Published on in Vol 7, No 4 (2018): April

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/9249, first published .
A Web-Based Decision Tool to Improve Contraceptive Counseling for Women With Chronic Medical Conditions: Protocol For a Mixed Methods Implementation Study

A Web-Based Decision Tool to Improve Contraceptive Counseling for Women With Chronic Medical Conditions: Protocol For a Mixed Methods Implementation Study

A Web-Based Decision Tool to Improve Contraceptive Counseling for Women With Chronic Medical Conditions: Protocol For a Mixed Methods Implementation Study

Journals

  1. Paz-Pascual C, Artieta-Pinedo I, Grandes G. Consensus on priorities in maternal education: results of Delphi and nominal group technique approaches. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2019;19(1) View
  2. Rodriguez M, Edelman A, Skye M, Anderson L, Darney B. Association of Pharmacist Prescription With Dispensed Duration of Hormonal Contraception. JAMA Network Open 2020;3(5):e205252 View
  3. Vricella L, Gawron L, Louis J. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Consult Series #48: Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception for women at high risk for medical complications. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2019;220(5):B2 View
  4. Johnson E, DeJonckheere M, Oliverio A, Brown K, Van Sparrentak M, Wu J. A theoretical model of contraceptive decision‐making and behaviour in diabetes: A qualitative application of the Health Belief Model. Diabetic Medicine 2021;38(6) View
  5. Brown H, Aker A, Wanigaratne S. Multimorbidity and use of reversible contraception: Results from a Canadian cross-sectional survey. Contraception 2021;104(6):628 View
  6. Mushy S, Shishido E, Leshabari S, Horiuchi S. Postpartum Green Star family planning decision aid for pregnant adolescents in Tanzania: a qualitative feasibility study. Reproductive Health 2021;18(1) View
  7. Fetters M, Tajima C. Joint Displays of Integrated Data Collection in Mixed Methods Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2022;21 View
  8. Kalpakjian C, Haapala H, Ernst S, Orians B, Barber M, Mulenga L, Bolde S, Kreschmer J, Parten R, Carlson S, Rosenblum S, Jay G. Development and pilot test of a pregnancy decision making tool for women with physical disabilities. Health Services Research 2023;58(1):223 View
  9. Wu J, Johnson E, Taichman L. Contraceptive decisions among individuals with medical conditions in Michigan, USA: A qualitative explanatory model informed by the Health Belief Model and the principle of respect for patient autonomy. Contraception 2022;113:37 View
  10. Philbin M, McCrimmon T, Shaffer V, Kerrigan D, Pereyra M, Cohen M, Sosanya O, Sheth A, Adimora A, Topper E, Rana A, Tamraz B, Goparaju L, Wilson T, Alcaide M. A Patient Decision Aid (i.ARTs) to Facilitate Women’s Choice Between Oral and Long-Acting Injectable Antiretroviral Treatment for HIV: Protocols for its Development and Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. JMIR Research Protocols 2022;11(9):e35646 View
  11. Mushy S, Horiuchi S, Shishido E. A Decision Aid for Postpartum Adolescent Family Planning: A Quasi-Experimental Study in Tanzania. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2023;20(6):4904 View
  12. Hugh M, Horbanczuk S, Fettig A, Locke J. Experience matters in special educators' preparation in intervention planning for autistic students. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs 2024 View
  13. Hariyanti H, Khatimah H, Kristianto J, Gumilang I, Hamidiyanti B. SITEPIS Contraception is an Extension Officer in Providing Information on Family Planning in Indonesia. JURNAL INFO KESEHATAN 2023;21(4):772 View