This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Scoping Review Protocols (157) Medicine 2.0: Social Media, Open, Participatory, Collaborative Medicine (1573) Infoveillance, Infodemiology, Digital Disease Surveillance, Infodemic Management (1015) Pregnancy Information, Education and Lifestyle Interventions (284) Infodemiology and Infoveillance (1278) Infoveillance and Social Listening (181)

Published on in Vol 11, No 3 (2022): March

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/34421, first published .
The Volume and Tone of Twitter Posts About Cannabis Use During Pregnancy: Protocol for a Scoping Review

The Volume and Tone of Twitter Posts About Cannabis Use During Pregnancy: Protocol for a Scoping Review

The Volume and Tone of Twitter Posts About Cannabis Use During Pregnancy: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Authors of this article:

Liam Cresswell1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Lisette Espin-Noboa3 Author Orcid Image ;   Malia S Q Murphy1 Author Orcid Image ;   Serine Ramlawi1 Author Orcid Image ;   Mark C Walker1, 4, 5, 6, 7 Author Orcid Image ;   Márton Karsai3 Author Orcid Image ;   Daniel J Corsi1, 4, 5, 6, 8 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (3) Tweetations (9) Metrics

    Protocol

    1Obstetrics & Maternal Newborn Investigations Research Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada

    2Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

    3Department of Network and Data Science, Central European University, Vienna, Austria

    4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

    5School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

    6Better Outcomes Registry & Network Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada

    7International and Global Health Office, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

    8CHEO Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada

    Corresponding Author:

    Daniel J Corsi, PhD

    CHEO Research Institute

    501 Smyth Rd

    Centre for Practice Changing Research, Room L1242, Box 241

    Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6

    Canada

    Phone: 1 613 737 8899

    Email: dcorsi@ohri.ca


    Background: Cannabis use has increased in Canada since its legalization in 2018, including among pregnant women who may be motivated to use cannabis to reduce symptoms of nausea and vomiting. However, a growing body of research suggests that cannabis use during pregnancy may harm the developing fetus. As a result, patients increasingly seek medical advice from online sources, but these platforms may also spread anecdotal descriptions or misinformation. Given the possible disconnect between online messaging and evidence-based research about the effects of cannabis use during pregnancy, there is a potential for advice taken from social media to affect the health of mothers and their babies.

    Objective: This study aims to quantify the volume and tone of English language posts related to cannabis use in pregnancy from January 2012 to December 2021.

    Methods: Modeling published frameworks for scoping reviews, we will collect publicly available posts from Twitter that mention cannabis use during pregnancy and use the Twitter Application Programming Interface for Academic Research to extract data from tweets, including public metrics such as the number of likes, retweets, and quotes, as well as health effect mentions, sentiment, location, and users’ interests. These data will be used to quantify how cannabis use during pregnancy is discussed on Twitter and to build a qualitative profile of supportive and opposing posters.

    Results: The CHEO Research Ethics Board reviewed our project and granted an exemption in May 2021. As of December 2021, we have gained approval to use the Twitter Application Programming Interface for Academic Research and have developed a preliminary search strategy that returns over 3 million unique tweets posted between 2012 and 2021.

    Conclusions: Understanding how Twitter is being used to discuss cannabis use during pregnancy will help public health agencies and health care providers assess the messaging patients may be receiving and develop communication strategies to counter misinformation, especially in geographical regions where legalization is recent or imminent. Most importantly, we foresee that our findings will assist expecting families in making informed choices about where they choose to access advice about using cannabis during pregnancy.

    Trial Registration: Open Science Framework 10.17605/OSF.IO/BW8DA; www.osf.io/6fb2e

    International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/34421

    JMIR Res Protoc 2022;11(3):e34421

    doi:10.2196/34421

    Keywords

    cannabis; pregnancy; health information; social media; Twitter 


    Recreational cannabis use has increased in Canada since its legalization in 2018, including among pregnant women [1]. Reductions in the perceived harms of cannabis use may occur around legalization, and as a result, pregnant women or individuals may find the activity to be low risk [2]. Cannabis and its derivative products are often marketed online as safe [3]. Certain groups and dispensaries may even promote the use of cannabis products during pregnancy for their antinausea and antiemetic effects [4,5]. Expecting mothers may also use the drug to stimulate appetite or treat depression, motivated by the perception that cannabis is natural and thus preferable to prescription medications [6]. However, a growing body of research suggests that cannabis and derivative products during pregnancy may harm the developing fetus. Cannabinoids readily cross the placenta and interfere with the endogenous cannabinoid system, a cell-signaling network that assists in neurodevelopment [7]. Consequently, maternal cannabis use has been associated with fetal growth restriction, higher rates of childhood affective disorders, and a greater incidence of learning disability and autism spectrum disorders among offspring [8-10].

    Pregnant patients increasingly seek medical and health advice on online platforms, especially for emerging topics like cannabis use [11,12]. Although medical professionals and research groups may use these avenues to promote research findings, other Twitter users may use social media to promote commercial interests, share anecdotal stories, or spread misinformation [13-15]. For example, a 2019 study by Ishida et al [16] found that those who primarily rely on social media for their health information were 31% more likely than others to endorse the claim that cannabis use during pregnancy is safe and 56% more likely to endorse any form of misinformation about cannabis.

    Given the possible disconnect between online messaging and evidence-based research about the effects of cannabis use during pregnancy, there is the possibility that advice taken from social media could have inaccuracies that may affect the health of mothers and their babies. Here, we propose a systematic search of Twitter to quantify the volume and tone of posts on the forum related to cannabis use in pregnancy. Twitter is a global platform, and our findings may have relevance in Canada, the United States, and other jurisdictions where access and availability to cannabis are increasing due to legalization. We will assess regional correlations in these data to determine if changes in the legalization of nonmedical cannabis affect online messaging of its use during pregnancy in Canada and states in the United States that have legalized recreational cannabis.


    Overview

    With reference to Arksey and O’Malley’s [17] framework for scoping reviews, we will synthesize publicly available posts from Twitter to determine how cannabis use during pregnancy is being discussed on the platform [17]. The steps, as outlined by this framework and adapted for a Twitter-based analysis, will be:

    • Identifying the research question
    • Identifying relevant Twitter posts
    • Selecting eligible Twitter posts
    • Charting the data
    • Collating, summarizing, and reporting the results

    Past research from Cavazos-Rehg et al [18] has identified Twitter as a good source for analyzing online discussions about cannabis use because of its popularity and acceptance of substance use disclosure. We will use this to model a novel scoping review approach to explore Twitter posts about cannabis use during pregnancy. We will report our findings following the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) [19].

    Step 1: Identifying the Research Question

    How is cannabis use during pregnancy discussed on Twitter regarding the volume, tone, content, and authors/users?

    Step 2: Identifying Relevant Twitter Posts

    Our search strategy will follow an iterative approach according to our population, concept, and context of interest (Textbox 1). We will first use Twitter’s native search function to conduct a preliminary scan of English language tweets about cannabis use during pregnancy and assemble a list of commonly used keywords and hashtags based on our findings. We will then refine our list to capture the breadth of online discussion while excluding mimicker terms (eg, non–drug-related uses of the word “high”). Finally, our search strategy will include a list of terms for pregnancy combined with terms for cannabis to search the Twitter Application Programming Interface (API; Textbox 2), for example, (pregnancy OR pregnant OR prenatal) AND (cannabis OR weed OR pot OR marijuana), with the final search strategy to be developed following preliminary findings. We will use the Twitter API for Academic Research for data collection. We will perform a full archive search of all English language tweets containing the keywords of interest posted from January 2012, when Colorado became the first English-speaking jurisdiction to legalize cannabis, to December 2021 [20].

    Population, Concept, Context framework.

    Population

    Twitter posts containing information relevant to pregnancy or pregnant individuals

    Concept

    Discussion or mention of cannabis use in relation to pregnancy or the developing fetus

    Context

    All English language Twitter posts (tweets) made from January 2012 to December 2021. Geographical analyses will be restricted to Canada and states in the United States where recreational cannabis use is legal.

    Textbox 1. Population, Concept, Context framework.
    List of keywords related to cannabis use in pregnancy used to search the Twitter Application Programming Interface.

    Pregnancy related 

    Pregnancy, pregnant, baby, fetus, fetal, prenatal, perinatal, womb, preggo, “pregnant life,” “baby bump,” “mom to be,” “mommy to be,” “baby on the way,” “preggers,” “pregnant af”

    Cannabis related

    cannabis, weed, pot, marijuana, marihuana, MJ, ganja, purp, bud, keef, kief, dope, “mary jane,” thc, cbd, cannamom, opiate, mdma, ecstasy, mmj, medical marijuana, blunt, bong, budder, hash, hemp, indica, kush, reefer, sativa

    Textbox 2. List of keywords related to cannabis use in pregnancy used to search the Twitter Application Programming Interface.

    Step 3: Selecting Eligible Twitter Posts

    Following the Twitter Archive search, we will preprocess the corpora to filter out content unrelated to cannabis use during pregnancy. Additionally, we will remove bot accounts [21], and tweets without geotags will be further analyzed to infer a location from their authors’ profile [22,23] (Figure 1). We will filter out all tweets containing our keywords but that are unrelated to the consumption of cannabis during pregnancy via a symmetric semantic search using Sentence Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) [24]. This search assigns a score to each tweet for each given query (Textbox 3). The higher the score, the more semantically close the tweet is to the query. Tweets with a score lower than, for example, 0.6 for all queries are discarded since they are likely unrelated. The cutoff value of 0.6 was selected here for illustrative purposes. In the final analysis, we will tune this parameter and select the score that gives optimal classification results. We will also perform a topical context analysis to provide meaning and classify tweets by performing a semantic community detection using Sentence BERT [24]. We will use the “Fast clustering” algorithm together with “all-MiniLM-L6-v2” a pretrained sentence-transformer model for large-scale data sets [25]. In this model, we will set the minimum size of communities (or clusters) to 10 and a threshold similarity of 0.6. In other words, clusters will contain at least 10 tweets, and the similarity between tweets of the same cluster will be at least 60%. We will further classify related tweets into broad categories related to cannabis during pregnancy and medical cannabis or cannabis and youth, or legalization of cannabis. In addition, we will classify tweets related to cannabis during pregnancy into commercial, anecdotal/conversational/babble, misinformation, memes, and research studies.

    Note, that most irrelevant tweets are pruned out by Sentence BERT in the preprocessing phase (Figure 1). We will evaluate the accuracy of this filtering by randomly sampling both types of tweets and label them as relevant or irrelevant by three independent reviewers and report precision and recall based on majority voting. Similarly, in the clustering phase, we will revise the inferred clusters and merge (if necessary) those that might be related to the same topical context.

    ‎
    Figure 1. Overview of the proposed data collection methodology, preprocessing, and analytical process for tweets about cannabis use during pregnancy. SBERT: Sentence Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers.
    View this figure
    Queries passed to the symmetric semantic search of Sentence Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers.

    Queries

    • Cannabis during pregnancy
    • Kids, children, and youth smoking cannabis
    • Smoking cannabis while pregnant
    • Medical cannabis for people
    • The effects of cannabis on pregnant women
    • Legalization of cannabis
    • Smoking or consuming drugs during pregnancy
    Textbox 3. Queries passed to the symmetric semantic search of Sentence Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers.

    Step 4: Charting the Data

    Data charting will include an automated analysis of all tweets returned by our search. A manual analysis will then be conducted on the smaller subset of tweets included during the process outlined in Step 2.

    Using the Twitter API for Academic Research [26], we will collect the timestamp of each returned tweet and analyze its text for sentiment (positive or negative) by integrating with the Natural Language Toolkit in Python and other techniques such as latent Dirichlet allocation [27], Sentence BERT [24], or recurrent neural networks [28]. We will also analyze the number and types of health effects mentioned in association with cannabis use in pregnancy and will extract location data when available from each tweet, either from geotagged tweets or from the location associated with the user’s profile [29].

    Three independent reviewers will manually review the smaller subset of randomly sampled tweets. We will verify the number of favorites and retweets each tweet has received against the automatic data collection via the API. We will use publicly available user lists to determine the category of organization or individual user that posted the tweet (government or public health agency, obstetrical society/network, university, hospital, news outlet, cannabis industry source, or other individual) [30], and we will manually (via majority voting from three reviewers) assign a category for organizations not appearing on the user lists. Finally, we will assess if the tweet mentions positive or adverse health effects on mothers or developing fetus/infants, and the specific health effects mentioned. For each tweet, data will be extracted by one reviewer and validated by a second reviewer. A third independent reviewer will resolve discrepancies if they arise.

    Separately, we will also extract CENSUS or population-level data on birth rates and maternal and infant mortality rates across the study period in Canada and the United States. It has been shown that Twitter is a good proxy to infer health-related statistics, including teenage birth rates [31]. Thus, we want to verify whether certain geographical areas with certain CENSUS characteristics behave similarly with respect to their opinions on cannabis use during pregnancy. These vital statistics data will be sourced from Statistics Canada and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States [32,33].

    Step 5: Collating, Summarizing, and Reporting the Results

    We will first report the total number of tweets returned over the search period and temporal trends in the number of tweets posted over the study period. Next, the number of tweets sampled in the automated and manual analyses will be reported. From the automated analysis, we will report the number and percentage of the returned posts that discuss cannabis use during pregnancy positively or negatively as determined by our sentiment analysis. Subsequently, we will calculate the standardized mean difference in the number of favorites and retweets received by positive and negative tweets, and to compute the odds (ratio) that positive posts originate from each category of organization or individual and mention health effects. We will further calculate the number of times each health effect was mentioned as a percentage of the total health effect mentions. These statistics will be presented in tabular form.

    The location-based component of our analysis will be restricted to tweets that offer location data and originate from Canada and legal states within the United States, as these are the only English-speaking regions that have legalized the sale of nonmedical cannabis. If any regions (eg, New Zealand or the United Kingdom) legalize cannabis before our analysis is conducted, this restriction will be changed to include them. We will match location data from these jurisdictions to the timestamp for each tweet to calculate the proportion of tweets originating from our predefined geographical regions for each week of the search period. Next, we will visualize each region on a line graph that plots time versus the volume of posts with a marker to indicate when that region legalized cannabis. A line graph that plots time versus percentage of positive posts will be plotted using the same process. We will then use a repeated cross-sectional design to analyze the correlation of these data with population-level vital statistics data and determine if trends in cannabis messaging on Twitter correlate with birth rates and maternal and infant mortality rates.

    In addition to these numerical analyses, we will develop qualitative profiles of influential accounts. These profiles will include elements such as the user’s background (eg, political leaning, socioeconomic status, or education/interests); their Twitter following; whether Twitter has verified their account as “authentic, notable, and active” [34]; and how they contribute to the discussion about cannabis use during pregnancy on the platform. Comparisons and contrasts will be drawn between the typical supportive and opposing posters based on these elements.

    Ethics and Dissemination

    This study was exempted from ethics review on the basis that it will collect and synthesize publicly available data. Therefore, the research does not require ethical approval.


    Using our data collection method, combing the search_all_tweets function from Tweepy [35] together with the Twitter API for Academic Research, we collected 2,000,000 tweets and 1,000,000 retweets that are potentially related to cannabis use during pregnancy. These results cover all English language tweets posted from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2021 (10 years), that include both pregnancy- and cannabis-related keywords. Of the 3,000,000 unique tweets, only 4.3% of them are geotagged (Figure 2). Note that these tweets are concentrated mainly in English-speaking cities or countries. This finding is expected since our search explicitly requested English tweets. Figure 3 shows the frequency distribution of all 3,000,000 tweets per day since 2012. Colorado was the first English-speaking jurisdiction to legalize cannabis in 2012, and Canada legalized cannabis in 2018. Our Twitter search includes 47 distinct keywords; we plotted the number of times each keyword appears in our corpora (Table 1).

    ‎
    Figure 2. Geographic distribution of geotagged tweets containing pregnancy and cannabis-related keywords posted between January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2021.
    View this figure
    ‎
    Figure 3. Number of tweets per day related to cannabis in pregnancy, January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2021.
    View this figure
    Table 1. Frequency of cannabis-related keywords identified in tweets posted between January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2021.
    KeywordCount
    weed1,047,115
    dope688,153
    blunt556,865
    pot399,444
    keef356,605
    marijuana183,409
    bud161,328
    bong116,876
    kush99,916
    thc44,970
    hash44,906
    cbd39,287
    ecstasy33,989
    hemp28,514
    purp25,353
    ganja24,641
    indica8447
    reefer6125
    opiate4102
    kief3092
    mdma2459
    mmj1386
    budder643
    marihuana637
    cannamom40
    medicalmarijuana13

    The semantic community detection algorithm detected 220 clusters within the 3,000,000 tweets from our corpora. We manually inspected the top 5 and bottom 5 tweets of each cluster and assigned an appropriate label that best described the topical context of those tweets. For example, we found 9 topical clusters related to cannabis use during pregnancy (Figure 4). A sample of paraphrased tweets from one identified cluster, “Cannabis exposure on infants,” is shown (Table 2).

    We expect to conclude this study in December 2022.

    ‎
    Figure 4. Topical contexts (clusters) identified from tweets collected about cannabis use during pregnancy.
    View this figure
    Table 2. Top 3 and bottom 3 tweets selected from the cluster “Cannabis exposure on infants.”a
    No.Paraphrased tweet
    1random thc found in baby soap
    2newborns test positive marijuana from baby soap
    3marijuana in newborns from baby soap are false positives.
    45Baby you only do thc, you need help.
    46pediatric doctor advises passing thc via placenta and breast feeding (previously thought to damage baby brain)
    47expert on thc exposure during pregnancy is Dr. X at Clinic Y.

    aItalicized words represent our set of query keywords.


    Preliminary Findings

    This study will infer how cannabis use in pregnancy is portrayed on Twitter, the content and origin of supportive posts, and how legal status changes influence the volume and tone of posts related to cannabis in pregnancy. Our findings will help inform policy strategies to public health agencies, care providers, and other stakeholders. Moreover, they will suggest future avenues for research. Our preliminary findings suggest that this work is feasible and that we have identified a sufficiently robust corpus of tweets for more detailed analyses.

    Limitations and Future Work

    Twitter is an extensive online platform to share news and opinions [36]. However, it is not representative of the whole population [37]. A 2016 survey found that only 21% of Americans use Twitter [38]. Users are, on average, younger and better educated than nonusers, and they are more liberal and pay more attention to politics [37]. However, a recent study [39] has shown that young adults (25-44 years) that were active on an abortion debate on Twitter were well represented compared to the 2017 CENSUS representation in Chile. While this age range overlaps with the women’s reproductive age (15-44 years), birth rates decreased for females aged 15 to 34 years, increased for females aged 35 to 44 years, and were unchanged for females aged 10 to 14 years and 45 to 49 years from 2018 to 2019 in the United States [40].

    Besides Twitter, there are several online platforms used to share opinions, for instance, Facebook, Reddit, and Quora. To the best of our knowledge, only Facebook has been used to study people’s opinions on cannabis [41] and during pregnancy [42]. However, in these studies, authors run surveys by targeting people via Facebook ads (ie, findings are based on answers to questionaries) and did not analyze free-text opinions. Here, we opt to use Twitter data since it has been shown that there is rich content to study health-related issues [20,43], including opinions on the use of cannabis during pregnancy [44-46]. Besides, Twitter is one of the largest social media platforms allowing discussions and debates with 187,000,000 daily users [47]. Future research may focus on other platforms to study how people discuss cannabis use during pregnancy and verify whether all these users combined can make a better representation of their offline population.

    Conclusions

    We will submit the final results of our review for publication in a peer-reviewed journal, present at academic conferences, and share through publicly available streams such as the professional and institutional social media accounts and webpages associated with the research team. The results will provide insight into how frequently and in what context Twitter is being used to discuss cannabis use during pregnancy. We anticipate that this knowledge will help public health agencies and health care providers assess the messaging patients may be receiving on Twitter and develop communication strategies to counter misinformation, especially in geographical regions where legalization is recent or imminent. Most importantly, we foresee that our findings will assist expecting families in making informed choices about where they choose to access advice about using cannabis during pregnancy.

    Acknowledgments

    This work was supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Team Grant awarded to DJC (funding reference CA3-170126). The authors would like to thank Roberto Ulloca for support with the Twitter Academic Application Programming Interface and Indira Sen for advice on the state-of-the-art natural language processing techniques.

    Authors' Contributions

    LC, LEN, MSQM, MK, and DJC conceptualized the study and designed the methodology. LC wrote the original draft. LC, LEN, MSQM, SR, MCW, MK, and DJC reviewed and edited the manuscript. DJC and MSQM supervised the study and acquired the funding. All authors read and approved the final version of this manuscript.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    1. Lowry DE, Corsi DJ. Trends and correlates of cannabis use in Canada: a repeated cross-sectional analysis of national surveys from 2004 to 2017. CMAJ Open 2020;8(3):E487-E495 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. Mark K, Gryczynski J, Axenfeld E, Schwartz RP, Terplan M. Pregnant women's current and intended cannabis use in relation to their views toward legalization and knowledge of potential harm. J Addict Med 2017;11(3):211-216. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Fattore L, Fratta W. Beyond THC: the new generation of cannabinoid designer drugs. Front Behav Neurosci 2011;5:60. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Cavazos-Rehg PA, Krauss MJ, Cahn E, Lee KE, Ferguson E, Rajbhandari B, et al. Marijuana promotion online: an investigation of dispensary practices. Prev Sci 2019 Feb;20(2):280-290 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Westfall RE, Janssen PA, Lucas P, Capler R. Survey of medicinal cannabis use among childbearing women: patterns of its use in pregnancy and retroactive self-assessment of its efficacy against 'morning sickness'. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2006 Feb;12(1):27-33. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Chang JC, Tarr JA, Holland CL, De Genna NM, Richardson GA, Rodriguez KL, et al. Beliefs and attitudes regarding prenatal marijuana use: perspectives of pregnant women who report use. Drug Alcohol Depend 2019 Mar 01;196:14-20 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Richardson KA, Hester AK, McLemore GL. Prenatal cannabis exposure - the "first hit" to the endocannabinoid system. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2016;58:5-14. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Corsi DJ, Donelle J, Sucha E, Hawken S, Hsu H, El-Chaâr D, et al. Maternal cannabis use in pregnancy and child neurodevelopmental outcomes. Nat Med 2020 Oct;26(10):1536-1540. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. El Marroun H, Tiemeier H, Steegers EAP, Jaddoe VWV, Hofman A, Verhulst FC, et al. Intrauterine cannabis exposure affects fetal growth trajectories: the Generation R Study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2009 Dec;48(12):1173-1181. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Gray KA, Day NL, Leech S, Richardson GA. Prenatal marijuana exposure: effect on child depressive symptoms at ten years of age. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2005;27(3):439-448. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Althouse BM, Scarpino SV, Meyers LA, Ayers JW, Bargsten M, Baumbach J, et al. Enhancing disease surveillance with novel data streams: challenges and opportunities. EPJ Data Sci 2015;4:17 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Meacham MC, Paul MJ, Ramo DE. Understanding emerging forms of cannabis use through an online cannabis community: an analysis of relative post volume and subjective highness ratings. Drug Alcohol Depend 2018 Jul 01;188:364-369 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Allem J, Escobedo P, Dharmapuri L. Cannabis surveillance with Twitter data: emerging topics and social bots. Am J Public Health 2020 Mar;110(3):357-362. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Peiper NC, Baumgartner PM, Chew RF, Hsieh YP, Bieler GS, Bobashev GV, et al. Patterns of Twitter behavior among networks of cannabis dispensaries in California. J Med Internet Res 2017 Jul 04;19(7):e236 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Tapper EB, Mirabella R, Walicki JJ, Banales JM. Optimizing the use of twitter for research dissemination: the "Three Facts and a Story" randomized-controlled trial. J Hepatol 2021 Aug;75(2):271-274. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Ishida JH, Zhang AJ, Steigerwald S, Cohen BE, Vali M, Keyhani S. Sources of information and beliefs about the health effects of marijuana. J Gen Intern Med 2020 Jan;35(1):153-159 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodology 2005 Feb;8(1):19-32. [CrossRef]
    18. Cavazos-Rehg PA, Sowles SJ, Krauss MJ, Agbonavbare V, Grucza R, Bierut L. A content analysis of tweets about high-potency marijuana. Drug Alcohol Depend 2016 Sep 01;166:100-108 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018 Oct 02;169(7):467-473 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    20. Sinnenberg L, Buttenheim AM, Padrez K, Mancheno C, Ungar L, Merchant RM. Twitter as a tool for health research: a systematic review. Am J Public Health 2017 Jan;107(1):e1-e8. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    21. Sayyadiharikandeh M, Varol O, Yang KC, Flammini A, Menczer F. Detection of novel social bots by ensembles of specialized classifiers. In: Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 2020 Oct Presented at: CIKM '20; October 19-23, 2020; Virtual Event. [CrossRef]
    22. Ajao O, Hong J, Liu W. A survey of location inference techniques on Twitter. J Inf Sci 2015 Nov 20;41(6):855-864. [CrossRef]
    23. Mahmud J, Nichols J, Drews C. Where is this tweet from? inferring home locations of twitter users. 2012 Presented at: The Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media; June 4-8, 2012; Trinity College in Dublin, Ireland.
    24. Reimers N, Gurevych I. Sentence-BERT: sentence embeddings using siamese BERT-Networks. arXiv. Preprint posted online on August 27, 2019. [CrossRef]
    25. Pretrained models. Sentence-Transformers.   URL: https://www.sbert.net/docs/pretrained_models.html [accessed 2021-12-31]
    26. Academic Research access. Twitter Developer Platform.   URL: https://developer.twitter.com/en/products/twitter-api/academic-research [accessed 2021-08-09]
    27. Hoffman M, Bach F, Blei D. Online learning for latent dirichlet allocation. Adv Neural Inf Processing Syst 2010;23:1-9.
    28. Nistor SC, Moca M, Moldovan D, Oprean DB, Nistor RL. Building a Twitter sentiment analysis system with recurrent neural networks. Sensors (Basel) 2021 Mar 24;21(7):2266 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Schlosser S, Toninelli D, Cameletti M. Comparing methods to collect and geolocate tweets in Great Britain. J Open Innovation Technol Market Complexity 2021 Jan 25;7(1):44. [CrossRef]
    30. van Draanen J, Krishna T, Tsang C, Liu S. Keeping up with the times: how national public health and governmental organizations communicate about cannabis on Twitter. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2019 Sep 12;14(1):38 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. Culotta A. Estimating county health statistics with twitter. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2014 Apr Presented at: CHI '14; April 26-May 1, 2014; Toronto, ON p. 1335-1344. [CrossRef]
