This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Systematic Review Protocols (268) Continuing Medical Education (CME) for Doctors (124) Professional Identity Development (18) Communities of Practice (24) Continuing Medical Education (CME) for Allied Health Professionals (131) Evaluation of Medical Education (78)

Published on in Vol 11, No 4 (2022): April

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/28625, first published .
Evidence for Continuing Professional Development and Recency of Practice Standards for Regulated Health Professionals in Australia: Protocol for a Systematic Review

Evidence for Continuing Professional Development and Recency of Practice Standards for Regulated Health Professionals in Australia: Protocol for a Systematic Review

Evidence for Continuing Professional Development and Recency of Practice Standards for Regulated Health Professionals in Australia: Protocol for a Systematic Review

Authors of this article:

Penelope Main1 Author Orcid Image ;   Sarah Anderson2, 3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (3) Tweetations (2) Metrics

Journals

  1. Main P, Anderson S. Evidence for recency of practice standards for regulated health practitioners in Australia: a systematic review. Human Resources for Health 2023;21(1) View
  2. Main P, Anderson S. Evidence for continuing professional development standards for regulated health practitioners in Australia: a systematic review. Human Resources for Health 2023;21(1) View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Pearce P. Nurse Practitioners and Nurse Anesthetists: The Evolution of the Global Roles. View