e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 3 of 3 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 1 JMIR Infodemiology
- 1 JMIR Medical Education
- 1 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
In the following subsections, all scoring methods are described with their corresponding scoring formulas for calculating examination results as absolute scores (S). In addition, an overview with the respective scoring results for individual items as well as alternative names used in the literature is presented in Table 2. All abbreviations used throughout this review are listed at the end of this review.
Flow diagram of systematic literature search.
JMIR Med Educ 2023;9:e44084
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Results from 35 adults suggest that individuals with OCD have voices with more jitter, breathiness, hoarseness and speak at a lower rate than individuals without a psychiatric diagnosis [11]. Increased percent jitter and hoarseness have also been found in children (6-15 years old) with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder compared with healthy controls [12].
JMIR Res Protoc 2022;11(10):e39613
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
A random subsample of 50 ads and 50 web results were independently coded by a second coder for type of information—the most subjective of the codes.
User engagement with the elements on the page was measured as the time spent on each of the page elements (eg, ads, info box, itemized web results, and standard web results) and whether itemized web results and standard web results were clicked. Times were measured by monitoring whether the mouse pointer of the user was hovering over an element [10].
JMIR Infodemiology 2022;2(2):e37286
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS