Accessibility settings

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Non-randomized Protocols and Methods (ehealth) (742) Methods and Feasibility Studies (565) Digital Health Reporting Standards, Quality and Transparency in e-Research (162) Digital Science, Open Science (95) Digital Health Meta-Research and Bibliographic Studies (78) Generative Language Models Including ChatGPT (876)

Published on in Vol 15 (2026)

This is a member publication of University of Toronto

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/90588, first published .
Evaluating the Methodological Quality of Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Systematic Reviews: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Meta-Research Study

Evaluating the Methodological Quality of Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Systematic Reviews: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Meta-Research Study

Evaluating the Methodological Quality of Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Systematic Reviews: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Meta-Research Study

Authors of this article:

Mohammad Jay1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Mary Morgan3 Author Orcid Image ;   Sharon Elizabeth Straus2, 4, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Emma Wilson6 Author Orcid Image ;   Rinku Sutradhar2, 7, 8 Author Orcid Image ;   Catherine Yu1, 2, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Lesley Gotlib Conn2 Author Orcid Image ;   Christoffer Dharma2 Author Orcid Image ;   Lorraine Lipscombe1, 2, 9 Author Orcid Image ;   Antoine Eskander2, 10 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations Metrics

There are no citations yet available for this article according to Crossref .