This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

CIHR funded proposals with peer-review reports (Canada) (50) Participatory Research Protocols and Proposals (165) Proposals (eHealth) (83) Scoping Review Protocols (228) Co-Design & Participatory Design (121)

Published on in Vol 12 (2023)

This is a member publication of University of Toronto

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/50463, first published .
Development of the Preferred Components for Co-Design in Research Guideline and Checklist: Protocol for a Scoping Review and a Modified Delphi Process

Development of the Preferred Components for Co-Design in Research Guideline and Checklist: Protocol for a Scoping Review and a Modified Delphi Process

Development of the Preferred Components for Co-Design in Research Guideline and Checklist: Protocol for a Scoping Review and a Modified Delphi Process

Authors of this article:

Sarah EP Munce1, 2, 3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Carolyn Steele Gray3, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Beverley Claire Pomeroy1 Author Orcid Image ;   Mark Bayley1, 6 Author Orcid Image ;   Kristina Marie Kokorelias1, 2, 4, 7 Author Orcid Image ;   Dorothy Luong1 Author Orcid Image ;   Elaine Biddiss4, 8, 9 Author Orcid Image ;   Trish Cave10 Author Orcid Image ;   Peter Bragge11 Author Orcid Image ;   Carolyn A Chew-Graham12 Author Orcid Image ;   Heather Colquhoun2, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Ann Dadich13 Author Orcid Image ;   Katie N Dainty3, 14 Author Orcid Image ;   Mark Elliott10 Author Orcid Image ;   Patrick Feng3, 15 Author Orcid Image ;   Jodeme Goldhar16 Author Orcid Image ;   Clayon B Hamilton17 Author Orcid Image ;   Gillian Harvey18 Author Orcid Image ;   Monika Kastner3, 14 Author Orcid Image ;   Anita Kothari19 Author Orcid Image ;   Joe Langley20 Author Orcid Image ;   Lianne Jeffs3, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Daniel Masterson21 Author Orcid Image ;   Michelle LA Nelson3, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Laure Perrier3, 22 Author Orcid Image ;   John Riley23 Author Orcid Image ;   Kate Sellen15 Author Orcid Image ;   Emily Seto3, 22, 24 Author Orcid Image ;   Robert Simpson6, 25 Author Orcid Image ;   Sophie Staniszewska26 Author Orcid Image ;   Vasanthi Srinivasan23 Author Orcid Image ;   Sharon E Straus3, 27 Author Orcid Image ;   Andrea C Tricco3, 22, 27, 28 Author Orcid Image ;   Kerry Kuluski3, 29 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (13) Tweetations (16) Metrics

Journals

  1. McAlpine R, Sacchet M, Simonsson O, Khan M, Krajnovic K, Morometescu L, Kamboj S. Development of a digital intervention for psychedelic preparation (DIPP). Scientific Reports 2024;14(1) View
  2. Bourke J, Bragge P, River J, Sinnott Jerram K, Arora M, Middleton J. Shining a light on the road towards conducting principle-based co-production research in rehabilitation. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences 2024;5 View
  3. Brown P, Singh H, Su E, Sirisegaram L, Munce S, Eaton A, Zhabokritsky A, McKinlay S, Kokorelias K, Hoddinott G. Understanding the use of co-design methods for research involving older adults living with HIV: A scoping review protocol. PLOS ONE 2024;19(5):e0303580 View
  4. Masterson D, Lindenfalk B, Kjellström S, Robert G, Ockander M. Mechanisms for co-designing and co-producing health and social care: a realist synthesis. Research Involvement and Engagement 2024;10(1) View
  5. Kwah L, Doshi K, Wai E, Hollis J, Bird M, Pua Y, Thumboo J, Low L, He H, De Silva D, Niam S, Toh I, Lui Y, Choo S, Wang J, Thilarajah S. Development of a behaviour change intervention for improving physical activity amongst stroke survivors with physical disabilities: a co-design approach. BMC Public Health 2024;24(1) View
  6. Kilfoy A, Hsu T, Stockton-Powdrell C, Whelan P, Chu C, Jibb L. An umbrella review on how digital health intervention co-design is conducted and described. npj Digital Medicine 2024;7(1) View
  7. Güemes A, Costa T, Makin T. Foundational guidelines for enhancing neurotechnology research and development through end-user involvement. Journal of Neural Engineering 2025;22(1):012001 View
  8. Gillard A, McNeair T, Andrew N, Haines T, Hill K, Moran C, Rawson H, Russell G, Long K, Heyn P. Multi-Stakeholder Aged Care Research Networks: A Scoping Review. The Gerontologist 2025;65(3) View
  9. Berger-Höger B. Co-Design in der Pflegeforschung: Vom Anspruch zur gelebten Praxis. Pflege 2025;38(2):61 View
  10. Shorting T, McCoy M, Weiss M, Schue J, Ernecoff N, Bush S, Lalumière G, Rice J, Hagarty M, Vincent D, Wentlandt K, David D, MacLeod K, Mysore V, Savigny M, Fitzgibbon E, Isenberg S. Engaging patients, family caregivers and healthcare providers to develop metrics tailored to a palliative care population: a content validity process. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes 2025;9(1) View
  11. Recabarren Silva J, Wu R, Scholes-Robertson N, Hughes A, van Zwieten A, Wong G, Sluiter A, Viecelli A, Craig J, McDonald S, Tunnicliffe D, Teixeira-Pinto A, Kim S, Hawley C, Jaure A. Reporting the involvement of patients and caregivers in identifying and designing healthcare interventions: the IDEAS framework. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2025;183:111784 View
  12. Racey M, Alliston P, Sherifali D, Sriskandarajah A, Sushko K, Lipscombe L. Co-Designing a postpartum diabetes prevention program after gestational diabetes mellitus: A MoSCoW prioritization workshop exercise. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2025;225:112269 View
  13. Burns C, Kilkenny M, Purvis T, Gall S, Farmer C, Barker S, Booth B, Bray J, Cadilhac D, Cameron J, Dalli L, Ho S, Horton E, Kleinig T, Murphy L, Nelson M, Olaiya M, Thrift A, Freak‐Poli R. Processes Underpinning Successful Co‐Design: Lessons From a Digital Health Project. Health Expectations 2025;28(3) View