This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Early Reports (28) New Methods (944) Nails and Musculoskeletal (24)

Published on in Vol 12 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/42964, first published .
Efficient Generation of Chondrocytes From Bone Marrow–Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a 3D Culture System: Protocol for a Practical Model for Assessing Anti-Inflammatory Therapies

Efficient Generation of Chondrocytes From Bone Marrow–Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a 3D Culture System: Protocol for a Practical Model for Assessing Anti-Inflammatory Therapies

Efficient Generation of Chondrocytes From Bone Marrow–Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a 3D Culture System: Protocol for a Practical Model for Assessing Anti-Inflammatory Therapies

Authors of this article:

Rajashree Patnaik1 Author Orcid Image ;   Shirin Jannati1 Author Orcid Image ;   Bala Mohan Sivani2 Author Orcid Image ;   Manfredi Rizzo1 Author Orcid Image ;   Nerissa Naidoo1 Author Orcid Image ;   Yajnavalka Banerjee1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (2) Tweetations (2) Metrics

    Protocol

    1Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

    2Department of Molecular Biology, Lund University, Lund, Lund, Sweden

    Corresponding Author:

    Yajnavalka Banerjee, BSc, MSc, PhD

    Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences

    Building 14

    Dubai Health Care City

    Dubai, 505055

    United Arab Emirates

    Phone: 971 568345125

    Email: yajnavalka.banerjee@mbru.ac.ae


    Background: Chondrocytes are the primary cells responsible for maintaining cartilage integrity and function. Their role in cartilage homeostasis and response to inflammation is crucial for understanding the progression and potential therapeutic interventions for various cartilage-related disorders. Developing an accessible and cost-effective model to generate viable chondrocytes and to assess their response to different bioactive compounds can significantly advance our knowledge of cartilage biology and contribute to the discovery of novel therapeutic approaches.

    Objective: We developed a novel, streamlined protocol for generating chondrocytes from bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) in a 3D culture system that offers significant implications for the study of cartilage biology and the discovery of potential therapeutic interventions for cartilage-related and associated disorders.

    Methods: We developed a streamlined protocol for generating chondrocytes from BMSCs in a 3D culture system using an “in-tube” culture approach. This simple pellet-based 3D culture system allows for cell aggregation and spheroid formation, facilitating cell-cell and cell–extracellular matrix interactions that better mimic the in vivo cellular environment compared with 2D monolayer cultures. A proinflammatory chondrocyte model was created by treating the chondrocytes with lipopolysaccharide and was subsequently used to evaluate the anti-inflammatory effects of vitamin D, curcumin, and resveratrol.

    Results: The established protocol successfully generated a large quantity of viable chondrocytes, characterized by alcian blue and toluidine blue staining, and demonstrated versatility in assessing the anti-inflammatory effects of various bioactive compounds. The chondrocytes exhibited reduced inflammation, as evidenced by the decreased tumor necrosis factor-α levels, in response to vitamin D, curcumin, and resveratrol treatment.

    Conclusions: Our novel protocol offers an accessible and cost-effective approach for generating chondrocytes from BMSCs and for evaluating potential therapeutic leads in the context of inflammatory chondrocyte–related diseases. Although our approach has several advantages, further investigation is required to address its limitations, such as the potential differences between chondrocytes generated using our protocol and those derived from other established methods, and to refine the model for broader applicability and clinical translation.

    JMIR Res Protoc 2023;12:e42964

    doi:10.2196/42964

    Keywords

    chondrocytes; bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cell; BMSC; tumor necrosis factor-α; TNF-α; vitamin D; curcumin; resveratrol; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; ELISA; inflammation; anti-inflammation; proinflammation; 3D culture system 


    Background

    The burgeoning field of regenerative medicine has placed a considerable focus on the differentiation of bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) into chondrocytes [1,2]. This area of research is critical for advancing our understanding of cartilage repair and regeneration and for developing novel therapeutic strategies [3]. Therefore, it is essential to consider the optimal environment for these sophisticated cellular processes. Although cell culture plates have been the standard for differentiation experiments, recent evidence suggests that using tubes for differentiation may better simulate the native chondrocyte habitat and foster more accurate cell-cell and cell–extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions [4]. Consequently, research has shifted its focus toward tube-based, 3D culture systems that more accurately simulate native tissue conditions [5].

    Several studies have highlighted the superiority of tube-based culture over conventional 2D cell culture plates. A comparative analysis is presented in Table 1. The rationale behind this innovative approach lies in the unique characteristics of the chondrocyte ECM and the intricacies of cartilage tissue formation. By using tubes for differentiation, we can create a 3D environment that better mimics the native milieu of chondrocytes, fostering improved cell-cell and cell-ECM interactions. This shift in methodology not only enhances our understanding of chondrogenesis but also has the potential to accelerate the development of novel therapeutic strategies for cartilage repair and regeneration.

    Table 1. Comparison of 2D and 3D cell culture methods.

    		Type of cell cultureKey referencesAdvantage of tube-based cell culture used in this protocola

    		2D3D

    Cell-cell interactionsLimitedEnhancedBreslin and O\'Driscoll [6]Enhanced cell-cell interactions
    Cell–extracellular matrix interactionsRestrictedMore accurateCukierman et al [7]Improved mimicry of in vivo conditions
    Spatial organizationFlat and monolayerComplex and multilayeredEdmondson et al [8]Better representation of tissue architecture
    Cell polarizationMostly absentProminentThéry [9]Improved cell polarity and functionality
    Cell signalingAltered and oversimplifiedMore realisticBissell and Radisky [10]More accurate signaling pathways
    Cell migration and invasionLess accurateCloser to in vivoFriedl and Alexander [11]Improved evaluation of cell migration and invasion
    Cellular morphologyFlattened and simplifiedMore in vivo–likeRavi et al [12]Enhanced representation of native morphology
    StiffnessHigh stiffness (approximately 3 × 109 Pa)Low stiffness (>4000 Pa)Krausz et al [13]Low stiffness reduces durotaxis, augmenting cell growth and proliferation and reduction of cellular stress, which may alter gene expression
    Gene expressionAlteredMore physiologically relevantDuval et al [14]Improved gene expression profile
    Cellular functions and responsesLimited and oversimplifiedMore complex and accurateEdmondson et al [8]Better simulation of in vivo functionality
    Differentiation and stem cell maintenanceReduced fidelityEnhanced fidelityHockemeyer and Jaenisch [15]Improved maintenance of cell identity
    Cell viability and proliferationUnreliable representationMore accurate representationLanghans [16]Better assessment of cell growth and survival
    Drug sensitivityLess predictiveMore predictiveImamura et al [17]More accurate drug sensitivity when compared with the 2D system but not as superior when compared with complex 3D techniques such as organoids and scaffold-based systems
    Drug exposureNonphysiologicalCloser to in vivoBadr-Eldin et al [18]Improved drug exposure over the 2D system; but when it comes to in vivo mimicry, it may not be as superior as complex 3D techniques such as organoids and scaffold-based systems
    Ease of imagingEnables simple imaging owing to their monolayer structureRequires sophisticated imaging protocol owing to the complex and multilayered structureTemple et al [19]Ease of imaging is high in 2D over 3D cell culture systems, although in-tube–based 3D cell culture systems involving a single type of cell, imaging is relatively easy with high replicability over complex 3D techniques such as organoids and scaffold-based systems
    Technical complexityLowHigher and varies according to the type of 3D culture system being usedCacciamali et al [20]In this protocol, complexity is moderate when compared with a 2D culture system
    ScalabilityHighVariable and technique dependentFang and Eglen [21]Depends on the 3D cell culture technique but is relatively high for tube-based 3D cell culture techniques. Scalability is especially restricted in scaffold and matrix and microfluidic 3D models
    ReproducibilityHighVariable and technique dependentDuval et al [14]Typically higher than other 3D cell culture techniques
    Cost of experimentationLowHigh—varies with techniqueKhalil et al [22]Typically higher than 2D cell culture techniques, varies with technique but lower when compared with scaffold or matrix, organoid, and microfluidic 3D models
    Cost of maintenanceLowHigh—varies with techniqueRaic et al [23]Typically higher than 2D cell culture techniques, varies with technique but lower when compared with scaffold or matrix, organoid, and microfluidic 3D models.

    aThe 3D tube-based method for culturing chondrocytes demonstrated in this protocol offers advantages over 2D culture plates, such as enhanced cell-cell interactions, improved extracellular matrix production, and more physiologically relevant cellular responses. Although this tube-based approach is relatively simple compared with other 3D methods such as scaffold-based systems, hydrogels, and organoids, it still possesses many benefits of 3D cell culture systems.

    Furthermore, investigating the response of the differentiated chondrocytes to proinflammatory stimuli such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a vital aspect of understanding the intricate mechanisms of cartilage tissue degeneration and inflammation. By creating a proinflammatory model using LPS with the differentiated chondrocytes, we can delve deeper into the cellular and molecular responses that occur during inflammatory conditions such as osteoarthritis. This knowledge is crucial for the development of targeted therapies to mitigate inflammation and promote cartilage regeneration.

    Objective

    In this concise research protocol, we outline an uncomplicated approach to differentiate BMSCs into chondrocytes within a 3D culture system. Subsequently, we establish a proinflammatory model using the differentiated chondrocytes for further investigation. This succinct research protocol not only provides a valuable contribution to the field of cartilage tissue engineering but also offers a practical foundation for researchers seeking to explore the potential therapeutic applications and underlying molecular mechanisms in chondrocyte-based proinflammatory models.


    Reagents and Equipment

    The different reagents and equipment that were used in this study are presented in Textbox 1 in the form of a list for ease of use and reference by researchers.

    Textbox 1. Reagents and equipment used in this study.

    Cell culture

    • Reagents
    • Human BMSC line (Addexbio, United States [24])
    • Complete MesenCult-ACF Chondrogenic Differentiation Medium (Stem Cell Technologies, Canada [25])
    • Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Gibco, United Kingdom [26])
      • Mesenchymal stem cell growth media (MSCM; Himedia, India [27])
      • Fetal bovine serum (Himedia, United States [28])
      • Penicillin-streptomycin solution (Himedia, India [29])
      • Trypsin and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid solution (Himedia, India [30])
    • Equipment
      • Automated cell counter (DeNovix, Cell Drop, United States [31])
      • Microfuge 20 centrifuge [32]

    Histological section of pellets

    • Reagents
      • Dimethyl sulfoxide [33]
      • Neutral-buffered formalin (TissuePro, United States [34])
    • Equipment
      • Microtome (Leica RM2255, Germany [35])

    Staining of chondrocytes

    • Reagents
      • Toluidine blue (C15H16N3S+; Abcam, United States [36])
      • Alcian blue (C56H68C14CuN16S4; Abcam, United States [37])
    • Equipment
      • Olympus BX63 microscope (Japan [38])

    Creation and evaluation of proinflammation model

    • Reagents
      • LPS (Thermofisher Scientific, United States [39])
      • Vitamin D (calcitriol; 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25(OH)2D3]; Abcam, United States [40])
      • Curcumin (MedChem Express, Ukraine [41])
      • Resveratrol (MedChem Express, Ukraine [42])

    Cytokine expression study

    • Reagents
      • Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (Abcam, United States [43])
    • Equipment
      • Microplate reader (Hidex, Finland [44])

    Ethical Considerations

    In this study, we conducted experimental procedures exclusively using in vitro methodologies with commercially available cell lines. The absence of animal models or samples, patient samples or data, and the recruitment of human participants ensured minimal risk associated with our research. As such, this study falls under 1 of the exempt review categories defined by the institutional review board regulations of Mohammed Bin Rashid University. For further information and clarification, the institutional review board of the Mohammed Bin Rashid University can be reached at irb@mbru.ac.ae.

    As our experiments were conducted using commercially purchased cell lines and did not involve human participants, there was no requirement for informed consent or the inclusion of minors, eliminating the need for parental or guardian consent. In addition, our study did not involve the use of medical records or archived samples. As no human participants were involved, the need for a language waiver was not applicable.

    In summary, our study focused on in vitro experiments using commercially available cell lines, negating the involvement of human participants. Consequently, no participant consent was required, and the need for consent, as well as a language waiver which is often required for addressing a form or an agreement while obtaining consent, was waived by the ethics committee. This study complies with human subject research ethics review, exemptions, and approvals, although it primarily involves observations of public behaviors or secondary analyses of research data.

    As this study did not involve human participants, the privacy and confidentiality protection descriptions for human participants research, such as statements about data anonymity or deidentification, were not applicable. In addition, because our research did not involve human participants, there was no compensation type or amount provided for human participants research.

    The workflow underlying the proof-of-concept study is shown in Figure 1.

    ‎
    Figure 1. Workflow of this study. LPS: lipopolysaccharide; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-α.

    Preparation of Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell Line for Cell Culture

    Upon receiving the human BMSC line in liquid nitrogen, they were immediately washed with PBS to ensure that the cells were free from the cryoprotectant dimethyl sulfoxide. The washed cells were then cultured in MSCM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin-streptomycin antibiotic solution. After the addition of MSCM, the cells were kept in an incubator at 37 °C and 5% carbon dioxide. The cell culture medium was replaced with fresh medium at an interval of 3 days, and their confluency was appraised. Once the cells reached 90% confluence, the proteolytic enzyme trypsin was added to dislodge the adherent cells from the culture flask. Trypsinization was performed using trypsin and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid solution. The detached cells were subcultured for further growth in MSCM.

    Cell Culture

    In this study, we cultured cells as pellets in 15-mL tubes, instead of using a monolayer culture. Although we did not use a matrix gel or scaffold, our cell culture system can be categorized as a “simple 3D cell culture system.” In this pellet culture system, cells are aggregated and allowed to form spheroids or clusters, promoting cell-cell and cell-ECM interactions that more closely resemble the in vivo cellular environment compared with traditional 2D monolayer cultures [45].

    This pellet culture system has several advantages over the 2D cell culture system. First, the 3D cell culture system provides a more physiologically relevant environment for the cells, allowing for better simulation of in vivo conditions, including nutrient diffusion, oxygen gradients, and cell signaling (Table 1) [8]. Second, cell behavior, morphology, and gene expression profiles are often more representative of in vivo conditions in 3D culture systems compared with 2D monolayers (Table 1) [14]. As a result, the pellet culture system may provide more accurate insights into cellular responses to various stimuli, such as drug treatments or the presence of inflammatory molecules, which can be beneficial for therapeutic development and disease modeling.

    It is worth noting that although the pellet culture system described in this study represents a simple form of 3D cell culture, more complex 3D culture systems using scaffolds or matrix gels can further enhance the recapitulation of the in vivo microenvironment and may provide additional benefits for various applications [46].

    After 5 passages of subculture (passage 5), the BMSCs were used for chondrogenic differentiation. For chondrogenic differentiation, 2 × 106 BMSCs (estimated using an automated cell counter) were pelleted in 15-mL polypropylene tubes after centrifugation at 1000 rpm for 10 minutes. In total, 2 mL of complete MSCM chondrogenic differentiation medium was added to the cell pellet, from which 0.5 mL of the cell suspension was added to each 15-mL polypropylene tube (4 in total) for “in-tube” differentiation. Each of these tubes was centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 10 minutes at 25 °C. Caps of the tubes were gently loosened, and the tubes were incubated at 37 °C in the presence of 5% carbon dioxide to ensure that there were no alterations in the pH of the cell culture media. After 3 days of incubation, 0.5 mL of complete MSCM chondrogenic differentiation medium was added to the tubes, followed by incubation at 37 °C in the presence of 5% CO₂ for 3 days. After incubation, the cell culture medium was carefully aspirated from each tube, and 0.5 mL of fresh MSCM chondrogenic differentiation medium was added. The tubes were further incubated at 37 °C in the presence of 5% CO₂ for 21 days, with intermittent replacement (at 3-day intervals) of cell culture medium with fresh MSCM chondrogenic differentiation medium. After each change of cell culture medium, the differentiating cell pellets were gently “flicked” to ensure that the pellets did not adhere to the tube surfaces. After 21 days of incubation, the cell pellets, which were at the stage of chondrogenic differentiation to prechondrocytes, were further incubated for 7 days.

    Cryopreservation of Differentiated Chondrocytes

    Chondrocytes intended for cryopreservation were centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 10 minutes. The cells were then resuspended in the freezing medium and transferred into suitable sized cryovials. The pellets were kept at −80 °C overnight, followed by storage in a liquid nitrogen tank for long-term use.

    Preparation of Histological Section From Cell Pellet

    The pellet was transferred to a histology cassette, followed by fixation in 10% neutral-buffered formalin for 24 hours. The cassette along with the pellet were then transferred to 70% ethanol, followed by dehydration in graded ethanol series (25%, 50%, 75%, 90%, 95%, and 100% for 3 minutes each). The clarification steps were carried out in xylene and embedded in paraffin, following a standard embedding protocol. Cell pellets containing chondrocytes were sectioned (6 µm) using a microtome. The sections were mounted on slides. The sections were deparaffinized in 3 changes of xylene, followed by rehydration of the slide sections using a decreasing alcohol series (100%, 95%, 90%, 75%, 50%, and 25% for 3 minutes each), followed by a final rinse with deionized water for 5 minutes.

    Toluidine Blue Staining

    Toluidine blue solution was prepared by dissolving 0.1 g of toluidine blue in 100 mL of deionized water. The pH of the solution was adjusted to 4. Following the preparation of slides (as described in detail in the Preparation of Histological Section From Cell Pellet section), the slides were stained with toluidine blue and kept for 2 minutes at room temperature. The slides were carefully rinsed with water for 1 minute, followed by dehydration in a graded ethanol series (25%, 50%, 75%, 90%, 95%, and 100% for 3 minutes each). The slides were incubated in xylene for 5 minutes to improve visibility by removal of impurities, and mounted in mounting solution. The slides were then observed using a microscope.

    Alcian Blue Staining

    The alcian blue solution was prepared by dissolving 1 g of alcian blue in 3% acetic acid. The pH of the solution was adjusted to 2.5. The preprepared slides (as described in detail in the Preparation of Histological Section From Cell Pellet section) containing 6-μm sections of the pellet were placed in 3% acetic acid solution for 3 minutes. The slides were placed in a 1% solution of alcian blue for 30 minutes. The slides were then washed with running water for 1 minute, followed by dehydration in a graded ethanol series (25%, 50%, 75%, 90%, 95%, and 100% for 3 minutes each). The slides were incubated in xylene for 5 minutes to improve visibility by removal of impurities, and mounted in mounting solution. The slides were then observed using a microscope.

    Microscopic Analysis

    The Olympus BX63 microscope was used to analyze the staining protocol. The microscope is equipped with Olympus DP80 camera (resolution of 4080 × 3072 pixels and pixel size of 6.45 × 6.45 µm) with Cell Sens Dimension 2.3 software (Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions GmbH). Images were acquired with 20X (numerical aperture 0.45; 1920 × 1200 pixels; 465.079-nm/pixel resolution in both x-axis and y-axis) and 40X (numerical aperture 0.6; 1920 × 1200 pixels; 232.54-nm/pixel resolution in both x-axis and y-axis) objective lenses.

    Creation and Evaluation of the Proinflammation Model

    LPS was used to stimulate inflammation in the differentiated chondrocytes to create the proinflammation model. LPS was administered at 10 µg/mL concentration to the differentiated chondrocytes to induce inflammation. The cells were incubated in an incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO₂ concentration for 1 day.

    To validate our proinflammation model, we evaluated the anti-inflammatory effects of vitamin D, curcumin, and resveratrol by their dose-dependent inhibition of TNF-α. After 1 day of LPS treatment, LPS-treated chondrocytes were treated with various doses of vitamin D (calcitriol) at 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.12, and 0.25 µM. Curcumin and resveratrol were used at various concentrations (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100 µM). Following treatment with these nutraceutical leads, the cells were incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO₂ concentration for 1 day.

    Cytokine Expression Study

    Expression of TNF-α was assessed in LPS-treated chondrocytes with or without vitamin D, curcumin, and resveratrol. The chondrocyte supernatants were collected by centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 10 minutes. Concentrations of TNF-α were determined through the use of a commercially available ELISA kit. The assay was performed in accordance with the manufacturer’s guidelines. The plates were precoated with human TNF-α. TNF-α levels were measured using a microplate reader at 450 nm, with a reference wavelength of 620 nm. All experiments were performed independently 3 times. All data were reported as mean (SD).


    Qualitative Evaluation of Differentiated Chondrocytes

    Chondrocytes successfully differentiated from human BMSCs (Figure 2A) after culturing in a chondrogenic differentiation medium. The quality of the differentiated chondrocytes was assessed histologically using 2 different dyes: toluidine blue (Figure 2B) and alcian blue (Figure 2C).

    ‎
    Figure 2. Qualitative analysis of the differentiated chondrocytes. (A) Differentiated chondrocytes obtained from bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells after 28 days; (B) differentiated chondrocytes stained with toluidine blue, and (C) differentiated chondrocytes stained with alcian blue.

    Qualitative assessment of successful chondrogenic differentiation of BMSCs was pursued using toluidine blue staining, where the cationic dye specifically binds to the sulfate groups of proteoglycans. A well-differentiated chondrocyte will stain purple owing to the presence of proteoglycans in the ECM, as observed in this study (Figure 2B). The expression of proteoglycan (aggrecan), type II collagen and type X collagen after 21 days of differentiation, was confirmed in the chondrocytes by alcian blue staining (Figure 2C).

    Creation of Proinflammatory Chondrocyte Model and Its Evaluation

    Following the generation of high-quality chondrocytes from BMSCs, inflammation was induced in the chondrocytes to generate a “proinflammation model.” Inflammation was induced using LPS, a biomolecule of predominant abundance in the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria, which is a key pathogenic stimulator for the dysfunctions. During septicemia, circulating LPS, as a pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) stimulates the innate immune system, leading to local or systemic inflammatory responses. It has also been shown that LPS also stimulates nonimmune cells and initiates the severe inflammatory responses through dedicated receptors. In particular, the innate LPS–pattern recognition receptor, that is, the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), is extensively expressed in cardiomyocytes, which leads to a severe LPS-induced inflammatory response in cardiomyocytes irrespective of the involvement of immune cells [47,48]. TLR4 is also extensively expressed in chondrocytes [49]. Building upon this foundation, we postulated that LPS can trigger proinflammatory reactions in differentiated chondrocytes independent of immune cell participation.

    To assess inflammation, the levels of TNF-α in LPS-treated chondrocytes versus LPS-naive chondrocytes (control) were investigated. TNF-α holds particular significance in comparison with other cytokines, with respect to inflammation in chondrocytes. This is primarily because of its well-established role as a key mediator of inflammatory processes in various cell types, including chondrocytes. Several studies have demonstrated the crucial involvement of TNF-α in the pathogenesis of cartilage degradation and osteoarthritis [50-52].

    First, TNF-α has been shown to directly promote the production of other proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and interleukin-6, which subsequently contribute to the inflammatory cascade in chondrocytes [50,53,54]. This amplification of the inflammatory response highlights the central role of TNF-α in this process.

    Moreover, TNF-α has been found to induce the expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in chondrocytes [55]. MMPs are enzymes responsible for the degradation of the ECM in cartilage tissue, thereby playing a crucial role in cartilage breakdown and the progression of osteoarthritis [56].

    In addition, TNF-α can inhibit the synthesis of cartilage matrix components, such as aggrecan and type II collagen, further impairing the structural integrity and function of the cartilage [57,58]. This effect on cartilage homeostasis further underscores the importance of TNF-α as a marker for assessing inflammation in chondrocytes.

    In light of these findings, focusing on TNF-α as a marker for evaluating inflammation in chondrocytes is well justified, as it serves as a reliable indicator of the extent of cartilage degradation and the inflammatory status of chondrocytes in various pathological conditions.

    Following the addition of LPS, differentiated chondrocytes were incubated for 24 hours, following which the level of TNF-α was assessed by ELISA. LPS-treated chondrocytes expressed 40% more TNF-α, when compared with the LPS-naive chondrocytes (control population of cells treated with PBS instead of LPS).

    Investigating the Effects of Vitamin D, Curcumin, and Resveratrol on Chondrocytes Derived From the “In-Tube” Culture System

    After successfully establishing a proinflammatory chondrocyte model, we evaluated its applicability for characterizing potential therapeutic candidates. In this context, we investigated the impact of vitamin D, curcumin, and resveratrol in ameliorating the expression of TNF-α in the proinflammatory chondrocyte model (Table 2).

    Table 2. Anti-inflammatory response of vitamin D, curcumin, and resveratrol at different doses in the generated proinflammatory chondrocyte model. (Note: Increasing concentrations of the bioceuticals attenuate tumor necrosis factor-α [TNF-α] expression, although vitamin D exhibits the highest potency of inhibition).
    Doses (µM)Percentage of TNF-α expression, mean (SD)TNF-α expression reduction at max assessed dose (%)
    Vitamin D66.1

    		0100 (0.2)

    		0.0188 (2.3)

    		0.0272 (1.7)

    		0.1258 (1.9)

    		0.2533.9 (0.9)
    Curcumin61.9

    		0100 (0.8)

    		1088.4 (2.9)

    		2572.9 (5.8)

    		5059.7 (1.2)

    		7544.3 (6.4)

    		10038.1 (2.4)
    Resveratrol45.3

    		0100 (1.9)

    		1092.3 (2.4)

    		2588.2 (6.8)

    		5076.2 (3.7)

    		7563.0 (5.9)

    		10054.7 (3.0)

    Although the effects of vitamin D on TNF-α are well described in the literature, our study focuses on the unique “in-tube” 3D culture approach for differentiating BMSCs into chondrocytes. This novel method offers significant advantages over traditional 2D culture systems (Table 1), such as improved cell-cell interactions, increased ECM production, and more physiologically relevant cellular responses. Given the unique nature of the “in-tube” culture system, it is essential to verify whether the well-known anti-inflammatory effects of vitamin D on TNF-α are maintained. Using vitamin D in our protocol, we aim to assess the reproducibility and consistency of its effects in an innovative 3D chondrocyte model.

    Moreover, the inclusion of vitamin D serves as a positive control to validate the effectiveness of our proinflammatory chondrocyte model, as its effects on TNF-α reduction are well established. By demonstrating that vitamin D effectively reduces TNF-α levels in our “in-tube” culture system, we can confirm the suitability of the model for investigating other potential therapeutics, such as curcumin and resveratrol.

    In summary, the use of vitamin D in our protocol is justified by the need to validate the “in-tube” 3D culture system’s ability to replicate well-known anti-inflammatory effects as well as to provide a positive control for evaluating the effectiveness of other nutraceuticals, such as curcumin and resveratrol. The inclusion of vitamin D, along with curcumin and resveratrol, expands our understanding of the potential therapeutic leads for inflammatory chondrocyte–related diseases in the context of our unique 3D culture model.

    Vitamin D, specifically its active form, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3), has been shown to exert anti-inflammatory effects in various cell types, including chondrocytes. It modulates the production of proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-1β, and suppresses the expression of MMPs, which are involved in cartilage degradation [59]. In addition, vitamin D promotes chondrocyte differentiation and enhances the synthesis of ECM components such as type II collagen and aggrecan [60]. Thus, vitamin D can be used to assess the effectiveness of anti-inflammatory agents in a proinflammatory chondrocyte model.

    Curcumin, the bioactive component of turmeric, has demonstrated potent anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and chondroprotective properties [61]. Studies have shown that curcumin can inhibit the expression of proinflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-1β, and interleukin-6, as well as MMPs in chondrocytes [62-64]. Furthermore, curcumin suppresses the activation of the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB), a key transcription factor involved in the regulation of inflammation and cartilage destruction [63]. Therefore, curcumin is an ideal candidate for assessing the efficacy of anti-inflammatory interventions in a proinflammatory chondrocyte model.

    Resveratrol, a polyphenol found in grapes, red wine, and other plant sources, exhibits strong anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. Research has shown that resveratrol can attenuate inflammation in chondrocytes by inhibiting the production of proinflammatory cytokines and reducing oxidative stress [65]. Moreover, resveratrol suppresses the activation of NF-κB and the expression of MMPs, which are implicated in cartilage degradation [63]. Given its well-documented anti-inflammatory and chondroprotective effects, resveratrol is an appropriate choice for evaluating the performance of anti-inflammatory agents in a proinflammatory chondrocyte model.

    In summary, vitamin D, curcumin, and resveratrol possess anti-inflammatory and chondroprotective properties, which make them suitable for assessing the effectiveness of potential therapeutic interventions in a proinflammatory chondrocyte model.

    Chondrocytes treated with LPS were exposed to varying concentrations of vitamin D, curcumin, and resveratrol. Each of these nutraceuticals effectively mitigated inflammation, as evidenced by the inverse relationship observed between TNF-α levels and the administered doses of vitamin D, curcumin, and resveratrol (Table 2). This finding has significant implications, as it highlights the potential therapeutic utility of these bioactive compounds in alleviating inflammation and promoting cartilage health in the context of inflammatory chondrocyte conditions. Furthermore, the successful demonstration of the anti-inflammatory effects of vitamin D, curcumin, and resveratrol in this model validates their utility for screening and evaluating other potential therapeutics.


    Principal Findings

    In summary, we have described a straightforward and efficient protocol for generating a large quantity of viable chondrocytes derived from BMSCs in a simple pellet-based 3D culture system. This approach, although not using a matrix gel or scaffold, allows for cell aggregation and spheroid formation, facilitating cell-cell and cell-ECM interactions that better mimic the in vivo cellular environment compared with 2D monolayer cultures. However, it is important to note that the pellet culture system is a simple form of 3D cell culture. More complex 3D culture systems using scaffolds or matrix gels can further improve the recapitulation of the in vivo microenvironment, providing additional benefits for various applications.

    This approach can also be used to evaluate the effects of potential therapeutic agents on the inflammatory response of chondrocytes. Importantly, this protocol is accessible to all laboratories, including those without readily available patient samples. Furthermore, this “proinflammatory model” can be used to investigate therapeutic targets for diseases involving chondrocytes, such as osteoarthritis.

    A notable aspect of this model is its versatility, as it has been effectively used to assess the anti-inflammatory effects of various bioactive compounds such as vitamin D, curcumin, and resveratrol (Table 2). This adaptability allows researchers to explore a wide range of potential therapeutic leads in the context of inflammatory chondrocyte–related diseases, ultimately expanding our understanding of these compounds’ mechanisms of action and their potential for clinical application.

    The established model offers several advantages over the existing methods reported in the literature. First, unlike some chondrogenesis models that recommend the use of synthetic or hybrid scaffolds [66], this model does not require scaffold presence. For instance, Sofu et al [67] demonstrated chondrogenesis using a hyaluronic acid scaffold. The incorporation of scaffolds not only adds multiple steps to the experimental process but also increases costs.

    Second, our novel chondrogenic differentiation protocol uses an “in-tube” culture system, which reduces the need for cell splitting. Consequently, this minimized the cells’ exposure to degradative enzymes, ensuring the production of higher-quality cells (Figure 2).

    Third, by significantly reducing the number of cell-splitting steps, our protocol minimizes human intervention in the chondrogenic differentiation process. This reduction in intervention subsequently decreases the risk of bacterial contamination, genetic alterations, and phenotypic instabilities [68]. Overall, the proposed protocol offers an accessible, cost-effective, and efficient method for generating chondrocytes and for assessing potential therapeutic leads in the context of inflammatory chondrocyte–related diseases.

    The chondrocytes derived through this “in-tube” protocol also have diverse applications:

    • Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: The derived chondrocytes can be used for the development of engineered cartilage constructs for cartilage repair and regeneration, particularly in conditions such as osteoarthritis and focal cartilage defects.
    • Drug screening and development: The chondrocytes can serve as an in vitro model for evaluating the efficacy and safety of novel therapeutic compounds targeting cartilage-related disorders, potentially accelerating the drug discovery process.
    • Disease modeling: The derived chondrocytes can be used to establish in vitro models for investigating the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying various cartilage-related diseases, providing valuable insights into disease pathogenesis and progression.
    • Personalized medicine: By generating patient-specific chondrocytes from autologous BMSCs, our protocol could facilitate the development of personalized treatment strategies tailored to individual patients’ needs, thereby improving therapeutic outcomes and reducing the risk of adverse effects.

    Limitations

    Nevertheless, certain aspects of the developed model warrant further investigation. One of the limitations of our proposed protocol is the potential difference between chondrocytes generated using our method and those derived from other established protocols or directly isolated from humans or laboratory animals. Although our simple 3D cell culture system facilitates cell-cell and cell-ECM interactions that more closely resemble the in vivo cellular environment compared with traditional 2D monolayer cultures, it is important to recognize that this system is not as advanced as more complex 3D culture systems using scaffolds or matrix gels. These more sophisticated systems can further improve the recapitulation of the in vivo microenvironment and provide additional benefits for various applications.

    Another aspect to consider is the use of single-cell transcriptomics to compare the gene expression profiles of chondrocytes generated using our protocol with those isolated directly from humans or laboratory animals. This analysis would help to validate the methodological strength of our approach and provide valuable insights into the similarities and differences between the generated chondrocytes.

    Another limitation of our protocol is that the pellet culture system, although beneficial for cell aggregation and spheroid formation, may not be suitable for all cell types or for studying specific cellular behaviors. Certain cell types may not adhere or proliferate well in this system, and the lack of a defined matrix or scaffold may limit the ability to investigate cell-matrix interactions and cellular migration.

    In addition, our protocol has not been extensively tested for scalability, which could be a concern when attempting to generate large quantities of chondrocytes for applications such as tissue engineering or regenerative medicine. Further optimization of the protocol may be required to ensure that the system can be effectively scaled up to meet the demands of these applications.

    Moreover, in response to an inflammatory microenvironment, chondrocytes adapt their physiology by modulating the expression of cell surface proteins, collectively referred to as the “surfaceome” [69], and the assortment of transporters and ion channels, known as the “channelome” [70]. It is crucial to determine whether the chondrocytes obtained using this new protocol exhibit surfaceome and channelome profiles consistent with those found in physiological conditions.

    In addition, other potential limitations of this study should be acknowledged. For instance, further research is necessary to validate the long-term stability and functionality of the generated chondrocytes in both in vitro and in vivo settings. Moreover, it would be beneficial to explore the effects of other inflammatory mediators on the chondrocytes derived from this protocol to determine their applicability in a broader range of inflammation-driven scenarios. Finally, a comprehensive assessment of the safety and efficacy of the tested bioactive compounds is essential before transitioning to clinical applications. By addressing these limitations, the model used in this study can be refined and expanded to provide a more robust foundation for future research on inflammatory chondrocyte–related diseases.

    Conclusions

    In conclusion, the development of our novel, streamlined protocol for generating chondrocytes from BMSCs in a 3D culture system offers significant implications for the study of cartilage biology and the discovery of potential therapeutic interventions for cartilage-related disorders. The “in-tube” culture approach not only allows for the efficient production of viable chondrocytes but also provides a versatile platform for evaluating the anti-inflammatory effects of various bioactive compounds, as demonstrated by the decreased TNF-α levels following treatment with vitamin D, curcumin, and resveratrol. This accessible and cost-effective model holds promise for advancing our understanding of chondrocyte function in cartilage homeostasis and its response to inflammation, which is critical for unraveling the progression of cartilage-related diseases and identifying novel therapeutic strategies. Although our findings contribute to the growing body of knowledge in the field, further investigation is needed to address the limitations of the model used in this study, refine its applicability, and facilitate its translation into clinical practice. By doing so, this innovative approach may ultimately pave the way for the development of more effective and targeted therapies for a range of cartilage-related disorders, ultimately improving patient outcomes and quality of life.

    Acknowledgments

    This study was supported by an internal grant from Mohammed Bin Rashid University (MBRU-CM-RG2022-04). RP would like to thank Mr Surendra Singh Rawat for his kind assistance with the microscopic experiments and analysis described in the manuscript.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    1. Gupta PK, Das AK, Chullikana A, Majumdar AS. Mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage repair in osteoarthritis. Stem Cell Res Ther. Jul 09, 2012;3(4):25. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. Ding N, Li E, Ouyang X, Guo J, Wei B. The therapeutic potential of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for articular cartilage regeneration in osteoarthritis. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;16(7):840-847. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Colombini A, Perucca Orfei C, Kouroupis D, Ragni E, De Luca P, ViganÒ M, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of articular cartilage degeneration: new biological insights for an old-timer cell. Cytotherapy. Dec 2019;21(12):1179-1197. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Antoni D, Burckel H, Josset E, Noel G. Three-dimensional cell culture: a breakthrough in vivo. Int J Mol Sci. Mar 11, 2015;16(3):5517-5527. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Abbott A. Cell culture: biology's new dimension. Nature. Aug 21, 2003;424(6951):870-872. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Breslin S, O'Driscoll L. Three-dimensional cell culture: the missing link in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today. Mar 2013;18(5-6):240-249. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Cukierman E, Pankov R, Yamada KM. Cell interactions with three-dimensional matrices. Curr Opin Cell Biol. Oct 2002;14(5):633-639. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Edmondson R, Broglie JJ, Adcock AF, Yang L. Three-dimensional cell culture systems and their applications in drug discovery and cell-based biosensors. Assay Drug Dev Technol. May 2014;12(4):207-218. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Théry M. Micropatterning as a tool to decipher cell morphogenesis and functions. J Cell Sci. Dec 15, 2010;123(Pt 24):4201-4213. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Bissell MJ, Radisky D. Putting tumours in context. Nat Rev Cancer. Oct 2001;1(1):46-54. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Friedl P, Alexander S. Cancer invasion and the microenvironment: plasticity and reciprocity. Cell. Nov 23, 2011;147(5):992-1009. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Ravi M, Paramesh V, Kaviya SR, Anuradha E, Solomon FD. 3D cell culture systems: advantages and applications. J Cell Physiol. Jan 2015;230(1):16-26. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Krausz E, de Hoogt R, Gustin E, Cornelissen F, Grand-Perret T, Janssen L, et al. Translation of a tumor microenvironment mimicking 3D tumor growth co-culture assay platform to high-content screening. J Biomol Screen. Jan 2013;18(1):54-66. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Duval K, Grover H, Han LH, Mou Y, Pegoraro AF, Fredberg J, et al. Modeling physiological events in 2D vs. 3D cell culture. Physiology (Bethesda). Jul 2017;32(4):266-277. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Hockemeyer D, Jaenisch R. Induced pluripotent stem cells meet genome editing. Cell Stem Cell. May 05, 2016;18(5):573-586. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Langhans SA. Three-dimensional in vitro cell culture models in drug discovery and drug repositioning. Front Pharmacol. Jan 23, 2018;9:6. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Imamura Y, Mukohara T, Shimono Y, Funakoshi Y, Chayahara N, Toyoda M, et al. Comparison of 2D- and 3D-culture models as drug-testing platforms in breast cancer. Oncol Rep. Apr 2015;33(4):1837-1843. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Badr-Eldin SM, Aldawsari HM, Kotta S, Deb PK, Venugopala KN. Three-dimensional in vitro cell culture models for efficient drug discovery: progress so far and future prospects. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). Jul 27, 2022;15(8):926. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Temple J, Velliou E, Shehata M, Lévy R. Current strategies with implementation of three-dimensional cell culture: the challenge of quantification. Interface Focus. Aug 12, 2022;12(5):20220019. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    20. Cacciamali A, Villa R, Dotti S. 3D cell cultures: evolution of an ancient tool for new applications. Front Physiol. Jul 22, 2022;13:836480. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    21. Fang Y, Eglen RM. Three-dimensional cell cultures in drug discovery and development. SLAS Discov. Jun 2017;22(5):456-472. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Khalil S, El-Badri N, El-Mokhtaar M, Al-Mofty S, Farghaly M, Ayman R, et al. A cost-effective method to assemble biomimetic 3D cell culture platforms. PLoS One. Dec 09, 2016;11(12):e0167116. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. Raic A, Rödling L, Kalbacher H, Lee-Thedieck C. Biomimetic macroporous PEG hydrogels as 3D scaffolds for the multiplication of human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Biomaterials. Jan 2014;35(3):929-940. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Human mesenchymal stem cell line bone marrow (HMSC-bm) cell line | P0004011. Maximum. URL: https:/​/maxanim.​com/​cancer-cell-lines/​human-mesenchymal-stem-cell-line-bone-marrow-hmsc-bm-cell-line-p0004011/​?setCurrencyId=3 [accessed 2023-07-11]
    25. MesenCult™-ACF chondrogenic differentiation kit. Stemcell Technologies. URL: https://www.stemcell.com/products/mesencult-acf-chondrogenic-differentiation-medium.html [accessed 2023-07-11]
    26. PBS, pH 7.4. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. URL: https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/10010023 [accessed 1999-11-30]
    27. Home page. HiMedia Laboratories. URL: https://www.himedialabs.com/in/ [accessed 2023-07-11]
    28. RM10938: fetal bovine serum mesenchymal stem cell tested us origin, sterile filtered. HiMedia Laboratories. URL: https:/​/www.​himedialabs.com/​in/​rm10938-fetal-bovine-serum-mesenchymal-stem-cell-tested-us-origin-sterile-filtered.​html [accessed 2023-07-11]
    29. A014: antibiotic solution 100X Liquid w/ 10,000U penicillin and 10 mg streptomycin per ml in citrate buffer. HiMedia Laboratories. URL: https:/​/www.​himedialabs.com/​in/​a014-antibiotic-solution-100x-liquid-w-10000u-penicillin-and-10-mg-streptomycin-per-ml-in-citrate-buffer.​html [accessed 2023-07-11]
    30. TCL014: trypsin - EDTA solution 1X 0.25% Trypsin and 0.001% EDTA in Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline w/o phenol red. HiMedia Laboratories. URL: https:/​/www.​himedialabs.com/​in/​tcl014-trypsin-edta-solution-1x-0-25-trypsin-and-0-001-edta-in-dulbeccos-phosphate-buffered-saline-w-o-phenol-red.​html [accessed 2023-07-11]
    31. CellDrop™ automated cell counters. Denovix. URL: https://www.denovix.com/products/celldrop/ [accessed 2023-07-11]
    32. Microcentrifuges from Beckman coulter. Beckman Coulter. URL: https:/​/www.​beckman.com/​landing/​ppc/​cent/​benchtop/​microcentrifuges?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_term=microcentrifuge&gclid=Cj0KCQjwlumhBhClARIsABO6p-zhzwqYhCYCHUa8XKKLNhT1sST39eisO9Z7vspcunmYinB3AgvyzuAaAoWNEALw_wcB [accessed 2023-07-11]
    33. Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO). Merck KGaA. URL: https://www.merckmillipore.com/IN/en/product/Dimethyl-Sulfoxide-DMSO,MM_NF-20-139 [accessed 2023-07-11]
    34. Tissue Protech. URL: https://tissueprotech.com/fixative-solution-10-formalin-4-paraformaldehyde/22-10-nfb-32-oz.html [accessed 2023-07-11]
    35. Leica RM2255 fully automated rotary microtome. Leica Biosystems Nussloch. URL: https://www.leicabiosystems.com/histology-equipment/microtomes/leica-rm2255/ [accessed 2023-07-11]
    36. Toluidine blue O, metachromatic dye (ab146366). Abcam plc. URL: https://www.abcam.com/products/biochemicals/toluidine-blue-o-metachromatic-dye-ab146366.html [accessed 2023-07-11]
    37. Alcian Blue stain kit (pH 2.5, Mucin Stain) (ab150662). Abcam plc. URL: https://www.abcam.com/products/assay-kits/alcian-blue-stain-kit-ph-25-mucin-stain-ab150662.html [accessed 2023-07-11]
    38. BX63: automated fluorescence microscope. Evident. URL: https://www.olympus-lifescience.com/en/microscopes/upright/bx63/ [accessed 2023-07-11]
    39. eBioscience™ Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) Solution (500X). Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. URL: https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/00-4976-93 [accessed 2023-07-11]
    40. Calcitriol, Vitamin D receptor (VDR) agonist (ab141456). Abcam plc. URL: https://www.abcam.com/products/biochemicals/calcitriol-vitamin-d-receptor-vdr-agonist-ab141456.html [accessed 2023-07-11]
    41. Curcumin-d6. MedChemExpress. URL: https://www.medchemexpress.com/curcumin-d6.html [accessed 2023-07-11]
    42. Resveratrol. MedChemExpress. URL: https://www.medchemexpress.com/Resveratrol.html [accessed 2023-07-11]
    43. Human TNF alpha ELISA kit (ab181421). Abcam plc. URL: https://www.abcam.com/products/elisa/human-tnf-alpha-elisa-kit-ab181421.html [accessed 2023-07-11]
    44. Hidex Sense: multi-mode microplate reader. LabLogic Systems Ltd. URL: https://lablogic.com/life-sciences/instruments/hidex-sense [accessed 2023-07-11]
    45. Fennema E, Rivron N, Rouwkema J, van Blitterswijk C, de Boer J. Spheroid culture as a tool for creating 3D complex tissues. Trends Biotechnol. Feb 2013;31(2):108-115. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    46. Baker BM, Chen CS. Deconstructing the third dimension: how 3D culture microenvironments alter cellular cues. J Cell Sci. Jul 01, 2012;125(Pt 13):3015-3024. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    47. Frantz S, Kobzik L, Kim YD, Fukazawa R, Medzhitov R, Lee RT, et al. Toll4 (TLR4) expression in cardiac myocytes in normal and failing myocardium. J Clin Invest. Aug 1999;104(3):271-280. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    48. Tavener SA, Long EM, Robbins SM, McRae KM, Van Remmen H, Kubes P. Immune cell toll-like receptor 4 is required for cardiac myocyte impairment during endotoxemia. Circ Res. Oct 01, 2004;95(7):700-707. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    49. Liu-Bryan R, Terkeltaub R. Chondrocyte innate immune myeloid differentiation factor 88-dependent signaling drives procatabolic effects of the endogenous toll-like receptor 2/toll-like receptor 4 ligands low molecular weight hyaluronan and high mobility group box chromosomal protein 1 in mice. Arthritis Rheum. Jul 2010;62(7):2004-2012. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    50. Kapoor M, Martel-Pelletier J, Lajeunesse D, Pelletier JP, Fahmi H. Role of proinflammatory cytokines in the pathophysiology of osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. Jan 2011;7(1):33-42. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    51. Hu G, Zhao X, Wang C, Geng Y, Zhao J, Xu J, et al. MicroRNA-145 attenuates TNF-α-driven cartilage matrix degradation in osteoarthritis via direct suppression of MKK4. Cell Death Dis. Oct 26, 2017;8(10):e3140. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    52. Caramés B, López-Armada MJ, Cillero-Pastor B, Lires-Dean M, Vaamonde C, Galdo F, et al. Differential effects of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1beta on cell death in human articular chondrocytes. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. Jun 2008;16(6):715-722. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    53. Goldring MB, Otero M. Inflammation in osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. Sep 2011;23(5):471-478. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    54. Burrage PS, Mix KS, Brinckerhoff CE. Matrix metalloproteinases: role in arthritis. Front Biosci. Jan 01, 2006;11:529-543. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    55. Bondeson J, Wainwright SD, Lauder S, Amos N, Hughes CE. The role of synovial macrophages and macrophage-produced cytokines in driving aggrecanases, matrix metalloproteinases, and other destructive and inflammatory responses in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8(6):R187. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    56. Yoshihara Y, Nakamura H, Obata K, Yamada H, Hayakawa T, Fujikawa K, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases in synovial fluids from patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. Jun 2000;59(6):455-461. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    57. Xiong X, Liu L, Xu F, Wu X, Yin Z, Dong Y, et al. Feprazone ameliorates TNF-α-induced loss of aggrecan via inhibition of the SOX-4/ADAMTS-5 signaling pathway. ACS Omega. Mar 12, 2021;6(11):7638-7645. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    58. Ahmed EA, Alzahrani AM. SOXC transcription factors as diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for arthritis. Int J Mol Sci. Feb 20, 2023;24(4):4215. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    59. Jhun J, Woo JS, Kwon JY, Na HS, Cho KH, Kim SA, et al. Vitamin D attenuates pain and cartilage destruction in OA animals via enhancing autophagic flux and attenuating inflammatory cell death. Immune Netw. Apr 19, 2022;22(4):e34. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    60. Garfinkel RJ, Dilisio MF, Agrawal DK. Vitamin D and its effects on articular cartilage and osteoarthritis. Orthop J Sports Med. Jun 20, 2017;5(6):2325967117711376. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    61. Sivani BM, Azzeh M, Patnaik R, Pantea Stoian A, Rizzo M, Banerjee Y. Reconnoitering the therapeutic role of curcumin in disease prevention and treatment: lessons learnt and future directions. Metabolites. Jul 12, 2022;12(7):639. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    62. Clutterbuck AL, Mobasheri A, Shakibaei M, Allaway D, Harris P. Interleukin-1beta-induced extracellular matrix degradation and glycosaminoglycan release is inhibited by curcumin in an explant model of cartilage inflammation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. Aug 2009;1171:428-435. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    63. Csaki C, Mobasheri A, Shakibaei M. Synergistic chondroprotective effects of curcumin and resveratrol in human articular chondrocytes: inhibition of IL-1beta-induced NF-kappaB-mediated inflammation and apoptosis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(6):R165. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    64. Henrotin Y, Clutterbuck AL, Allaway D, Lodwig EM, Harris P, Mathy-Hartert M, et al. Biological actions of curcumin on articular chondrocytes. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. Feb 2010;18(2):141-149. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    65. Dave M, Attur M, Palmer G, Al-Mussawir HE, Kennish L, Patel J, et al. The antioxidant resveratrol protects against chondrocyte apoptosis via effects on mitochondrial polarization and ATP production. Arthritis Rheum. Sep 2008;58(9):2786-2797. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    66. Wasyłeczko M, Sikorska W, Chwojnowski A. Review of synthetic and hybrid scaffolds in cartilage tissue engineering. Membranes (Basel). Nov 17, 2020;10(11):348. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    67. Sofu H, Camurcu Y, Ucpunar H, Ozcan S, Yurten H, Sahin V. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of chitosan-glycerol phosphate/blood implant are similar with hyaluronic acid-based cell-free scaffold in the treatment of focal osteochondral lesions of the knee joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. Mar 2019;27(3):773-781. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    68. Geraghty RJ, Capes-Davis A, Davis JM, Downward J, Freshney RI, Knezevic I, et al. Cancer Research UK. Guidelines for the use of cell lines in biomedical research. Br J Cancer. Sep 09, 2014;111(6):1021-1046. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    69. Matta C, Boocock DJ, Fellows CR, Miosge N, Dixon JE, Liddell S, et al. Molecular phenotyping of the surfaceome of migratory chondroprogenitors and mesenchymal stem cells using biotinylation, glycocapture and quantitative LC-MS/MS proteomic analysis. Sci Rep. Jun 21, 2019;9(1):9018. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    70. Barrett-Jolley R, Lewis R, Fallman R, Mobasheri A. The emerging chondrocyte channelome. Front Physiol. Oct 14, 2010;1:135. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

    ‎
    BMSC: bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cell
    ECM: extracellular matrix
    ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
    IL-1β: interleukin-1β
    LPS: lipopolysaccharide
    MMP: matrix metalloproteinase
    MSCM: mesenchymal stem cell growth media
    PAMP: pathogen-associated molecular pattern
    PBS: phosphate-buffered saline
    TLR4: Toll-like receptor 4
    TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-α

    Edited by A Mavragani; submitted 26.09.22; peer-reviewed by M Brent, H Sundaramoorthi; comments to author 18.10.22; revised version received 17.04.23; accepted 05.05.23; published 28.07.23.

    Copyright

    ©Rajashree Patnaik, Shirin Jannati, Bala Mohan Sivani, Manfredi Rizzo, Nerissa Naidoo, Yajnavalka Banerjee. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 28.07.2023.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.