Evaluation of the Swedish Web-Version of Quality of Recovery (SwQoR): Secondary Step in the Development of a Mobile Phone App to Measure Postoperative Recovery

Journals

1. Hälleberg Nyman M, Nilsson U, Dahlberg K, Jaensson M. Association Between Functional Health Literacy and Postoperative Recovery, Health Care Contacts, and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Patients Undergoing Day Surgery. JAMA Surgery 2018;153(8):738 View
2. Nilsson U, Dahlberg K, Jaensson M. The Swedish Web Version of the Quality of Recovery Scale Adapted for Use in a Mobile App: Prospective Psychometric Evaluation Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2017;5(12):e188 View
3. Nilsson U, Jaensson M, Dahlberg K, Hugelius K. Postoperative Recovery After General and Regional Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Day Surgery: A Mixed Methods Study. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing 2019;34(3):517 View
4. Dahlberg K, Philipsson A, Hagberg L, Jaensson M, Hälleberg-Nyman M, Nilsson U. Cost-effectiveness of a systematic e-assessed follow-up of postoperative recovery after day surgery: a multicentre randomized trial. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2017;119(5):1039 View
5. Dick S, O’Connor Y, Heavin C. Approaches to Mobile Health Evaluation: A Comparative Study. Information Systems Management 2020;37(1):75 View
6. Mori M, Brooks C, Spatz E, Mortazavi B, Dhruva S, Linderman G, Grab L, Zhang Y, Geirsson A, Chaudhry S, Krumholz H. Protocol for project recovery after cardiac surgery: a single-center cohort study leveraging digital platform to characterise longitudinal patient-reported postoperative recovery patterns. BMJ Open 2020;10(9):e036959 View
7. Emerson J, Paquet A, Sangha R, Robison K. Gynecologic Surgical Outcomes Through the Patient’s Eyes: Are Physicians Looking in the Same Direction?. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 2019;74(6):351 View
8. Jaensson M, Dahlberg K, Nilsson U. Sex Similarities in Postoperative Recovery and Health Care Contacts Within 14 Days With mHealth Follow-Up: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Perioperative Medicine 2018;1(1):e2 View
9. Abelson J, Kaufman E, Symer M, Peters A, Charlson M, Yeo H. Barriers and benefits to using mobile health technology after operation: A qualitative study. Surgery 2017;162(3):605 View
10. Nilsson U, Dahlberg K, Jaensson M. Low Preoperative Mental and Physical Health is Associated with Poorer Postoperative Recovery in Patients Undergoing Day Surgery: A Secondary Analysis from a Randomized Controlled Study. World Journal of Surgery 2019;43(8):1949 View
11. Dahlberg K, Jaensson M, Nilsson U, Eriksson M, Odencrants S. Holding It Together—Patients' Perspectives on Postoperative Recovery When Using an e-Assessed Follow-Up: Qualitative Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2018;6(5):e10387 View
12. Dahlberg K, Jaensson M, Nilsson U. “Let the patient decide” – Person-centered postoperative follow-up contacts, initiated via a phone app after day surgery: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Surgery 2019;61:33 View
13. Jaensson M, Dahlberg K, Eriksson M, Nilsson U. Evaluation of postoperative recovery in day surgery patients using a mobile phone application: a multicentre randomized trial. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2017;119(5):1030 View
14. Qudah B, Luetsch K. The influence of mobile health applications on patient - healthcare provider relationships: A systematic, narrative review. Patient Education and Counseling 2019;102(6):1080 View
15. Jaensson M, Dahlberg K, Nilsson U. Factors influencing day surgery patients’ quality of postoperative recovery and satisfaction with recovery: a narrative review. Perioperative Medicine 2019;8(1) View
16. Nilsson U, Dahlberg K, Jaensson M. Swedish Web Version of the Quality of Recovery Scale Adapted for Patients Undergoing Local Anesthesia and Peripheral Nerve Blockade (SwQoR-LA): Prospective Psychometric Evaluation Study. JMIR Perioperative Medicine 2021;4(1):e23090 View
17. Fiorinelli M, Di Mario S, Surace A, Mattei M, Russo C, Villa G, Dionisi S, Di Simone E, Giannetta N, Di Muzio M. Smartphone distraction during nursing care: Systematic literature review. Applied Nursing Research 2021;58:151405 View
18. Forget P, Dahlberg K. Is multi-source feedback the future of perioperative medicine?. Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine 2021;40(3):100886 View
19. Mori M, Brooks C, Dhruva S, Lu Y, Spatz E, Dey P, Zhang Y, Chaudhry S, Geirsson A, Allore H, Krumholz H. Trajectories of Pain After Cardiac Surgery: Implications for Measurement, Reporting, and Individualized Treatment. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 2021;14(8) View
20. Jakobsson J, Kumlien C. Everyday challenges following hospital discharge. A multi‐method study identifying and describing areas of concern for patients during the first month after colorectal cancer surgery. Nursing Open 2023;10(4):2172 View
21. Mori M, Dhruva S, Geirsson A, Krumholz H. Characterization of multi-domain postoperative recovery trajectories after cardiac surgery using a digital platform. npj Digital Medicine 2022;5(1) View
22. Liu Y, Qiu Y, Fu Y, Liu J. Evaluation of postoperative recovery: past, present and future. Postgraduate Medical Journal 2023;99(1174):808 View
23. McLean K, Knight S, Diehl T, Varghese C, Ng N, Potter M, Zafar S, Bouamrane M, Harrison E. Readiness for implementation of novel digital health interventions for postoperative monitoring: a systematic review and clinical innovation network analysis. The Lancet Digital Health 2023;5(5):e295 View
24. van Hout L, Harker M, Vriens P, Bökkerink W. Identifying postoperative complications after inguinal hernia repair with a smartphone application: a comparative cohort study. Hernia 2024;28(4):1265 View