This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Non-randomized Protocols and Methods (ehealth) (567) Depression and Mood Disorders; Suicide Prevention (1363) Web-based and Mobile Health Interventions (3297)

Published on in Vol 11, No 12 (2022): December

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/42526, first published .
General Practice Patients’ Experiences and Perceptions of the WiserAD Structured Web-Based Support Tool for Antidepressant Deprescribing: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Case Study With Realist Evaluation

General Practice Patients’ Experiences and Perceptions of the WiserAD Structured Web-Based Support Tool for Antidepressant Deprescribing: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Case Study With Realist Evaluation

General Practice Patients’ Experiences and Perceptions of the WiserAD Structured Web-Based Support Tool for Antidepressant Deprescribing: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Case Study With Realist Evaluation

Authors of this article:

Amy Coe1 Author Orcid Image ;   Jane Gunn1 Author Orcid Image ;   Catherine Kaylor-Hughes1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (4) Tweetations (5) Metrics

    Protocol

    Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

    Corresponding Author:

    Amy Coe, BSci Hons

    Department of General Practice

    University of Melbourne

    Level 2, 780 Elizabeth St

    Melbourne, 3004

    Australia

    Phone: 61 90356335

    Email: amy.coe@unimelb.edu.au


    Background: Research suggests that the rapid increase in worldwide antidepressant use is mainly due to a rise in long-term and potentially inappropriate use. It has been suggested that 1 in 3 antidepressant users among general practice patients are no longer experiencing clinical benefits from their medication and should commence deprescribing. However there are many barriers to antidepressant deprescribing for both patients and clinicians, which adds to the complex nature of reducing or ceasing the medication. As such, antidepressant deprescribing does not routinely occur in clinical practice. Evidence-based supports and interventions for safe and successful antidepressant deprescribing are needed to assist patients and their doctors. Interventions should also include an understanding of how an intervention works, why it works, and whom it is for.

    Objective: This study aims to evaluate how the WiserAD approach to antidepressant deprescribing works, whom it is for, and the underlying circumstances by (1) examining the experiences and perceptions of WiserAD among antidepressant users, (2) identifying the underlying mechanisms of the WiserAD approach to antidepressant deprescribing, and (3) describing in what contexts and to what extent the underlying mechanisms of WiserAD are suited for antidepressant users.

    Methods: A mixed methods case study with realist evaluation will be conducted among participants in the WiserAD randomized controlled trial for antidepressant deprescribing. Quantitative data will be obtained from up to 12 participants from the intervention and control arms at baseline and 3-month follow-up. Baseline data will be used to characterize the sample using descriptive statistics. Paired samples t tests will also be performed to compare responses between baseline and 3-month follow-up for participant self-management, skills, confidence and knowledge, beliefs about medicines, current emotional health, and well-being symptoms. Qualitative data from the same participants will be collected via narrative interview at 3-month follow-up. Quantitative and qualitative data will be converged to form a “case,” and analysis will be conducted within each case with comparisons made across multiple cases.

    Results: Recruitment of participants commenced in October 2022 and will be completed by March 2023. Analysis will be completed by June 2023.

    Conclusions: To our knowledge, this will be the first realist evaluation of an antidepressant deprescribing intervention in general practice. Findings from this evaluation may assist in the implementation of the WiserAD approach to antidepressant deprescribing in routine clinical practice.

    International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/42526

    JMIR Res Protoc 2022;11(12):e42526

    doi:10.2196/42526

    Keywords

    antidepressants; primary care; depression; deprescribing; realist evaluation; online support tool; case study; general practice; online; tool; data; evaluation; intervention; clinical 


    Background

    Antidepressant use is rapidly increasing with the rate of antidepressant prescriptions doubling in western countries, such as Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Iceland, over the past 10 years [1,2]. Antidepressants are the first-line treatment for depression that is considered as “more severe” (or moderate to severe depression), for which they have been shown to be effective [3-5]. Current guidelines advise that antidepressant treatment should continue for 6-12 months after remission of symptoms; however, research indicates that there has been an increase in long-term use (≥12 months) [6]. For example, in the Netherlands, long-term use increased from 30% in the period of 1995-2005 to 44% in the period between 2005 and 2015 [7] and from 45.6% to 67.4% between 2009 and 2010 in the United States [8]. Other studies have shown that the prevalence of long-term use among antidepressant users is approximately 36% and 42% in the United Kingdom [9] and the Netherlands [10], respectively.

    Antidepressants are associated with common side effects such as gastrointestinal upset (for example nausea and constipation), dry mouth, and fatigue [11,12]. Research suggests that these initial side effects persist with long-term use [13], which also increases the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding [14], cardiovascular disease [15], weight gain [16], and feelings of emotional numbness [17]. Studies have shown that 1 in 3 people may be taking antidepressants without any clinical benefit [18,19], which suggests that prolonged use may place some people at unnecessary risk of adverse side effects.

    The majority (86%) of antidepressants are prescribed in primary care [20], placing general practitioners (GPs) in a unique position to also deprescribe (the planned and supervised process of dose reduction or cessation [21]). However, antidepressant deprescribing can be complex and does not routinely occur in clinical practice [22,23] with reported barriers by both GPs and patients, including fear of relapse or recurrence and a lack of quality guidelines for deprescribing [24-27]. Discontinuation symptoms such as tremors, sweating, anxiety, mood swings, and electric shock sensations are also associated with stopping antidepressants [28-30] and can be confused with relapse or recurrence. As such, there is a need to support GPs and patients through the complexities of antidepressant deprescribing.

    Patients have become increasingly responsible for managing the demands of their own health care [31,32] but are rarely being given the right support or information for how to do so effectively and confidently [31]. For deprescribing, GPs report only providing advice and support upon patient request [24,33]; hence, initiation of the deprescribing process is often left to the patient. However, patients who have approached their GP for antidepressant deprescribing often report becoming disillusioned with their clinician owing to a perceived lack of clinical skills and knowledge, causing them to turn to informal sources for deprescribing advice [34]. Stopping antidepressant medication without proficient GP support can increase the risk of withdrawal effects, relapse, and recommencement of medication [35,36]. As such, there is a need to determine how to best assist patients to make supported and evidenced-based decisions when stopping their antidepressant treatment in conjunction with their GP.

    A web-based support tool called “WiserAD” has been developed to support patients and their GPs to safely and successfully deprescribe unnecessary antidepressant medication. WiserAD is currently being tested in a randomized controlled trial (RCT; see Textbox 1) and offers an opportunity to investigate the mechanisms and contextual factors that may influence the utility of the antidepressant deprescribing activities embedded in WiserAD. Determining how and why WiserAD works and for whom may assist in the implementation and sustainability of antidepressant deprescribing in clinical practice.

    Details about the WiserAD trial.

    WiserAD (Kaylor-Hughes et al, unpublished data, 2022) is a patient-centered, web-based structured support tool for patients and general practitioners (GPs) to safely deprescribe antidepressants while maintaining patients’ mental and physical well-being. WiserAD is based on the “5As” approach (ask, assess, advise, assist and arrange follow-up) to quitting smoking endorsed by the World Health Organization and the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Potential participants will be invited to consider taking part in the WiserAD randomized controlled trial by their GP clinic and will receive a follow-up call by a WiserAD team member who will provide more information about the study and check participant eligibility. Patients will be aged 18-75 years, stable on their selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) for at least 12 months, have no or mild depressive symptoms, and have sufficient English to provide informed consent. Antidepressant users who are currently experiencing or expect to be experiencing a major life event in the next 3 months, are taking an SSRI or SNRI for a reason other than depression, are currently taking a non-SSRI or antipsychotic or another mood stabilizer, or do not have daily access to the internet will be excluded from participation. Once enrolled, participants will be randomly allocated to the WiserAD intervention or attention control group. Participants allocated to receive access to WiserAD will receive a login to the WiserAD portal, which will house their personalized tapering schedule and action plan for the management of any withdrawal symptoms, a daily mood tracker to monitor for changes in mental well-being and education about their antidepressant medication. Participants will only begin deprescribing once the tapering plan has been approved and discussed with their GP. Attention control participants will also be given a login to the WiserAD portal where they will only be able to view an antidepressant medication fact sheet. The WiserAD trial aims to recruit 312 antidepressant users from up to 30 GP clinics in Victoria, Australia.

    Textbox 1. Details about the WiserAD trial.

    Objectives

    The aim of this study is to understand how the WiserAD approach to antidepressant deprescribing works, for whom it is, and in what circumstances can it be implemented. To realize this aim, the following research questions will be answered: What are the experiences and perceptions of WiserAD by antidepressant users? What are the key underlying mechanisms of the WiserAD approach to antidepressant deprescribing? In what contexts and to what extent do the underlying mechanisms work for antidepressant users enrolled in WiserAD?


