This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

SSHRC funded proposals with peer-review reports (Canada) (5) Innovations and Technology for Physical Activity Education (703) Parent and Child Education on Physical Activity (129)

Published on in Vol 9, No 6 (2020): June

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/15302, first published .
Exploring the Effectiveness of an Integrated Physical Activity and Psychosocial Program Targeting At-Risk Adolescent Girls: Protocol for the Girls United and on the Move (GUM) Intervention Study

Exploring the Effectiveness of an Integrated Physical Activity and Psychosocial Program Targeting At-Risk Adolescent Girls: Protocol for the Girls United and on the Move (GUM) Intervention Study

Exploring the Effectiveness of an Integrated Physical Activity and Psychosocial Program Targeting At-Risk Adolescent Girls: Protocol for the Girls United and on the Move (GUM) Intervention Study

Authors of this article:

Cristina M Caperchione1 Author Orcid Image ;   Nicole Hargreaves2 Author Orcid Image ;   Catherine M Sabiston3 Author Orcid Image ;   Stephen Berg4 Author Orcid Image ;   Kent C Kowalski5 Author Orcid Image ;   Leah J Ferguson5 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (1) Tweetations (1) Metrics

    Proposal

    1School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia

    2School of Health and Exercise Science, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, Canada

    3Faculty of Kinesiology & Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    4Okanagan School of Education, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, Canada

    5College of Kinesiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada

    Corresponding Author:

    Cristina M Caperchione, BHK, MHK, PhD

    School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation

    University of Technology Sydney

    15 Broadway

    Ultimo

    Sydney, NSW 2007

    Australia

    Phone: 61 2 9514 2000

    Email: cristina.caperchione@uts.edu.au


    Background: Adolescents are highly susceptible to negative self-perceptions, likely due to their social cues and environment. The presence of these negative self-perceptions has been shown to adversely impact levels of physical activity (PA). Although PA has the ability to foster improved self-perceptions, the rates of PA among adolescents continue to descend, with girls appearing to be most susceptible to these declines. At-risk adolescent girls, who may experience a number of negative preceding lifestyle conditions, may be exceptionally vulnerable to declines in PA. There are a high number of adolescent girls from low-income and abusive households in British Columbia, Canada, thus indicating a need for a program to relay the importance of PA and healthy lifestyle behaviors.

    Objective: This paper aims to describe the protocol of the Girls United and on the Move (GUM) pragmatic intervention, an integrated PA and psychosocial program aimed at improving self-compassion, social connectedness, and overall self-perceptions among at-risk adolescent girls.

    Methods: Using a quasi-experimental mixed methods approach, the GUM intervention was conducted in 5 schools in British Columbia, Canada. Adolescent girls aged 11 to 15 years who were identified as at risk were included in the study. The 9-week intervention, co-delivered by a PA/health promotion–trained researcher and a registered social worker, involved a PA component and a psychosocial component with evidence-based topics addressing the concerns of the adolescent girls. The following outcomes were evaluated: PA, self-compassion, social support, leader supportiveness, and sport enjoyment and commitment. Program acceptability and satisfaction was also examined. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline (week 1), week 6, and postintervention (week 9), and interview data concerning program acceptability and satisfaction were collected at postintervention from a subsample of participants.

    Results: A total of 101 participants were invited to participate in the GUM intervention. Reporting of the results is projected for the fall of 2020.

    Conclusions: It is anticipated that the GUM intervention will enhance PA while also improving self-compassion, social connectedness, and overall self-perceptions among at-risk adolescent girls. The findings of this research will contribute to the literature concerning PA and various psychosocial factors that impact the physical and mental health of at-risk adolescent girls.

    Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03567200; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03567200.

    International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/15302

    JMIR Res Protoc 2020;9(6):e15302

    doi:10.2196/15302

    Keywords

    adolescence; girls; at-risk; self-compassion; sport enjoyment; physical activity; community-based intervention 


    Worldwide levels of physical activity (PA) among adolescent girls have seen a substantial decline in past decades [1,2], with this decline being related to a number of physical and mental health issues (eg, increased risk of cardiovascular diseases, overweight and obesity, type 2 diabetes, depression, anxiety, poor emotional health, and overall mortality rates) [3-5]. Despite enhanced efforts to increase levels of PA among adolescent girls, only 33% of adolescent girls currently report being physically active, with only 16% meeting the PA recommendations put forth by the World Health Organization [6] (ie, a minimum of 60 minutes of moderate-vigorous intensity PA daily). The lack of participation in PA and sports among adolescent girls is thought to be influenced by a number of negative self-perceptions, including low levels of self-compassion, poor social support, and social isolation [7-10].

    At-risk adolescent girls are especially vulnerable to these negative self-perceptions, as they may be faced with additional hardships, including low socioeconomic housing, exposure to substance abuse, sexual exploitation, etc [11]. At-risk adolescents have been known to have a higher prevalence of depression and low self-esteem compared with the general population of adolescents [9], possibly leading to a higher likelihood of adopting future problem behaviors, which consequently have more serious long-term consequences [12,13]. In fact, conditions such as low income, insufficient caregiving, and family breakup have all been identified as conditions predictive of youth delinquency [14,15]. Adolescents who are categorized as at risk in this regard are also at higher risk of compromised health outcomes, such as obesity, cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, and numerous other chronic diseases [2]. For the purposes of this study, at risk was operationally defined as one with a dysfunctional family life, socioeconomic instabilities, various forms of abuse, or mental health issues such as anxiety or depression [16,17].

    By providing an emotionally supportive environment for this population, it is likely that enhanced physical and mental health outcomes will be exhibited, as a strong support system is able to establish a sense of belonging and aid in case of problems [18]. In particular, engaging in regular PA during adolescence has been directly linked to reduced rates of anxiety, depression, emotional disturbances, and psychological distress [19,20] and improved self-perception facets, such as self-esteem, self-confidence, self-compassion, and perceived social support [20-22]. For instance, Raudsepp and Vink [23] examined the longitudinal associations between girls’ sedentary behavior and depressive symptoms and found that higher levels of depressive symptoms were predictive of greater sedentary behavior. Additionally, Kliziene and colleagues [24] investigated the influence of a 7-month exercise intervention on levels of anxiety among adolescents aged 14 to 15 years and revealed that the exercise intervention was related to decreased anxiety scores. Further, self-compassion, or the way in which an individual offers kindness and support to oneself [25], has been shown to increase in individuals who are physically active [26], and by increasing self-compassion, one is more apt to engage in other healthful behaviors (eg, healthy diet, stress-reducing practices) [27]. Social support provided from peers and significant adult figures has been shown to play a large role in the adoption of various health behaviors, and the critical role that program leaders play as personal role models has been vastly highlighted throughout the literature [28,29]. Positive self-perceptions and PA and sport enjoyment are also key emotional and motivational processes that have been linked to continued participation in PA [30].

    There have been various interventions to date with the goal of improving PA behavior among adolescent girls; however, few have focused on at-risk girls. There is a need for tailored and targeted evidence-based programs focused on addressing specific physical, mental, and psychosocial health issues that at-risk adolescent girls may currently face in everyday life. To address these issues, Girls United and on the Move (GUM), an integrated PA and psychosocial program, was developed. The overarching purpose of the GUM study was to explore the effectiveness of an integrated PA and psychosocial program on PA behaviors and various identified psychosocial factors among at-risk adolescent girls. The purpose of this paper is to describe the intervention design and methodological protocol of the GUM program.


    Study Design

    The GUM study protocol was prepared according to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines [31] and used an exploratory quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design. Data collection occurred at baseline (T1), week 6 (T2), and postintervention (T3) and included self-report questionnaires and semistructured interviews. Recruitment for the GUM program began in December 2017 and was completed in May 2019. Figure 1 provides a flow diagram of the GUM protocol, and Table 1 provides a detailed description of relative program recruitment dates.

    ‎
    Figure 1. Flow diagram of the GUM protocol. GUM: Girls United and on the Move.
    View this figure
    Table 1. Detailed description of relative program start datesa.
    Group No.Number of participantsProgram recruitment
    113January 2018
    211January 2018
    313April 2018
    49April 2018
    57July 2018
    614September 2018
    710September 2018
    811October 2018
    913May 2019

    aProgram commencement dates were consistent with program recruitment dates. Each program was 9 weeks in duration.

    Ethical Approval

    Ethical approval was obtained from the Behavioural Human Research Ethics Board at the University of British Columbia (H17-01540) and from School District 23. In all cases, both parental consent and student assent were obtained prior to data collection.

    Objectives

    The specific objectives of the GUM study were (1) deliver and explore the effectiveness of the 9-week GUM intervention program on the primary outcomes of PA, self-compassion, social support, and leader behavior; (2) explore the effectiveness of the 9-week GUM intervention program on the secondary outcomes of sport enjoyment and commitment; and (3) examine participant perceptions of the GUM program in terms of acceptability and satisfaction.

    Participants, Setting, and Recruitment

    Participants of the GUM study included adolescent girls from 5 middle schools in British Columbia, Canada, who were aged 11 to 15 years and identified as at risk. Guidance counselors from each middle school used these criteria to identify girls and invite them to participate, encouraging those whom they felt would benefit from participating in the program. The guidance counselors were exclusively responsible for recruitment because they had previous history working with the girls on a regular one-to-one basis due to the girls’ behavioral inadequacies, issues with home life, or mental health–related concerns such as anxiety or depression. Counselors then provided interested individuals with further detailed information about the program (including parental consent and student assent forms) and prompted the students to discuss the program with their parents or guardians. Participants were asked to return the signed consent and assent forms to the guidance counselor or the research team prior to the start of the program or at T1. There were no specific exclusion criteria except that participants could not have been a participant of the previous pilot study, Girls on the Move (GoM) which took place from 2015 to 2016 [32]. A total of 101 participants forming 9 groups were recruited from 5 schools throughout the region, with group sizes ranging from 7 to 14 participants per school. Each group had a different start date, with some groups in different schools running simultaneously. However, no two groups from the same school received the intervention at the same time. Recruitment was completed in May 2019.

    Each GUM intervention session occurred at the participating school (eg, a classroom, gymnasium, or outside on school grounds) or off campus within the community, depending on the scheduled activity for the given day (eg, kickboxing occurred at a local community kickboxing and martial arts studio). The participants were provided with transportation to all off-campus activities by the trained researcher and social worker (ie, program facilitators). Both facilitators were authorized and insured to provide transportation for program participants. Participation was completely voluntary and all participants were informed that they did not need to participate in the research component to participate in the GUM program. Those who chose to participate in the research component were informed that they could withdraw from participation in the study at any time and without consequence.

    Description of the GUM Intervention

    Pilot Study

    The GUM intervention was developed and refined based on the GoM pilot study. GoM was conducted from 2015 to 2016 and included 2 middle schools, with a total of 24 participants aged 11 to 17 years. The purpose of the GoM intervention was to examine program and methodological feasibility and gain further insight concerning PA experiences, preferences, and self-concept among at-risk adolescent girls [32]. Findings from the GoM program indicated that the assessments used were appropriate, program delivery (ie, duration, geographic setting, and facilitation) was acceptable, and participants were satisfied with the activities and content. The findings also suggested that adolescent girls are aware of the importance of proper PA and nutrition in relation to health outcomes, believe that peer social support is important for PA engagement, and feel that enjoyment is crucial when dictating PA participation. Based on these outcomes, minor refinements were made to the GUM intervention protocol and research methodology, including the addition of alternative physical activities on and off school grounds, the use of personalized journals for participants to write in, the addition of measures to assess different contexts of social support and the impact of the leaders and facilitators, and the name change from Girls on the Move to Girls United on the Move.

    Program Components

    The GUM intervention was a pragmatic PA and psychosocial program designed specifically for at-risk adolescent girls. Components of the self-determination theory, particularly autonomy, competence, and relatedness, were integrated throughout the intervention because these are known to affect intrinsic motivation and engagement in PA, especially among underserved youth [11,33]. The GUM intervention consisted of 9 weekly, group-based, 90-minute face-to-face sessions that were cofacilitated by a trained researcher and a registered social worker from a partnering community organization or key stakeholder. The partnering stakeholder was a nonprofit organization with the goal of bringing an end to violence and poverty and seeking justice for children and women. This nonprofit organization works extensively with adolescent populations, particularly those categorized as at risk. Each GUM group consisted of 7 to 14 at-risk adolescent girls from participating schools. Smaller groups were desired in order to create an intimate and supportive environment and provide a greater opportunity for participants to get acquainted with each other and the program facilitators.

    Within each of the weekly 90-minute program sessions, 45 minutes of PA were delivered by a trained researcher and 45 minutes were allocated to social worker–led discussions on various psychosocial topics. Examples of physical/sport activities included on-campus activities such as yoga, team obstacle courses, and soccer, or off-campus activities such as rock climbing, self-defense classes, and fitness classes. Examples of psychosocial topics that were discussed within each group included healthy relationships, conflict resolution strategies, substance abuse issues, sexuality, and gender issues. Table 2 outlines the components of the GUM intervention.

    In addition to the group discussions facilitated by the social worker, personal journals were distributed to each participant during week 1. These journals provided participants with an opportunity to disclose their thoughts and feelings about their current state, any personal struggles they may be undergoing, or anything to do with the GUM program itself. Participants returned the journals to the registered social worker at the end of each of the weekly GUM sessions, indicating if they wanted the social worker to read the entry and give a written response. This allowed participants to reach out and seek advice if they needed it, without requiring the participants to talk in person about their issues to either one of the program facilitators. Although not previously used in the GoM pilot study, disclosure journals have been used previously by the social worker and have been reported to be an important component of previous programs delivered to this population. The disclosure journals were used as a component of the intervention, but no data were extracted or evaluated from the journals. After program completion (ie, after week 9), a subsample of participants (30/101, 29.7%) were invited to participate in an individual semistructured interview so that the program facilitators could gain further information concerning program acceptability and satisfaction. Those who attended a minimum of 80% (7/9) of the program sessions were invited to participate in the voluntary semistructured interviews. Participants were informed that they were able to withdraw from the study at any time, for any reason, without consequence. All personal data were coded and handled with confidentiality.

    Table 2. Components of the Girls United and on the Move (GUM) program.
    WeekPhysical activity componentPsychosocial component
    Week 1 (T1)aN/AbN/A
    Week 2YogaEmotional wellness
    Week 3DanceSelf-awareness, self-esteem, and body image
    Week 4Self-defenseHealthy relationships
    Week 5Hike/walk outdoorsHealthy sexuality
    Week 6 (T2)cRock climbingCommunication skills, conflict resolution, and boundaries
    Week 7KickboxingSexual exploitation and abuse
    Week 8Free play and outdoor games (eg, capture the flag, scavenger hunt)Media and gender issues
    Week 9 (T3)dN/AN/A

    aIntroductions and questionnaires were completed. Baseline data were collected at T1.

    bN/A: not applicable.

    cThe Learning Climate Questionnaire was the only self-report questionnaire administered at T2. See Outcome Measures for further information.

    dQuestionnaires and a wrap-up were completed. Follow-up data were collected at T3.

    Outcome Measures

    Mixed methods were used to collect and analyze data. Quantitative data measures consisted of self-report questionnaires to assess self-compassion, social support, leader supportiveness, and sport commitment and enjoyment. Qualitative data consisted of semistructured interviews with a subsample of program participants, which provided further insight concerning the acceptability and satisfaction of the program components, physical and psychosocial activities, resources, and overall delivery (ie, environment/facilities, facilitators, etc). Self-report measures were used because they are easy to administer, relatively inexpensive, and recognized as an acceptable means of recording participant responses and psychological constructs in youth populations [34]. Further, the guidance counselors advised us that handing out wearable measurement devices, such as accelerometers and pedometers, and having participants return them after the program could be very difficult, with a high likelihood that the devices would be lost, damaged, or stolen, which the counselors identified as an unfortunate reality within an at-risk population. The majority of the assessments occurred at T1 and at T3 at each participating school. Demographic information was collected during T1 and the Learning Climate Questionnaire (LCQ) [35] was completed at T2. Figure 2 provides the SPIRIT figure for the GUM trial.

    ‎
    Figure 2. Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials figure for the GUM study. GUM: Girls United and on the Move.
    View this figure
    Demographics

    Demographic information consisted of age, grade, number of siblings, housing location, mode of transportation to school, and whether the participant took part in any PA inside or outside of school.

    Physical Activity

    Level of PA was assessed using the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Children, a 10-item questionnaire that assesses the frequency of PA participation over a 7-day recall period [36]. This assessment has been reported to be a valid and reliable measure of PA among children and adolescents as it is able to accurately measure general PA patterns regarding intensity, frequency, and duration [36].

    Self-compassion

    The Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) was used to assess self-compassion through 6 subscales that include contrasting components: self-kindness vs self-judgement, mindfulness vs overidentification, and common humanity vs isolation [37,38]. The SCS is a 26-item scale that measures each of these components using a 5-point Likert scale (1=almost never, 5=almost always). The mean scores of each of the subscales can then be combined to yield a total score, which reflects a global self-compassion score [38].

    Social Support

    Perceived social support was assessed using the Child and Adolescent Social Support Scale (CASSS) [39]. The CASSS consists of five 12-item subscales that measure social support received from a variety of sources, including parents, teachers, classmates, close friends, and the school environment [39]. However, a condensed version without the school environment subscale was used, as the actual sources of social support received in the school environment were not well defined and were deemed unnecessary for the purposes of the GUM study [40]. The CASSS measures each of the items on a 6-point Likert scale, ranking each item on how often the participant feels they receive social support from the indicated source, from never (1) to always (6). Additionally, each item has a perceived importance scale, which is measured using a 3-point Likert scale ranging from not important (1) to very important (3). The CASSS has been represented as a valid and reliable measure for its intended purposes [40].

    Perceived Leader Supportiveness

    The LCQ [35] was used to assess participants’ perceptions of support provided by the program facilitators. The LCQ is a 15-item measure with values ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (7). It provides a good indication of the support that leaders provided for the 3 psychological needs (ie, autonomy, competence, and relatedness) [35]. Research shows that when these needs are supported, higher levels of psychological well-being are evident [35]. The LCQ has been shown to have extensive internal consistency and reliability, and it provides a valid indication of perceived supportiveness among youth outside of sporting contexts [41]. The LCQ was the only self-report questionnaire that was not administered at both T1 and T3; instead, it was distributed at T2.

    Sport Commitment and Enjoyment

    Sport commitment and enjoyment was assessed using the Sport Commitment Model [42], a questionnaire that has been shown to be a valid and reliable measure of sport commitment and enjoyment among youth [42]. The model addresses the 5 components related to sport commitment, namely sport enjoyment, personal investments in the self-indicated activity, involvement opportunities, social constraints, and involvement alternatives. Each of the 58 items is assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, with scores ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5).

    Program Acceptability and Satisfaction

    Face-to-face, individual, semistructured interviews were conducted with a subsample of participants (30/101, 29.7%) to gain greater knowledge concerning acceptability of and satisfaction with the GUM program. Participants were asked to share their thoughts, opinions, experiences, and recommendations concerning activities, education, and resources of the program. These interviews were conducted at postintervention by a trained researcher at a time that was convenient to the participants. Interview questions were informed by the study objectives and the research literature specific to this topic area and study population. Data from the interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim with all possible identifiable information removed.

    To enhance rigor, various verification strategies were used, such as having the data systematically checked by other trained researchers and closely monitoring gradually learned information as the research project progressed. Table 3 provides a summary of the measures used at the various data collection time points.

    Table 3. Summary of measures and data collection time points.
    MeasureMethods for data collectionData collection time points
    DemographicsAge, grade, number of siblings, housing location, main mode of transportation to school, participation in organized PA or sport inside or outside of schoolWeek 1 (baseline only)
    Physical activityPhysical Activity Questionnaire for ChildrenWeeks 1 and 9
    Self-compassionSelf-Compassion ScaleWeeks 1 and 9
    Social supportChild and Adolescent Social Support ScaleWeeks 1 and 9
    Perceived leader supportivenessLearning Climate QuestionnaireWeek 6 only
    Sport commitment and enjoymentSport Commitment ModelWeeks 1 and 9
    Program acceptabilityIn-person semistructured interviewsAfter week 9 (postintervention only)

    Data Analysis

    All data collected for descriptive purposes will be presented as means and standard deviations for all sample characteristics. All outcome variables, including changes in PA behavior, self-compassion, social support, perceived leader supportiveness, and sport commitment and enjoyment, will be analyzed using an analysis of covariance statistical design. The level of significance will be set at α=.05. Statistical analyses will be conducted using SPSS software (version 21.0; IBM Corp).

    Inductive thematic analysis, as outlined by Braun and Clarke [43], will be used to analyze the interview data. Data analyses will be conducted by 2 trained researchers who will independently read the transcripts numerous times to become familiar with the data and generate initial codes by identifying important features of the data that are relevant to the study objective. Coded data will then be examined for similarities, grouped, and refined to identify potential themes [43]. Representative quotes will be used to provide evidence of the themes within the data.

    Data Management

    Data collection, as well as the handling and storage of data, will be coordinated within the Physical Health and Activity Behaviour (PHAB) Lab at the University of British Columbia. Demographic and self-report questionnaire data will be entered electronically by a trained researcher on the project. All paper-based data will be stored in a secure and locked filing cabinet located in the PHAB Lab. All electronic data will be stored on a password-protected computer also located in the PHAB Lab.


    The final recruitment phase for the GUM study was completed in May 2019, with the final study results projected to be published in the fall of 2020. The results of the GUM study will be disseminated through traditional avenues such as presentations at national and international academic meetings and publication in open-access, peer-reviewed journals. In addition, these results will be disseminated through plain language summaries to participants and through summary briefings to local stakeholders and government agencies.


    This protocol paper describes the methodology processes of a unique intervention encompassing both PA and psychosocial components, designed to help address the specific issues and barriers faced by an underserved subpopulation of adolescent girls. Through evidence provided in the literature, issues revolving around self-compassion, social support, and social isolation are further amplified by lack of PA and sports participation. To make matters worse, adolescent girls who are considered to be at risk may experience magnified barriers to PA and lack interest in the potential benefits of a PA program. This is problematic because this specific population may experience significant benefits from a successful PA program compared with the general population of adolescent girls. PA has been shown to positively enhance self-perceptions of self-compassion and social support and to reduce social isolation, all of which are prevalent traits among at-risk adolescent girls [7,20,44]. Therefore, there is a need for an integrated PA and psychosocial program to help address these specific issues faced by this vulnerable population, as well as to foster at-risk girls’ interests in the discussion of various psychosocial topics deemed important by them.

    The GUM intervention was designed with these specific elements in mind. By providing a safe space for at-risk adolescent girls to talk about their issues and engage in fun, organized PAs that help emphasize the importance of a physically active lifestyle, the intervention’s outcomes may be highly valuable to future research. However, this study does pose some potential limitations as a result of its noncontrolled environment, the population being studied, and the constraints based on budget and resources. First, the use of subjective self-report measures may be problematic, as the ability to recall PA engagement and other psychological factors can be imperfect among adolescents [45,46]. Second, this study was exploratory in nature and did not include a control group. Therefore, a true cause and effect cannot be determined and the outcomes may have been a result of some unforeseen variables. Additionally, the outcomes from this study will provide an estimate/exploration of effectiveness immediately after the completion of the intervention and do not include long-term follow-up, making it difficult to be certain of sustained behavior change. Lastly, the fact that the GUM study was specifically targeting at-risk adolescent girls means that the findings are only generalizable and applicable to this specific population.

    In conclusion, given the lack of research around at-risk adolescents, the overarching goals and objectives of the GUM program may provide the current literature with promising results and aid in the future design and refinement of effective PA programs for at-risk adolescent girls.

    Acknowledgments

    We would like to thank all participants who gave their time and effort to the GUM study. In addition, we thank the Central Okanagan Elizabeth Fry Society for their efforts and collaboration on the project. This study was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (#430-2017-00144). The funding body did not take part in the design of the study; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; or the preparation of the manuscript.

    Authors' Contributions

    CMC, CMS, SB, KCK, and LJF conceived the project and procured the project funding. CMC is leading the coordination of the trial. CMC, CMS, SB, KCK, LJF, and NH assisted with the protocol design. NH will manage the project, including participant recruitment, program delivery, and data collection, with assistance from CMC and SB. CMC and NH drafted the manuscript and all authors read, edited, and approved the final manuscript.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    ‎
    Multimedia Appendix 1

    Peer Review Report Summary SSHRC CRSH.

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 117 KB
    1. Rhodes RE, Janssen I, Bredin SS, Warburton DE, Bauman A. Physical activity: Health impact, prevalence, correlates and interventions. Psychology & Health 2017 May 30;32(8):942-975. [CrossRef]
    2. Currie C, Zanotti C, Morgan A, Currie D, de Looze M, Roberts C, et al. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization; 2012. Social determinants of health and well-being among young people. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: international report from the 2009/2010 survey   URL: http:/​/www.​euro.who.int/​__data/​assets/​pdf_file/​0003/​163857/​Social-determinants-of-health-and-well-being-among-young-people.​pdf [accessed 2020-05-17]
    3. Kelley GA, Kelley KS, Pate RR. Exercise and adiposity in overweight and obese children and adolescents: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ Open 2019 Nov 11;9(11):e031220. [CrossRef]
    4. Biddle SJ, Ciaccioni S, Thomas G, Vergeer I. Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents: An updated review of reviews and an analysis of causality. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2019 May;42:146-155. [CrossRef]
    5. Janssen I, LeBlanc AG. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010;7(1):40. [CrossRef]
    6. World Health Organization. World Health Organization website. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2018. Global action plan on physical activity 2018-2030: more active people for a healthier world   URL: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/272722/9789241514187-eng.pdf?ua=1 [accessed 2020-05-19]
    7. Laird Y, Fawkner S, Kelly P, McNamee L, Niven A. The role of social support on physical activity behaviour in adolescent girls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2016 Jul 7;13(1). [CrossRef]
    8. Lawler M, Nixon E. Body dissatisfaction among adolescent boys and girls: The effects of body mass, peer appearance culture and internalization of appearance ideals. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 2010 Jan 8;40(1):59-71. [CrossRef]
    9. Lubans D, Plotnikoff R, Lubans N. Review: A systematic review of the impact of physical activity programmes on social and emotional well-being in at-risk youth: Review of physical activity programmes for at-risk youth. Child and Adolescent Mental Health 2012;17(1):2-13. [CrossRef]
    10. Pila E, Gilchrist J, Sabiston C. Self-compassion protects against negative body-related emotions: A three-wave study of adolescent girls in sport. 2017 Presented at: North American Society for the Psychology of Sport and Physical Activity 2017; June 4-7, 2017; San Diego, CA.
    11. Lawman H, Wilson D, Van HM, Resnicow K, Kitzman-Ulrich H. The relationship between psychosocial correlates and physical activity in underserved adolescent boys and girls in the ACT Trial. Journal of Physical Activity & Health 2011;8(2):253-261. [CrossRef]
    12. Park K, Yang T. The long-term effects of self-esteem on depression: The roles of alcohol and substance use during young adulthood. The Sociological Quarterly 2017 Jun 19;58(3):429-446. [CrossRef]
    13. van den Berg PA, Mond J, Eisenberg M, Ackard D, Neumark-Sztainer D. The link between body dissatisfaction and self-esteem in adolescents: Similarities across gender, age, weight status, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Journal of Adolescent Health 2010 Sep;47(3):290-296. [CrossRef]
    14. Ogundele MO. Behavioural and emotional disorders in childhood: A brief overview for paediatricians. World Journal of Pediatrics 2018 Feb 8;7(1):9-26. [CrossRef]
    15. Henneberger AK, Tolan PH, Hipwell AE, Keenan K. Delinquency in adolescent girls: Using a confluence approach to understand the influences of parents and peers. Criminal Justice and Behavior 2014 Jul 22;41(11):1327-1337. [CrossRef]
    16. Brownell M, Roos N, MacWilliam L, Leclair L, Ekuma O, Fransoo F. Academic and social outcomes for high-risk youths in Manitoba. Canadian Journal of Education 2010;33(4):804-836.
    17. Wotherspoon T, Schissel B. The business of placing Canadian children and youth?at-risk. ? Can J Educ 2001;26(3):321-339.
    18. Van DF, Spruyt B, Keppens G. Gender differences in mental health problems among adolescents and the role of social support: results from the Belgian health interview surveys 2008 and 2013. BMC Psychiatry 2018;18(1):6. [Medline]
    19. Ahn S, Fedewa A. A meta-analysis of the relationship between children's physical activity and mental health. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 2011;36(4):385-397. [CrossRef]
    20. Eime RM, Young JA, Harvey JT, Charity MJ, Payne WR. A systematic review of the psychological and social benefits of participation in sport for adults: informing development of a conceptual model of health through sport. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2013;10:135.
    21. Gopinath B, Hardy LL, Baur LA, Burlutsky G, Mitchell P. Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviors and Health-Related Quality of Life in Adolescents. Pediatrics 2012 Jun 11;130(1):e167-e174. [CrossRef]
    22. Babic MJ, Morgan PJ, Plotnikoff RC, Lonsdale C, White RL, Lubans DR. Physical activity and physical self-concept in youthystematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 2014;44(11):1589-1601.
    23. Raudsepp L, Vink K. Longitudinal Associations Between Sedentary Behavior and Depressive Symptoms in Adolescent Girls Followed 6 Years. J Phys Act Health 2019;16(3):191-196.
    24. Kliziene I, Klizas S, Cizauskas G, Sipaviciene S. Effects of a 7-month Exercise Intervention Programme on the Psychosocial Adjustment and Decrease of Anxiety Among Adolescents. European Journal of Contemporary Education 2018 Mar 18;7(1):127-136. [CrossRef]
    25. Neff K. Self-Compassion: An Alternative Conceptualization of a Healthy Attitude Toward Oneself. Self and Identity 2003 Apr;2(2):85-101. [CrossRef]
    26. Sirois FM. A self-regulation resource model of self-compassion and health behavior intentions in emerging adults. Prev Med Rep 2015;2:218-222.
    27. Thakur MB, Joshi N. Analysis of self compassion and self esteem between adolescents engaged in physical exercise in the form of gym with those having sedentary lifestyle. J Psychosoc Res 2016;11(1):65-75.
    28. Gruno J, Gibbons S. Peer Review: Developing a relatedness-supportive learning environment in dance: small group learning activities. Physical Health Education Journal 2016;82(4):1.
    29. Sabiston C, Crocker P. Exploring self-perceptions and social influences as correlates of adolescent leisure-time physical activity. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psycholigy 2008;30(1):3-22. [CrossRef]
    30. Gardner LA, Magee CA, Vella SA. Social climate profiles in adolescent sports: Associations with enjoyment and intention to continue. J Adolesc 2016;52:A.
    31. Chan A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Annals of Internal Medicine 2013 Feb 05;158(3):200-207 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    32. Carlson KA. University of British Columbia Theses and Dissertations. Kelowna, BC: University of British Columbia; 2016 Oct. Examining perceptions and experiences of physical activity, body image and physical self-concept in at-risk adolescent girls   URL: https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0319122 [accessed 2020-05-18]
    33. Mitchell F, Gray S, Inchley J. This choice thing really works. .. ? Changes in experiences and engagement of adolescent girls in physical education classes, during a school-based physical activity programme. Phys Educ Sport Pedagogy 2015;20(6):593-611.
    34. Chinapaw MJ, Mokkink LB, van PMN, van MW, Terwee CB. Physical activity questionnaires for youth: a systematic review of measurement properties. Sports Med 2010;40(7):a.
    35. Williams G, Deci E. Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory. J Pers Soc Psychol 1996;70(4):A.
    36. Kowalski K, Crocker P, Faulkner R. Validation of the physical activity questionnaire for older children. Pediatr Exerc Sci 1997;9(2):174-186. [CrossRef]
    37. Neff KD. The Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure Self-Compassion. Self and Identity 2003 Jul;2(3):223-250. [CrossRef]
    38. Williams MJ, Dalgleish T, Karl A, Kuyken W. Examining the factor structures of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire and the self-compassion scale. Psychol Assess 2014;26(2):407-418.
    39. Malecki CK, Demaray MK. Measuring perceived social support: Development of the child and adolescent social support scale (CASSS). Psychol Sch 2002;39(1):1-18.
    40. Demaray MK, Malecki CK, Davidson LM, Hodgson KK, Rebus PJ. The relationship between social support and student adjustment: A longitudinal analysis. Psychol Sch 2005;42(7):A.
    41. Bean CN, Rocchi M, Forneris T. Using the Learning Climate Questionnaire to Assess Basic Psychological Needs Support in Youth Sport. J Appl Sport Psychol 2019.
    42. Scanlan T, Carpenter P, Schmidt G, Simons J, Keeler B. An introduction to the sport commitment model. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology 1993;15(1):1-15. [CrossRef]
    43. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3(2):77-101.
    44. Homan KJ, Sirois FM. Self-compassion and physical healthxploring the roles of perceived stress and health-promoting behaviors. Health Psychol Open 2017;4(2):E.
    45. Pearson N, Braithwaite R, Biddle SJH. The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity among adolescent girls: a meta-analysis. Academic Pediatrics 2015;15(1):9-18. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    46. Ridgers ND, Timperio A, Crawford D, Salmon J. Validity of a brief self-report instrument for assessing compliance with physical activity guidelines amongst adolescents. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 2012 Mar;15(2):136-141. [CrossRef]

    ‎
    CASSS: Child and Adolescent Social Support Scale
    GoM: Girls on the Move
    GUM: Girls United and on the Move
    LCQ: Learning Climate Questionnaire
    PA: physical activity
    PHAB: Physical Health and Activity Behaviour
    SCS: Self-Compassion Scale
    SPIRIT: Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials

    Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 28.06.19; peer-reviewed by K Ng, L Sharp, YM Schoenberger; comments to author 06.01.20; revised version received 18.02.20; accepted 10.04.20; published 09.06.20

    Copyright

    ©Cristina M Caperchione, Nicole Hargreaves, Catherine M Sabiston, Stephen Berg, Kent C Kowalski, Leah J Ferguson. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 09.06.2020.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.