This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Non-Randomized Study Protocols and Methods (Non-eHealth) (543) Epidemiology (130) Developmental Problems (39) Birth Defects (13) Epidemiologic Studies and Surveys in Child Health (14) Screening and Early Diagnosis in Pediatrics (21) Pediatrics (121)

Published on in Vol 10, No 8 (2021): August

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/28619, first published .
Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I Disease Prevalence Among Patients With Idiopathic Short Stature in Saudi Arabia: Protocol for a Multicenter Cross-sectional Study

Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I Disease Prevalence Among Patients With Idiopathic Short Stature in Saudi Arabia: Protocol for a Multicenter Cross-sectional Study

Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I Disease Prevalence Among Patients With Idiopathic Short Stature in Saudi Arabia: Protocol for a Multicenter Cross-sectional Study

Authors of this article:

Danyah Alsafadi1 Author Orcid Image ;   Aly Ezzat2 Author Orcid Image ;   Fatima Altamimi3 Author Orcid Image ;   Marwan ElBagoury2 Author Orcid Image ;   Mohammed Olfat4 Author Orcid Image ;   Mohammed Saleh5 Author Orcid Image ;   Sherif Roushdy2 Author Orcid Image ;   Yahia Aktham2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations (2) Metrics

    Protocol

    1Al Aziziah Maternity and Children Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

    2Medical Affairs Department, Sanofi-Genzyme, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

    3Yamamah General Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    4Maternity and Children Hospital, Madinah, Saudi Arabia

    5King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Corresponding Author:

    Marwan ElBagoury, MD

    Medical Affairs Department

    Sanofi-Genzyme

    Gate C, 2nd floor

    Nojoud Center, Tahlia St

    Jeddah

    Saudi Arabia

    Phone: 966 544271984

    Email: marwanessam@hotmail.com


    Background: Since the underlying cause of idiopathic short stature can indeed be undiagnosed mucopolysaccharidosis type I, it is critical to identify patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type I among screened patients with idiopathic short stature.

    Objective: The primary objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of mucopolysaccharidosis type I disease in a high-risk group (ie, patients with idiopathic short stature).

    Methods: We plan to perform a multicenter, cross-sectional screening study to primarily assess the prevalence of mucopolysaccharidosis type I disease in patients with idiopathic short stature. All eligible patients will be tested after obtaining written informed consent from their parents and guardians. Eligible patients will be recruited over 18 months from specialty care centers for pediatrics and genetics.

    Results: This protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of King Fahd Medical City and funded by Sanofi Genzyme Saudi Arabia. We expect to collect data from ≥800 patients, as determined by our sample size calculation.

    Conclusions: Saudi Arabia is the largest country in the Arabian Peninsula; it has a population of more than 28 million people. To date, there are no reliable data regarding the incidence and prevalence of mucopolysaccharidosis type I in Saudi Arabia; therefore, future multicenter studies will be needed. Further, the prevalence of an attenuated form of mucopolysaccharidosis type I is largely underestimated in Saudi Arabia due to the absence of an effective newborn screening program. Therefore, the implementation of a nationwide newborn screening program is essential for the accurate estimation of the burden of mucopolysaccharidosis and the early diagnosis of patients.

    International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/28619

    JMIR Res Protoc 2021;10(8):e28619

    doi:10.2196/28619

    Keywords

    mucopolysaccharidosis; lysosomal storage disorders; epidemiology; Saudi Arabia 


    Mucopolysaccharidoses are a group of chronic progressive disorders with multisystem affection and a fatal disease course; each disorder results from the significant deficiency of 1 of the 10 known enzymes that contribute to the lysosomal degradation of glycosaminoglycans [1]. Mucopolysaccharidosis type I is a common form of mucopolysaccharidosis; it accounts for nearly 15% of all mucopolysaccharidosis cases and occurs secondarily to a deficiency in α-L-iduronidase enzyme activity and the subsequent intracellular accumulation of dermatan and heparan sulfate [2]. Mucopolysaccharidosis type I is an autosomal recessive disorder with a progressive course and multisystem involvement [3]. The condition is associated with a wide range of phenotypic and clinical features. However, there are three distinct phenotypes of mucopolysaccharidosis type I—the Hurler, Hurler-Scheie, and Scheie syndromes (Scheie syndrome is the most severe form of mucopolysaccharidosis type I) [4]. Patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type I can present with characteristic facial features, cognitive and neurological impairments, hearing impairments, eye problems, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, recurrent respiratory infections, acute and chronic liver failure, joint contractures, and cervical instability, and spinal stenosis [2]. Further, patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type I are at higher risk of morbidity and mortality during anesthesia and surgical interventions [5].

    The diagnosis of mucopolysaccharidosis type I depends on the detection of glycosaminoglycans in urine and a significant deficiency in the activity of the α-L-iduronidase enzyme. Alongside biochemical analysis, molecular tests play a critical role in the identification of the genotype of mucopolysaccharidosis; knowing the genotype can aid in the identification of the phenotype, genetic counseling, and prenatal diagnosis [6]. With regard to mucopolysaccharidosis diagnosis, different methods are available for the early diagnosis of mucopolysaccharidosis type I. These methods are based on the detection of deficient enzyme activity via dried blood spot (DBS) punches. DBS punching is a blood sampling technique in which a drop of blood is dried and placed on filter paper (a DBS card) [7]. These blood samples can be shipped to central laboratories—those in the same country or those from abroad—to be analyzed by using different methods such as enzymatic assays and confirmatory molecular testing, as in our study. Conventional fluorometric methods are widely available techniques for the detection of enzymatic activity; however, they have limited value due to their inability to test multiple enzymes simultaneously [8]. Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) methods, which quantify lysosomal enzyme activity, have exhibited high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs) and have a high capacity for multiplex testing [9]. Recent reports have also introduced new, cheap, and feasible MS/MS-based methods for the mass detection of mucopolysaccharidosis type I [10,11].

    All mucopolysaccharidosis types are characterized by musculoskeletal manifestations in the form of joint stiffness, reduced joint mobility, carpal tunnel syndrome, and bone abnormalities [12]. Idiopathic short stature is widely considered as the main feature of mucopolysaccharidosis type I [13]; in previous studies, children with mucopolysaccharidosis type I constantly had growth measure values that were below the normal percentiles for age and sex and independent of disease severity and the age of onset [14,15]. Since the underlying cause of idiopathic short stature can indeed be undiagnosed mucopolysaccharidosis type I, it is critical to identify patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type I among screened patients with idiopathic short stature. Therefore, the primary objective of our study is to determine the prevalence of mucopolysaccharidosis type I disease in a high-risk group (ie, patients with idiopathic short stature). The secondary objectives are to describe the demographic profiles and clinical characteristics of patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type I and to describe other comorbid conditions in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type I.


    Study Design and Participants

    We plan to perform a national, multicenter, cross-sectional screening study in which an interventional diagnostic procedure (DBS enzymatic assays followed by confirmatory molecular testing) will be conducted for each patient who meets the inclusion criteria in the outpatient setting. The study will be noninterventional in terms of the therapeutic strategy. The primary aim is to assess the prevalence of mucopolysaccharidosis type I disease in patients with idiopathic short stature.

    Inclusion Criteria

    Patients will be deemed eligible for the study if they meet the following criteria:

    • Male and female children aged between 2 and 15 years with idiopathic short stature if the treating physician believes that the underlying cause of idiopathic short stature could be undiagnosed mucopolysaccharidosis type I
    • Patients who are confirmed to have at least 1 symptom of mucopolysaccharidosis type I, including growth impairment, hepatosplenomegaly, claw hand, carpal tunnel syndrome, and skeletal involvement (eg, kyphoscoliosis, joint stiffness, joint limitation, hernia, or scoliosis or corneal clouding)

    Idiopathic short stature will be defined as a height of more than 2 SDs below the corresponding average height for a given age and sex.

    Exclusion Criteria

    Patients will be deemed ineligible for the study if they meet the following criteria:

    • Patients who are already known to have mucopolysaccharidosis disease
    • Patients with a confirmed growth hormone deficiency
    • Patients with other known causes of short stature, such as endocrine, genetic, and organ system disorders
    • Patients who have already undergone DBS enzymatic assay tests

    All eligible patients will be tested after obtaining written informed consent from their parents and guardians.

    Eligible patients will be recruited over 18 months from specialty care centers for pediatrics and genetics, which have a fair amount of experience with managing patients with idiopathic short stature and may have experience with clinical research.

    Evaluation Criteria

    Main Evaluation Criteria

    The main evaluation criterion will be the percentage of subjects with confirmed (low enzymatic activity based on the enzyme assay and positive molecular tests; ie, “genetic pathogenic mutation detected”) mucopolysaccharidosis type I disease.

    Secondary Evaluation Criteria

    The description of demographic profiles and patient characteristics will include age, gender, risk factors (eg, a family history of mucopolysaccharidosis disease and the ethnicity of patients with mucopolysaccharidosis I disease; risk factors will be compared to those of the rest of the screened population), and the frequency of comorbid conditions in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type I disease.

    Sample Size Calculation and Sampling Technique

    The primary objective of this study is to evaluate mucopolysaccharidosis type I prevalence in the high-risk group (patients with idiopathic short stature). According to the Saudi Arabia Demographics Profile 2018, about 26.1% of the Saudi population are aged under 15 years [16]. Moreover, El Mouzan et al [17] reported that the prevalence of moderate and severe short stature in Saudi male and female children is 24.8%, as shown in Table 1.

    Table 1. The prevalence of short stature among children in Saudi Arabia.
    SexChildren with moderate short stature, %Children with severe short stature, %
    Male11.31.8
    Female10.51.2

    The expected number of people with short stature aged under 15 years in Saudi Arabia is about 2,193,698. According to Pedicelli et al [18], about 80% of short children have no history of low birth weight and length and no detectable pathologies (ie, idiopathic short stature). Therefore, we expected to find 1,754,958 patients with idiopathic short stature aged under 15 years in Saudi Arabia, given that the overall Saudi population size is 33,891,021 (based on the latest United Nations estimates).

    The expected prevalence of mucopolysaccharidosis type I disease worldwide is 3.5 to 4.5 patients per 100,000 people among the overall population [3]. On the other hand, the expected prevalence of mucopolysaccharidosis type I in Saudi Arabia is 3.31 patients per 100,000 people (0.003%) [19]. We calculated a sample size of 720 patients with idiopathic short stature aged under 15 years and an acceptable absolute deviation (95% CI) of 0.04% between the sample rate and the population rate (precision rate) in Saudi Arabia. We expect to have a 10% dropout rate resulting from a lack of data. Therefore, 800 patients will be required for this study. The sample size was calculated by using StatsDirect Statistical Analysis Software (version 3.1.17; StatsDirect Ltd).

    Data Collection

    Following an initial screening test, all potentially eligible patients will undergo anthropometric examinations to confirm the diagnosis of short stature. The following equations will be used:

    Stature of females = (maternal stature + paternal stature – 12.5 cm)/2 (1)
    Stature of males = (maternal stature + paternal stature + 12.5 cm)/2 (2)

    The following data will be collected from each patient: sociodemographic profiles; findings from the physical examination; anthropometric examination findings, including height, weight, BMI, and body circumference (waist, hip, and limb circumferences); a history of comorbidities; a history of previous surgeries; a family history of inborn errors of metabolism; presenting symptoms; findings from routine laboratory investigations; a history of mucopolysaccharidosis treatment; and findings from enzymatic assay screening.

    A central laboratory will provide ARCHIMED Life Science Laboratories DBS and genetic test services to all sites participating in the study. All patient data (except the results of the investigation) will be collected during a single visit. Each enrolled patient will visit the investigators for a baseline visit. The investigators will complete the electronic case report form (eCRF) soon after the baseline visit. Upon receiving the test results, investigators will be required to report in the eCRF (within 5 days) that the results that will be provided to their respective patients. The general logistic aspects of the study are presented in Figure 1.

    ‎
    Figure 1. A flowchart depicting the logistic aspects of the study. Lab results will be uploaded on Arvado (ARCHIMED Life Sciences Laboratories) by the lab and will be available on each HCP account. DBS: dried blood spot; HCP: health care personnel.
    View this figure

    An independent contract research organization (CRO) will provide the study centers with the proper levels of access, grants, and privileges for the eCRFs, which will be filled by the investigators or the authorized designees according to the complete guidelines. Data entry screen development, validation rules programming, and the maintenance of the study database will be the responsibility of the independent CRO. The computerized handling of the data by the CRO may generate additional queries, which will be automatically identified via preprogrammed and tested validation rules. Validation rules will be detailed in the data validation plan. In addition to automatic validation rules, a manual and medical review of data may generate further queries; these will be uploaded to the system as well. Site staff will be responsible for resolving automatic and manual queries by confirming or modifying the data, which will be collected with the electronic data capture system. The data collection and validation procedures will be detailed in the operational study manual.

    Study End Points

    The primary end point is the prevalence of mucopolysaccharidosis type I in the high-risk group (patients with idiopathic short stature), which will be confirmed by enzyme activity DBS testing. Other end points include a description of demographic profiles and patient characteristics and the frequency of comorbid conditions in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type I.

    Statistical Methods

    All data collected during the study will be analyzed with the appropriate descriptive analysis. Statistical analyses will be performed by using SPSS version 18 or higher (IBM Corporation). The prevalence of mucopolysaccharidosis type I will be described by using counts and percentages with 95% CIs. Other variables will be described by using means and SDs (for continuous variables) or counts (for categorical variables). Patients’ variables will be compared by using Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon tests for continuous parameters and Chi-square tests for categorical parameters. A P value of less than .05 will be considered significant.

    Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

    The study’s protocol was approved by the ethics committee of King Fahd Medical City for participant hospitals (Aseer Central Hospital and Abha and Yamamah General Hospital in Riyadh). The study protocol was registered by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology.

    Written informed consent will be obtained from every eligible patient prior to the sample withdrawal.

    This study will be conducted in accordance with the principles laid out by the 18th World Medical Assembly (1964 Helsinki Declaration) and all their subsequent amendments.

    The study will be conducted in accordance with the US and European guidelines for Good Epidemiology Practice. All necessary regulatory submissions (eg, IRB and independent ethics committee) were performed in accordance with Saudi Arabia’s local regulations, including the local data protection regulations.

    Consent for Publication

    If case reports are presented in the study, consent for publication will be obtained from the subject of the case report. If children are the subject of the case report, consent for publication will be obtained from their parents and legal guardians.

    Availability of Data and Materials

    Data sharing does not apply to this paper, as no data sets were generated or analyzed in this manuscript.


    Our protocol was reviewed and approved by the IRB of King Fahd Medical City and funded by Sanofi Genzyme Saudi Arabia. According to our sample size calculation, we expect that at least 800 patients from different sites in Saudi Arabia will be enrolled in our study.


    The early diagnosis of mucopolysaccharidosis followed by early treatment can have a huge impact on patients’ quality of life; previous reports have demonstrated that the early initiation of treatment is the most important factor for slowing the progression of the disease [2]. Enzyme replacement therapy, when delivered early in the disease process, has alleviated many systematic signs and symptoms of mucopolysaccharidosis. This is possibly due to the prevention of permanent tissue damage resulting from excessive substrate deposition [20]. Since many mucopolysaccharidosis type I symptoms are often unspecific, many patients, especially those with undiagnosed mucopolysaccharidosis type I or an attenuated form of the disease, are either misdiagnosed or diagnosed later in the course of the disease (ie, after precious time has been lost due to inappropriate treatment and after irreplaceable organ damage has occurred) [21]. At some point during the course of the disease, patients with mucopolysaccharidosis consult rheumatologists. As such, rheumatologists should be aware of clinical manifestations that raise the suspicion of a mucopolysaccharidosis diagnosis. Thus, we found it imperative to assess the prevalence of mucopolysaccharidosis type I among high-risk patients, such as pediatric patients with idiopathic short stature.

    The added values of our screening program include (1) the determination of the actual prevalence of mucopolysaccharidosis type I among children with idiopathic short stature, (2) the early detection of potentially disabling conditions among Saudi children (these data will provide a chance for early treatment and better prognoses), and (3) the increased awareness of Saudi pediatricians and primary care physicians with regard to how and when to suspect a mucopolysaccharidosis diagnosis in children.

    We chose to conduct this epidemiological study in Saudi Arabia due to the peculiar characteristics of this country, which is located in the Arabian Peninsula and has a population of more than 28 million people. Recent reports have noted a trend toward a higher incidence of genetic disorders among Arab countries when compared to those of other parts of the world. These incidence rates also apply to the incidence of mucopolysaccharidosis type I. Recent global data show that the overall birth prevalence rate of mucopolysaccharidosis ranges from 1.04 to 4.8 infants per 100,000 live births. Additionally, reports from Europe show that the incidence rate of mucopolysaccharidosis is 1.56 infants per 100,000 live births [3]. This incidence rate is quite similar to the mucopolysaccharidosis incidence rates of Japan and other East Asian countries that were reported during the same period [22-24]. On the other hand, reports from Saudi Arabia show that the country has a higher incidence of mucopolysaccharidosis compared to those in the abovementioned reports. The first retrospective study from Saudi Arabia on this topic reported that the combined incidence rate of mucopolysaccharidosis type I and mucopolysaccharidosis type IV was 3.62 infants per 100,000 live births, and each disease type accounted for 21% of all mucopolysaccharidosis cases. Moreover, the birth prevalence of mucopolysaccharidosis III is 1.8 infants per 100,000 live births (11% of total cases) [25]. In addition, Al-Sannaa and colleagues [19] reported that the incidence rate of mucopolysaccharidosis diseases was 14 infants per 100,000 live births; with mucopolysaccharidosis type VI accounted for most of the mucopolysaccharidosis cases. A 13-year retrospective chart review reported an incidence rate of 14 infants per 100,000 live birth [26]. The incidence of mucopolysaccharidosis in Saudi Arabia appears to be even higher than those reported by other Arab countries; a previous report from Tunisia reported a mucopolysaccharidosis birth prevalence of 2.27 infants per 100,000 live births [27]. These high figures were postulated to stem from the higher incidence of congenital and genetic diseases in Arab countries compared to those of other parts of the world [28]; high consanguinity rates, which reach up to 60% in some regions; the high prevalence of hemoglobinopathies and metabolic disorders; relatively high maternal and parental ages; and the lack of proper genetic screening [28-30].

    With regard to mucopolysaccharidosis diagnosis, different methods are available for the early diagnosis of mucopolysaccharidosis type I. These methods are based on the detection of deficient enzyme activity via DBS punches. Conventional fluorometric methods are widely available techniques for the detection of enzymatic activity; however, they have limited value due to their inability to test multiple enzymes simultaneously [8]. MS/MS methods, which quantify lysosomal enzyme activity, have exhibited high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of LSDs and have a high capacity for multiplex testing [9]. Recent reports have also introduced new, cheap, and feasible MS/MS-based methods for the mass detection of mucopolysaccharidosis type I [10,11]. Such advances in the diagnostic methods have encouraged other researchers to conduct several mucopolysaccharidosis type I neonatal screening programs; these researchers aim to evaluate the utility of mucopolysaccharidosis type I neonatal screening to determine whether such screening should be included in primary screening programs. From 2008 to 2013, a pilot screening program for mucopolysaccharidosis type I was conducted for 35,286 newborns from Taiwan. Only 2 neonates had a confirmed diagnosis of mucopolysaccharidosis type I. The rate of mucopolysaccharidosis type I incidence in Taiwan that was estimated from the results of this program was about 1:17,643 [31]. In the United States, several states have conducted pilot mucopolysaccharidosis screening programs. In a comprehensive program for LSDs that was conducted in Missouri, a multiplexing digital microfluidic fluorometric enzymatic assay was used to detect Pompe disease, Fabry disease, Gaucher disease, and mucopolysaccharidosis type I in 2013. Of the 43,701 screened newborns, 3 had a confirmed diagnosis of mucopolysaccharidosis type I, and 7 had pseudodeficiencies. In this Missouri program, the rate of mucopolysaccharidosis type I incidence (1:14,567) was similar to the incidence rate reported in a previous pilot study conducted in Taiwan (1:17,643) [32]. In Saudi Arabia, a national newborn screening program was established in 2005. This program covers inborn errors of metabolism, endocrine disorders, congenital heart defects, and hearing loss [33]. A recent 7-year retrospective study of 139 hospitals reported a higher rate of inborn errors of metabolism in Saudi Arabia compared to those in other parts of the world [34]. However, the inclusion of LSDs, including mucopolysaccharidosis type I, in Saudi Arabia’s newborn screening program has not yet been discussed.

    Acknowledgments

    We would like to thank Hussien Ahmed, MD, and Ahmed Salah Hussein, MD, from RAY-CRO, Egypt, by providing their expertise in medical writing. The study will be conducted by Sanofi Genzyme Saudi Arabia (Nojoud Center, Tahlia Street, Gate C, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia). Sanofi Genzyme will provide support for all of the study steps, including protocol formation, data collection, medical writing, and manuscript submission. In accordance with local and international regulations, Sanofi Genzyme Saudi Arabia will provide all of the required resources needed for the study to be conducted and published. Additionally, we confirm that the study protocol was peer-reviewed by the representative of Sanofi Genzyme before submission.

    Conflicts of Interest

    AE, MEB, SR, and YA are employees of Sanofi Genzyme. The study has been funded by Sanofi Genzyme Saudi Arabia.

    1. Dorfman A, Matalon R. The mucopolysaccharidoses (a review). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1976 Feb;73(2):630-637 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. Giugliani R, Federhen A, Rojas MVM, Vieira T, Artigalás O, Pinto LL, et al. Mucopolysaccharidosis I, II, and VI: Brief review and guidelines for treatment. Genet Mol Biol 2010 Oct;33(4):589-604 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Khan SA, Peracha H, Ballhausen D, Wiesbauer A, Rohrbach M, Gautschi M, et al. Epidemiology of mucopolysaccharidoses. Mol Genet Metab 2017 Jul;121(3):227-240 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Muenzer J. The mucopolysaccharidoses: a heterogeneous group of disorders with variable pediatric presentations. J Pediatr 2004 May;144(5 Suppl):S27-S34. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Ard JL, Bekker A, Frempong-Boadu AK. Anesthesia for an adult with mucopolysaccharidosis I. J Clin Anesth 2005 Dec;17(8):624-626. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Pastores GM, Arn P, Beck M, Clarke JTR, Guffon N, Kaplan P, et al. The MPS I registry: design, methodology, and early findings of a global disease registry for monitoring patients with Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I. Mol Genet Metab 2007 May;91(1):37-47. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Matsumoto K, Uchida N, Sakurai A, Taniguchi S, Morita K. Clinical application of the dried blood spot method in the measurement of blood busulfan concentration. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2016 Nov;22(11):1968-1973 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Sista RS, Wang T, Wu N, Graham C, Eckhardt A, Winger T, et al. Multiplex newborn screening for Pompe, Fabry, Hunter, Gaucher, and Hurler diseases using a digital microfluidic platform. Clin Chim Acta 2013 Sep 23;424:12-18 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Duffey TA, Bellamy G, Elliott S, Fox AC, Glass M, Turecek F, et al. A tandem mass spectrometry triplex assay for the detection of Fabry, Pompe, and mucopolysaccharidosis-I (Hurler). Clin Chem 2010 Dec;56(12):1854-1861 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Elliott S, Buroker N, Cournoyer JJ, Potier AM, Trometer JD, Elbin C, et al. Pilot study of newborn screening for six lysosomal storage diseases using Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Mol Genet Metab 2016 Aug;118(4):304-309 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. la Marca G, Casetta B, Malvagia S, Guerrini R, Zammarchi E. New strategy for the screening of lysosomal storage disorders: the use of the online trapping-and-cleanup liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2009 Aug 01;81(15):6113-6121. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Schmidt M, Breyer S, Löbel U, Yarar S, Stücker R, Ullrich K, et al. Musculoskeletal manifestations in mucopolysaccharidosis type I (Hurler syndrome) following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2016 Jul 08;11(1):93 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Muenzer J, Wraith JE, Clarke LA, International Consensus Panel on Management and Treatment of Mucopolysaccharidosis I. Mucopolysaccharidosis I: management and treatment guidelines. Pediatrics 2009 Jan;123(1):19-29. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Polgreen LE, Miller BS. Growth patterns and the use of growth hormone in the mucopolysaccharidoses. J Pediatr Rehabil Med 2010;3(1):25-38 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Rogers DG, Nasomyont N. Growth hormone treatment in a patient with Hurler-Scheie syndrome. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2014 Sep;27(9-10):957-960. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Saudi Arabia Population 2021 (Demographics, Maps, Graphs). World Population Review. 2021.   URL: https://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/saudi-arabia-population [accessed 2021-05-05]
    17. El Mouzan MI, Al Herbish AS, Al Salloum AA, Foster PJ, Al Omer AA, Qurachi MM. Prevalence of short stature in Saudi children and adolescents. Ann Saudi Med 2011;31(5):498-501 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Pedicelli S, Peschiaroli E, Violi E, Cianfarani S. Controversies in the definition and treatment of idiopathic short stature (ISS). J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 2009;1(3):105-115 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Al-Sannaa NA, Al-Abdulwahed HY, Al-Ghamdi MS. Lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs): The prevalence in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Neurological Disorders 2017 Oct 05;1(2):38-43 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
    20. Fecarotta S, Gasperini S, Parenti G. New treatments for the mucopolysaccharidoses: from pathophysiology to therapy. Ital J Pediatr 2018 Nov 16;44(Suppl 2):124 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    21. Hendriksz CJ, Harmatz P, Beck M, Jones S, Wood T, Lachman R, et al. Review of clinical presentation and diagnosis of mucopolysaccharidosis IVA. Mol Genet Metab 2013;110(1-2):54-64 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Lin HY, Lin SP, Chuang CK, Niu DM, Chen MR, Tsai FJ, et al. Incidence of the mucopolysaccharidoses in Taiwan, 1984-2004. Am J Med Genet A 2009 May;149A(5):960-964. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. Cho SY, Sohn YB, Jin DK. An overview of Korean patients with mucopolysaccharidosis and collaboration through the Asia Pacific MPS Network. Intractable Rare Dis Res 2014 Aug;3(3):79-86 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Chen X, Qiu W, Ye J, Han L, Gu X, Zhang H. Demographic characteristics and distribution of lysosomal storage disorder subtypes in Eastern China. J Hum Genet 2016 Apr;61(4):345-349. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    25. Moammar H, Cheriyan G, Mathew R, Al-Sannaa N. Incidence and patterns of inborn errors of metabolism in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia, 1983-2008. Ann Saudi Med 2010;30(4):271-277 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Alfadhel M, Benmeakel M, Hossain MA, Al Mutairi F, Al Othaim A, Alfares AA, et al. Thirteen year retrospective review of the spectrum of inborn errors of metabolism presenting in a tertiary center in Saudi Arabia. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2016 Sep 15;11(1):126 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. Turkia HB, Tebib N, Azzouz H, Abdelmoula MS, Chehida AB, Chemli J, et al. Incidence of mucopolysaccharidoses in Tunisia. Tunis Med 2009 Nov;87(11):782-785 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    28. Al-Gazali L, Hamamy H, Al-Arrayad S. Genetic disorders in the Arab world. BMJ 2006 Oct 21;333(7573):831-834 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Al-Gazali LI, Alwash R, Abdulrazzaq YM. United Arab Emirates: communities and community genetics. Community Genet 2005;8(3):186-196. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Wahab AA, Bener A, Teebi AS. The incidence patterns of Down syndrome in Qatar. Clin Genet 2006 Apr;69(4):360-362. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. Lin SP, Lin HY, Wang TJ, Chang CY, Lin CH, Huang SF, et al. A pilot newborn screening program for Mucopolysaccharidosis type I in Taiwan. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2013 Sep 22;8:147. [CrossRef]
    32. Hopkins PV, Campbell C, Klug T, Rogers S, Raburn-Miller J, Kiesling J. Lysosomal storage disorder screening implementation: findings from the first six months of full population pilot testing in Missouri. J Pediatr 2015 Jan;166(1):172-177. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    33. Gosadi IM. National screening programs in Saudi Arabia: Overview, outcomes, and effectiveness. J Infect Public Health 2019;12(5):608-614 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    34. Alfadhel M, Al Othaim A, Al Saif S, Al Mutairi F, Alsayed M, Rahbeeni Z, et al. Expanded newborn screening program in Saudi Arabia: Incidence of screened disorders. J Paediatr Child Health 2017 Jun;53(6):585-591. [CrossRef] [Medline]

    ‎
    CRO: contract research organization
    DBS: dried blood spot
    eCRF: electronic case report form
    IRB: Institutional Review Board
    LSD: lysosomal storage disorder
    MS/MS: Tandem mass spectrometry

    Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 08.03.21; peer-reviewed by H Ahmed; comments to author 21.05.21; revised version received 07.06.21; accepted 08.06.21; published 31.08.21

    Copyright

    ©Danyah Alsafadi, Aly Ezzat, Fatima Altamimi, Marwan ElBagoury, Mohammed Olfat, Mohammed Saleh, Sherif Roushdy, Yahia Aktham. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 31.08.2021.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.