This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Non-randomized Protocols and Methods (ehealth) (540) Insomnia and Sleep Hygiene (151) Dementia and Cognitive Decline (419) Mobile Health (mhealth) (2748) Wearable Devices and Sensors (811) mHealth for Data Collection and Research (907) Sleep Monitoring, Sleep Quality, Sleep Disorders (167)

Published on in Vol 13 (2024)

This is a member publication of University of Bristol (Jisc)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/52652, first published .
Remote Evaluation of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: Protocol for a Feasibility and Acceptability Mixed Methods Study

Remote Evaluation of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: Protocol for a Feasibility and Acceptability Mixed Methods Study

Remote Evaluation of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: Protocol for a Feasibility and Acceptability Mixed Methods Study

Authors of this article:

Victoria Grace Gabb1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Jonathan Blackman1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Hamish Duncan Morrison1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Bijetri Biswas1 Author Orcid Image ;   Haoxuan Li1, 2, 3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Nicholas Turner1 Author Orcid Image ;   Georgina M Russell1 Author Orcid Image ;   Rosemary Greenwood1, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Amy Jolly6, 7 Author Orcid Image ;   William Trender6 Author Orcid Image ;   Adam Hampshire6 Author Orcid Image ;   Alan Whone1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Elizabeth Coulthard1, 2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations (6) Metrics

    Protocol

    1Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom

    2Neurology Department, Bristol Brain Centre, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom

    3King’s College Hospital, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

    4Bristol Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom

    5Research & Innovation, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom

    6Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

    7UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom

    Corresponding Author:

    Victoria Grace Gabb, BSc (Hons), MSc

    Bristol Medical School

    University of Bristol

    Bristol Brain Centre, Elgar House

    Southmead Road

    Bristol, BS10 5NB

    United Kingdom

    Phone: 44 117 456 0700

    Email: victoria.gabb@bristol.ac.uk


    Background: Sleep disturbances are a potentially modifiable risk factor for neurodegenerative dementia secondary to Alzheimer disease (AD) and Lewy body disease (LBD). Therefore, we need to identify the best methods to study sleep in this population.

    Objective: This study will assess the feasibility and acceptability of various wearable devices, smart devices, and remote study tasks in sleep and cognition research for people with AD and LBD.

    Methods: We will deliver a feasibility and acceptability study alongside a prospective observational cohort study assessing sleep and cognition longitudinally in the home environment. Adults aged older than 50 years who were diagnosed with mild to moderate dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to probable AD or LBD and age-matched controls will be eligible. Exclusion criteria include lack of capacity to consent to research, other causes of MCI or dementia, and clinically significant sleep disorders. Participants will complete a cognitive assessment and questionnaires with a researcher and receive training and instructions for at-home study tasks across 8 weeks. At-home study tasks include remote sleep assessments using wearable devices (electroencephalography headband and actigraphy watch), app-based sleep diaries, online cognitive assessments, and saliva samples for melatonin- and cortisol-derived circadian markers. Feasibility outcomes will be assessed relating to recruitment and retention, data completeness, data quality, and support required. Feedback on acceptability and usability will be collected throughout the study period and end-of-study interviews will be analyzed using thematic analysis.

    Results: Recruitment started in February 2022. Data collection is ongoing, with final data expected in February 2024 and data analysis and publication of findings scheduled for the summer of 2024.

    Conclusions: This study will allow us to assess if remote testing using smart devices and wearable technology is a viable alternative to traditional sleep measurements, such as polysomnography and questionnaires, in older adults with and without MCI or dementia due to AD or LBD. Understanding participant experience and the barriers and facilitators to technology use for research purposes and remote research in this population will assist with the development of, recruitment to, and retention within future research projects studying sleep and cognition outside of the clinic or laboratory.

    International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/52652

    JMIR Res Protoc 2024;13:e52652

    doi:10.2196/52652

    Keywords

    feasibility; sleep; mild cognitive impairment; dementia; Lewy body disease; Alzheimer disease; Parkinson; wearable devices; research; mobile phone; electroencephalography; accelerometery; mobile applications; application; app; cognitive; cognitive impairment; sleeping; sleep disturbance; risk factor; Alzheimer; wearable; wearables; acceptability; smart device 


    Background

    Dementia is the leading cause of death in the United Kingdom [1]. While the search continues for disease-modifying therapies, key research priorities include preventing, identifying, and reducing dementia risk and improving symptom burden and quality of life for patients with dementia and those who care for them [2]. With increasing evidence to support poor sleep as an important risk factor for dementia [3-5], sleep may offer an untapped opportunity in both reducing dementia incidence and improving quality of life for those with or at risk of developing dementia.

    Sleep and Dementia

    Sleep is essential for optimal brain function and health [3]. Disrupted sleep and circadian rhythms are considered among the most debilitating symptoms in dementia, and increasing evidence suggests that sleep disturbances are a consequence of and contribute toward neurodegeneration underlying dementia including Alzheimer disease (AD) and Lewy body disease (LBD) [3,6].

    Changes to sleep such as shorter total sleep time, more nocturnal awakenings, less time spent in deep slow-wave and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, and a slight shift to earlier circadian rhythms are commonly observed as we age [7,8]. Most of these changes appear to stabilize around the seventh decade of life in healthy older adults [9]. In AD, sleep and circadian disturbances are more robust and severe than the changes seen in normal aging [10,11]. Some people with AD also experience a phenomenon known as “sundowning” (worsening of neuropsychiatric symptoms in the late afternoon or evening), which is thought to be in part caused by disturbances in circadian rhythms [12,13]. LBD is more typically associated with worse subjective sleep quality, REM sleep behavior disorder, sleep-related movement disorders such as restless legs syndrome, and higher levels of daytime sleepiness [5] compared to other dementias.

    Sleep as a Modifiable Risk Factor for Dementia

    Individuals with sleep disorders (such as insomnia), sleep-disordered breathing, sleep-related movement disorders, circadian rhythm disorders, and poor quality or insufficient sleep are more likely to develop dementia later in life [14].

    Mechanistically, chronic sleep deprivation and fragmentation are associated with various neurodegenerative processes including neuroinflammation [15], amyloid deposition [16,17], autophagy [15], tau phosphorylation [18], and hippocampal atrophy [19,20]. Sleep and circadian disturbances can precede cognitive and functional impairment, appearing in cognitively unimpaired older adults with AD biomarkers such as decreased cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-beta 42 and in mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and correlate with severity of cognitive impairment in AD [21-23]. Sleep disturbances also appear early in the disease course for LBD, particularly REM sleep behavior disorder [24,25]. Profiling sleep may offer noninvasive biomarkers for earlier diagnosis and staging, as well as targets for intervention to improve prognosis.

    Improving Quality of Life and Symptom Burden for People With Dementia

    Sleep disturbances impact daily functioning, socialization, emotional well-being, and cognitive function in patients [26] and have a profound impact on caregivers [27]. Identifying targets for sleep interventions, whether tailored to an individual’s sleep profile or general advice given alongside dementia diagnosis or care, could help improve the quality of life for both persons with dementia and their caregivers. A single night of sleep deprivation disrupts cognitive performance [28], increases AD-related pathology such as amyloid burden [29], and reduces waste clearance in the brain [30], and improving sleep through treating sleep-disordered breathing has been associated with improvements in both neuropsychological assessments and blood biomarkers relating to AD in people with MCI [31]. Therefore, improving sleep could also benefit those with already established dementia and MCI, in addition to reducing incidence.

    Further research is warranted to identify the most important sleep metrics and different sleep profiles in older adults with and without cognitive impairment to help identify targets for intervention [32].

    Measuring Sleep in Individuals With, or at Risk of, Dementia

    Technological advancements in “wearables” (such as smartwatches and electroencephalography (EEG) headsets), “nearables” (such as a mattress or room sensors), and smartphones offer the unprecedented ability for tracking sleep at home for both consumers and researchers—to varying degrees of accuracy and accessibility [33,34]. The use of wearable technology is not new to sleep medicine or research; the current gold standard for sleep medicine is polysomnography (PSG) conducted under laboratory conditions, and wrist-worn actigraphy has been used for decades alongside paper-based sleep diaries to monitor rest and activity patterns typically over days or a couple of weeks [35]. However, most studies to date assessing sleep in individuals with MCI and early dementia have used questionnaires, with fewer studies adopting objective sleep technologies that could complement them such as actigraphy and EEG [32,36].

    Alongside technological advancements, improved digital literacy and accessibility in older adults in recent years offer great promise for sleep research. A 2020 survey identified that 94.6% of 55-64 year olds, 85.5% of 65-74 year olds, and 54% of those aged 75 years and older had used the internet in the last 3 months [37]. Leveraging technology and remote assessments offers several potential benefits above PSG under laboratory conditions. PSG is often used across 1 or 2 nights, potentially leaving results vulnerable to the well-established “first-night effect,” which describes how sleep is quantitatively and qualitatively different during the first compared to subsequent night recordings. This has been observed to affect REM and non-REM sleep, awakenings, total sleep time, and subjective sleep quality [38]. PSG also limits mobility during the night. Conducting research in the home setting is more likely to capture naturalistic sleep as participants can largely continue their usual sleep-wake routines. Remote assessments enable longitudinal assessment, which may uncover natural night-to-night sleep variations. Newer sleep technologies enable the collection of both objective (via wearables and nearables) and subjective (via smartphone apps) sleep data that are considered the best practice to accurately capture sleep quality in older adults [39]. Subjective and objective sleep data may produce complementary or conflicting results [22] and allow multiple aspects of sleep (architecture vs experience) to be captured, enabling comprehensive profiling of sleep. Circadian and infradian rhythms may also be more accurately captured over a longer assessment period than is practical in a laboratory or outpatient setting, using actigraphy and repeated saliva samples that participants complete themselves. Finally, since participants do not need to attend sleep clinics, remote and technology-supported research may improve accessibility to research studies for those with less access to transport, reduce participant and study partner burden, and be more affordable, allowing for larger sample sizes.

    However, before large-scale clinical trials and observational studies invest in and adopt technology- and home-based sleep measurements for dementia research, it is important to determine whether research conducted in this way is feasible and acceptable to older adults with and without cognitive impairment or dementia. People living with MCI and dementia experience changes in their communication or thinking, which may influence their experience of remote research, or they may have difficulty remembering to complete or understanding tasks without in-person support from a researcher; however, remote research may offer significant benefits including overcoming logistical issues typically faced in research and thus increase participation while reducing study burden [40]. The few studies that have addressed the feasibility of home-based sleep research and wearable technologies have often collected basic short-term feasibility data across only a few nights [41,42] and have typically required participants to be supported by a caregiver or care home staff [43,44]. Research is needed to see if community-dwelling participants with MCI and early dementia tolerate remote sleep and memory testing across an extended period of weeks or months (as would be expected in a clinical trial setting) and if they themselves can complete the study tasks. Caregivers or partners can provide important contributions to sleep and dementia research [45,46] but they often report poor quality sleep and high burden [47,48], and requiring a study partner may be a barrier to enrollment in research [49]. Independent (or minimally supported) involvement in research in milder stages of cognitive impairment may also positively acknowledge someone’s cognitive ability to engage in autonomous decision-making regarding their health [50].

    Improving how we measure sleep and cognition in this population can deepen our understanding of the link between sleep and brain health, advice around sleep we give to patients, and improve monitoring in future interventional studies.

    Objectives

    We will test the feasibility and acceptability of remote, in-home sleep and cognitive testing in a cohort of older adults with MCI or mild to moderate dementia due to AD or LBD and older adults without cognitive impairment. We hypothesize that using technology (wearable devices and smart devices) and remote study tasks will be well-tolerated by all study participants. Firstly, we will apply mixed methods to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of remote study tasks based on the recruitment and retention of study participants, participant adherence to remote study tasks, data quality and completeness, and qualitative feedback on study tasks from participants. Secondly, we will explore whether sociodemographic or clinical variables explain any of the variability in feasibility and acceptability outcomes (whether someone is supported with tasks at home, cognitive impairment at baseline, and psychological variables at baseline such as apathy and anxiety). Thirdly, we will compare agreement on core sleep outcome measures (such as total sleep time, sleep efficiency, nocturnal awakenings, and sleep quality) across different measures. Finally, we will explore key themes in feedback from participants to identify strengths, limitations, and guidance for future sleep and remote-based research.

    It is envisaged that these outcomes will be used to inform future research methodologies for both observational and interventional sleep research in older adults with and without dementia.


    Study Design

    This is a mixed methods study assessing the feasibility and acceptability of a novel combination of remote technology-supported sleep and cognitive assessments in older adults with and without cognitive impairment and dementia. The feasibility study is embedded within a prospective, longitudinal, and observational cohort study called the Remote Evaluation of Sleep to Enhance Understanding of Early Dementia (RESTED) study. Participants will complete baseline assessments and undergo remote sleep and cognitive assessments for a main study period of 8 weeks and a follow-up cognitive assessment at 6 months. Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed through the analysis of quantitative and qualitative data collected throughout the study and during the end-of-study interviews. Qualitative data will help to contextualize and enhance quantitative outcomes to deliver a more comprehensive analysis of the feasibility and acceptability [51].

    Setting

    The study will be conducted at the Bristol Brain Centre, Southmead Hospital, within the North Bristol NHS (National Health Service) Trust and is sponsored by the University of Bristol. Baseline and follow-up assessments will be conducted at Southmead Hospital, remotely via phone or video call, or at the participant’s home. Participants will be asked to complete study activities from home, with visits from a researcher where needed, to deliver or collect study materials or provide support with study activities. Participants will be asked to complete a follow-up cognitive assessment at 6 months.

    Participants and Sample Size

    Participants will be eligible if they are 50 years of age and older at consent, have full capacity to consent and are willing to adhere to study procedures, have Wi-Fi at home, and meet the criteria to fall into 1 of the 3 study arms: AD group, LBD group, and the control group.

    For the AD group, participants will require a clinical diagnosis of MCI due to probable AD or mild AD dementia obtained from medical records. This may include participants with mixed dementia where AD is considered a significant component of clinical presentation.

    For the LBD group, participants will require a clinical diagnosis of established or prodromal Parkinson disease dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies, MCI due to Parkinson disease, or MCI due to LBD obtained from medical records. This may include participants with mixed dementia where LBD is considered a significant component to clinical presentation.

    For the control group, participants will confirm that they have no known cognitive impairment or neurodegenerative condition. Efforts will be made to match the AD and LBD cohorts on age and sex.

    For all groups, participants with a clinically significant untreated sleep disorder predating or unrelated to a dementia diagnosis (such as narcolepsy or untreated sleep apnea), a severe medical or psychiatric comorbidity that may substantially impact sleep (such as refractory epilepsy), or a diagnosis of dementia other than AD or LBD will be excluded from the study.

    Study participants will be recruited from cognitive and movement disorders clinics at the North Bristol NHS Trust, volunteer databases, and Join Dementia Research. The study is expected to be open to recruitment between February 2022 and June 2023 with a recruitment target of 75 participants (n=25 in each group). Prospective participants will be introduced to the study via a telephone call from the research team or during a meeting with their clinical team and provided with a digital or paper copy of the participant information sheet. Those who are interested in taking part will be invited to a screening visit for further discussion and, if agreeable, to provide consent. The participants will be asked if they would like to attend with a friend or relative, but we will not recruit formal study partners.

    Following consent, participants will undergo a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Those scoring <11/30 will be withdrawn from the study as this would indicate more advanced cognitive impairment, unless in the opinion of the principal investigator that there is a mitigating factor impacting performance on the MoCA (such as prominent speech disorder), in which case they will be eligible to continue in the study.

    Outcome Measures

    Brief Overview of the RESTED Study

    Participants in the RESTED study will be asked to undergo screening and baseline assessments, including the MoCA, medical and clinical observations, questionnaires on sleep (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [52], including responses from a cohabitant if available at the assessment, Epworth Sleepiness Scale [53], STOP (Snoring Tiredness Observed Pressure)-Bang Questionnaire [54], REM Sleep Behavior Disorder Single-Question Screen [55], Ultra-Short Version of the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire [56]), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder—7-item scale [57]), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale—8 [58]), and apathy (Apathy Evaluation Scale [59]). Participants will be asked to undergo blood biomarker testing for potential biomarkers of AD (amyloid beta 40 and 42, phosphorylated tau 181), neuroinflammation (glial fibrillary acidic protein), and neurodegeneration (neurofilament light chain) and overnight pulse oximetry using the Nonin 3150 WristOx2 to screen for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), except where a diagnosis of OSA has already been given or assessment has been completed within 6 months of recruitment to the study. The main study period will involve 8 weeks of remote study tasks, such as sleep diaries (Consensus Sleep Diary—Main [60] with a bespoke additional question on comparison of the previous night to typical sleep), wrist-based actigraphy (Axivity AX3), and regular online cognitive tests (choice reaction time, digit span, and self-ordered search via Cognitron). Throughout the main study period, participants are supported by researchers via MyDignio, a patient-facing mobile platform designed specifically for delivering remote health care, using task reminders and checklists. During 1 of the 8 weeks, participants will undergo an “intensive week” consisting of daily browser-based cognitive testing, wearing a Dreem 2 EEG headband during sleep, saliva samples for dim light melatonin onset (evening) and cortisol awakening response analyses (morning), and verbal memory recall and recognition tasks via a video link with a researcher. Participants will also be asked to provide feedback on their experiences throughout the study. A subsample of participants will be invited to take part in an end-of-study interview. Finally, participants will be invited to a 6-month follow-up MoCA.

    Feasibility Outcomes

    The feasibility and acceptability outcomes will be predominantly based on data relating to recruitment and retention, the remote study tasks (Table 1), and participant feedback. The core outcomes of the study are outlined in Figure 1.

    Table 1. Summary of data collection methods and frequency of remote home-based study tasks for the Remote Evaluation of Sleep to Enhance Understanding of Early Dementia study.
    Remote study taskMethod of data collectionFrequency of data collectionDuration of data collection
    Sleep diaryApp-based, via MyDignioDaily8 weeks
    ActigraphyWrist-based actigraphyContinuous8 weeks
    Remote browser-based cognitive tasksParticipants’ own device, via Cognitron websiteTwice per week, then daily during intensive week8 weeks
    Recall and recognition tasks with a researcherVideoconferencing softwareFour brief tasks to complete across 4 separate days (<5 minutes each)1 week (intensive week only)
    Overnight electroencephalography (EEG)Dreem EEG headbandEvery night1 week (intensive week only)
    Saliva samples for cortisol awakening responseSaliva swabsThree swabs (0, 30, and 60 minutes after awakening)1 morning (intensive week only)
    Saliva samples for dim light melatonin assayPassive drool samplesSeven samples hourly starting from 5 hours before usual bedtime1 evening (intensive week only)
    Overnight pulse oximetry for sleep apnea screeningPulse oximeterOvernight2 nights
    ‎
    Figure 1. Conceptual map of feasibility and acceptability outcomes for the remote evaluation of sleep to enhance understanding of early dementia study. The core outcomes will be recruitment and retention, data quality, resources required, and participant experience.
    Recruitment and Retention Rates

    Recruitment and retention to the study will be described and presented in a flowchart following Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines (Figure 2). Key recruitment and retention outcomes will include the proportion of eligible patients who consent to take part in the study and the proportion of patients who withdraw from the study after consent. Reasons for ineligibility and nonparticipation at each stage (prescreening, screening, main study period, and follow-up), as well as barriers and facilitators to recruitment, will be summarized. Sample characteristics will be presented in tables.

    ‎
    Figure 2. A template flowchart of participant flow through the RESTED study, based on STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines. This flowchart will document participant recruitment and retention at each stage of the study. MCI: mild cognitive impairment; MoCA: Montreal Cognitive Assessment; RESTED: Remote Evaluation of Sleep to Enhance Understanding of Early Dementia.
    Data Quality, Participant Adherence, and Data Completeness

    The participants will be provided written and verbal guidance and reminders on how and when to complete each of the study tasks. Descriptive statistics on adherence and data completeness for each remote study task will be summarized (eg, the number of nights the EEG headband was worn and the number of completed sleep diaries). Reasons for incompleteness (eg, participant nonadherence and technical problems) and methods used to encourage or improve data completion (eg, reminders to complete tasks) will be described.

    We will also assess the extent to which data appear to be valid and of sufficient quality for analysis of core sleep metrics (eg, for EEG data, this will include individual EEG channels and overall record quality metrics).

    Where multiple sleep metrics are measured on a single night (eg, total sleep time via actigraphy, sleep diary, and EEG), an agreement between different measurement tools will be calculated (eg, Bland-Altman plot comparing sleep diary-adjusted actigraphy to EEG).

    Resources

    We will assess the amount of support and resources (eg, in-person visits, email, app-based, and telephone support) required from the research team to complete remote study tasks. Though the study will not require a study partner, we will also record whether participants perceive that they have access to support from outside of the study team (eg, family member, caregiver, or friend), whether this support is used, and what support is provided (eg, technical support and reminders).

    Barriers, Facilitators, and Participant Feedback

    We will review participant feedback expressed before, during, and at the end-of-study interviews to identify barriers and facilitators in (1) participating in remote sleep and cognitive research in general and (2) study-specific remote tasks.

    The end-of-study interviews were designed and guided by the Capability Opportunity Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) system model of behavior, which suggests that capability, opportunity, and motivation interact with behavior in a system [61]. The interviews will probe the capacity to engage in the study activities (capability), habits and decision-making around study involvement (motivation), external factors that influenced behavior, and completion of the study tasks (opportunity). Interview transcripts will be coded and organized into themes using NVivo (version 20; Lumivero; or newer) software. We will use an inductive approach to thematic analysis and aim to identify semantic and latent themes [62,63].

    Where appropriate and scientifically sound, we will incorporate feedback on acceptability and feasibility to improve the study design. Changes to the study design due to feasibility or acceptability or based on feedback from prospective or enrolled participants will be documented.

    Subgroup Analyses

    We will compare acceptability and feasibility outcomes between study arms (AD, LBD, or controls) and conduct exploratory analyses to determine whether subjective sleep quality support from a relative or friend or baseline apathy and anxiety predict overall adherence to study tasks.

    Ethical Considerations

    This study has been approved by the Health Research Authority (Yorkshire and the Humber—Bradford Leeds Research Ethics Committee, reference 21/YH/0177) and carries minimal risk to participants. The study will be conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice and the Helsinki Declaration to protect the rights and welfare of all participants. All data will be kept securely and handled in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation (EU 2016/679). Capacity to consent to the research study will be assessed and participants will be required to provide full written informed consent prior to participation in any study activities. The participants will be reminded of their right to withdraw at any point, without providing a reason, and without this affecting their health care. Participants will be offered cash reimbursement for travel or postage expenses incurred during the study. The participants will be assigned a study ID at consent to allow pseudonymization of participant data, with personal information stored separately and securely from deidentified data. The final paper and any data shared will contain no information that allows for the identification of individual participants.

    Results will be presented at scientific meetings and conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. Summaries will be provided to participants where they have indicated consent to be contacted about results from the study.


    The study opened to recruitment in February 2022. Participant recruitment is scheduled to be completed in 2023. Data collection is anticipated to continue until February 2024, with analysis beginning in 2023 and continuing into 2024.

    Results will be reported in line with guidance from the STROBE checklist [64] and the CONSORT 2010 extension [65] for pilot and feasibility trials [66].


    Principal Findings

    Sleep is a fundamental component of health, and sleep disturbances are commonly observed in people living with MCI and dementia. Insufficient or poor sleep may represent both a risk factor and a symptom of these conditions, but more work is needed to confirm the relationship between sleep and MCI or dementia. Improvements to the way we measure sleep, such as measuring sleep in someone’s natural home environment and using technologies to supplement data collected from sleep questionnaires may help us to better understand the sleep profile in these conditions compared to normal aging, identify targets for intervention, and monitor disease progression [32,67]. However, we first need to understand whether it is possible to collect good-quality sleep and cognitive data from people living with MCI and dementia in their own homes. Accordingly, this paper proposes a study to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of remote sleep and memory data collection using study tasks designed to be completed at home by people living with MCI or dementia. The study aims to assess whether people with MCI or dementia are willing to engage in sleep studies using technology and home-based study tasks, describe participant experience, and evaluate the study tasks based on retrieving complete and analyzable data. The findings from this study will guide future research design in sleep and memory.

    Limitations

    The eligibility criteria for the study require participants to have an internet connection and be willing to use technology for the duration of the study. Understanding the feasibility and acceptability of technology-supported remote research is the purpose of the study; however, this inherently may introduce bias into the study. For example, it is possible this may mean those who are unfamiliar or uncomfortable with technology may not take part, or those who are particularly interested in technology may find the study more acceptable or feasible. If recruitment, retention rates, or feedback from patients who would otherwise be eligible but were unable or unwilling to take part because of limited access to or ability to use the internet or a smart device, we may offer an adapted version of the study and will record whether this influences recruitment rate and other relevant outcomes.

    Subjective measures used in the study may be prone to recall bias and may be difficult for individuals with cognitive impairment to answer accurately. While participants themselves will need to provide answers to questions during the study, they can be supported by a family member, friend, or caregiver where needed and requested by the participant. Subjective measures will also be complemented by objective measures which are not prone to recall bias.

    The longitudinal and remote nature of the study may result in a greater proportion of missing data compared to sleep research studies conducted in a laboratory setting. As a study enrolling persons with MCI and dementia, it is also expected that participants may have difficulty remembering to complete study tasks. Reasonable efforts will be taken to encourage adherence and data completion throughout the study period, particularly in the intensive week (eg, schedules and digital reminders via SMS text messaging or email). Automated scheduled reminders and task lists will be supplemented with ad hoc contacts from the research team directly (eg, contacting to ascertain reasons behind consecutive days of missing data).

    Conclusions

    Technological advancements and improved digital literacy offer the opportunity to research sleep longitudinally and in the home environment. However, further research is needed to understand whether these developments may benefit MCI and dementia study design. This protocol outlines a mixed methods study that examines the feasibility and acceptability of remote sleep and cognitive testing in a cohort of older adults specifically those with MCI or dementia due to probable AD or LBD. Outputs from the study will inform the approach to studying sleep in people with MCI or dementia in this population, contributing toward global efforts to identify and better understand potentially modifiable risk factors in these conditions.

    Acknowledgments

    With thanks to the Respiratory Physiology department at North Bristol National Health Service (NHS) Trust, the research teams at Cognitron and Dreem, Ewa G Truchanowicz and Phil Reay in the Dignio team, and our Patient and Public Involvement contributors. We would also like to thank all individuals who took part in the research, including the participants and those who supported them.

    Data Availability

    Data sets generated during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

    Authors' Contributions

    VGG contributed to the study authorship, protocol authorship, study management, study design, participant recruitment, participant consent, and data collection. JB and HDM contributed to the protocol authorship, study design, sub principal investigators, participant recruitment, participant consent, data collection, and study review. EC contributed to the project conception, study design, principal investigator, and study review. BB contributed to the study design, data collection, and study review. HL contributed to the participant recruitment, participant consent, and data collection. NT contributed to the data analysis methodology. AJ, WT, and AH performed the cognitive task formulation. AW, GMR, and RG contributed to the study design.

    Conflicts of Interest

    AH is owner and director of Future Cognition Ltd and H2 Cognitive Designs, which provide custom cognitive assessment software and digital research and healthcare services. WT is employed by H2 Cognitive Designs LTD, owners and developers of the Cognitron software

    1. Leading causes of death, UK: 2001 to 2018. Office for National Statistics. 2020. URL: https:/​/www.​ons.gov.uk/​peoplepopulationandcommunity/​healthandsocialcare/​causesofdeath/​articles/​leadingcausesofdeathuk/​2001to2018#:~:text=From%202001%20to%202018%2C%20suicide,deaths%20for%20this%20age%20group [accessed 2024-02-15]
    2. Shah H, Albanese E, Duggan C, Rudan I, Langa KM, Carrillo MC, et al. Research priorities to reduce the global burden of dementia by 2025. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(12):1285-1294. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Lewis LD. The interconnected causes and consequences of sleep in the brain. Science. 2021;374(6567):564-568. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Sabia S, Fayosse A, Dumurgier J, van Hees VT, Paquet C, Sommerlad A, et al. Association of sleep duration in middle and old age with incidence of dementia. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):2289. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Elder GJ, Lazar AS, Alfonso-Miller P, Taylor JP. Sleep disturbances in Lewy body dementia: a systematic review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022;37(10):1-22. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Fifel K, Videnovic A. Circadian and sleep dysfunctions in neurodegenerative disorders-an update. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:627330. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Lavoie CJ, Zeidler MR, Martin JL. Sleep and aging. Sleep Sci Pract. 2018;2(1):3. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
    8. Bliwise DL. Sleep in normal aging and dementia. Sleep. 1993;16(1):40-81. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Ohayon MM, Carskadon MA, Guilleminault C, Vitiello MV. Meta-analysis of quantitative sleep parameters from childhood to old age in healthy individuals: developing normative sleep values across the human lifespan. Sleep. 2004;27(7):1255-1273. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Romanella SM, Roe D, Tatti E, Cappon D, Paciorek R, Testani E, et al. The sleep side of aging and Alzheimer's disease. Sleep Med. 2021;77:209-225. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Cordone S, de Gennaro L. Insights from human sleep research on neural mechanisms of Alzheimer's disease. Neural Regen Res. 2020;15(7):1251-1252. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Volicer L, Harper DG, Manning BC, Goldstein R, Satlin A. Sundowning and circadian rhythms in Alzheimer's disease. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158(5):704-711. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Khachiyants N, Trinkle D, Son SJ, Kim KY. Sundown syndrome in persons with dementia: an update. Psychiatry Investig. 2011;8(4):275-287. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Damsgaard L, Janbek J, Laursen TM, Erlangsen A, Spira AP, Waldemar G. Hospital-diagnosed sleep disorders and incident dementia: a nationwide observational cohort study. Eur J Neurol. 2022;29(12):3528-3536. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Xie Y, Ba L, Wang M, Deng SY, Chen SM, Huang LF, et al. Chronic sleep fragmentation shares similar pathogenesis with neurodegenerative diseases: endosome-autophagosome-lysosome pathway dysfunction and microglia-mediated neuroinflammation. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2020;26(2):215-227. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Mander BA, Marks SM, Vogel JW, Rao V, Lu B, Saletin JM, et al. β-amyloid disrupts human NREM slow waves and related hippocampus-dependent memory consolidation. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18(7):1051-1057. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Cordone S, Annarumma L, Rossini PM, de Gennaro L. Sleep and ß-amyloid deposition in Alzheimer disease: insights on mechanisms and possible innovative treatments. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:695. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Barthélemy NR, Liu H, Lu W, Kotzbauer PT, Bateman RJ, Lucey BP. Sleep deprivation affects tau phosphorylation in human cerebrospinal fluid. Ann Neurol. 2020;87(5):700-709. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Fjell AM, Sørensen Ø, Amlien IK, Bartrés-Faz D, Bros DM, Buchmann N, et al. Self-reported sleep relates to hippocampal atrophy across the adult lifespan: results from the Lifebrain consortium. Sleep. 2020;43(5):zsz280. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    20. Noh HJ, Joo EY, Kim ST, Yoon SM, Koo DL, Kim D, et al. The relationship between hippocampal volume and cognition in patients with chronic primary insomnia. J Clin Neurol. 2012;8(2):130-138. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    21. Naismith SL, Mowszowski L. Sleep disturbance in mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review of recent findings. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2018;31(2):153-159. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Palmer K, Mitolo M, Burgio F, Meneghello F, Venneri A. Sleep disturbance in mild cognitive impairment and association with cognitive functioning. a case-control study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2018;10:360. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. Zhang Y, Ren R, Yang L, Zhang H, Shi Y, Okhravi HR, et al. Sleep in Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of polysomnographic findings. Transl Psychiatry. 2022;12(1):136. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Schenck CH, Boeve BF, Mahowald MW. Delayed emergence of a parkinsonian disorder or dementia in 81% of older men initially diagnosed with idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder: a 16-year update on a previously reported series. Sleep Med. 2013;14(8):744-748. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    25. Fei M, Wang F, Wu H, Liu S, Gan J, Ji Y. Characteristics of initial symptoms in patients with dementia with Lewy body disease. Front Neurol. 2022;13:1024995. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Petrovsky DV, McPhillips MV, Li J, Brody A, Caffeé L, Hodgson NA. Sleep disruption and quality of life in persons with dementia: a state-of-the-art review. Geriatr Nurs. 2018;39(6):640-645. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. McCurry SM, Logsdon RG, Teri L, Gibbons LE, Kukull WA, Bowen JD, et al. Characteristics of sleep disturbance in community-dwelling Alzheimer's disease patients. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 1999;12(2):53-59. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. Holding BC, Ingre M, Petrovic P, Sundelin T, Axelsson J. Quantifying cognitive impairment after sleep deprivation at different times of day: a proof of concept using ultra-short smartphone-based tests. Front Behav Neurosci. 2021;15:666146. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Shokri-Kojori E, Wang GJ, Wiers CE, Demiral SB, Guo M, Kim SW, et al. β-Amyloid accumulation in the human brain after one night of sleep deprivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(17):4483-4488. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Eide PK, Vinje V, Pripp AH, Mardal KA, Ringstad G. Sleep deprivation impairs molecular clearance from the human brain. Brain. 2021;144(3):863-874. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. Huang H, Li M, Zhang M, Qiu J, Cheng H, Mou X, et al. Sleep quality improvement enhances neuropsychological recovery and reduces blood Aß42/40 ratio in patients with mild-moderate cognitive impairment. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021;57(12):1366. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    32. Blackman J, Morrison HD, Lloyd K, Gimson A, Banerjee LV, Green S, et al. The past, present, and future of sleep measurement in mild cognitive impairment and early dementia-towards a core outcome set: a scoping review. Sleep. 2022;45(7):zsac077. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    33. de Zambotti M, Cellini N, Goldstone A, Colrain IM, Baker FC. Wearable sleep technology in clinical and research settings. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(7):1538-1557. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    34. Bianchi MT. Sleep devices: wearables and nearables, informational and interventional, consumer and clinical. Metabolism. 2018;84:99-108. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    35. Marino M, Li Y, Rueschman MN, Winkelman JW, Ellenbogen JM, Solet JM, et al. Measuring sleep: accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of wrist actigraphy compared to polysomnography. Sleep. 2013;36(11):1747-1755. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    36. van de Water ATM, Holmes A, Hurley DA. Objective measurements of sleep for non-laboratory settings as alternatives to polysomnography–a systematic review. J Sleep Res. 2011;20(1 Pt 2):183-200. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    37. Internet users, UK: 2020. Office for National Statistics. 2020. URL: https://www.ons.gov.uk/businessindustryandtrade/itandinternetindustry/bulletins/internetusers/2020 [accessed 2024-02-15]
    38. Le Bon O, Arpi S. Effect of the first sleep night in polysomnography: classification by variable sensitivity and factorial analysis of differences between nights. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2003;159(Suppl 11):6S42-6S47. [Medline]
    39. Landry GJ, Best JR, Liu-Ambrose T. Measuring sleep quality in older adults: a comparison using subjective and objective methods. Front Aging Neurosci. 2015;7:166. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    40. Maddali HT, Dixon E, Pradhan A, Lazar A. Supporting remote participation when designing with people with dementia. CSCW 20 Companion (2020). 2020;2020:335-340. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    41. Kent BA, Casciola AA, Carlucci SK, Chen M, Stager S, Mirian MS, et al. Home EEG sleep assessment shows reduced slow-wave sleep in mild-moderate Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2022;8(1):e12347. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    42. van den Berg JF, van Rooij FJA, Vos H, Tulen JHM, Hofman A, Miedema HME, et al. Disagreement between subjective and actigraphic measures of sleep duration in a population-based study of elderly persons. J Sleep Res. 2008;17(3):295-302. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    43. Pavlickova H, Russell AE, Lightman S, McCabe R. Feasibility of salivary cortisol collection in patients and companions attending dementia diagnostic meetings in memory clinics. BMC Res Notes. 2021;14(1):30. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    44. Jones C, Moyle W. A feasibility study of Dreampad™ on sleep, wandering and agitated behaviors in people living with dementia. Geriatr Nurs. 2020;41(6):782-789. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    45. Black BS, Taylor H, Rabins PV, Karlawish J. Researchers' perspectives on the role of study partners in dementia research. Int Psychogeriatr. 2014;26(10):1649-1657. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    46. Denny A, Bartley K, Edwards S, Webbe F, LoGalbo A. AD8 patient-informant discrepancy predicts insight and cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease. Geriatr Nurs. 2021;42(1):262-267. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    47. Song MJ, Kim JH. Family caregivers of people with dementia have poor sleep quality: a nationwide population-based study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(24):13079. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    48. Osakwe ZT, Senteio C, Bubu OM, Obioha C, Turner AD, Thawani S, et al. Sleep disturbance and strain among caregivers of persons living with dementia. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:734382. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    49. Grill JD, Zhou Y, Elashoff D, Karlawish J. Disclosure of amyloid status is not a barrier to recruitment in preclinical Alzheimer's disease clinical trials. Neurobiol Aging. 2016;39:147-153. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    50. Bosco A, Schneider J, Coleston-Shields DM, Jawahar K, Higgs P, Orrell M. Agency in dementia care: systematic review and meta-ethnography. Int Psychogeriatr. 2019;31(5):627-642. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    51. Doyle L, Brady AM, Byrne G. An overview of mixed methods research—revisited. J Res Nurs. 2016;21(8):623-635. [CrossRef]
    52. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989;28(2):193-213. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    53. Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Sleep. 1991;14(6):540-545. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    54. Chung F, Abdullah HR, Liao P. STOP-bang questionnaire: a practical approach to screen for obstructive sleep apnea. Chest. 2016;149(3):631-638. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    55. Postuma RB, Arnulf I, Hogl B, Iranzo A, Miyamoto T, Dauvilliers Y, et al. A single-question screen for rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder: a multicenter validation study. Mov Disord. 2012;27(7):913-916. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    56. Ghotbi N, Pilz LK, Winnebeck EC, Vetter C, Zerbini G, Lenssen D, et al. The µMCTQ: an ultra-short version of the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire. J Biol Rhythms. 2020;35(1):98-110. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    57. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(10):1092-1097. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    58. Kroenke K, Strine TW, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Berry JT, Mokdad AH. The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. J Affect Disord. 2009;114(1-3):163-173. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    59. Marin RS, Biedrzycki RC, Firinciogullari S. Reliability and validity of the apathy evaluation scale. Psychiatry Res. 1991;38(2):143-162. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    60. Carney CE, Buysse DJ, Ancoli-Israel S, Edinger JD, Krystal AD, Lichstein KL, et al. The consensus sleep diary: standardizing prospective sleep self-monitoring. Sleep. 2012;35(2):287-302. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    61. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    62. Proudfoot K. Inductive/deductive hybrid thematic analysis in mixed methods research. J Mix Methods Res. 2022;17(3):308-326. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
    63. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101. [CrossRef]
    64. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344-349. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    65. Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, et al. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. BMJ. 2016;355:i5239. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    66. Lancaster GA, Thabane L. Guidelines for reporting non-randomised pilot and feasibility studies. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019;5:114. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    67. Blackman J, Butters A, Oliver C, Coulthard E. Sleep measurement in mild cognitive impairment and early dementia: is it time for a rethink? Sleep. 2023;46(11):zsad185. [CrossRef] [Medline]

    ‎
    AD: Alzheimer disease
    COM-B: Capability Opportunity Motivation-Behavior
    CONSORT: Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials
    EEG: electroencephalography
    LBD: Lewy body disease
    MCI: mild cognitive impairment
    MoCA: Montreal Cognitive Assessment
    NHS: National Health Service
    OSA: obstructive sleep apnea
    PSG: polysomnography
    REM: rapid eye movement
    RESTED: Remote Evaluation of Sleep to Enhance Understanding of Early Dementia
    STOP: Snoring Tiredness Observed Pressure
    STROBE: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology

    Edited by A Mavragani; submitted 19.09.23; peer-reviewed by O Grau-Rivera, TAR Sure; comments to author 01.02.24; revised version received 12.02.24; accepted 13.02.24; published 22.03.24.

    Copyright

    ©Victoria Grace Gabb, Jonathan Blackman, Hamish Duncan Morrison, Bijetri Biswas, Haoxuan Li, Nicholas Turner, Georgina M Russell, Rosemary Greenwood, Amy Jolly, William Trender, Adam Hampshire, Alan Whone, Elizabeth Coulthard. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 22.03.2024.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.