This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

RCTs - Protocols/Proposals (eHealth) (540) Robots in Healthcare (86) Dementia and Cognitive Decline (482)

Published on in Vol 9, No 2 (2020): February

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/14927, first published .
The Effects of a Humanoid Socially Assistive Robot Versus Tablet Training on Psychosocial and Physical Outcomes of Persons With Dementia: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

The Effects of a Humanoid Socially Assistive Robot Versus Tablet Training on Psychosocial and Physical Outcomes of Persons With Dementia: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

The Effects of a Humanoid Socially Assistive Robot Versus Tablet Training on Psychosocial and Physical Outcomes of Persons With Dementia: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

Authors of this article:

Sandra Schüssler1 Author Orcid Image ;   Julia Zuschnegg1 Author Orcid Image ;   Lucas Paletta2 Author Orcid Image ;   Maria Fellner2 Author Orcid Image ;   Gerald Lodron2 Author Orcid Image ;   Josef Steiner3 Author Orcid Image ;   Sandra Pansy-Resch3 Author Orcid Image ;   Lara Lammer4 Author Orcid Image ;   Dimitrios Prodromou4 Author Orcid Image ;   Sebastian Brunsch4 Author Orcid Image ;   Magdalena Holter5 Author Orcid Image ;   Lorenzo Carnevale4 Author Orcid Image ;   Silvia Russegger2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (25) Tweetations (3) Metrics

Journals

  1. Howick J, Morley J, Floridi L. An Empathy Imitation Game: Empathy Turing Test for Care- and Chat-bots. Minds and Machines 2021;31(3):457 View
  2. Hirt J, Ballhausen N, Hering A, Kliegel M, Beer T, Meyer G, Palm R. Social Robot Interventions for People with Dementia: A Systematic Review on Effects and Quality of Reporting. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 2021;79(2):773 View
  3. Zuschnegg J, Paletta L, Fellner M, Steiner J, Pansy-Resch S, Jos A, Koini M, Prodromou D, Halfens R, Lohrmann C, Schüssler S. Humanoid socially assistive robots in dementia care: a qualitative study about expectations of caregivers and dementia trainers. Aging & Mental Health 2022;26(6):1270 View
  4. Yuan F, Klavon E, Liu Z, Lopez R, Zhao X. A Systematic Review of Robotic Rehabilitation for Cognitive Training. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 2021;8 View
  5. Floridi L. An Empathy Imitation Game: Empathy Turing Test for Care‑ and Chat‑bots. SSRN Electronic Journal 2021 View
  6. Tulsulkar G, Mishra N, Thalmann N, Lim H, Lee M, Cheng S. Can a humanoid social robot stimulate the interactivity of cognitively impaired elderly? A thorough study based on computer vision methods. The Visual Computer 2021;37(12):3019 View
  7. Tanioka T, Locsin R, Betriana F, Kai Y, Osaka K, Baua E, Schoenhofer S. Intentional Observational Clinical Research Design: Innovative Design for Complex Clinical Research Using Advanced Technology. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(21):11184 View
  8. Yuan F, Sadovnik A, Zhang R, Casenhiser D, Paek E, Zhao X. A simulated experiment to explore robotic dialogue strategies for people with dementia. Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering 2022;9 View
  9. Sony M, Antony J, McDermott O. The Impact of Healthcare 4.0 on the Healthcare Service Quality: A Systematic Literature Review. Hospital Topics 2023;101(4):288 View
  10. Asl A, Toribio-Guzmán J, van der Roest H, Castro-González Á, Malfaz M, Salichs M, Martin M. The usability and feasibility validation of the social robot MINI in people with dementia and mild cognitive impairment; a study protocol. BMC Psychiatry 2022;22(1) View
  11. Mahmoudi Asl A, Molinari Ulate M, Franco Martin M, van der Roest H. Methodologies Used to Study the Feasibility, Usability, Efficacy, and Effectiveness of Social Robots For Elderly Adults: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(8):e37434 View
  12. Zuschnegg J, Schoberer D, Häussl A, Herzog S, Russegger S, Ploder K, Fellner M, Hofmarcher-Holzhacker M, Roller-Wirnsberger R, Paletta L, Koini M, Schüssler S. Effectiveness of computer-based interventions for community-dwelling people with cognitive decline: a systematic review with meta-analyses. BMC Geriatrics 2023;23(1) View
  13. Kumar S, Underwood S, Masters J, Manley N, Konstantzos I, Lau J, Haller R, Wang L. Ten questions concerning smart and healthy built environments for older adults. Building and Environment 2023;244:110720 View
  14. Kratky W, Paletta L, Schüssler S. Pflegeroboter unterstützen Pflegekräfte, aber sie ersetzen sie nicht. ProCare 2023;28(4):52 View
  15. Russo S, Lorusso L, D’Onofrio G, Ciccone F, Tritto M, Nocco S, Cardone D, Perpetuini D, Lombardo M, Lombardo D, Sancarlo D, Greco A, Merla A, Giuliani F. Assessing Feasibility of Cognitive Impairment Testing Using Social Robotic Technology Augmented with Affective Computing and Emotional State Detection Systems. Biomimetics 2023;8(6):475 View
  16. Yuan F, Boltz M, Bilal D, Jao Y, Crane M, Duzan J, Bahour A, Zhao X. Cognitive Exercise for Persons With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia Using a Social Robot. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 2023;39(4):3332 View
  17. Su Z, Liang F, Sheng W, Bishop A. Robot-assisted homecare for older adults: A user study on needs and challenges. Cobot 2024;2:5 View
  18. Howick J, de Zulueta P, Gray M. Beyond empathy training for practitioners: Cultivating empathic healthcare systems and leadership. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2024;30(4):548 View
  19. Yuan F, Bray R, Oliver M, Duzan J, Crane M, Zhao X. A Social Robot-facilitated Performance Assessment of Self-care Skills for People with Alzheimer’s: A Preliminary Study. International Journal of Social Robotics 2024 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Schmidhuber M. Das ganze Leben leben. View
  2. Kolcu M, Kolcu G. Health 4.0 and Medical Supply Chain. View
  3. Huang H, Fu W, Chen R. Cross-Cultural Design. View
  4. Buchem I, Tutul R, Bäcker N. Digital Interaction and Machine Intelligence. View