This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

CIHR funded proposals with peer-review reports (Canada) (40) Clinical Cancer Research (71) Colon and Rectal Cancer (17) Health Services Research (407) Health Services Research in Oncology (28) Research Infrastructures and Registries (44)

Published on in Vol 11, No 8 (2022): August

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/38874, first published .
The Variations in Care and Real-world Outcomes in Individuals With Rectal Cancer: Protocol for the Ontario Rectal Cancer Cohort

The Variations in Care and Real-world Outcomes in Individuals With Rectal Cancer: Protocol for the Ontario Rectal Cancer Cohort

The Variations in Care and Real-world Outcomes in Individuals With Rectal Cancer: Protocol for the Ontario Rectal Cancer Cohort

Authors of this article:

Sunil Patel1 Author Orcid Image ;   Chad McClintock1 Author Orcid Image ;   Christopher Booth1 Author Orcid Image ;   Shaila Merchant1 Author Orcid Image ;   Carl Heneghan2 Author Orcid Image ;   Clare Bankhead2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (1) Tweetations (2) Metrics

    Protocol

    1Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada

    2Centre for Evidence Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

    Corresponding Author:

    Sunil Patel

    Department of Surgery

    Queen's University

    76 Stuart Street

    Kingston, ON, K7L 2V7

    Canada

    Phone: 1 613 549 6666 ext 7995

    Email: sunil.patel@kingstonhsc.ca


    Background: Individuals with rectal cancer require a number of pretreatment investigations, often require multidisciplinary treatment, and require ongoing follow-ups after treatment is completed. Due to the complexity of treatments, large variations in practice patterns and outcomes have been identified. At present, few comprehensive, population-level data sets are available for assessing interventions and outcomes in this group.

    Objective: Our study aims to create a comprehensive database of individuals with rectal cancer who have been treated in a single-payer, universal health care system. This database will provide an excellent resource that investigators can use to study variations in the delivery of care to and real-world outcomes of this population.

    Methods: The Ontario Rectal Cancer Cohort database will include comprehensive details about the management and outcomes of individuals with rectal cancer who have been diagnosed in Ontario, Canada (population: 14.6 million), between 2010 and 2019. Linked administrative data sets will be used to construct this comprehensive database. Individual and care provider characteristics, investigations, treatments, follow-ups, and outcomes will be derived and linked. Surgical pathology details, including the stage of disease, histopathology characteristics, and the quality of surgical excision, will be included. Ethics approval for this study was obtained through the Queen’s University Health Sciences and Affiliated Teaching Hospitals Research Ethics Board.

    Results: Approximately 20,000 individuals who meet the inclusion criteria for this study have been identified. Data analysis is ongoing, with an expected completion date of March 2023. This study was funded through the Canadian Institute of Health Research Operating Grant.

    Conclusions: The Ontario Rectal Cancer Cohort will include a comprehensive data set of individuals with rectal cancer who received care within a single-payer, universal health care system. This cohort will be used to determine factors associated with regional variability and adherence to recommended care, and it will allow for an assessment of a number of understudied areas within the delivery of rectal cancer treatment.

    International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/38874

    JMIR Res Protoc 2022;11(8):e38874

    doi:10.2196/38874

    Keywords

    rectal cancer; survival; adherence to care; regional variability 


    Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer diagnosed in Ontario, Canada, with approximately 9000 cases per year [1]. Ontario (estimated population: 14.6 million) is Canada’s largest province, and residents of Ontario benefit from a single-payer, universal health care system. Diagnostic tests, treatments, and follow-ups for individuals with colorectal cancer are almost exclusively provided through this single-payer system.

    The real-world impact of variations in patterns of care and adherence to recommended treatments is an important aspect of determining the effectiveness of a cancer care system. Individuals with rectal cancer in Ontario have an estimated 5-year survival rate of approximately 70% [1], but substantial variations in survival have been noted between regions and hospitals. A previous publication from members of our group found up to an 8% (66.4% vs 58.4%) absolute difference in 5-year overall survival between regions, while also finding up to a 20% (72% vs 52%) absolute difference in 5-year overall survival between the best- and worst-performing hospitals [2]. These differences in outcomes are at least in part due to differences in treatment, access, and the quality of care, as the case mix was minimally different among regions.

    The management of individuals with rectal cancer often requires several diagnostic tests, the use of multidisciplinary teams during the delivery of multimodality treatment, and ongoing surveillance for identifying recurrent or metastatic disease. With this level of complexity, the fragmentation of care can occur [3], and inconsistent delivery of treatments may be observed [4]. In addition, due to the nature of the treatments, patients with rectal cancer often experience high rates of short- and long-term morbidity.

    There are a number of strategies for assessing the delivery and outcomes of rectal cancer care at a population level. The limitations of many of these approaches are the lack of detailed histopathology data, the inability to assess surgical quality, the discontinuity of care, and high rates of loss to follow-up. The ability to overcome these limitations would substantially improve the ability to assess the real-world effectiveness of cancer care systems and identify the impact of variations in care and/or adherence to recommended care on survival and other important outcomes.

    The objective of the Ontario Rectal Cancer Cohort (OntaReCC) is to create a comprehensive clinical-pathological database of individuals who are diagnosed with rectal cancer in Ontario. This database will allow investigators to assess practice patterns, adherence to recommended care, and outcomes within this population. This protocol describes the methods used to establish this database.


    Study Setting

    Ontario is Canada’s most populous province (estimated population of 14.6 million in 2019) and is a large and diverse region. The province includes large metropolitan areas, as well as sparsely populated rural communities. The demographics of Ontario residents include a wide range of socioeconomic backgrounds, a large number of first- and second-generation Canadians, and indigenous populations [5].

    Residents of Ontario are eligible for a government-run, universal, single-payer health insurance plan (ie, the Ontario Health Insurance Plan). This plan covers the costs of physician visits, diagnostic investigations, hospital stays, surgical services, and cancer services (including radiation therapy and chemotherapy). Ontario routinely collects clinical and demographic data, as well as other health care–related data, within a number of linked administrative databases.

    Study Population

    Individuals who were diagnosed with rectal cancer between 2010 and 2019 were identified through the Ontario Cancer Registry (OCR) by using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10), codes for rectal cancer (ICD-10 20.9). The OCR captures incident cancer cases through mandatory reporting and is estimated to include >95% of newly diagnosed cancer cases, in which >94% of colorectal cancers were microscopically confirmed [6,7]. Individuals with a histopathology code that was consistent with the adenocarcinoma of the rectum were included. Those aged <18 years at time of diagnosis, those who died on or before the date of diagnosis, and those who were ineligible for the Ontario Health Insurance Plan were excluded. We also excluded those who were diagnosed with cancer at another site (ie, breast cancer, prostate cancer, lung cancer, etc) within the preceding 3 years.

    Data Sources

    The OntaReCC combines data from a number of provincially maintained administrative data sets with data from histopathology reports that are made available through the OCR. A full listing of the administrative data sets can be found in Textbox 1. These data sets include health administrative data that are generated whenever a health care service is delivered to an individual, which are utilized for billing, registration, transactions, or record keeping by health care providers. The heath administrative data sets are linked to other provincially maintained data sets that provide vital statistics, census information, and other demographic data.

    These data sets provide comprehensive data on individual characteristics (ie, demographics, comorbidities, and socioeconomic status), diagnostic details (the date of diagnosis, histologic variants, and cancer sites), and treatment details. In addition, health care provider details and institution details are captured within these data sets. By using the abovementioned data sets, we will be able to derive important factors or characteristics, including the completeness of preoperative investigations; the type, extent, and completeness of treatments (including surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy); treating clinician characteristics (volumes and practice setting) and institution characteristics (volumes, the level of care, and the presence of a multidisciplinary cancer center); and cancer-related outcomes (overall and cancer-specific survival, the treatment of metastatic disease, the use of palliative treatments, and symptom burden).

    Summary of sources of data to be linked within the Ontario Rectal Cancer Cohort database.

    Ontario Cancer Registry

    • The Ontario Cancer Registry is the provincial database of information for all Ontario residents who have been diagnosed with cancer (incidence) or have died from cancer (mortality). Data are collected from hospitals, regional cancer centers, pathology reports, and death certificates and cover the entire province of Ontario.

    Cancer Activity Level Reporting database

    • The data elements constitute patient-level activities within the cancer system that focus on radiation and systemic therapy services and outpatient oncology clinic visits. The data set contains clinical, patient-level data.

    Canadian Institute of Health Information-Discharge Abstract Database (CIHI-DAD)

    • The CIHI-DAD captures administrative, clinical, and demographic information on hospital discharges (including deaths, sign-outs, and transfers). This includes demographic, administrative, and clinical data for inpatient discharges (including surgery) and day surgery interventions.

    Ontario Drug Benefit program

    • The Ontario Drug Benefit program provides drug benefits for all adults aged 65 years and older and those receiving social assistance in Ontario. Pharmacists submit claims for each prescribed drug that is covered under the Ontario Drug Benefit formulary. These claims form the basis of the data set.

    Symptom Management Database

    • This database contains data that are used to improve symptom management and collaborative palliative care planning through the earlier identification, documentation, and communication of patient symptoms and performance status.

    Registered Persons Database

    • A listing of all persons who are insured under the Ontario Health Insurance Plan. The data are used to ensure that individuals in other data sources are identified correctly and to support analyses by demographic groups and geography.
    Textbox 1. Summary of sources of data to be linked within the Ontario Rectal Cancer Cohort database.

    Pathology Data Collection

    Histopathology reports were requested from the OCR for individuals who were undergoing biopsy, local excision/polypectomy, or major surgical excision for rectal cancer during the study dates. Cancer Care and Epidemiology at the Queen’s Cancer Research Institute has established processes for abstracting comprehensive details from these types of reports [8-10]. These processes allow for reliable and reproducible data abstraction. A data abstraction manual was created for abstraction. Trained histopathology data abstractors were utilized for data abstraction. Regular meetings for reviewing inconsistencies within and between reports were completed to ensure the validity and reliability of the pathology data abstraction. The data elements are summarized in Textbox 2.

    Histopathology data to be included in the Ontario Rectal Cancer Cohort database.

    Quality of reporting

    • Synoptic report
    • Completeness of reporting

    Quality of excision

    • Intactness of the mesorectum (complete, near complete, or incomplete)
    • Margin status (proximal, distal, or circumferential)
    • Nodal harvest (≥12)

    Histology

    • Adenocarcinoma and its variants
    • Degree of differentiation
    • Lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion

    Stage of disease

    • Tumor stage, nodal stage, and metastatic disease (if applicable)

    Neoadjuvant treatment response

    • Complete response, partial response, or no response (if applicable)

    Mutations and immunohistochemistry

    • BRAF and KRAS gene status
    • Microsatellite instability and mismatch repair proteins
    Textbox 2. Histopathology data to be included in the Ontario Rectal Cancer Cohort database.

    Exposures and Outcomes

    The proposed cohort will contain a number of exposure and outcome variables that are pertinent to a wide range of research questions. Potential exposures include those related to individuals, the circumstances of the cancer diagnosis, health care providers, the institutions where care was delivered, the regions, and the nature and extent of treatments, as summarized in Table 1. A number of outcomes will also be examined and will include the intent and extent of treatments, adherence to recommended care, and short- and long-term outcomes. In addition, symptom burden will be examined, which is a unique feature of the proposed database.

    Table 1. Summary of the exposures and outcomes that are contained within the Ontario Rectal Cancer Cohort database.
    Exposures and outcomesVariables
    Exposures

    		Patient characteristicsAge, sex, comorbidities, social economic status, rurality, and geographic region

    		Cancer characteristicsMethod of diagnosis, symptoms, stage at diagnosis, and histopathologic features

    		TreatmentSurgical excision, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy

    		Health care providersPractice setting, specialization, and volume

    		Treating institution/hospitalSetting, type, and presence of multidisciplinary care
    Outcomes

    		Diagnostic and surveillance investigationsEndoscopic, local-regional, and metastatic disease assessments and tumor markers

    		Completeness and quality of treatmentsQuality of surgical excision, completeness of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies, and interruptions in treatments

    		Timeliness of careDiagnosis to investigations, investigations to first treatment, time between treatments, and appropriate timing of surveillance

    		Adherence to standard or recommended careAdherence to staging and treatment and surveillance recommendations based on the stage of disease

    		Fragmentation of the delivery of careConsistent versus inconsistent site of the delivery of surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy

    		Utilization of treatments for metastatic diseaseUtilization of surgical resection, radiation, and chemotherapy

    		Symptom burdenPatient-reported symptoms in various domains and symptom trajectory over time

    		SurvivalOverall survival and cancer-specific survival

    Ethics Approval

    Ethics approval for this research was obtained through the Queen’s University Health Research Ethics Board (approved on October 20, 2020; reference number: 6019418). A number of potential issues were addressed, including how personal health information will be used, the necessity for the linkage of personal health information with other information, and how the linkage would be completed. In addition, we identified potential harms and how they would be mitigated by using previously developed data confidentiality and privacy protocols, via appropriate data handling and curating, via the use of encryption, and via storage on a restricted server behind a firewall. The study will take place at the Queen’s Cancer Research Institute – Cancer Care Epidemiology, which has undergone previous external audits pertaining to data curation and security.


    We identified approximately 20,062 individuals with a new diagnosis of rectal cancer during the study period. After exclusions, 10,957 unique individuals underwent curative intent surgical resection, while 7980 did not (Figure 1). The average age at the time of diagnosis was 64.9 (SD 12.6) years, with men accounting for 62.8% (6887/10,957) of those included in the surgical cohort. Individuals from a rural setting accounted for 19.3% (2116/10,957), while there was an equal distribution of individuals among income quintiles (lowest quintile: 2193/10,957, 20%; quintile 2: 2248/10,957, 20.5%; quintile 3: 2138/10,957, 19.5%; quintile 4: 2167/10,957, 19.8%; highest quintile: 2148/10,957, 19.6%). Treatment occurred most commonly at a regional cancer center (5914/10,957, 54%), followed by an affiliated cancer center (3626/10,957, 33.1%) and a satellite or nondesignated cancer center (1401/10,957, 12.8%). Adherence to staging investigations, including local-regional and metastatic assessments, occurred in 74.1% (8111/10,957) of individuals. Of the eligible individuals, 62.1% (4148/6681) received radiation therapy, and 58% (3877/6681) received adjuvant chemotherapy.

    ‎
    Figure 1. Cohort flow sheet.
    View this figure

    Protocol Overview

    The overall objective of the OntaReCC is to provide a comprehensive data set of individuals diagnosed with rectal cancer in Ontario, and it will include details on the complete cancer journey (from diagnosis to death). This data set will allow investigators to assess the real-world, population-level outcomes of these individuals and allow for an assessment of the performance of the cancer system. A number of research themes will be explored by using the OntaReCC database, including (1) the regional variability in the delivery of care and outcomes, (2) the predictors and impact of adherence to recommended care, and (3) assessments of other understudied areas of rectal cancer care.

    Regional Variability in the Delivery of Care and Outcomes

    Regional variability in survival following the treatment of colorectal cancer has been reported by the Cancer System Quality Index [11]. This report demonstrated a 10% absolute difference in 5-year mortality between the best- and worst-performing regions within Ontario. Other publications identified similar themes [2], demonstrating large variations in 5-year survival between regions and between hospitals despite them having a similar case mix. Members of our group have explored the variation in the delivery of care for individuals with colon cancer. Within this population, significant variations were observed in the use of preoperative investigations [12], surgical quality and pathologic assessments [13,14], and treatment delivery to specific populations [8,9,15,16]. We anticipate similar themes for individuals with rectal cancer, and due to the increased complexity of care, we expect that the magnitude of difference will be greater. The proposed cohort will allow for the assessment of variability in the delivery of care based on geography, hospital type (ie, the presence of a multidisciplinary cancer center), and hospital volume. Importantly, we will use this comprehensive data set to identify predictors of variations in care and outcomes for potential knowledge translation and for interventions at the hospital and regional levels.

    Predictors and Impact of Adherence to Recommended Care

    Cancer Care Ontario has developed recommendations for the care of individuals with rectal cancer [17]. These recommendations are consistent with those proposed in other jurisdictions within Canada and elsewhere [18]. Despite the wide availability of clinical practice guidelines and recommendations, significant variability in adherence has been demonstrated in a number of studies [19-24]. The OntaReCC will be utilized to assess the predictors of adherence to recommended care. In addition, we will be able to assess the impact of guideline-adherent care on patient outcomes.

    Assessment of Understudied Areas of Rectal Cancer Care

    Practice patterns and outcomes of understudied aspects of rectal cancer care will be assessed, including the treatment of early rectal cancer and end-of-life care.

    Practice Patterns and Outcomes in Individuals With Early-Stage Rectal Cancer

    The OntaReCC will provide an opportunity to explore the practice patterns and outcomes of individuals with early-stage rectal cancer. Although major surgical resection remains the standard of care for many individuals undergoing curative-intent rectal cancer surgery, these procedures have the potential for significant morbidities and poor functional results. In addition, a number of individuals will be required to undergo a permanent colostomy as an outcome of these procedures. Consequently, there has been great interest in avoiding major resection, especially for individuals with early-stage disease. Local excision/polypectomy has been proposed as an adequate alternative for carefully selected individuals [17,25]. Some studies have questioned the safety of this approach [26] and found that careful patient selection is important in ensuring acceptable outcomes. The OntaReCC will allow for the assessment of the appropriateness of local excision (through histopathology data), the risk of local recurrence requiring surgical excision, the risk of metastatic disease, and the impact on overall survival.

    End-of-Life Care

    The type and delivery of care for individuals in their last month of life have been inadequately studied for those with rectal cancer. Our group has assessed potentially aggressive treatments, symptom burden, and the utilization of palliative care services for other disease sites [27-29]. These population-based studies identified the inconsistent delivery of palliative care treatments, high rates of potentially aggressive interventions, and significant symptom burden among many patients. The OntaReCC database will describe variations in end-of-life care and outcomes for this understudied population.

    Strengths and Limitations

    As described above, the OntaReCC database will have a near-complete capture of incident rectal cancer cases in Ontario during the study period. Unlike the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (around 30% capture) [30] and the National Cancer Database (around 70% capture) [31], the OCR has a near-complete capture of incident colorectal cancer cases [6,7]. As treatment for colorectal cancer is almost exclusively provided through the publicly funded health care system, the linked administrative databases provide a complete description of an individual’s cancer care journey. Low losses to follow-up are expected, regardless of the location or institution in which an individual receives care. By using detailed histopathology data, a comprehensive assessment can be undertaken, which is often not possible with other large population-level data sets or registries. The described cohort will also allow for an assessment of the symptoms that an individual experiences throughout their treatments and follow-ups, which is another unique aspect of the OntaReCC.

    Although the proposed cohort will allow for a comprehensive assessment of individuals with rectal cancer, limitations to such population health research exist. First, the reasons behind treatment decisions and patient preferences are unknown. Nonadherence or variations in care may be partially explained by an individual refusing aspects of care or preferring nonstandard approaches, which will not be captured. Second, we will be unable to capture the reasons behind delays in treatment or care, which could be related to nonmodifiable factors. Third, we will not have access to detailed diagnostic radiology reports. This will limit our ability to assess the pretreatment stage of disease (which is primarily determined through magnetic resonance imaging) and the ability to fully capture the development of metastatic disease. Our data set will identify metastatic disease that is either treated (ie, via resection or other local therapies) or documented within applicable linked data sets. Finally, a number of potentially pertinent patient characteristics are not captured well within the available data sets, including individuals’ level of education, employment status, race/ethnicity, obesity, and alcohol or cigarette use.

    Conclusions

    The OntaReCC will provide a comprehensive and complete assessment of the care and outcomes of individuals diagnosed with rectal cancer in Ontario. The data set will be an important resource in evaluating the real-world management and outcomes of individuals with rectal cancer. In doing so, we will be able to identify opportunities for improving the delivery of cancer care to this group of individuals.

    Acknowledgments

    This study has been funded through the Canadian Institute of Health Research Operating Grant, the Clinical Teachers of Queen’s endowment grant, and the South Eastern Ontario Academic Medical Organization Interdisciplinary Grant.

    Authors' Contributions

    SP, C Booth, SJM, CH, and C Bankhead were responsible for study conception. All authors were responsible for the study design. SP drafted the manuscript, and all authors revised the manuscript. CM was responsible for data acquisition. All authors have given their final approval of the manuscript and are accountable for all aspects of the work.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    ‎
    Multimedia Appendix 1

    Peer-review reports from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research / Instituts de recherche en santé du canada (CIHR/IRSC).

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 106 KB
    1. Ontario cancer statistics 2020. Cancer Care Ontario.   URL: https://www.cancercareontario.ca/en/statistical-reports/ontario-cancer-statistics-2020 [accessed 2021-06-21]
    2. Brundage MD, Groome P, Hanna T, Booth CM, Kong W, Dyer T, et al. Cancer survival outcomes in Ontario, Canada: Significant unexplained variation. J Clin Oncol 2018 Oct 20;36(30_suppl):36. [CrossRef]
    3. Abelson JS, Bauer PS, Barron J, Bommireddy A, Chapman WCJ, Schad C, et al. Fragmented care in the treatment of rectal cancer and time to definitive therapy. J Am Coll Surg 2021 Jan;232(1):27-33. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Bubis L, Mahar AL, Gupta V, Jeong Y, Davis L, Li Q, et al. Variation in the use of adjuvant chemotherapy following neoadjuvant radiotherapy and surgery for rectal cancer in a publicly-insured health care system. J Clin Oncol 2018 Feb 01;36(4_suppl):854. [CrossRef]
    5. Martel L. Recent changes in demographic trends in Canada. Statistics Canada. 2015 Oct 27.   URL: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/75-006-x/2015001/article/14240-eng.pdf?st=U5t5OdQ1 [accessed 2022-06-10]
    6. Ontario cancer statistics 2020: Data sources. Cancer Care Ontario.   URL: https://www.cancercareontario.ca/en/statistical-reports/ontario-cancer-statistics-2020/data-sources [accessed 2021-06-16]
    7. Robles SC, Marrett LD, Clarke EA, Risch HA. An application of capture-recapture methods to the estimation of completeness of cancer registration. J Clin Epidemiol 1988;41(5):495-501. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Booth CM, Nanji S, Wei X, Mackillop WJ. Management and outcome of colorectal cancer liver metastases in elderly patients: A population-based study. JAMA Oncol 2015 Nov;1(8):1111-1119. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Booth CM, Nanji S, Wei X, Peng Y, Biagi JJ, Hanna TP, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer: Practice patterns and effectiveness in the general population. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2017 Jan;29(1):e29-e38. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Karim S, Brennan K, Nanji S, Berry SR, Booth CM. Association between prognosis and tumor laterality in early-stage colon cancer. JAMA Oncol 2017 Oct 01;3(10):1386-1392 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Displaying indicators. Cancer Quality Council of Ontario.   URL: https://www.csqi.on.ca/en/2019/indicators [accessed 2022-06-10]
    12. McInnes MDF, Nanji S, Mackillop WJ, Flemming JA, Wei X, Macdonald DB, et al. Utilization of pre-operative imaging for colon cancer: A population-based study. J Surg Oncol 2017 Feb;115(2):202-207. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Del Paggio JC, Nanji S, Wei X, MacDonald PH, Booth CM. Lymph node evaluation for colon cancer in routine clinical practice: a population-based study. Curr Oncol 2017 Feb;24(1):e35-e43 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Flemming JA, Nanji S, Wei X, Webber C, Groome P, Booth CM. Association between the time to surgery and survival among patients with colon cancer: A population-based study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017 Aug;43(8):1447-1455. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Merchant SJ, Nanji S, Brennan K, Karim S, Patel SV, Biagi JJ, et al. Management of stage III colon cancer in the elderly: Practice patterns and outcomes in the general population. Cancer 2017 Aug 01;123(15):2840-2849 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Rodriguez L, Brennan K, Karim S, Nanji S, Patel SV, Booth CM. Disease characteristics, clinical management, and outcomes of young patients with colon cancer: A population-based study. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2018 Dec;17(4):e651-e661. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Colorectal cancer pathway map. Cancer Care Ontario.   URL: https://www.cancercareontario.ca/en/pathway-maps/colorectal-cancer [accessed 2022-06-10]
    18. Mir ZM, Yu D, Merchant SJ, Booth CM, Patel SV. Management of rectal cancer in Canada: an evidence-based comparison of clinical practice guidelines. Can J Surg 2020 Jan 22;63(1):E27-E34 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Bao H, Yang F, Su S, Wang X, Zhang M, Xiao Y, et al. Evaluating the effect of clinical care pathways on quality of cancer care: analysis of breast, colon and rectal cancer pathways. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2016 May;142(5):1079-1089. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    20. Charlton ME, Hrabe JE, Wright KB, Schlichting JA, McDowell BD, Halfdanarson TR, et al. Hospital characteristics associated with stage II/III rectal cancer guideline concordant care: Analysis of surveillance, epidemiology and end results-Medicare data. J Gastrointest Surg 2016 May;20(5):1002-1011 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    21. Garfinkle R, Vasilevsky CA, Ghitulescu G, Morin N, Faria J, Boutros M. Compliance with preoperative elements of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Rectal Cancer Surgery Checklist improves pathologic and postoperative outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 2020 Jan;63(1):30-38. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Richardson B, Preskitt J, Lichliter W, Peschka S, Carmack S, de Prisco G, et al. The effect of multidisciplinary teams for rectal cancer on delivery of care and patient outcome: has the use of multidisciplinary teams for rectal cancer affected the utilization of available resources, proportion of patients meeting the standard of care, and does this translate into changes in patient outcome? Am J Surg 2016 Jan;211(1):46-52. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. Candy S, Zhang L, Yu D, Merchant S, Caycedo A, Patel SV. The impact of physician and hospital volume on guideline recommended care in patients with Rectal Cancer: A systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 2020;63(6):e110.
    24. Patel SV, Candy S, Bankead C, Heneghan C. A systematic review to identify barriers and facilitators to guideline adherent staging investigations in rectal cancer patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2020;63(6):e382.
    25. Benson AB, Venook A. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Rectal cancer. National Comprehensive Cancer Network.   URL: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/rectal.pdf [accessed 2022-06-10]
    26. Kidane B, Chadi SA, Kanters S, Colquhoun PH, Ott MC. Local resection compared with radical resection in the treatment of T1N0M0 rectal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2015 Jan;58(1):122-140. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. Merchant SJ, Brogly SB, Booth CM, Goldie C, Nanji S, Patel SV, et al. Palliative care and symptom burden in the last year of life: A population-based study of patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2019 Aug;26(8):2336-2345. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. Merchant SJ, Kong W, Brundage M, Booth CM. Symptom evolution in patients with esophageal and gastric cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy: A population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol 2021 Jan;28(1):79-87. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Merchant SJ, Lajkosz K, Brogly SB, Booth CM, Nanji S, Patel SV, et al. The final 30 days of life: A study of patients with gastrointestinal cancer in Ontario, Canada. J Palliat Care 2017;32(3-4):92-100. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Daly MC, Paquette IM. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and SEER-Medicare databases: Use in clinical research for improving colorectal cancer outcomes. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2019 Jan;32(1):61-68 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. Mohanty S, Bilimoria KY. Comparing national cancer registries: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. J Surg Oncol 2014 Jun;109(7):629-630. [CrossRef] [Medline]

    ‎
    ICD-10: International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision
    OCR: Ontario Cancer Registry
    OntaReCC: Ontario Rectal Cancer Cohort

    Edited by T Leung; This paper was externally peer-reviewed by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research / Instituts de recherche en santé du canada (CIHR/IRSC) - Data Analysis Using Existing Databases and Cohorts (Subvention de fonctionnement: Analyse de données à partir de bases de données et de cohortes existantes). See the Multimedia Appendix for the peer-review report; submitted 19.04.22; accepted 29.05.22; published 05.08.22

    Copyright

    ©Sunil Patel, Chad McClintock, Christopher Booth, Shaila Merchant, Carl Heneghan, Clare Bankhead. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 05.08.2022.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.