Published on in Vol 14 (2025)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/71839, first published .
Development of a Novel Web-Based Intervention Targeting Pain-Related Outcomes in Individuals With Chronic Orofacial Pain: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

Development of a Novel Web-Based Intervention Targeting Pain-Related Outcomes in Individuals With Chronic Orofacial Pain: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

Development of a Novel Web-Based Intervention Targeting Pain-Related Outcomes in Individuals With Chronic Orofacial Pain: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

Protocol

1Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States

2Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States

3Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States

4Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States

5Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States

6Lab of Computer Science, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States

Corresponding Author:

Jonathan Greenberg, PhD

Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research

Department of Psychiatry

Massachusetts General Hospital

One Bowdoin Square, Suite 648

Boston, 02114

United States

Phone: 1 617 643 9402

Email: jgreenberg5@mgh.harvard.edu


Background: Chronic orofacial pain (COP) is common, costly, and associated with substantial pain interference and emotional distress. Psychosocial treatments for COP are scarce and limited (eg, rely on talking, which is often painful for this population; require intensive resources, limiting scalability). Here, we describe the study protocol for developing Face-Forward-Web, a “talk-free” web-based mind-body intervention for patients with COP.

Objective: We aim to (1) develop Face-Forward-Web with the aid of live-video focus groups with adults with COP and (2) optimize Face-Forward-Web and our study protocol through beta testing followed by an open feasibility trial.

Methods: We will accomplish these aims in 2 phases, incorporating user-centered design principles. For phase 1, we conducted semistructured focus groups (n=4 groups, 22 participants) with individuals with COP. We are using rapid data analysis followed by thematic analysis to gauge treatment needs, preferences, and perceptions of the proposed platform and skills. This information will inform session structure and content as well as development of a wireframe followed by a prototype. For phase 2, we will conduct beta testing (up to n=10) followed by a feasibility trial (up to n=20) with exit interviews to gather feedback. The primary outcomes are feasibility benchmarks such as recruitment (≥70% of the eligible participants will participate), acceptability (≥70% of the participants complete ≥4 or 5 sessions), credibility, expectancy (≥70% above the Credibility and Expectancy scale’s midpoint), and satisfaction (≥70% above the User Experience Questionnaire’s midpoint).

Results: Recruitment for phase 1 began in October 2024 and concluded in January 2025. Data analysis for phase 1 will conclude in fall 2025 and for phase 2 in 2026. Results will iteratively guide the development of the intervention.

Conclusions: Face-Forward-Web will be the first talk-free web-based intervention tailored to the needs of adults with COP. Results will inform a future efficacy trial.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06754917; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06754917

International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/71839

JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e71839

doi:10.2196/71839

Keywords



Chronic orofacial pain (COP) is common [1], costly [2], and associated with substantial pain interference (ie, pain-related activity limitations) and emotional distress [3-5]. COP includes a group of conditions that involve pain in the hard and soft tissues of the head, face, and neck that last for more than 3 months [6]. Although the etiological aspects of COP are heterogeneous, COP conditions are unified by a psychosocial profile of substantial maladaptive coping (eg, pain-related fear, pain catastrophizing) [7-9], pain interference, and emotional distress (eg, depression, anxiety) [3,4,10-14], which worsen each other over time [15,16]. Treatments are typically biomedical [4], mostly ineffective [17], and often involve adverse side effects [18], misdiagnoses or incomplete diagnoses [17], and unnecessary/painful procedures (eg, tooth extractions, occlusal adjustment) that may lead to irreversible damage [4,19]. Such treatments do not typically address and often exacerbate activity limitations, maladaptive coping, and emotional distress [4,19]. These psychosocial factors are critical causative elements of COP but are mostly overlooked in COP treatment [20].

Psychosocial interventions such as cognitive behavioral therapy [21-28] and other behavioral programs [29-32] show promise in improving outcomes in individuals with COP [21-32]. However, the existing interventions are limited in several ways: these interventions (1) almost exclusively rely on talking, which is often painful for patients with COP and limits treatment engagement [20,33]; (2) are resource-intensive and require availability of trained providers, limiting accessibility, particularly for underserved communities [34]; (3) often involve costs, travel, and limited insurance coverage [35]; (4) carry a mental health stigma, which limits treatment-seeking and participation [36]; (5) tend to focus on an incomplete diagnosis and mostly temporomandibular disorder, limiting generalizability, and (6) are typically unimodal (eg, cognitive behavioral therapy alone), despite evidence that multimodal interventions work better for complex conditions like COP, which have high psychiatric comorbidity [24,37]. Talk-free asynchronous multimodal web-based platforms can bypass these limitations while maintaining effectiveness [38]. However, to our knowledge, no such interventions exist. Delivering COP interventions through a web-based platform holds potential to expand accessibility, increase scalability, and address this population’s largely unmet needs [20,39].

To this end, we will develop Face-Forward-Web, the first web-based platform adapted and refined via mixed methods for COP by using user-centered design principles [40-43]. Face-Forward-Web will be adapted from GetActive, a mind-body and activity intervention for individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain [44]. Face-Forward-Web will be delivered via a talk-free asynchronous web platform and will address some of the unique and often unaddressed challenges faced by individuals with COP, including difficulty with talking due to pain [20,33], emotional distress [3,5,20], orofacial pain interference and pain intensity [8], and coping with unpredictable pain [20].

Our conceptual model (Figure 1) is informed by the fear-avoidance framework [45,46] and poses that improvement in pain interference, pain, and emotional distress after participation in Face-Forward-Web will be explained by improvement in the mechanistic targets of pain catastrophizing, fear of pain, and mindfulness. Our guiding hypothesis (to be tested in future work) is that the Face-Forward-Web intervention will be an effective, efficient, and scalable strategy to address the unmet needs and challenges of pain interference and distress among patients with COP.

Figure 1. The Face-Forward-Web conceptual model.

This study aims to (1) develop Face-Forward-Web with the aid of live video focus groups with adults with COP and (2) optimize Face-Forward-Web and our study protocol through beta testing (n=up to 10) to refine the intervention followed by a feasibility trial (n=up to 20). The results will inform future efficacy research, evaluating Face-Forward-Web versus an active control web platform in improving pain interference, depression, and anxiety.


Study Design and Setting

This study protocol adheres to the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) 2013 statement (Multimedia Appendix 1). Our approach is consistent with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) stage model for behavioral intervention development [47,48]. The proposed phases address stages 1A (intervention development and refinement) and 1B (feasibility testing). For phase 2, the primary outcomes are feasibility benchmarks (ie, feasibility of recruitment, credibility and expectancy, acceptability of treatment, adherence to homework, satisfaction [user experience], feasibility of assessments, adverse events).

This study will be completed in 2 main phases conducted at a large academic hospital. In phase 1, we conducted 4 virtual focus groups (22 patients with COP) at which point we reached saturation [49]. We aimed to understand their treatment needs and preferences, perceptions, and recommendations for a web platform delivery, and the best ways to engage and retain participants. We also gathered participants’ feedback on program content via sample videos similar to those intended to be used in the Face-Forward-Web program. We are using this information to inform adaptations from the GetActive intervention for chronic musculoskeletal pain intervention to the Face-Forward-Web intervention for chronic orofacial pain as well as for the development of a wireframe for Face-Forward-Web, followed by a prototype [42].

In phase 2, we will conduct beta testing (up to n=10) and revise Face-Forward-Web and the study procedures according to the feedback and information gathered. We will then conduct a feasibility trial (up to n=20) with rapid iterative development of the prototype intervention [50].

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

We plan to include participants aged ≥18 years, with English fluency and literacy, chronic nonmalignant COP (>3 months), who express ability and willingness to participate in a live-video focus group/web platform intervention, are free of concurrent psychotropic medications for at least 2 weeks prior to treatment, or stable on current psychotropic medication for ≥6 weeks, and have pain intensity ≥4/10. We will exclude individuals who practiced mindfulness >45 min/wk in the past 3 months and those who have participated in mind-body or cognitive behavioral therapy in the past 3 months; have severe untreated mental health (eg, psychosis) or active suicidal ideation; or are pregnant (per our institutional review board).

Recruitment

For both phases of the study, we will recruit from sources such as the Facial Pain Association—a large organization providing support, education, and advocacy for individuals with COP—the Facial Pain Clinic at Massachusetts General Hospital, social media, and other sources. We will prioritize recruitment of racial and ethnic minorities and aim to reflect the US population (38% of the minorities). Individuals who participate in phase 1 focus groups may participate in phase 2 feasibility testing.

Procedures

Ethical Considerations

Methodology, including interview script and recruitment strategies and materials, were approved by the institutional review board of the Massachusetts General Hospital. The institutional review board determined that phase 1 activities were exempt from written informed consent. Instead, all participants viewed an online study fact sheet during enrollment and provided consent to participate (protocol 2024P001309). Participants in phase 2 will provide written informed consent and may opt out at any time during the study (protocol 2024P003501). All focus group and exit interview transcripts are deidentified prior to analysis, and any quantitative data exported for analysis will also be deidentified. Participants can receive payment up to US $50 via check for completing all phase 1 activities and up to US $170 for completing all phase 2 activities.

Phase 1: Developmental Phase With Focus Group Feedback

We have developed a semistructured qualitative interview script with items assessing treatment needs, preferences, and perceptions of the intervention skills and structure (Multimedia Appendix 2). We completed recruitment and data collection for phase 1 in January 2025. We recruited individuals with COP. Study staff screened potential participants and obtained verbal consent. Then, eligible patients were invited to participate in one of the 4 focus groups. Upon enrollment, participants completed an electronic demographic questionnaire and were aided with downloading and installing the video software (Zoom) as needed. All qualitative interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, organized, and analyzed using the NVivo 12 qualitative statistical package (QSR International). We will use the qualitative results of phase 1 to develop Face-Forward-Web and the treatment manual to be piloted in phase 2.

Phase 2: Beta Testing and Feasibility Trial With Exit Interviews
Beta Testing

After screening, consent, and enrollment, up to 10 individuals with COP will beta test the Face-Forward-Web intervention. The research coordinator will schedule an orientation session, in which she will outline how to navigate the Face-Forward-Web platform. Participants will then independently complete the intervention. After each module, participants will be asked to indicate their level of satisfaction from the module on a 1-4 Likert scale and provide feedback on their impressions from the module in a textbox. At the conclusion of the intervention, participants will participate in exit interviews over Zoom. Exit interviews will last ~30 minutes and will be audio-recorded and transcribed. Similar to phase 1, the exit interviews will involve a semistructured script, followed by rapid data analysis and qualitative thematic analysis using NVivo 12. We will utilize results to further refine the intervention’s content manual and procedures as well as refine Face-Forward-Web prior to the feasibility trial.

Feasibility Testing

Participants will be recruited, screened, and enrolled using the methods described above. After consenting, participants (n=up to 20) will complete a set of valid and reliable online questionnaires over the secure Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) system. The estimated time for completion is 20 minutes. If participants miss an item, they will be prompted to complete it, thereby minimizing missing data. Participants will complete the questionaries at 2 additional timepoints—after completing the intervention and again 3 months later. After baseline assessments, participants will participate in an orientation session. Then they will complete the intervention and subsequent exit interviews following similar procedures as in the beta testing.

The Face-Forward-Web Intervention

Face-Forward-Web consists of 5 sessions (Table 1), which teach relaxation (eg, body scan, deep breathing), mindfulness, and cognitive-behavioral skills (eg, adaptive thinking, reducing negative affective reactivity). The content is consistent with GetActive [44] and adapted to the unique needs of people with COP and for delivery via the web platform. Due to the individual/asynchronous format of Face-Forward-Web, we were able to condense the GetActive content into 5 sessions, which may maximize feasibility and engagement (to be tested in the proposed studies). Each session consists of a combination of short (~5-10 minutes) videos conveying educational content and skill delivery. Each session ends with an interactive quiz covering the session’s content to gauge comprehension and facilitate material absorption, which can be an effective intervention element for people with chronic pain [51]. Audio and video clips will be available to guide participants through their daily home practice. Once invited by a research assistant, participants will log in and access the first session’s materials. Contingent on completion of the interactive quiz at the end of each session, access to the subsequent session will be granted in the following week. Participants will be free to review and practice all the skills and materials from the completed sessions until the 3-month follow-up assessment and will be encouraged to use the platform for daily practice. The platform will be easily accessible across multiple interfaces such as a website and mobile app through any internet-enabled device (eg, smartphone, tablet, computer). We will track participants’ homework completion and platform activity. To encourage retention, we will text reminders about the sessions and home practice through the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act–compliant texting service, as previously successfully implemented by our group and deemed useful by participants [52].

Table 1. Face-Forward-Web session topics and examples of content.
SessionFace-Forward-Web topicSkills and examples of content/videos
1Taking charge of orofacial pain
  • Orofacial “Pain alarm” (reactions to COPa)
  • Debunking myths about COP
    • Downward and upward spirals (COP is associated with thoughts, feelings, and behaviors that can be maladaptive or adaptive)
  • Deep breathing
2Managing emotional challenges in orofacial pain
  • Mindfulness
  • Body scan
3Working with negative thoughts
  • Identifying NATsb
  • Checking NATs
    • Challenging NATs
4Not letting orofacial pain get the best of us
  • Acceptance
  • Using Face-Forward-Web skills to reengage in activities (eg, daily, recreational, social, family, work-related)
5Facing forward: “Rolling” with orofacial pain and staying resilient
  • Mindfulness of discomfort and pain
  • Review all skills
  • Create personalized plan

aCOP: chronic orofacial pain.

bNAT: negative automatic thought.

Treatment Delivery and Protocol Adherence

Participants will continue their usual care as determined by their medical providers (eg, medication, occlusal splits and adjustments, physical therapy). We will determine fidelity to Face-Forward-Web via a user experience software such as Google Analytics [53]. This will enable us to track participants’ frequency and time spent on each of the web platform’s pages and clicks on exercises and quizzes and evaluate participation, even on partially completed sessions, thereby increasing the accuracy of attendance evaluation.

Assessments

Pain Severity and Pain Interference

The Graded Chronic Pain Scale [54] is a 7-item scale measuring pain severity and pain interference. The time frame of reference will be the past week, consistent with prior work [55,56]. The Numerical Rating Scale [57] is a single item measure assessing pain severity.

Anxiety

The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale [58] is a 7-item scale that assesses the severity of the anxiety symptoms over the past 2 weeks.

Depression

The Patient Health Questionnaire [59] is a 9-item measure that assesses depression symptoms over the past 2 weeks.

Catastrophic Thinking About Pain

The Pain Catastrophizing Scale [60] is a 13-item measure assessing hopelessness, helplessness, and rumination about pain.

Fear of Pain Due To Movement

The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia for Temporomandibular Disorders [61] is a 12-item scale assessing fear of pain due to facial movement and adapted to heterogeneous orofacial pain [62] (ie, expanding references from “jaw” to “jaw or face”)

Mindfulness

The Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised [63] is a 12-item questionnaire that measures an individual's level of mindfulness, including present-focused attention, awareness of thoughts and feelings, and nonjudgmental acceptance of internal experiences. The Applied Mindfulness Process Scale [64] is a 15-item questionnaire that measures respondents’ application of mindfulness practices in daily life.

Treatment Satisfaction

The User Experience Questionnaire assesses users’ satisfaction and experience with digital products, software, and platforms [65]. This assessment is administered at 1 timepoint, immediately after the intervention.

Treatment Credibility

The Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire assesses how believable and logical patients perceive the treatment to be [66]. This assessment is administered at 1 timepoint, immediately after the intervention.

Data Analysis

Phase 1: Focus Groups

We used rapid data analysis during focus groups to enable timely application of key findings to iterative refinement of our prototype and procedures. Next, we will use thematic analysis following a hybrid deductive-inductive approach [67,68] for a deeper analysis to gauge treatment needs, preferences, and perceptions of the intervention. We will analyze qualitative data from the interviews by using NVivo 12, which enables reliability assessment (κ) of theme-coding between independent coders. Coders will discuss and resolve potential discrepancies until they reach agreement and sufficient reliability, indicated by κ>.80. We will use the results to make specific adaptations to the program content and procedures based on focus group data to best meet participants’ needs and challenges.

Phase 2: Beta and Feasibility Testing With Exit Interviews

We will use frequency and proportions to assess the feasibility of the recruitment and retention procedures. We will determine treatment satisfaction and credibility by the proportion of participants who score above the scale midpoint in the User Experience Questionnaire [65] and Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire [66], respectively. See Table 2 for further details on the feasibility, credibility, and acceptability benchmarks, consistent with other established feasibility work [67-69]. We will analyze qualitative data from the exit interviews by using the same procedures described in phase 1.

Table 2. Feasibility benchmarks.
OutcomeAcceptableExcellent
Credibility and expectancy>70% of the participants with score over scale midpoint.>75% of the participants with score over scale midpoint.
User experience >70% of the participants with score over scale midpoint.>75% of the participants with score over scale midpoint.
Feasibility of recruitment>70% of eligible participants agree to participate.At least 80% of eligible participants agree to participate.
Acceptability of treatment>70% of the participants attend 3 out of 5 sessions.>80% of the participants attend 3 out of 5 sessions.
Adherence to homework>70% of the participants practice >1 skill on 3 d/wk.>80% of participants practice >1 skill on 3 d/wk.
Feasibility of assessments>70% of the participants have no measures fully missing.>90% of the participants have no measures fully missing.
Adverse eventsMinimal None

This study is funded by the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research grant 1R21DE033502-01A1 to JG and AMV. Recruitment began in October 2024 for phase 1. Data collection for phase 1 was completed in March 2025. Primary data analysis for phase 1 is expected to conclude by fall 2025 and in 2026 for phase 2. As of August 2025, we have completed 4 planned focus groups with a total of 22 participants representing a variety of COP diagnoses, including temporomandibular joint dysfunction, trigeminal neuralgia, and burning mouth syndrome. The rapid data analysis is complete, and we are beginning thematic analysis. We are starting to create intervention content, informed by results from our focus groups. Once available, we will share the data and results in the Vivli global clinical research data sharing platform.


Pain interference and emotional distress are prevalent among people with COP [62] but are commonly neglected in current treatments [20,39]. Available psychosocial interventions such as cognitive behavioral therapy [21-28] and other behavioral programs [29-32] show promise in improving outcomes in individuals with COP [21-32] but are often not suitable for people with COP due to several limitations. Most notably, these interventions typically rely on verbal communication, which is often painful for this population due to facial pain symptoms, which can be exacerbated by talking. Additionally, such interventions can be associated with stigma and require extensive resources (eg, availability of a trained live clinician). Here, we describe a protocol to develop, test, and refine Face-Forward-Web, the first talk-free web-based intervention for adults with heterogeneous COP, tailored specifically to meet their needs and challenges. By teaching mind-body (eg, mindfulness, relaxation) and cognitive behavioral skills within a talk-free modality, this intervention holds potential to bypass barriers and address these commonly neglected needs [38].

We anticipate that the results of phase 1 will align with our preliminary work underscoring the need for a COP intervention that addresses psychosocial factors [20] and uses a web-based platform. We also anticipate findings to highlight specific elements of the intervention’s content, structure, and study procedures that can be tailored to maximize fit for this population’s needs. Assuming the successful integration of these findings, we hypothesize that phase 2 will demonstrate high levels of feasibility across domains (eg, user experience, acceptability, adherence) and no adverse events related to study participation.

We follow the NIH stage model [48] and prioritize establishing feasibility and iterative refinement of the intervention prior to efficacy testing. By integrating qualitative methods, our approach centers on participant needs and preferences, ensuring that the intervention is best positioned to support those impacted by COP. Once both phases are complete, these results will inform a future efficacy trial of Face-Forward-Web versus an active control platform.

Potential limitations should be considered. First, the study relies on participants’ self-reported diagnoses and symptoms. This limitation is partially mitigated by our recruitment methods, which include referrals from COP medical specialists and established advocacy groups. Second, our broad diagnostic inclusion criteria may reduce the specificity of the findings. However, our preliminary research suggests that individuals across diagnostic categories share more common needs than differences. This inclusive approach enhances the potential for generalizability to a broader population and may be considered a potential strength. Other strengths include the use of established feasibility benchmarks, validated measures, and following the NIH model for behavioral intervention development.

Our work has yielded a few lessons learned thus far. First, given our small budget, we have had to carefully prioritize spending and have chosen to focus on the remuneration of participants [70]. Additionally, for recruitment, we have found both professional networks (providers who treat COP) and community resources (Facial Pain Association) to be effective. However, meeting our goal of including the perspectives of diverse populations, including a variety of COP diagnoses, as well as racial, ethnic, and medically underserved areas [71] has required additional strategies such as direct engagement of referral providers.

In summary, this protocol describes the development, refinement, and feasibility testing of Face-Forward-Web, the first talk-free web platform for adults with heterogeneous COP, tailored specifically to their needs and challenges by using mixed methods. We will utilize the NIH stage model for behavioral intervention development [47,48], the Science of Behavioral Change framework [72], and a user-centered design process to maximize the intervention’s fit for this population’s needs [40,41]. Our results will establish feasibility and directly inform a subsequent efficacy trial.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health and National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research grant 1R21DE033502-01A1 to JG and AMV: NCCIH 1K23AT010653-01A1 to JG and NCCIH 1K24AT011760-01 to AMV.

Authors' Contributions

AMV and JG are the shared senior authors for this study.

Conceptualization: JG and AMV (co-lead)

Funding acquisition: JG, AMV (co-lead)

Investigation: JG, AMV (co-lead), BCL (supporting)

Methodology: JG, AMV (co-lead)

Project administration: JG

Resources: RK, JRS

Supervision: JG (lead), AMV (supporting)

Writing – original draft: BCL

Writing – review & editing: JG (lead), JB (supporting), RK (supporting), HTC (supporting), SH (supporting), AMV (supporting)

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

Multimedia Appendix 1

SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) checklist.

DOCX File , 31 KB

Multimedia Appendix 2

Focus group interview script.

DOCX File , 28 KB

Multimedia Appendix 3

Peer review report by BMHO - Biobehavioral Medicine and Health Outcomes Study Section Risk, Prevention and Health Behavior Integrated Review Group (National Institutes of Health, USA).

PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 167 KB

  1. Macfarlane TV, Blinkhorn AS, Davies RM, Kincey J, Worthington HV. Oro-facial pain in the community: prevalence and associated impact. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. Mar 2002;30(1):52-60. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  2. Facial pain. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research. 2018. URL: https://www.nidcr.nih.gov/research/data-statistics/facial-pain [accessed 2021-11-02]
  3. Rollman GB, Gillespie JM. The role of psychosocial factors in temporomandibular disorders. Curr Rev Pain. 2000;4(1):71-81. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  4. Peters S, Goldthorpe J, McElroy C, King E, Javidi H, Tickle M, et al. Managing chronic orofacial pain: a qualitative study of patients', doctors', and dentists' experiences. Br J Health Psychol. Nov 2015;20(4):777-791. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  5. Tesch RS, Denardin OVP, Baptista CA, Dias FL. Depression levels in chronic orofacial pain patients: a pilot study. J Oral Rehabil. Oct 2004;31(10):926-932. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  6. Schmidt J, Hawkins J. Orofacial pain. In: Handbook of Psychosocial Interventions for Chronic Pain: An Evidence-Based Guide. New York. Routledge; May 29, 2019:425.
  7. Davis CE, Stockstill JW, Stanley WD, Wu Q. Pain-related worry in patients with chronic orofacial pain. J Am Dent Assoc. Jul 2014;145(7):722-730. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  8. Turner JA, Brister H, Huggins K, Mancl L, Aaron LA, Truelove EL. Catastrophizing is associated with clinical examination findings, activity interference, and health care use among patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain. 2005;19(4):291-300. [Medline]
  9. Jang H, Kim M, Kim H. Pain catastrophizing mediates the effects of psychological distress on pain interference in patients with orofacial pain: a cross-sectional study. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2018;32(4):409-417. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  10. Durham J, Raphael KG, Benoliel R, Ceusters W, Michelotti A, Ohrbach R. Perspectives on next steps in classification of oro-facial pain - part 2: role of psychosocial factors. J Oral Rehabil. Dec 2015;42(12):942-955. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  11. Crandall JA. An introduction to orofacial pain. Dent Clin North Am. Oct 2018;62(4):511-523. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  12. Wolf E, Birgerstam P, Nilner M, Petersson K. Nonspecific chronic orofacial pain: studying patient experiences and perspectives with a qualitative approach. J Orofac Pain. 2008;22(4):349-358. [Medline]
  13. Gustin SM, Wilcox SL, Peck CC, Murray GM, Henderson LA. Similarity of suffering: equivalence of psychological and psychosocial factors in neuropathic and non-neuropathic orofacial pain patients. Pain. Apr 2011;152(4):825-832. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  14. Woda A, Tubert-Jeannin S, Bouhassira D, Attal N, Fleiter B, Goulet J, et al. Towards a new taxonomy of idiopathic orofacial pain. Pain. Aug 2005;116(3):396-406. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  15. Crombez G, Eccleston C, Van Damme S, Vlaeyen JWS, Karoly P. Fear-avoidance model of chronic pain: the next generation. Clin J Pain. Jul 2012;28(6):475-483. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  16. Vlaeyen JWS, Crombez G, Linton SJ. The fear-avoidance model of pain. Pain. Dec 2016;157(8):1588-1589. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  17. Beecroft EV, Durham J, Thomson P. Retrospective examination of the healthcare 'journey' of chronic orofacial pain patients referred to oral and maxillofacial surgery. Br Dent J. Mar 2013;214(5):E12. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  18. Furlan AD, Sandoval JA, Mailis-Gagnon A, Tunks E. Opioids for chronic noncancer pain: a meta-analysis of effectiveness and side effects. CMAJ. May 23, 2006;174(11):1589-1594. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  19. Pfaffenrath V, Rath M, Pöllmann W, Keeser W. Atypical facial pain--application of the IHS criteria in a clinical sample. Cephalalgia. Apr 1993;13 Suppl 12:84-88. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  20. Lovette BC, Bannon SM, Spyropoulos DC, Vranceanu A, Greenberg J. “I Still Suffer Every Second of Every Day”: a qualitative analysis of the challenges of living with chronic orofacial pain. JPR. Jul 2022;Volume 15:2139-2148. [CrossRef]
  21. Aggarwal VR, Tickle M, Javidi H, Peters S. Reviewing the evidence: can cognitive behavioral therapy improve outcomes for patients with chronic orofacial pain? J Orofac Pain. 2010;24(2):163-171. [Medline]
  22. Bergdahl J, Anneroth G, Perris H. Cognitive therapy in the treatment of patients with resistant burning mouth syndrome: a controlled study. J Oral Pathol Med. May 1995;24(5):213-215. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  23. McMillan R, Forssell H, Buchanan JA, Glenny A, Weldon JC, Zakrzewska JM. Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Nov 18, 2016;11(11):CD002779. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  24. Noma N, Watanabe Y, Shimada A, Usuda S, Iida T, Shimada A, et al. Effects of cognitive behavioral therapy on orofacial pain conditions. J Oral Sci. Dec 23, 2020;63(1):4-7. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  25. Litt MD, Shafer DM, Kreutzer DL. Brief cognitive-behavioral treatment for TMD pain: long-term outcomes and moderators of treatment. Pain. Oct 2010;151(1):110-116. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  26. Song YL, Yap AU. Outcomes of therapeutic TMD interventions on oral health related quality of life: a qualitative systematic review. Quintessence Int. 2018;49(6):487-496. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  27. Wang J, Jian F, Chen J, Ye NS, Huang YH, Wang S, et al. Cognitive behavioral therapy for orthodontic pain control: a randomized trial. J Dent Res. Jun 2012;91(6):580-585. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  28. Wang J, Wu D, Shen Y, Zhang Y, Xu Y, Tang X, et al. Cognitive behavioral therapy eases orthodontic pain: EEG states and functional connectivity analysis. Oral Dis. Jul 2015;21(5):572-582. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  29. Fricton JR. Management of masticatory myofascial pain. Semin Orthod. Dec 1995;1(4):229-243. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  30. Tan G, Glaros A, Sherman R, Wong C. Integrative approaches to orofacial pain: role of biofeedback and hypnosis. Orofacial Disorders: Current Therapies in Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine. 2017:324. [CrossRef]
  31. Bae Y, Park Y. The effect of relaxation exercises for the masticator muscles on temporomandibular joint dysfunction (TMD). J Phys Ther Sci. May 2013;25(5):583-586. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  32. Carlson CR, Bertrand PM, Ehrlich AD, Maxwell AW, Burton RG. Physical self-regulation training for the management of temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain. 2001;15(1):47-55. [Medline]
  33. Melchior MDO, Mazzetto MO, Magri LV. Relation of painful TMD with the speech function: what are the possible characteristics of mandibular movements and the main symptoms reported? Codas. Apr 01, 2019;31(2):e20180161. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  34. Wang D, Cao X, Huang X. Equity of accessibility to health care services and identification of underserved areas. Chin Geogr Sci. Jan 13, 2021;31(1):167-180. [CrossRef]
  35. Schatman ME. The role of the health insurance industry in perpetuating suboptimal pain management. Pain Med. Mar 2011;12(3):415-426. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  36. Wahl OF. Mental health consumers' experience of stigma. Schizophr Bull. 1999;25(3):467-478. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  37. Türp JC, Jokstad A, Motschall E, Schindler HJ, Windecker-Gétaz I, Ettlin DA. Is there a superiority of multimodal as opposed to simple therapy in patients with temporomandibular disorders? A qualitative systematic review of the literature. Clin Oral Implants Res. Jun 2007;18 Suppl 3:138-150. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  38. Dear BF, Gandy M, Karin E, Staples LG, Johnston L, Fogliati VJ, et al. The Pain Course: a randomised controlled trial examining an internet-delivered pain management program when provided with different levels of clinician support. Pain. Oct 2015;156(10):1920-1935. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  39. Grunberg VA, Reichman M, Lovette BC, Vranceanu A, Greenberg J. "No one truly understands what we go through and how to treat it": lived experiences with medical providers among patients with orofacial pain. Int J Environ Res Public Health. Aug 20, 2022;19(16):16. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  40. Garrett JJ. The Elements of User Experience: User-Centered Design for the Web and Beyond 2nd Edition. Hoboken, NJ. Peachpit Press; Dec 10, 2010:49-0321-49-0321.
  41. Walden A, Garvin L, Smerek M, Johnson C. User-centered design principles in the development of clinical research tools. Clin Trials. Dec 2020;17(6):703-711. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  42. Lyon AR, Koerner K. User-centered design for psychosocial intervention development and implementation. Clin Psychol (New York). Jun 2016;23(2):180-200. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  43. Dopp AR, Parisi KE, Munson SA, Lyon AR. Aligning implementation and user-centered design strategies to enhance the impact of health services: results from a concept mapping study. Implement Sci Commun. 2020;1:17. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  44. Park ER, Traeger L, Vranceanu A, Scult M, Lerner JA, Benson H, et al. The development of a patient-centered program based on the relaxation response: the Relaxation Response Resiliency Program (3RP). Psychosomatics. 2013;54(2):165-174. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  45. Greenberg J, Popok PJ, Lin A, Kulich RJ, James P, Macklin EA, et al. A mind-body physical activity program for chronic pain with or without a digital monitoring device: proof-of-concept feasibility randomized controlled trial. JMIR Form Res. Jun 08, 2020;4(6):e18703. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  46. Greenberg J, Singh T, Popok PJ, Kulich RJ, Vranceanu A. Sustainability of improvements in adaptive coping following mind-body and activity training for chronic pain. Int J Behav Med. Dec 2021;28(6):820-826. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  47. NIH stage model for behavioral intervention development. National Institutes of Health. URL: https://www.nia.nih.gov/research/dbsr/nih-stage-model-behavioral-intervention-development [accessed 2024-11-01]
  48. Onken LS, Carroll KM, Shoham V, Cuthbert BN, Riddle M. Reenvisioning clinical science: unifying the discipline to improve the public health. Clin Psychol Sci. Jan 01, 2014;2(1):22-34. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  49. Fusch P, Ness L. Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. TQR. Sep 8, 2015:1408-1416. [CrossRef]
  50. Pagoto SL, Waring ME, Schneider KL, Oleski JL, Olendzki E, Hayes RB, et al. Twitter-delivered behavioral weight-loss interventions: a pilot series. JMIR Res Protoc. Oct 23, 2015;4(4):e123. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  51. Vranceanu A, Hageman M, Strooker J, ter Meulen D, Vrahas M, Ring D. A preliminary RCT of a mind body skills based intervention addressing mood and coping strategies in patients with acute orthopaedic trauma. Injury. Apr 2015;46(4):552-557. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  52. Popok PJ, Greenberg J, Gates MV, Vranceanu A. A qualitative investigation of activity measurement and change following a mind-body activity program for chronic pain. Complement Ther Clin Pract. Aug 2021;44:101410. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  53. Clifton B. Advanced Web Metrics With Google Analytics. Hoboken, NJ. John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
  54. Smith BH, Penny KI, Purves AM, Munro C, Wilson B, Grimshaw J, et al. The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire: validation and reliability in postal research. Pain. Jun 1997;71(2):141-147. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  55. Osborne TL, Raichle KA, Jensen MP, Ehde DM, Kraft G. The reliability and validity of pain interference measures in persons with multiple sclerosis. J Pain Symptom Manage. Sep 2006;32(3):217-229. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  56. Law AS, Nixdorf DR, Rabinowitz I, Reams GJ, Smith JA, Torres AV, et al. National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group. Root canal therapy reduces multiple dimensions of pain: a national dental practice-based research network study. J Endod. Nov 2014;40(11):1738-1745. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  57. Farrar JT, Young JP, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. Nov 2001;94(2):149-158. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  58. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. May 22, 2006;166(10):1092-1097. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  59. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. Sep 2001;16(9):606-613. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  60. Ho E, Chen G, Bray TM. Alpha-phenyl-tert-butylnitrone (PBN) inhibits NFkappaB activation offering protection against chemically induced diabetes. Free Radic Biol Med. Mar 15, 2000;28(4):604-614. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  61. Visscher CM, Ohrbach R, van Wijk AJ, Wilkosz M, Naeije M. The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia for temporomandibular disorders (TSK-TMD). Pain. Sep 2010;150(3):492-500. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  62. Greenberg J, Bakhshaie J, Lovette B, Vranceanu A. Association between coping strategies and pain-related outcomes among individuals with chronic orofacial pain. JPR. Feb 2022;15:431-442. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
  63. Feldman G, Hayes A, Kumar S, Greeson J, Laurenceau J. Mindfulness and emotion regulation: the development and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R). J Psychopathol Behav Assess. Nov 7, 2006;29(3):177-190. [CrossRef]
  64. Li MJ, Black DS, Garland EL. The Applied Mindfulness Process Scale (AMPS): a process measure for evaluating mindfulness-based interventions. Pers Individ Dif. Apr 01, 2016;93:6-15. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  65. Laugwitz B, Held T, Schrepp M. Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Nov 2008:63-76. [CrossRef]
  66. Devilly GJ, Borkovec TD. Psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. Jun 2000;31(2):73-86. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  67. Mace RA, Gates MV, Bullard B, Lester EG, Silverman IH, Quiroz YT, et al. Development of a novel mind-body activity and pain management program for older adults with cognitive decline. Gerontologist. Apr 03, 2021;61(3):449-459. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  68. Greenberg J, Singh T, Iverson GL, Silverberg ND, Macklin EA, Parker RA, et al. A live video mind-body treatment to prevent persistent symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury: protocol for a mixed methods study. JMIR Res Protoc. Jan 14, 2021;10(1):e25746. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  69. Greenberg J, Lin A, Zale E, Kulich RJ, James P, Millstein R, et al. Development and early feasibility testing of a mind-body physical activity program for patients with heterogeneous chronic pain: the GetActive study. JPR. Dec 2019;Volume 12:3279-3297. [CrossRef]
  70. Różyńska J. The ethical anatomy of payment for research participants. Med Health Care Philos. Sep 2022;25(3):449-464. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  71. Medically underserved area and medically underserved population find. Health Resources & Services Administration. URL: https://data.hrsa.gov/tools/shortage-area/mua-find [accessed 2025-01-08]
  72. Science of Behavior Change (SOBC). National Institutes of Health: Office of Strategic Coordination - The Common Fund. URL: https://commonfund.nih.gov/behaviorchange [accessed 2024-12-01]


COP: chronic orofacial pain
NIH: National Institutes of Health
REDCap: Research Electronic Data Capture
SPIRIT: Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials


Edited by A Schwartz; The proposal for this study was peer reviewed by BMHO - Biobehavioral Medicine and Health Outcomes Study Section Risk, Prevention and Health Behavior Integrated Review Group (National Institutes of Health, USA). See the Multimedia Appendix for the peer-review report; submitted 27.01.25; accepted 18.07.25; published 20.08.25.

Copyright

©Brenda C Lovette, Jafar Bakhshaie, Ronald Kulich, Jeffry R Shaefer, Hsinlin Thomas Cheng, Shuhan He, Ana-Maria Vranceanu, Jonathan Greenberg. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 20.08.2025.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.