Search Results (1 to 10 of 1068 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 256 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 229 JMIR Research Protocols
- 129 JMIR Formative Research
- 88 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 55 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 52 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 44 JMIR Mental Health
- 32 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 29 JMIR Human Factors
- 25 JMIR Serious Games
- 20 JMIR Cancer
- 15 JMIR Medical Education
- 14 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 11 JMIR Aging
- 11 JMIR Diabetes
- 10 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 8 JMIR Cardio
- 7 Iproceedings
- 6 JMIR Dermatology
- 5 JMIR AI
- 4 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 4 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 3 JMIR Nursing
- 3 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 3 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 2 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 2 JMIR Infodemiology
- 1 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
A Student sample two-tailed t test was used to examine the difference in the average number of days to heal a wound across adoption and control branches between the pre- and postadoption periods. The significance of the statistical test was accepted at P
Data analysis was conducted using SPSS software (version 28; IBM Corp).
The analyses showed that the days to heal for both the adoption and control groups were normally distributed, as assessed by Shapiro-Wilk normality test (P>.05).
JMIR Nursing 2025;8:e71535
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
For our quantitative effectiveness outcomes, we used a paired samples t test with 1 within-subject factor of time (treatment) and 2 measurement points (baseline and posttreatment) and included effect sizes, as measured by Cohen d. We analyzed the qualitative data descriptively with a focus on key themes.
This study was approved by the Behavioural Research Ethics Board at the University of British Columbia (certificate #H22-02993), and all participants provided written informed consent.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e69828
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS