This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Non-Randomized Study Protocols and Methods (Non-eHealth) (571) Breast Cancer (206) Surgery, Trauma and Surgical Sciences (144) Longitudinal and Cohort Studies in Public Health (309) Emotional, Social, Psychological Support for Cancer (194) Clinical Cancer Research (83) Innovations and Technology in Cancer Care (423)

Published on in Vol 10, No 11 (2021): November

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/27893, first published .
Health-Related Quality of Life of Lebanese Women With Breast Cancer: Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study

Health-Related Quality of Life of Lebanese Women With Breast Cancer: Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study

Health-Related Quality of Life of Lebanese Women With Breast Cancer: Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study

Authors of this article:

Rana El Haidari1 Author Orcid Image ;   Amelie Anota1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Linda Abou-Abbas3 Author Orcid Image ;   Virginie Nerich1, 4 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (1) Tweetations (2) Metrics

    Protocol

    1INSERM (French Institut of Health and Medical Research), EFS BFC (Etablissement français du sang Bourgogne Franche-Comté), UMR1098 (Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire et Génique), University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, RIGHT Interactio, Besancon, France

    2French National Platform Quality of Life and Cancer, Besançon, France

    3Neuroscience Research Center, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Hadath, Lebanon

    4Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France

    Corresponding Author:

    Rana El Haidari, PhD

    INSERM (French Institut of Health and Medical Research), EFS BFC (Etablissement français du sang Bourgogne Franche-Comté), UMR1098 (Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire et Génique), University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, RIGHT Interactio

    32 avenue de l'observatoire

    Besancon, 25000

    France

    Phone: 33 71662058

    Email: ranahaidari14@hotmail.com


    Background: In the past few decades, Lebanon has witnessed a significant increase in the incidence rates of women diagnosed with breast cancer. This increase, which is associated with the advancements in treatment modalities, emphasizes the need to evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of women with breast cancer and to compare its patterns before and after breast-conserving surgery (BCS).

    Objective: This study aims to describe changes in HRQoL according to body image pre- and post-BCS and just before initiation of adjuvant therapy in newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer in Lebanon.

    Methods: A prospective cohort study targeting Lebanese women newly diagnosed with breast cancer and who have an indication for BCS will be conducted in 2 health care facilities. Baseline characteristics and clinical data will be collected. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life cancer-specific and breast cancer–specific questionnaires will be used to assess HRQoL. The outcomes will be measured at baseline and 1 day after breast surgery. The primary outcome will be the body image dimensions of the Quality-of-Life breast cancer–specific questionnaire. Statistical analyses will include descriptive statistics, paired 2-tailed t test, and stepwise multiple regression. A total of 120 patients will be required.

    Results: A total of 120 patients were enrolled in the study. Future outcomes will be published in professional peer-reviewed health-related research journals.

    Conclusions: This study is strengthened by its follow-up nature, allowing us to draw conclusions about causality. The results of this study will identify the most affected components of HRQoL, as well as the factors that could play a role in improving HRQoL among women undergoing BCS. The findings of this study will help decision makers, physicians, and social workers to design a comprehensive program with multidisciplinary components for the management and care of patients with breast cancer in Lebanon.

    International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/27893

    JMIR Res Protoc 2021;10(11):e27893

    doi:10.2196/27893

    Keywords

    breast cancer; cohort; health-related quality of life; Lebanese women; prospective 


    Background

    Approximately 2.1 million women were newly diagnosed with breast cancer in 2018 worldwide [1]. According to Global Cancer Observatory estimates, 684,996 breast cancer–related deaths occurred in 2020 [2]. In the Arab World, the incidence of breast cancer represents 14%-42% of all cancers in women [3]. This wide range is attributed to the capability of each country to detect, monitor, and treat patients with breast cancer [4]. For example, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Qatar can be classified as high-incidence areas with >40% of all female cancers [5]. Meanwhile, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and Oman are classified as low-incidence areas [6]. Lebanon, in particular, is a small Arabic middle-income country with a prominent breast cancer incidence [7]. A significant number of Lebanese women are diagnosed with an incidence rate that has been on the rise over the years, going from a reported 1451 cases in 2005 to 3219 cases in 2018 [8-10]. Approximately 920 (10%) breast cancer–related deaths occurred in 2018 [1].

    Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is one of the most recommended treatments for early-stage breast cancer [11,12]. According to El Saghir et al [4], BCS in Lebanon increased from 48% between 1997 and 2002 to 64% between 2002 and 2010, with a corresponding decrease in the total mastectomy rate from 51% to 36%.

    Despite the increase in BCS, this treatment carries an array of side effects and uncomfortable physical symptoms as well as psychological disturbances, such as fear of recurrence, feelings of decreased femininity and attractiveness, and depression. The experience of breast cancer has a prevailing effect on female body image, which varies according to the clinical features and phases of the disease [13]. Unfortunate body image perceptions have the potential to negatively impact the physical and psychological functioning of patients with breast cancer and subsequently their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) [14].

    Body image is defined as women’s perception and feelings about their body and their self-observation, self-esteem, social interaction, and belief [15]. Han et al [16] found that patients with breast cancer who had better conceptualization of their body image better managed with cancer. Furthermore, fatigue is one of the most common and disabling HRQoL symptoms of cancer among women successfully treated for breast cancer [17]. Fatigue is defined as a general feeling of debilitating tiredness or loss of energy. Fatigue can be associated with several symptoms, such as pain, sleep disturbance, and depression [18,19]. Thus, the impact of body image and fatigue on HRQoL can be extensive, reducing the patient’s engagement in work and personal and social activities [20]. With the intention of supporting patients who adapt to their illness and report positive mental health states, several studies have been performed to identify psychological resources that predict better outcomes. One of these resources is habitual or dispositional optimism, a personality trait that describes the degree to which a person generally expects positive outcomes [21,22]. Dispositional optimism is associated with HRQoL [23,24].

    Robust scientific data on the HRQoL of patients with breast cancer postactive treatment in Lebanon, especially those who experienced BCS, are still scarce. Only 2 single-center studies with cross-sectional designs were conducted in Lebanon [25,26]. Data of the first study collected from 89 participants between 2009 and 2010 showed that younger, single, and better-educated participants who were diagnosed for <30 months, who had no metastasis, and who paid <US $450 per month on medical expenses had better HRQoL. The second study conducted among 150 female patients with breast cancer diagnosed between January 2009 and March 2014 showed that participants who were Iraqi, had stage 4 disease, had a monthly household income <US $1000, or had received chemotherapy exhibited significantly lower HRQoL. Impaired quality of life (QoL) was also reported in patients with worse psychological well-being [26]. The results of this study cannot be generalized because of the lack of a well-representative sample and the small sample size of patients [27-30]. In addition, this study did not compare the QoL of the same individuals at several time points but rather compared different participants with various times elapsed since diagnosis.

    Objectives

    This study aims to describe changes in the HRQoL according to body image pre- and post-BCS and just before initiation of adjuvant therapy in newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer in Lebanon. The secondary objectives are (1) to assess changes in the HRQoL according to fatigue and optimism and pessimism between pre- and post-BCS and (2) to identify sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with changes in the HRQoL.


    Study Design

    To meet the objectives of the study, a prospective study must be conducted.

    Characteristics of Participants

    Inclusion Criteria

    Only the patients who met the inclusion criteria were invited to participate in this study.

    Patient inclusion criteria are women aged ≥18 years; recently diagnosed with invasive early breast cancer of stages 1, 2a, and 2b who are scheduled to undergo breast surgery as primary treatment; without a history of another type of cancer or metastasis; with an absence of other medical or psychiatric conditions; with no previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy; able to read and write the Arabic language; and able to sign informed consent.

    Exclusion Criteria

    Patients were excluded if they met any of the following exclusion criteria: women who are pregnant or breastfeeding, women who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, women who had bilateral breast cancer, and women with an active infection or other underlying serious conditions that may prevent the patient from receiving surgery.

    Proceedings

    After an explanation of the study, the principal researcher will answer the participants’ questions and present the consent form for signature. Patients will complete the questionnaires during 2 periods: the first assessment will be done on the admission day, and the second period is 1 day after the surgery (Figure 1). The estimated average time spent on assessment will be 30-45 minutes. The patients will complete the following questionnaires:

    • The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life cancer-specific questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) to assess HRQoL [31]
    • The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life breast cancer–specific questionnaire (QLQ-BR23) to assess HRQoL
    • The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) to assess the multidimensional aspect of fatigue [32]
    • The Life Orientation Test (LOT) to assess Optimism and Pessimism [24]
    • The European Quality of Life group 5-Dimensional questionnaire–5 Level version (EQ-5D-5L) to assess HRQoL [33]

    The study will be conducted in 2 hospitals located in Beirut, namely Rafik Hariri University Hospital and Sahel General Hospital. The duration of the study is estimated at approximately 34 months.

    ‎
    Figure 1. Study flowchart. EORTC QLQ-BR23: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life breast cancer–specific Questionnaire; EORTC QLQ-C30: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life cancer-specific Questionnaire; EQ-5D-5L: European Quality of Life group 5-Dimensional questionnaire–5 Level version; LOT: Life Orientation Test; MFI-20: Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory.
    View this figure

    Ethical Statement

    The proposal of the study was approved by the institutional review board of the Rafik Hariri University Hospital in Beirut (reference number: 18.007-Trans-CMO-[OM]) and the ethical committee of Sahel General Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from each participant. All necessary measures to safeguard participants’ anonymity and confidentiality of information were respected.

    Outcome Measures

    The primary outcome measure will be a change in the body image dimension of HRQoL. The secondary outcome measures will be changes in the HRQoL, first according to fatigue and second according to optimism and pessimism; the EORTC QLQ-C30 dimension (physical, emotional, social, role, cognitive, pain, nausea or vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, dyspnea, and appetite loss); and the EORTC QLQ-BR23 dimension (sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment, future perspective, systemic therapy side effects, breast symptoms, arm symptoms, and upset by hair loss), as summarized in Table 1.

    Table 1. Outcome measures and source data.
    Outcome and measureValidation in Arabic languageDescriptionSource of dataPeriod of assessment




    		Before surgeryAfter surgery
    HRQoLa

    		EORTC QLQ-C30b [30]✓cA cancer HRQoL questionnaire that has been widely used in clinical trials and investigations for individual patient with cancer management 30 itemsIncludes 5 function domains: physical, emotional, social, role, cognitive; and 9 symptoms: fatigue, pain, nausea or vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, dyspnea and appetite loss and global health or quality-of-life and financial impactRecall period: past weekItems 1-28 formed by Likert scale: 1-4 (very much)Items 29-30 formed by Likert scale: 1-7 (excellent)PROd✓✓

    		EORTC QLQ-BR23e [40]✓A breast cancer–specific module of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire 23 itemsIncludes 8 function domains: body image, sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment, future perspective, systemic therapy side effects, breast symptoms, arm symptoms, and upset by hair lossRecall period: past weekItems 1-23 formed by Likert scale: 1-4 (very much)PRO✓✓

    		EQ-5D-5Lf [33,35,36]✓A measure of HRQoL that can be used in a wide range of health conditions and treatments Includes 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, anxiety or depressionIncludes a visual analog scaleSuch dimensions are evaluated by 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problemsPRO✓✓
    Body image

    		EORTC QLQ-BR23 [40]✓—gPRO✓✓
    Fatigue

    		MFI-20h [39]✓A scale designed to evaluate the dimensions of fatigue
    • 20 items
      • ‎
    • Includes 5 dimensions: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced activity, reduced motivation, mental fatigue
      • ‎
    • Recall period: past 4 weeks
      • ‎
    • Items 1-20 formed by Likert scale: 1-5 (no, it’s not true)
      • ‎
    		PRO✓✓
    Optimism and pessimism

    		LOTi [41]✓A scale was developed to assess individual differences in generalized optimism versus pessimism:
    • 10 items
      • ‎
    • Distinguishing between optimism and pessimism
      • ‎
    • 3 items measure the optimism, and 3 items measure the pessimism
      • ‎
    • Recall period: present
      • ‎
    • Items 2, 5, 6, and 8 are fillers
      • ‎
    • Items 1-10 formed by Likert scale: 1-4 (strongly disagree)
      • ‎
    		PRO✓✓

    aHRQoL: health-related quality of life.

    bEORTC QLQ-C30: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life cancer-specific Questionnaire.

    cFeature present.

    dPRO: patient-reported outcome.

    eEORTC QLQ-BR23: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life breast- cancer–specific Questionnaire.

    fEQ-5D-5L: European Quality of Life group 5-Dimensional questionnaire–5 Level version.

    gNot available.

    hMFI-20: Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory.

    iLOT: Life Orientation Test.

    Body Image

    Body image will be evaluated using the Arabic version of the EORTC QLQ-BR23 [30]. The breast cancer module is designed for patients with different disease stages and treatment modalities [34].

    Functional and symptomatic items of the QLQ-BR23 questionnaire will be rated on a 4-level response system from not at all (score 1) to very much (score 4), whereas the global QoL (Q29 and Q30) will be rated on a 7-point response scale.

    Health-Related Quality of Life

    HRQoL will be evaluated using the Arabic versions of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and its QLQ-BR23 [30] and the Arabic version of the EQ-5D-5L [33,35,36].

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer-specific HRQoL questionnaire that has been widely used in clinical trials and investigations for individual cancer patient management [31]. It comprises 30 items. Items 1-28 are assessed on a 4-point Likert scale from 1, not at all, to 4, very much, and items 29 and 30 from 0 to 7. The EORTC QLQ-C30 incorporates 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting), a global health status or QoL scale, and a number of single items assessing additional symptoms commonly reported by patients with cancer (dyspnea, loss of appetite, insomnia, constipation, and diarrhea), and the perceived financial impact of the disease.

    For each scale, a score is generated from 0 to 100 according to the recommendations of the EORTC such that a high score will correspond to a high level of global health/QoL health, a high functional level, and a high symptomatic level.

    The QLQ-BR23 incorporates 5 multi-item scales to assess systemic therapy side effects, arm symptoms, breast symptoms, body image, and sexual functioning. In addition, single items assess sexual enjoyment, hair loss, and future perspectives [31]. As with the EORTC QLQ-C30, a score is generated per dimension such that a high score will reflect a high functional level and a high symptomatic level [31].

    The EQ-5D-5L was also used to assess the patients’ HRQoL levels. The Arabic version was requested from the European Quality of Life group [33]. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises the same 5 dimensions as the EQ-5D-3L (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression); however, each dimension now has 5 response levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and unable to or extreme problems. The respondent is asked to indicate his or her health state by checking the box next to the most appropriate response level for each of the 5 dimensions [32]. Furthermore, another part of EQ-5D-5L is a visual analog scale, which can be used to assess the self-rated health of respondents using a 100 mm scale with the score ranging from 0 (the worst health you can imagine) to 100 (the best health you can imagine). The Arabic version of EQ-5D-5L has been used and validated elsewhere, and it was requested from the European Quality of Life group [33,35,36].

    Fatigue

    The MFI-20 is a self-report tool that has been used to assess fatigue in patients with a variety of cancers [37,38]. The MFI-20 Arabic version will be used to evaluate the multidimensional aspects of fatigue [39]. The scale comprises items evaluating general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced activity, reduced motivation, and mental fatigue during the past 4 weeks. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (yes, it’s true) to 5 (no, it’s not true) [32], which is a 20-item scale evaluating the dimensions of fatigue.

    Optimism and Pessimism

    The LOT is a 10-item self-report measure; 4 of the items are filler items that are included to disguise (somewhat) the underlying purpose of the test. Of the 6 scored items, 3 are phrased in an optimistic direction and 3 in a pessimistic direction. The respondents indicated the extent to which they agreed with each of the items on a 5-point scale from 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The recall period was the present. The total score was calculated by the addition of the optimism raw scores and the inverted pessimism raw scores. Scores range from 0 to 24; higher scores indicate greater optimism, and lower scores indicate lower optimism, often referred to as pessimism [24].

    Statistical Considerations

    Population Analysis

    The primary population of analysis will be all included patients with both questionnaires completed pre- and postsurgery. Secondary analyses will be conducted on all included patients with at least the baseline questionnaire completed.

    Sample Size

    According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, the number of new breast cancer cases in Lebanon in 2018 was estimated to be 3219, regardless of the stage of the disease [10]. To demonstrate a change of at least 5 points and considering a bilateral type 1 error rate of 5% and a statistical power of 80% as the minimal clinically important difference in the body image score after surgery as compared with the baseline score, with an SD of 20 points, it will be required to include 120 patients (paired t test) with both baseline and postsurgery scores available. Indeed, to explore factors associated with change in the body image scale after surgery, a multiple linear regression model will be used. With a sample size of 95 patients, a bilateral type 1 error rate of 5%, and a statistical power of 80%, we will be able to introduce 5 explanatory variables in the model in addition to age as a control variable. To consider 5% of nonexploitable data, a total of 126 patients need to be included.

    Statistical Analysis

    Descriptive statistics will be calculated for all study variables at specified times. The qualitative variables will be expressed using frequencies and percentages, whereas quantitative data will be presented as means and SDs, and demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with breast cancer will be compared using the t test for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. To determine potential predictors of HRQoL, bivariate associations among candidate predictor variables (demographic information, including age, marital status, family situation, education, employment status, habitation, and medical data, including the type of surgery, pathological tumor size, histological grade of tumor, menopausal status, and hormone receptor status) and HRQoL pre- and post-BCS scores were examined using Pearson correlation coefficients. Significant predictor variables for HRQoL will be included in the multiple regression analyses.

    Variables with a P value ≤.20 in the univariate model were eligible for the multivariate model. The collinearity between variables will be tested using univariate analysis. Variables presenting collinearity will not be simultaneously included in the same multivariate model. A stepwise selection approach will be then used to select the final multivariate model. The 95% CI will be calculated, and R2 values will be computed to determine how the data fit the regression model.

    Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) will be used to determine surgery effects on the variables of interest. To evaluate the relationships between body image scores, fatigue scores, optimism and pessimism scores, and HRQoL scores, Spearman correlation coefficients will be calculated for all patients pre- and post-BCS.

    The scale scores of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 will be computed as recommended [31]. The minimal clinically important difference will be set at 5 points for each score of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires [31,42] and at 10 points for the MFI-20 questionnaire [43]. All the results will be interpreted within the meaning of this minimal clinically important difference, in addition to the statistical significance, to measure the clinical relevance of the results. The percentage of missing questionnaires and missing items for the HRQoL questionnaire will be provided. Only women who provide information pre and after operation could be included for the comparison.

    Analysis of the Primary Outcome

    Normally distributed continuous outcomes will be summarized as means and SDs. The rate of missing data at each HRQoL measurement time will be reported.

    To compare the main scores of the EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BR23, EQ-5D-5L, MFI-20, and LOT across pre- and postsurgery data, a paired t test will be used.

    To compare possible differences between pre- and postsurgery outcomes, a one-way ANOVA will be used for quantitative variables.

    The factors associated with the change in HRQoL according to body image before BCS will be identified using a multiple regression model. To determine the factors potentially predicting the change in HRQoL according to body image, Pearson correlation coefficients between all the numerical variables collected at inclusion and the body image scores at baseline and after surgery will be calculated.

    Analysis of the Secondary Outcomes

    Independent sample t tests and ANOVAs will be used to test differences in the mean scores of the main questionnaires used in this study and their subscales (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BR23, EQ-5D-5L, MFI-20, and LOT) and mean scores of demographic variables (age, residence, employment, and income) and clinical characteristics (comorbidities, BMI, and laboratory values). Pearson correlation between EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L, MFI-20, and LOT scores and their subscales will be calculated to see which domain has the strongest relationship with QoL after surgery.

    All analyses will be calculated with their 95% CIs; statistical significance will be set at P<.05. The collected data will be captured and analyzed using the SPSS software version 26 (IBM Corp).

    Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

    The proposal of study is approved by the institutional review board of the Rafik Hariri University Hospital in Beirut (reference number: 18.007-Trans-CMO-[OM]) and the ethical committee of Sahel General Hospital.


    The study received ethics approval from the institutional review board. Recruitment and enrollment began in January 2018. A total of 120 patients were enrolled in this study. Future outcomes will be published in professional peer-reviewed health-related research journals.


    Principal Findings

    Nowadays, Lebanese women in general reflect the importance of gender roles in the Lebanese culture and society; most women are still expected to be homemakers, taking care of their families’ needs, although many of them work outside the house and are breadwinners as much as their male partners [30]. However, most studies show that patients with breast cancer experience physical symptoms and psychosocial distress that adversely affect their HRQoL [44,45]. So far, according to limited data, there is a weakness in studies concerning the impact of HRQoL on Lebanese women with breast cancer [29]. This study will report an important gap in the literature by answering a crucial question regarding the patient-reported outcome of HRQoL after BCS. In this context, we designed a study to evaluate HRQoL changes between pre- and post-BCS and just before initiation of adjuvant therapy in newly diagnosed patients with invasive breast cancer, targeting the body image dimension as the primary outcome of interest.

    This study is strengthened by its follow-up nature, allowing us to draw conclusions about causality. However, the questionnaires used were well-validated in Lebanese populations. However, some limitations must be acknowledged. As it is a sample of convenience and not population based, the generalizability of the results to the entire Lebanese population is not possible as data were collected from 2 hospitals only. However, our hospitals are a reference center in Beirut city for the treatment of breast cancer, and our population could be representative of this group of patients. On the other hand, considering the gap in the scientific literature on prospective studies focusing on HRQoL, body image, fatigue, and optimism and pessimism before and after BCS, this study is presented as the first prospective study on HRQoL of breast cancer in Lebanon.

    Subgroup analysis will be performed to compare baseline characteristics and will be adjusted in the multivariable analysis considering those variables with significant differences.

    Conclusions

    In summary, the findings of this study will help decision makers, physicians, and social workers design a comprehensive program with multidisciplinary components for the management and care of patients with breast cancer in Lebanon.

    Acknowledgments

    This work is supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche under the program Investissements d’Avenir with reference ANR-11-LABX-0021-LipSTIC by the Région Bourgogne Franche-Comté (grant number 2019-0083).

    The authors would like to thank the Rafik Hariri University Hospital and Sahel General Hospital staff of the Department of Medicine Surgery. The authors also thank Fatima Haidar (Lebanese University) for her editorial assistance.

    Authors' Contributions

    REH, VN, AA, and LAA conceptualized the study; REH was responsible for writing the original draft, reviewing and editing; VN and AA were responsible for visualization; and VN, AA, and LAA supervised the study. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. Cancer today. International Agency for Research on Cancer.   URL: http://gco.iarc.fr/today/home [accessed 2021-07-26]
    3. Haddou Rahou B, El Rhazi K, Ouasmani F, Nejjari C, Bekkali R, Montazeri A, et al. Quality of life in Arab women with breast cancer: a review of the literature. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2016 Apr 27;14:64 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. El Saghir NS, Assi HA, Jaber SM, Khoury KE, Nachef Z, Mikdashi HF, et al. Outcome of breast cancer patients treated outside of clinical trials. J Cancer 2014;5(6):491-498 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Hashim MJ, Al-Shamsi FA, Al-Marzooqi NA, Al-Qasemi SS, Mokdad AH, Khan G. Burden of breast cancer in the Arab world: findings from Global Burden of Disease, 2016. J Epidemiol Glob Health 2018 Dec;8(1-2):54-58 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Al-Othman S, Haoudi A, Alhomoud S, Alkhenizan A, Khoja T, Al-Zahrani A. Tackling cancer control in the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries. Lancet Oncol 2015 May;16(5):e246-e257. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Fares MY, Salhab HA, Khachfe HH, Khachfe HM. Breast cancer epidemiology among Lebanese women: an 11-year analysis. Medicina (Kaunas) 2019 Aug 10;55(8):463 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Homepage. Ministry of Public Health.   URL: http://www.moph.gov.lb [accessed 2021-11-01]
    9. Breast cancer statistics. World Cancer Research Fund.   URL: https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer/cancer-trends/breast-cancer-statistics [accessed 2020-05-28]
    10. Howard MA, Sisco M, Yao K, Winchester DJ, Barrera E, Warner J, et al. Patient satisfaction with nipple-sparing mastectomy: a prospective study of patient reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q. J Surg Oncol 2016 Sep;114(4):416-422 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Breast Cancer Control in Canada. Canadian Partnership Against Cancer. 2012.   URL: https://s22457.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Breast-cancer-control-EN.pdf [accessed 2021-10-19]
    12. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002 Oct 17;347(16):1233-1241. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Fazzino TL, Hunter RC, Sporn N, Christifano DN, Befort CA. Weight fluctuation during adulthood and weight gain since breast cancer diagnosis predict multiple dimensions of body image among rural breast cancer survivors. Psychooncology 2017 Mar;26(3):392-399 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Fobair P, Stewart SL, Chang S, D'Onofrio C, Banks PJ, Bloom JR. Body image and sexual problems in young women with breast cancer. Psychooncology 2006 Jul;15(7):579-594. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Lehmann V, Hagedoorn M, Tuinman MA. Body image in cancer survivors: a systematic review of case-control studies. J Cancer Surviv 2015 Jun;9(2):339-348. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Han J, Grothuesmann D, Neises M, Hille U, Hillemanns P. Quality of life and satisfaction after breast cancer operation. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010 Jul;282(1):75-82. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Bower JE, Ganz PA, Desmond KA, Rowland JH, Meyerowitz BE, Belin TR. Fatigue in breast cancer survivors: occurrence, correlates, and impact on quality of life. J Clin Oncol 2000 Feb;18(4):743-753. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Armstrong TS, Cohen MZ, Eriksen LR, Hickey JV. Symptom clusters in oncology patients and implications for symptom research in people with primary brain tumors. J Nurs Scholarsh 2004;36(3):197-206. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Dodd MJ, Miaskowski C, Lee KA. Occurrence of symptom clusters. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2004(32):76-78. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    20. Ancoli-Israel S, Liu L, Marler MR, Parker BA, Jones V, Sadler GR, et al. Fatigue, sleep, and circadian rhythms prior to chemotherapy for breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 2006 Mar;14(3):201-209 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    21. Carver CS, Scheier MF, Segerstrom SC. Optimism. Clin Psychol Rev 2010 Nov;30(7):879-889 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Carver CS, Scheier MF. Dispositional optimism. Trends Cogn Sci 2014 Jun;18(6):293-299 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. Colby DA, Shifren K. Optimism, mental health, and quality of life: a study among breast cancer patients. Psychol Health Med 2013;18(1):10-20. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Scheier MF, Carver CS, Bridges MW. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994 Dec;67(6):1063-1078. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    25. Akel R, El Darsa H, Anouti B, Mukherji D, Temraz S, Raslan R, et al. Anxiety, depression and quality of life in breast cancer patients in the Levant. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2017 Oct 26;18(10):2809-2816 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Abu-Saad Huijer H, Abboud S. Health-related quality of life among breast cancer patients in Lebanon. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2012 Dec;16(5):491-497. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. Naja F, Fadel RA, Alameddine M, Aridi Y, Zarif A, Hariri D, et al. Complementary and alternative medicine use and its association with quality of life among Lebanese breast cancer patients: a cross-sectional study. BMC Complement Altern Med 2015 Dec 22;15:444 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. Doumit MA, El Saghir N, Abu-Saad Huijer H, Kelley JH, Nassar N. Living with breast cancer, a Lebanese experience. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2010 Feb;14(1):42-48. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Akel R, El Darsa H, Anouti B, Mukherji D, Temraz S, Raslan R, et al. Anxiety, depression and quality of life in breast cancer patients in the Levant. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2017 Oct 26;18(10):2809-2816 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Huijer HA, Sagherian K, Tamim H. Validation of the Arabic version of the EORTC quality of life questionnaire among cancer patients in Lebanon. Qual Life Res 2013 Aug;22(6):1473-1481. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. EORTC QLQ-C30 Reference Values. EORTC Quality of Life Group. 2008.   URL: https://www.eortc.org/app/uploads/sites/2/2018/02/reference_values_manual2008.pdf [accessed 2021-10-21]
    32. Smets EM, Garssen B, Bonke B, De Haes JC. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. J Psychosom Res 1995 Apr;39(3):315-325. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    33. EQ-5D-5L - self-complete version on paper. EQ-5D.   URL: https:/​/euroqol.​org/​eq-5d-instruments/​eq-5d-5l-available-modes-of-administration/​self-complete-on-paper/​ [accessed 2021-10-19]
    34. Sprangers MA, Groenvold M, Arraras JI, Franklin J, te Velde A, Muller M, et al. The European Organization for research and treatment of cancer breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire module: first results from a three-country field study. J Clin Oncol 1996 Oct;14(10):2756-2768. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    35. Bekairy AM, Bustami RT, Almotairi M, Jarab A, Katheri AM, Aldebasi TM, et al. Validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the the EuroQOL (EQ-5D). A study from Saudi Arabia. Int J Health Sci (Qassim) 2018;12(2):16-20 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    36. Aburuz S, Bulatova N, Twalbeh M, Gazawi M. The validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the EQ-5D: a study from Jordan. Ann Saudi Med 2009;29(4):304-308 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    37. Fürst CJ, Ahsberg E. Dimensions of fatigue during radiotherapy. An application of the multidimensional fatigue inventory. Support Care Cancer 2001 Jul;9(5):355-360. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    38. Jean-Pierre P, Figueroa-Moseley CD, Kohli S, Fiscella K, Palesh OG, Morrow GR. Assessment of cancer-related fatigue: implications for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Oncologist 2007;12(1):11-21 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    39. Haggag W, Soliman H. The Arabic version of multidimensional fatigue inventory: reliability, validity and findings in three groups. Egypt J Psychiatry 1997 Feb 10;20:85-96 [FREE Full text]
    40. Awad MA, Denic S, El Taji H. Validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires for Arabic-speaking populations. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008 Sep;1138:146-154. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    41. Life orientation test. Sudan Forum.   URL: https://psycho.sudanforums.net/t1479-topic [accessed 2021-10-19]
    42. Cocks K, King MT, Velikova G, St-James MM, Fayers PM, Brown JM. Evidence-based guidelines for determination of sample size and interpretation of the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30. J Clin Oncol 2011 Jan 01;29(1):89-96. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    43. Chan A, Yo TE, Wang XJ, Ng T, Chae J, Yeo HL, et al. Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form (MFSI-SF) for fatigue worsening in Asian breast cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 2018 Mar;55(3):992-7.e2 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    44. Paraskevi T. Quality of life outcomes in patients with breast cancer. Oncol Rev 2012 Mar 05;6(1):e2 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    45. Perry S, Kowalski TL, Chang CH. Quality of life assessment in women with breast cancer: benefits, acceptability and utilization. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007 May 02;5:24-25 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

    ‎
    ANOVA: analysis of variance
    BCS: breast-conserving surgery
    EORTC: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer
    EQ-5D-5L: European Quality of Life group 5-Dimensional questionnaire–5 Level version
    EORTC QLQ-C30: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life cancer-specific Questionnaire
    HRQoL: health-related quality of life
    LOT: Life Orientation Test
    MFI-20: Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory
    QLQ-BR23: Quality of Life breast cancer–specific Questionnaire
    QoL: quality of life

    Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 11.02.21; peer-reviewed by AJ Nagarajan, M Lozano-Lozano, S Azadnajafabad; comments to author 19.07.21; revised version received 02.08.21; accepted 09.08.21; published 23.11.21

    Copyright

    ©Rana El Haidari, Amelie Anota, Linda Abou-Abbas, Virginie Nerich. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 23.11.2021.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.