This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Systematic Review Protocols (268)

Published on in Vol 9, No 1 (2020): January

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/15309, first published .
Movement-Evoked Pain Versus Pain at Rest in Postsurgical Clinical Trials and Meta-Analyses: Protocol for a Follow-Up Systematic Review

Movement-Evoked Pain Versus Pain at Rest in Postsurgical Clinical Trials and Meta-Analyses: Protocol for a Follow-Up Systematic Review

Movement-Evoked Pain Versus Pain at Rest in Postsurgical Clinical Trials and Meta-Analyses: Protocol for a Follow-Up Systematic Review

Authors of this article:

Daenis Camiré1 Author Orcid Image ;   Jason Erb1 Author Orcid Image ;   Henrik Kehlet2 Author Orcid Image ;   Timothy Brennan3 Author Orcid Image ;   Ian Gilron1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (6) Tweetations (1) Metrics

Daenis Camiré   1 , BScN, RN, MD ;   Jason Erb   1 , MD, FRCP ;   Henrik Kehlet   2 , MD, PhD ;   Timothy Brennan   3 , MD, PhD ;   Ian Gilron   1 , MD, MSc, FRCP

1 Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada

2 Section for Surgical Pathophysiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark

3 Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States

Corresponding Author:

  • Ian Gilron, MD, MSc, FRCP
  • Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine
  • Queen's University
  • Victory 2, Kingston General Hospital
  • 76 Stuart Street
  • Kingston, ON, K7L2V7
  • Canada
  • Phone: 1 613 549 6666 ext 3963
  • Fax: 1 613 548 1375
  • Email: gilroni@queensu.ca