Search Results (1 to 10 of 2651 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 821 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 471 JMIR Research Protocols
- 273 JMIR Formative Research
- 246 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 101 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 86 JMIR Mental Health
- 78 JMIR Human Factors
- 76 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 66 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 62 JMIR Dermatology
- 47 JMIR Serious Games
- 41 JMIR Cancer
- 40 JMIR Aging
- 31 JMIR Cardio
- 29 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 28 JMIR Medical Education
- 27 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 21 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 19 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 16 JMIR Diabetes
- 15 Iproceedings
- 13 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 10 JMIRx Med
- 9 JMIR Infodemiology
- 7 JMIR AI
- 6 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 5 JMIR Nursing
- 2 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 1 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 1 JMIR Data
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing
- 1 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
Statistical significance was defined as P
Of the 3684 participants screened for eligibility, 633 participants were excluded (346 declined participation and 287 did not meet eligibility criteria; Figure 2). The program started with 3051 participants, of which 2367 participants completed it, translating into a completion rate of 77.6%.
Study flowchart.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e68242
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
The KMO score was 0.97 and the Bartlett test of sphericity was significant (P
Based on the eigenvalue (Table 1), 3 factors needed to be considered, while the Scree plot (Figure 2) showed 4 factors. However, attention was focused on reporting the 3-factor loading (Table 2) since the results obtained for the fourth factor were too weak. The fourth factor was formed by only two items that were not significant, leading to a focus on the 3-factor loading.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e66904
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
STAIC-Ta
STAIC-Sb
VASc anxiety
PANAS-Kd
SSQ-Ce
STAIC-S
VAS anxiety
PANAS-K
VAS pain
SSQ-C
Adapted PXIf for childreng
Patient experience
Presence
PANAS
PANAS-C-Pg
VAS anxiety (child)
PANAS
0-P
VAS anxiety (child)
VAS pain (child)
PXIh
Player experienceg
CHEOPSi
Self-designed questions for assessing procedure flow
a STAIC-T: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for children–trait anxiety.
b STAIC-S: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for children–state anxiety.
c VAS: visual analog scale.
d PANAS-K: German translation of the
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e63098
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
P values for the chi-square test are given.
a EV: embryonic volume.
b Not applicable.
c GA: gestational age.
d HV: head volume.
For the HV, a total of 475 ultrasound scans of 326 participants were included. The data were divided over similar subsets. The development set contained 383 ultrasound scans of 261 participants acquired before 2020. The test set contained 92 ultrasound scans of 65 participants acquired before 2020. The future test set contained 80 ultrasound scans of 58 participants acquired in 2020.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e60887
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
The scoping review protocol has been registered on the Open Science Framework Registries [30] and was guided by and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) [31]. The completed PRISMA-P checklist can be found in Multimedia Appendix 1. The results of the scoping review will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-Sc R) checklist [32].
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e65733
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
All analyses were completed in Stata (version 17; Stata Corp), and all models used robust estimates of variance and 2-tailed P values, with P
This study was deemed exempt by the Dartmouth College Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects (00032337). As practices were the unit of analysis, participants received an information sheet in lieu of informed consent. Practices were deidentified prior to analysis.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e70404
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The ORCID for author David P Neal was changed from:
000-0002-5531-9962
To the following:
0000-0001-7916-3299
Additionally, the author “Ellen MA Smets” was changed to “Ellen M A Smets.”
The correction will appear in the online version of the paper on the JMIR Publications website on March 27, 2025, together with the publication of this correction notice.
JMIR Med Inform 2025;13:e73416
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS