This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

RCTs - Protocols/Proposals (eHealth) (538) mHealth for Wellness, Behavior Change and Prevention (2872) Text-messaging (SMS, WeChat etc)-Based Interventions (650) Alcohol Abuse, Alcoholism Prevention and Recovery (300)

Published on in Vol 9, No 10 (2020): October

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/19720, first published .
Evaluating the Efficacy of a Mobile App (Drinks:Ration) and Personalized Text and Push Messaging to Reduce Alcohol Consumption in a Veteran Population: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Evaluating the Efficacy of a Mobile App (Drinks:Ration) and Personalized Text and Push Messaging to Reduce Alcohol Consumption in a Veteran Population: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Evaluating the Efficacy of a Mobile App (Drinks:Ration) and Personalized Text and Push Messaging to Reduce Alcohol Consumption in a Veteran Population: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors of this article:

Daniel Leightley1 Author Orcid Image ;   Roberto J Rona1 Author Orcid Image ;   James Shearer2 Author Orcid Image ;   Charlotte Williamson3 Author Orcid Image ;   Cerisse Gunasinghe4 Author Orcid Image ;   Amos Simms5, 6 Author Orcid Image ;   Nicola T Fear1, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Laura Goodwin7 Author Orcid Image ;   Dominic Murphy1, 3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (12) Tweetations (1) Metrics

Daniel Leightley   1 , BSc, MSc, PhD ;   Roberto J Rona   1 , PhD, FFPH ;   James Shearer   2 , PhD ;   Charlotte Williamson   3 , BSc, MSc ;   Cerisse Gunasinghe   4 , BSc, MSc, DCounPsych ;   Amos Simms   5, 6 , BSc, MSc ;   Nicola T Fear   1, 5 , BSc, MSc, DPhil ;   Laura Goodwin   7 * , BSc, MSc, PhD ;   Dominic Murphy   1, 3 * , MA, PhD, DCM

1 King's College London, King's Centre for Military Health Research, London, United Kingdom

2 King's College London, King’s Health Economics, London, United Kingdom

3 Combat Stress, Leatherhead, United Kingdom

4 King's College London, Department of Psychological Medicine, London, United Kingdom

5 Academic Department of Military Mental Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom

6 British Army, London, United Kingdom

7 University of Liverpool, Department of Psychological Sciences, Liverpool, United Kingdom

*these authors contributed equally

Corresponding Author: