies and early reports of ongoing and planned work that encourages collaboration and early feedback, and reduces duplication of effort.
  • JRP will be a valuable educational resource for researchers who want to learn about current research methodologies and how to write a winning grant proposal.
  • JRP creates an early scientific record for researchers who have developed novel methodologies, software, innovations or elaborate protocols.
  • JRP provides a "dry-run" for peer-review of the final results paper, and allows feedback/critique of the methods, often while they still can be fixed.
  • JRP enhances rigor and demonstrates to reviewers of subsequent results papers that authors followed and adhered to carefully developed and described a-priori methods, rather than fishing for P-values (HARKing).
  • JRP facilitates and guarantees subsequent publication of results demonstrating that the methodology has already been reviewed, and reduces the effort of writing up the results, as the protocol can be easily referenced.
  • JRP is compatible with the concept of "Registered Reports" and since May 2018, published protocols receive an International Registered Report Identifier (What is a Registered Report Identifier?) and acceptance of the subsequent results paper is "in principle" guaranteed in any JMIR journal and partner journals - see What is a Registered Report?. We assign an IRRID (International Registered Report Identifier) to each published protocol, faciliating the linking between protocol and final study, and also indicating that results papers of studies are also "in principle accepted" for subsequent publication in other JMIR journals (or other members of the IRRID Registry Network) as long as authors adhere to their original protocol - regardless of study results (even if they are negative), reducing publication bias in medicine.
  • Authors publishing their protocols in JRP will receive a 20% discount on the article processing fee if they publish their results in another journal of the JMIR journal family (for example, JMIR for e-health studies, i-JMR for others).

Need more reasons? Read the Knowledge Base article on "Why should I publish my protocol/grant proposal"!

 

Recent Articles

Article Thumbnail
Non-Randomized Study Protocols and Methods (Non-eHealth)

Systemic therapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, has improved survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, its efficacy remains limited in patients with macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI), a subgroup with an extremely poor prognosis. Although combining immunotherapy with local treatments such as hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and radiation therapy (RT) is considered a promising approach, robust supportive evidence from routine clinical practice is lacking.

Article Thumbnail
Non-Randomized Studies (funded, non-eHealth)

It is well known that breastfeeding provides favorable health outcomes for both mother and baby. However, many mothers struggle to meet global recommendations to exclusively breastfeed for 6 months. Of those who cease breastfeeding early, one third attribute this to perceived insufficient milk supply. Currently, it is uncertain how the perception of insufficient milk supply relates to physiological milk volume or nutrient composition.

Article Thumbnail
Qualitative Methods

Adolescent social media research has primarily focused on frequency of platform use and self-report measures. There has been limited focus on the self-generated content posted by adolescents and how this might relate to their well-being.

Article Thumbnail
Scoping Review Protocols

This scoping review protocol addresses the imperative need for a comprehensive understanding of the health and well-being of university members, aligning with the global recognition of universities as pivotal in promoting holistic well-being. The lack of consensus and diverse definitions surrounding health and well-being in the academic literature necessitate a systematic approach. The scoping review protocol is designed to develop proposals for measures to improve the health and well-being of university members.

Article Thumbnail
Proposals (non-eHealth)

The Mothers’ Absolute Affection (MAA) program is a national initiative launched by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, on August 5, 2016, to promote, support, and protect breastfeeding across the country. The program aims to provide focused breastfeeding promotion and counseling services through the health system. It targets approximately 39 million pregnant and nursing mothers, 880,000 Accredited Social Health Activists, 150,000 subcenters, and 17,000 delivery points across all states and union territories. Despite its wide reach, there remains a lack of valid and reliable tools to assess mothers’ knowledge and practices related to breastfeeding and the MAA program.

Article Thumbnail
Non-Randomized Study Protocols and Methods (Non-eHealth)

Master’s degree programs in advanced nursing practice have been established in Switzerland for approximately 2 decades, and the role of advanced practice nurses (APNs) is increasingly embedded within the Swiss health care system. Despite their growing presence, there remains a lack of clarity and consistency regarding this progress; persistent ambiguity in role definitions, expectations, and competencies continues to hinder consistent implementation and contributes to uncertainty for both APNs and employers. Existing research has not sufficiently examined how APN competencies and role perceptions develop during graduate education and the early transition to practice. This substudy of the research initiative, –Competence and Role Development (), focuses exclusively on a defined cohort of master’s students and follows their competence and role development longitudinally.

Article Thumbnail
RCTs - Protocols/Proposals (non-eHealth)

Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer in women worldwide, and its incidence is increasing. Although breast cancer survival is slowly increasing, related sequelae can persist after the disease has been treated. The main physical symptoms associated with breast cancer survival include pain, lymphedema, and associated functional limitations. Although multiple treatments are available for alleviating symptoms in breast cancer survivors, their effectiveness remains limited. Motor imagery (MI) and action observation (AO) therapies, which are based on the theory of motor simulation and are used in multiple fields with satisfactory results, have been proposed as alternatives for treating pain and improving mobility and strength.

Article Thumbnail
RCTs - Protocols/Proposals (eHealth)

The burden of children with lower respiratory infections and low blood oxygen levels (hypoxemia) is high, and outcomes are poor in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Pulse oximeters noninvasively measure the capillary oxyhemoglobin saturation (SpO) to identify hypoxemia, but high-quality devices designed for the unique needs of children are rarely available in primary health care clinics (PHCs) in LMICs, where children initially access care.

Article Thumbnail
Systematic Review Protocols

The widespread use of mobile devices has markedly increased global exposure to nonionizing electromagnetic waves (EMWs). Emerging evidence indicates potential biological effects of EMW exposure in susceptible populations, particularly pregnant women; however, findings remain inconsistent.

Article Thumbnail
Proposals (non-eHealth)

Conventional treatments have been frequently reported to offer partial relief for some individuals managing arthritis pain and related symptoms, leading many to consider alternative options, such as cannabis. Informed decision-making about cannabis use requires patients to weigh potential benefits and risks in light of their personal values and preferences.

Article Thumbnail
Non-randomized Protocols and Methods (ehealth)

Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography reduces mortality by up to 20%, yet uptake in the United States remains below 6% of eligible individuals. Factors contributing to low uptake include lack of awareness, eligibility confusion, stigma associated with smoking history, and nihilistic beliefs about outcomes. Stigma triggers shame-avoidance behaviors, nihilism undermines perceived screening benefit, and misinformation amplifies both by spreading inaccurate eligibility criteria and exaggerated harms. Social media increasingly shapes how individuals encounter health information, form risk perceptions, and make screening decisions. Because platform architectures differ in content modality, algorithmic curation, and user demographics, single-platform studies cannot reliably characterize the digital information environment or identify platform-specific intervention targets.

Article Thumbnail
Non-randomized Protocols and Methods (ehealth)

Research indicates that university students experience higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (SAD) than the general population. In Uganda, existing psychological interventions for addressing SAD among students are primarily delivered face to face, which limits effective diagnosis and treatment due to stigma, a shortage of counselors, and long waiting times, which contribute to significant unmet mental health needs. Consequently, there is an urgent need for innovative approaches to improve access to mental health services.

Preprints Open for Peer Review

We are working in partnership with

  • Crossref Member
  • Open Access
  • Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association
  •  
  •  
  • TrendMD MemberORCID Member
  •  

This journal is indexed in

  • PubMed
  • PubMed CentralMEDLINE
  •  
  •  
  • DOAJDOAJ Seal
    Sherpa RomeoEBSCO/EBSCO Essentials

  •  
  •  
  • Web of Science - ESCI

  •  

  •  
  •