    32. National Vital Statistics System. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.   URL: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/index.htm [accessed 2021-08-09]
    33. Statistics Canada, Canadian Vital Statistics - Birth database (CVSB). Statistics Canada.   URL: https://www23.statcan.gc.ca/imdb/p2SV.pl?Function=getSurvey&SDDS=3231 [accessed 2021-08-09]
    34. About verified accounts. Twitter Help Center.   URL: https://help.twitter.com/en/managing-your-account/about-twitter-verified-accounts [accessed 2021-08-09]
    35. Roesslein J. tweepy / tweepy. GitHub. 2020.   URL: https://github.com/tweepy/tweepy [accessed 2022-03-13]
    36. Rosenstiel T, Sonderman J, Loker K, Ivancin M, Kjarval N. Twitter and the news: how people use the social network to learn about the world. American Press Institute. 2015.   URL: https:/​/www.​americanpressinstitute.org/​wp-content/​uploads/​2015/​09/​Twitter-and-News-How-people-use-Twitter-to-get-news-American-Press-Institute.​pdf [accessed 2022-03-15]
    37. Mellon J, Prosser C. Twitter and Facebook are not representative of the general population: political attitudes and demographics of British social media users. Res Polit 2017 Jul 13;4(3):205316801772000. [CrossRef]
    38. Greenwood S, Perrin A, Duggan M. Social media update 2016. Downtown Dubuque, Iowa. 2016.   URL: http://downtowndubuque.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Social-Media-Update-2016.pdf [accessed 2022-03-15]
    39. Graells-Garrido E, Baeza-Yates R, Lalmas M. How representative is an abortion debate on Twitter? In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science. 2019 Jun Presented at: WebSci '19; June 30-July 3, 2019; Boston, MA p. 133-134. [CrossRef]
    40. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK. Births: final data for 2019. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2021 Apr;70(2):1-51. [Medline]
    41. Borodovsky JT, Marsch LA, Budney AJ. Studying cannabis use behaviors with Facebook and web surveys: methods and insights. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2018 May 02;4(2):e48 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    42. Pike CK, Sofis MJ, Budney AJ. Correlates of continued cannabis use during pregnancy. Drug Alcohol Depend 2021 Oct 01;227:108939. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    43. Berry N, Lobban F, Belousov M, Emsley R, Nenadic G, Bucci S. #WhyWeTweetMH: understanding why people use Twitter to discuss mental health problems. J Med Internet Res 2017 Apr 05;19(4):e107 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    44. Dakkak H, Brown R, Twynstra J, Charbonneau K, Seabrook J. The perception of pre- and post-natal marijuana exposure on health outcomes: a content analysis of Twitter messages. J Neonatal Perinatal Med 2018;11(4):409-415. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    45. Pang RD, Dormanesh A, Hoang Y, Chu M, Allem J. Twitter posts about cannabis use during pregnancy and postpartum: a content analysis. Subst Use Misuse 2021;56(7):1074-1077. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    46. Pradyumn M. Systematic review of literature using Twitter as a tool. The ScholarShip at ECU. 2018 Jul.   URL: https:/​/thescholarship.​ecu.edu/​bitstream/​handle/​10342/​6950/​PRADYUMN-MASTERSTHESIS-2018.​pdf?sequence=1 [accessed 2022-03-15]
    47. Kastrenakes J. Reddit reveals daily active user count for the first time: 52 million. The Verge.   URL: https://www.theverge.com/2020/12/1/21754984/reddit-dau-daily-users-revealed [accessed 2022-03-13]

    ‎
    API: Application Programming Interface
    BERT: Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers
    PRISMA-ScR: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews

    Edited by T Leung; submitted 22.10.21; peer-reviewed by T Ndabu, M Waring, JP Allem; comments to author 17.12.21; revised version received 26.01.22; accepted 08.02.22; published 29.03.22

    Copyright

    ©Liam Cresswell, Lisette Espin-Noboa, Malia S Q Murphy, Serine Ramlawi, Mark C Walker, Márton Karsai, Daniel J Corsi. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 29.03.2022.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.