This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Systematic Review Protocols (306) Validity, Reliability, and Bias (104)

Published on in Vol 8, No 11 (2019): November

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/15140, first published .
Allegiance Bias and Treatment Quality as Moderators of the Effectiveness of Humanistic Psychotherapy: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Allegiance Bias and Treatment Quality as Moderators of the Effectiveness of Humanistic Psychotherapy: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Allegiance Bias and Treatment Quality as Moderators of the Effectiveness of Humanistic Psychotherapy: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors of this article:

Olivia Schünemann1 Author Orcid Image ;   Alessa Jansen2 Author Orcid Image ;   Ulrike Willutzki3 Author Orcid Image ;   Nina Heinrichs1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (1) Tweetations (2) Metrics

Journals

  1. Schünemann O, Jansen A, Willutzki U, Heinrichs N. Allegiance and treatment quality as moderators of the comparative effectiveness of psychotherapy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing humanistic psychotherapy to other psychotherapy approaches. Clinical Psychology in Europe 2025;7(1) View