    Theoretical Approach

    A pragmatic, mixed methods case study with a core convergent design that draws upon the realist evaluation principles of Pawson and Tilley [37] will be used. Realist evaluation and case study designs are complimentary as both approaches aim to investigate how and why complex interventions work, not whether they work [38,39]. Mixed methods case studies can be used to examine a phenomenon from multiple perspectives in a real-life context [39], which allows for more in-depth understanding of a research problem [40]. For example, the exploration of qualitative and quantitative responses across patients who may have different levels of exposure to WiserAD will help to determine how the intervention may be working differently in different contexts and for different people [37]. In convergent mixed method designs, qualitative and quantitative data are collected concurrently and then merged together to enable comparison across and within multiple cases [40].

    Realist evaluations are theory-driven evaluations that are based on an underlying theory of how an intervention (or program) works to trigger an outcome. In a realist evaluation, an initial theory is firstly elicited, and then it is tested and refined [37]. During the elicitation phase, a set of hypotheses (or initial program theories) are articulated using the formula “C + M = O,” where C refers to context, M to mechanism, and O to outcomes [37,38]. Mechanisms are underlying interactions between the resources of a program and the ways in which a participant interprets and responds to them. Mechanisms are central to realist evaluation as they provide an explanation for how and why programs produce outcomes [37,38,41]. Contexts are factors in situations that are not part of a program but interact, modify, and influence the program and how mechanisms may operate [37,38,41]. Outcomes are the intended and unintended consequences of a program and are generated by the activation of mechanisms and contexts [37].

    Realist evaluations are conducted across three phases: (1) eliciting and formulating the initial program theory, (2) testing the initial program theory, and (3) building a refined program theory [37,42]. An initial program theory has already been formulated and is ready for testing in the current study. As such, phase 1 has been completed, and the focus of this protocol is how we propose to test the initial theory in phase 2 and present the results in phase 3 (see Figure 1). The RAMESES (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses–Evolving Standards) II reporting standards for realist evaluations [41,43] also informed the design of the 3 phases.

    ‎
    Figure 1. The 3 phases of a mixed methods case study with realist evaluation of the WiserAD approach to antidepressant deprescribing. GP: general practitioner.
    View this figure

    Phase 1: Eliciting and Formulating the Initial Program Theory

    Phase 1 has been completed. Briefly, 4 data sources were used to develop the initial program theory. First, separate focus groups with GPs (n=8) and individuals with a history of long-term AD use (current or past; n=9) were conducted in 2019 at the Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne (Kaylor-Hughes et al, unpublished data, 2022). The focus groups were analyzed thematically to identify barriers and facilitators to antidepressant deprescribing and inform the development of the first prototype of the WiserAD intervention. Second, a scoping review of 50 deprescribing interventions being used in general practice for any condition and medication was conducted in 2021 [44]. The scoping review identified key deprescribing activities and provided additional steps to create a self-sustaining deprescribing process loop for use in clinical practice. Third, a qualitative case study examined the reasons that 178 general practice patients with depressive symptoms gave for reducing or stopping their antidepressant medications (Coe et al, unpublished data, 2022). Thematic analysis was used to identify if the reasons why antidepressant users reduce or stop using antidepressants in a naturalistic setting could inform features of an antidepressant deprescribing intervention. Finally, a 2021 web-based qualitative survey was completed by 30 members of 2 web-based support groups for antidepressant deprescribing (Abid et al, unpublished data, 2022). This survey examined the motivations of participants for joining a web-based support group as well as their past and current experiences with deprescribing.

    Initial Program Theory

    The findings from the studies in phase 1 have informed the initial program theory for how WiserAD may work, which is presented in the subsequent section (see Figure 2). It is expected that antidepressant users will have minimal prior knowledge of antidepressant deprescribing [26] (Coe et al, unpublished data, 2022). Participants may have also had limited clinical advice when initially being prescribed antidepressant medications with subsequent unsuccessful deprescribing attempts in the past [26] (Abid et al, unpublished data, 2022; Kaylor-Hughes et al, unpublished data, 2022). Despite the anticipated lack of deprescribing knowledge, it is anticipated that participants will be interested in or express a desire and willingness to deprescribe when presented with the opportunity [45,46].

    ‎
    Figure 2. Conceptual context–mechanism–outcome framework for antidepressant deprescribing. AD: antidepressant; GP: general practitioner.
    View this figure

    The following potential WiserAD mechanisms are expected to trigger deprescribing: (1) initiation of and participating in shared decision-making with GP regarding antidepressant deprescribing [26,35,44,47]; (2) patient education (participants will be assessed for, and informed of, their eligibility to deprescribe on the basis of the stability of their mental well-being, information about antidepressant medication, and withdrawal symptoms and daily check-ins of their depressive symptom status) [26,44,48] (Abid et al, unpublished data, 2022; Kaylor-Hughes et al, unpublished data, 2022); (3) guidance (provided with a tapering plan that is supported by a GP and a research nurse) [26,35,44,47], (Kaylor-Hughes et al, unpublished data, 2022); (4) relational support (GPs, family, and friends are supportive of deprescribing) [26]; and (5) technical support (patient feels supported by the WiserAD tool and processes; for example, the research nurse) [26,44]. These mechanisms will work by increasing participant empowerment, confidence, and self-management and by positively challenging participant beliefs about antidepressant medication, allowing participants to at least intend to or have commenced deprescribing or successfully complete deprescribing.

    Phase 2: Testing the Initial Program Theory

    Testing of the initial program theory will be conducted as a mixed methods case study realist evaluation. The realist evaluation will be carried out in the early stages (participant recruitment to 3-month follow-up) of the WiserAD trial and will form a multiple case study of up to 12 WiserAD participants from the intervention and control arms. Three-month follow-up has been chosen, as this will capture the context–mechanism–outcome configuration related to early decision-making by participants regarding the initiation of antidepressant deprescribing and the resulting outcome. The 5 outcomes presented in Figure 2 anticipate the different stages that participants may be in at 3-month follow-up. These outcomes acknowledge that participants may take longer or shorter periods of time to taper their medication. As this evaluation focuses on how, why, and who WiserAD works for, it will determine all possible outcomes of an approach to antidepressant deprescribing rather than showing if it works. The effectiveness of WiserAD on successful deprescribing will be shown at the completion of the WiserAD RCT where an additional evaluation may be carried out and presented in a future publication.

    Recruitment and Consent

    All participants will have been invited to complete an interview at the time of enrollment in the trial. Participants from the intervention and control arms who agreed to an interview will then be purposively selected on the basis of their age, gender, and level of use of the web-based WiserAD tool (ie, the number of logins to the website in the 3 months since enrollment into the trial) and their GP clinic to ensure diversity of experiences. When participants reach 3 months post commencing participation in the trial, author AC will send an email with a plain-language statement to reinvite them to an interview. AC will then follow up the email with a phone call within 7-10 days. Interested participants will then be booked in to complete the interview at a mutually convenient time.

    Data Collection

    Quantitative data from the WiserAD study collected at baseline and 3-month follow-up from interview participants will be used in this study. Surveys will be completed digitally, though, if required, the surveys can be completed via telephone or video call or in person at the participants GP clinic. The baseline survey will collect demographic information and both the baseline and 3-month follow-up surveys will ask questions about participant self-management, skills, confidence, and knowledge (Patient Activation Measure–Mental Health) [49], beliefs about their antidepressants (Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire) [50], and current emotional health and well-being symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) [51], including those of generalized anxiety disorder; (7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale [52]). WiserAD website usage data will be analyzed to determine the number of logins, number of times pages were looked at, and how much time was spent on each page. The survey has been tested and approved by antidepressant users with lived experience of depression.

    Interviews with WiserAD participants will be conducted by a PhD researcher (AC) at 3-month follow-up to further identify and understand the mechanisms of impact that WiserAD has on antidepressant deprescribing. Interviews will be conducted via telephone, video call, or in person. Each interview will last approximately 60 minutes. A narrative interview approach will be taken to allow the participant to naturally report potential mechanisms, contexts, and outcomes without the risk of interviewer bias. The interview process will be guided by the narrative interviewing phases, as suggested by Jovchelovitch and Bauer [53], namely, preparation (formulation of questions), initiation (posing or formulating the topic for narration), main narration (allowing interviewee to talk without interruption), questioning phase (prompting interviewee to continue narration), and conclusion of talk [53]. The phases of narrative interviewing are designed to elicit rich narration rather than falling into a pattern of question-answer with the interviewee.

    Sample Size

    When conducting qualitative studies, a sample size is deemed adequate when no new information (or data saturation) has been reached [54]. However, for realist evaluations, reaching saturation occurs by exploring a combination of qualitative and quantitative data along with the information obtained when formulating the initial program theory [55]. Additionally, the descriptive statistics that will be generated in this study do not require a minimum sample size. This study will be guided by the case study design recommendation of a minimum sample size of 4-10 participants [40]. As this is a novel area of research, a target sample size of 10-12 participants will used to ensure thoroughness and depth.

    Data Analysis

    Quantitative Data

    Quantitative data (numerical and closed-question data) will be coded and prepared for analysis in Stata (version 17; StataCorp) [56]. Summary statistics in the form of descriptives (means and SDs for continuous data and frequencies and percentages for categorical data) will be calculated, and repeated measures t tests will be performed to compare survey data at baseline and 3-month follow-up. Data will be described and graphically represented. Identification of missing values will first be achieved through web-based assessment, and the Little Missing Completely at Random test [57] will be performed.

    Qualitative Interview Data

    Narrative interviews will be audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Anonymized transcripts will be uploaded to NVivo (version 12; QSR International) [58] for management, coding, and analysis. Data will be coded as a context, mechanism, or outcome. Coding, analysis, and interpretations will be conducted iteratively via discussion among study team members. Independent double-coding of the transcripts will be completed by 2 study team members.

    Data Converging

    In accordance with convergent mixed method designs, qualitative and quantitative data will be collected and analyzed concurrently to generate cases (the main subject of study in a case study) [39,40]. These cases will represent an individual participant in the WiserAD trial. Cases will be analyzed separately and then compared across cases to determine any similar or opposing evidence through data triangulation and theme matching (Figure 3).

    ‎
    Figure 3. Concurrent triangulation of data.
    View this figure

    Phase 3: Building a Refined Program Theory

    In phase 3, triangulation of the quantitative and qualitative data from phase 2 will be used to check and, if necessary, adapt the initial program theory to create a refined program theory showing what works, for whom, and in what circumstances, for successful antidepressant deprescribing. The refined theory will be discussed in depth by the WiserAD research and investigator team that comprises experts in primary care, nursing, health economics, psychiatry, psychology, pharmacology, and business management. Experts will provide validation or disconfirmation of the program theory on the basis of their own experiences and knowledge. This feedback will be used to apply final refinements to the theory. The final refined theory will inform any necessary changes to the web-based WiserAD support tool prior to implementation into clinical practice.

    Ethical Considerations

    Ethical approval for this study has been granted by the University of Melbourne Human Ethics Committee (#20558). Participants will receive a plain-language statement that will detail the aims of the study, what participation involves and, information regarding privacy and confidentiality of data. Confirmation of consent will be given verbally at the time of the interview, which will be audio-recorded with the participants’ permission. Consent to take part in the interview will also be indicated by continued participation in the interview. Participants will be asked for permission to have their interview audio-recorded and will be informed that they are free to decline, and if they consent, they are free to discontinue the recording or interview at any time. No participant details will be stored with the audio recordings or transcripts, both of which will receive a study identification number. Participants will be informed that any names mentioned in the interviews will be anonymized in the transcript. All quantitative data will be deidentified prior to being provided to AC for analysis by the WiserAD data manager. After completing the interview, participants will receive an Aus $50 (US $33.5) gift card as reimbursement for their time.


    The WiserAD trial commenced in May 2022. Sample size requirements for the realist evaluation were reached by November 2022 with the anticipated completion date for the current study being March 2023. Dissemination of the study findings will occur via peer-reviewed publications, public presentations, and a PhD thesis in 2023.


    Expected Findings

    This protocol presents a mixed methods case study with realist evaluation of the web-based WiserAD support tool. This will be an evaluation of the first participants in the WiserAD RCT and aims to understand how the WiserAD approach to antidepressant deprescribing works, for whom it is intended, and in what circumstances can it be implemented. Quantitative survey data and qualitative interview data will provide information about participants’ experiences and perceptions of WiserAD to confirm and refine an initial theory of how antidepressant deprescribing may work in general practice. It is anticipated that initiation of deprescribing, guidance, provision of education about deprescribing, relational support, and technical support will be drivers for patients to intend to or be actively deprescribing their antidepressant.

    Only one realist evaluation of a deprescribing intervention has been conducted to date, which investigated the impact of providing an educational brochure about benzodiazepines to older adults in the community [46]. Martin and Tannenbaum [46] reported that by improving knowledge about medication, patients’ self-efficacy to deprescribe also increased. As detailed earlier in this protocol, it is expected that education and increased self-efficacy will also impact patients’ decision to deprescribe their antidepressants. To our knowledge, this will be the first realist evaluation of an antidepressant deprescribing intervention in general practice and will contribute empirical and theory-informed novel findings about the mechanisms underlying antidepressant deprescribing. It will advance knowledge of antidepressant user experiences of deprescribing in general practice and provide a theoretical contribution to the deprescribing literature. Specifically, it will help determine what general practice patients need in order to successfully and safely deprescribe their antidepressant. It will also enhance knowledge about how to support patients to make decisions about their own antidepressant treatment.

    Strengths and Limitations

    This study sample will satisfy the sample size requirements of a case study design; however, a sample of 12 participants is small. Additionally, the duration of antidepressant deprescribing may occur over a time period that is longer than 3 months. Therefore, future evaluation of the WiserAD approach to deprescribing should be conducted upon completion of the RCT. The use of mixed methods over a singular data collection method is a strength of this study and will allow for a better understanding of participants’ experiences with the WiserAD approach to antidepressant deprescribing. Mixed methods designs are also used to provide in-depth, rigorous evidence of a phenomenon; thus, we can be confident that the findings of this study will make an important contribution to the literature.

    Conclusions

    This will be the first realist evaluation of an approach to antidepressant deprescribing in general practice. The findings from this study will provide insight into patients’ experiences and perceptions of antidepressant deprescribing and thus increase the current understanding of the factors that influence the occurrence of deprescribing in clinical practice.

    Acknowledgments

    WiserAD is funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council (grant 1157337). AC is a recipient of an Australian Rotary Health (Rotary Club of Richmond and the Kaiyu Rotary Club) PhD scholarship.

    Data Availability

    The data sets generated or analyzed in this study will not be publicly available as the proposed sample size is small and could compromise the privacy of research participants. Additionally, consent and ethical approval for this study does not include a provision for the sharing of data from this study.

    Authors' Contributions

    All authors contributed to the conceptualization and design of the study. AC drafted the manuscript. All authors revised all drafts.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    1. Pharmaceutical Market. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.   URL: https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?DataSetCode=HEALTH_PHMC [accessed 2022-12-20]
    2. Mental health services in Australia: in brief 2019. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.   URL: https:/​/www.​aihw.gov.au/​reports/​mental-health-services/​mental-health-services-in-australia-in-brief-2019/​summary [accessed 2022-12-20]
    3. Iacobucci G. NICE updates antidepressant guidelines to reflect severity and length of withdrawal symptoms. BMJ 2019 Oct 18;367:l6103 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Malhi GS, Bell E, Bassett D, Boyce P, Bryant R, Hazell P, et al. The 2020 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for mood disorders. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2021 Jan;55(1):7-117 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). In: The Grants Register 2018. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2018.
    6. Mojtabai R, Olfson M. Proportion of antidepressants prescribed without a psychiatric diagnosis is growing. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011 Aug;30(8):1434-1442 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Huijbregts KM, Hoogendoorn A, Slottje P, van Balkom AJLM, Batelaan NM. Long-term and short-term antidepressant use in general practice: aata from a large cohort in the Netherlands. Psychother Psychosom 2017;86(6):362-369 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Mojtabai R, Olfson M. National trends in long-term use of antidepressant medications. J Clin Psychiatry 2013 Dec 10;75(02):169-177 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
    9. Read J, Gee A, Diggle J, Butler H. Staying on, and coming off, antidepressants: the experiences of 752 UK adults. Addict Behav 2019 Jan;88:82-85 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Verhaak PFM, de Beurs D, Spreeuwenberg P. What proportion of initially prescribed antidepressants is still being prescribed chronically after 5 years in general practice? A longitudinal cohort analysis. BMJ Open 2019 Feb 05;9(2):e024051 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Kelly K, Posternak M, Jonathan E. Toward achieving optimal response: understanding and managing antidepressant side effects. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2022 Apr 01;10(4):409-418 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
    12. Ramic E, Prasko S, Gavran L, Spahic E. Assessment of the antidepressant side effects occurrence in patients treated in primary care. Mater Sociomed 2020 Jun;32(2):131-134 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Bet PM, Hugtenburg J, Penninx B, Hoogendijk W. Side effects of antidepressants during long-term use in a naturalistic setting. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2013 Nov;23(11):1443-1451 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Anglin R, Yuan Y, Moayyedi P, Tse F, Armstrong D, Leontiadis G. Risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors with or without concurrent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2014 Jun;109(6):811-819 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Maslej MM, Bolker B, Russell M, Eaton K, Durisko Z, Hollon S, et al. The mortality and myocardial effects of antidepressants are moderated by preexisting cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis. Psychother Psychosom 2017;86(5):268-282 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Gafoor R, Booth H, Gulliford M. Antidepressant utilisation and incidence of weight gain during 10 years' follow-up: population based cohort study. BMJ 2018 May 23;361:k1951 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Cartwright C, Gibson K, Read J, Cowan O, Dehar T. Long-term antidepressant use: patient perspectives of benefits and adverse effects. PPA 2016 Jul;Volume 10:1401-1407 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
    18. Ambresin G, Palmer V, Densley K, Dowrick C, Gilchrist G, Gunn J. What factors influence long-term antidepressant use in primary care? Findings from the Australian diamond cohort study. J Affect Disord 2015 May 01;176:125-132 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Davidson SK, Romaniuk H, Chondros P, Dowrick C, Pirkis J, Herrman H, et al. Antidepressant treatment for primary care patients with depressive symptoms: data from the longitudinal cohort study. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2020 Apr;54(4):367-381 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    20. Australia’s health 2020: data insights. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.   URL: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/australias-health/australias-health-2020-data-insights/summary [accessed 2022-12-20]
    21. Woodward MC. Deprescribing: achieving better health outcomes for older people through reducing medications. J Pharm Pract Res 2003;33:323-328 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
    22. Ailabouni NJ, Nishtala P, Mangin D, Tordoff J. Challenges and enablers of deprescribing: a general practitioner perspective. PLoS One 2016;11(4):e0151066 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. Scholten W, Batelaan N, Van Balkom A. Barriers to discontinuing antidepressants in patients with depressive and anxiety disorders: a review of the literature and clinical recommendations. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol 2020;10:2045125320933404 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Ellen VL, Anthierens S, van Driel ML, Sutter A, Branden EVD, Christiaens T. 'Never change a winning team': GPs' perspectives on discontinuation of long-term antidepressants. Scand J Prim Health Care 2021 Dec;39(4):533-542 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    25. Van Leeuwen E, Anthierens S, van Driel ML, De Sutter A, De Beir R, Christiaens T. Should I, can I, dare I? Patients' view on stopping long-term antidepressant use, a qualitative study. Acta Clin Belg 2022 Dec;77(6):962-969 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Maund E, Dewar-Haggart R, Williams S, Bowers H, Geraghty A, Leydon G, et al. Barriers and facilitators to discontinuing antidepressant use: a systematic review and thematic synthesis. J Affect Disord 2019 Feb 15;245:38-62 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. Bosman R, Huijbregts K, Verhaak P, Ruhé H, van Marwijk HW, van Balkom AJ, et al. Long-term antidepressant use: a qualitative study on perspectives of patients and GPs in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2016 Aug 15;66(651):e708-e719 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
    28. Fava GA, Gatti A, Belaise C, Guidi J, Offidani E. Withdrawal symptoms after selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor discontinuation: a systematic review. Psychother Psychosom 2015;84(2):72-81 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Maund E, Stuart B, Moore M, Dowrick C, Geraghty A, Dawson S, et al. Managing antidepressant discontinuation: a systematic review. Ann Fam Med 2019 Jan;17(1):52-60 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Jha MK, Rush A, Trivedi M. When discontinuing SSRI antidepressants is a challenge: management tips. Am J Psychiatry 2018 Dec 01;175(12):1176-1184 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. May CR, Eton D, Boehmer K, Gallacher K, Hunt K, MacDonald S, et al. Rethinking the patient: using Burden of Treatment Theory to understand the changing dynamics of illness. BMC Health Serv Res 2014 Jun 26;14:281 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    32. Duncan P, Duerden M, Payne R. Deprescribing: a primary care perspective. Eur J Hosp Pharm 2017 Jan;24(1):37-42 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    33. Doherty A, Boland P, Reed J, Clegg A, Stephani A, Williams N, et al. Barriers and facilitators to deprescribing in primary care: a systematic review. BJGP Open 2020 Jul 28;4(3):bjgpopen20X101096 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
    34. White E, Read J, Julo S. The role of Facebook groups in the management and raising of awareness of antidepressant withdrawal: is social media filling the void left by health services? Ther Adv Psychopharmacol 2021;11:2045125320981174 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    35. Leydon GM, Rodgers L, Kendrick T. A qualitative study of patient views on discontinuing long-term selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Fam Pract 2007 Dec;24(6):570-575 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    36. van Geffen ECG, Hermsen J, Heerdink E, Egberts A, Verbeek-Heida P, van Hulten R. The decision to continue or discontinue treatment: experiences and beliefs of users of selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors in the initial months--a qualitative study. Res Social Adm Pharm 2011 Jun;7(2):134-150 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    37. Kaboub F. Realistic Evaluation. Soc Sci J 2019 Dec 09;41(1):153-154. [CrossRef]
    38. Westhorp G. Realist impact evaluation: an introduction. In: Overseas Development Institute. London: Methods Lab; 2014.
    39. Yin RK. Case Study Research Design and Methods (5th edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2014.
    40. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2017.
    41. Greenhalgh T, Wong G, Jagosh J, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, Westhorp G, et al. Protocol--the RAMESES II study: developing guidance and reporting standards for realist evaluation. BMJ Open 2015 Aug 03;5(8):e008567 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    42. Mukumbang FC, Marchal B, Van Belle S, van Wyk B. Unearthing how, why, for whom and under what health system conditions the antiretroviral treatment adherence club intervention in South Africa works: A realist theory refining approach. BMC Health Serv Res 2018 May 09;18(1):343 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    43. Wong G, Westhorp G, Manzano A, Greenhalgh J, Jagosh J, Greenhalgh T. RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluations. BMC Med 2016 Jun 24;14(1):96 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    44. Coe A, Kaylor-Hughes C, Fletcher S, Murray E, Gunn J. Deprescribing intervention activities mapped to guiding principles for use in general practice: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2021 Sep 06;11(9):e052547 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    45. Reeve E, Anthony A, Kouladjian O'Donnell L, Low L, Ogle S, Glendenning J, et al. Development and pilot testing of the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing questionnaire for people with cognitive impairment. Australas J Ageing 2018 Dec;37(4):E150-E154 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    46. Martin P, Tannenbaum C. A realist evaluation of patients' decisions to deprescribe in the EMPOWER trial. BMJ Open 2017 May 04;7(4):e015959 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    47. Verbeek-Heida PM, Mathot E. Better safe than sorry--why patients prefer to stop using selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants but are afraid to do so: results of a qualitative study. Chronic Illn 2006 Jun;2(2):133-142 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    48. Dills H, Shah K, Messinger-Rapport B, Bradford K, Syed Q. Deprescribing medications for chronic diseases management in primary care settings: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2018 Nov;19(11):923-935.e2 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    49. Green CA, Perrin N, Polen M, Leo M, Hibbard J, Tusler M. Development of the Patient Activation Measure for mental health. Adm Policy Ment Health 2010 Jul;37(4):327-333 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    50. Horne R, Weinman J, Hankins M. The beliefs about medicines questionnaire: the development and evaluation of a new method for assessing the cognitive representation of medication. Psychology & Health 1999 Jan;14(1):1-24. [CrossRef]
    51. Kroenke K, Spitzer R, Williams J. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001 Sep;16(9):606-613 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    52. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams J, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-1097 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    53. Jovchelovitch S, Bauer M. Narrative interviewing. In: Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound. London: Sage Publications; 2000.
    54. Fusch P, Ness L. Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. TQR 2015 Sep 8;20(9):1408-1416. [CrossRef]
    55. Greenhalgh T, Pawson R, Wong G, Westhorp G, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, et al. The Realist Interview: The RAMESES II Project. 2017.   URL: http://www.ramesesproject.org/media/RAMESES_II_Realist_interviewing.pdf [accessed 2022-12-20]
    56. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 17. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC; 2021.
    57. Little RJA. A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. J Am Stat Assoc 1988 Dec;83(404):1198-1202 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
    58. NVivo (Version 12).   URL: https:/​/www.​qsrinternational.com/​nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/​support-services/​nvivo-downloads [accessed 2022-12-20]

    ‎
    GP: general practitioner
    RAMESES: Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses–Evolving Standards
    RCT: randomized controlled trial

    Edited by A Mavragani; submitted 08.09.22; peer-reviewed by E Van Leeuwen, E Mancinelli, H Kim; comments to author 07.11.22; revised version received 24.11.22; accepted 14.12.22; published 29.12.22

    Copyright

    ©Amy Coe, Jane Gunn, Catherine Kaylor-Hughes. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 29.12.2022.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.