Published on in Vol 7, No 10 (2018): October

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/11239, first published .
Facilitating the Informed Consent Process Using Teleconsent: Protocol for a Feasibility and Efficacy Study

Facilitating the Informed Consent Process Using Teleconsent: Protocol for a Feasibility and Efficacy Study

Facilitating the Informed Consent Process Using Teleconsent: Protocol for a Feasibility and Efficacy Study

Journals

  1. Chantler T, Letley L, Paterson P, Yarwood J, Saliba V, Mounier-Jack S. Optimising informed consent in school-based adolescent vaccination programmes in England: A multiple methods analysis. Vaccine 2019;37(36):5218 View
  2. Skelton E, Drey N, Rutherford M, Ayers S, Malamateniou C. Electronic consenting for conducting research remotely: A review of current practice and key recommendations for using e-consenting. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2020;143:104271 View
  3. Berkman E, McGuire J. Remote Telesimulation: Standardizing Clinical Research Staff Training From a Distance*. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2020;21(12):1089 View
  4. Ponathil A, Bhanu A, Rogers H, Wilson M, Chalil Madathil K. An Investigation of the Usability of a Teleconsent System. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2020;64(1):1851 View
  5. Yun W, Youn J, Ko D, Yeom I, Joo H, Kong H, Kim H. Tele-consent using mixed reality glasses (NREAL) in pediatric inguinal herniorrhaphy: a preliminary study. Scientific Reports 2022;12(1) View
  6. Weeda E, Burnette B, Rowe S, Haas S, Zecopoulos A, Alnewais M. Disparity in the rural‐urban distribution of clinical trial sites used in studies cited by diabetes treatment guidelines. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism 2022;24(3):561 View
  7. Nyholm Gaarskjær A, Crookshanks Duroux M, Hogreffe R. Participant comprehension and perspectives regarding the convenience, security, and satisfaction with teleconsent compared to in-person consent: A parallel-group pilot study among Danish citizens. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications 2022;28:100927 View
  8. Phillips H, Deshpandey M, Staveski S. Consenting in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Pediatric Nursing 2024;74:129 View
  9. Terao M, Mittal N, Roth M, Saha A, Super L, Reichek J. Utilization of Teleconsent for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Clinical Trials, a Report from the Children's Oncology Group. Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology 2024;13(1):132 View
  10. Sawant S, Madathil K, Molloseau M, Obeid J. Overcoming recruitment hurdles in clinical trials: An investigation of remote consenting modalities and their impact on workload, workflow, and usability. Applied Ergonomics 2024;114:104135 View
  11. Cummins M, Burr J, Young L, Yeatts S, Ecklund D, Bunnell B, Dwyer J, VanBuren J. Decentralized research technology use in multicenter clinical research studies based at U.S. academic research centers. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 2023;7(1) View
  12. Tan N, Lafeber M, Sablerolles R, Veerman Roders I, van de Hoef A, van Grafhorst K, Visser L, Postma D, Goorhuis A, Rietdijk W, van der Kuy P. Evaluation of a group-based online informed consent conversation (eConsent) in participants from a low-risk vaccination clinical trial. Trials 2024;25(1) View
  13. Wilson M, Khasawneh A, Ponathil A, Narasimha S, Agnisarman S, Welch B, Madathil K. A Preliminary Study Investigating Patients’ Perceptions of Research Consenting Methods. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2019;63(1):1931 View