Published on in Vol 8, No 11 (2019): November

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/14222, first published .
Comparing the Impact of an Implicit Learning Approach With Standard Care on Recovery of Mobility Following Stroke: Protocol for a Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparing the Impact of an Implicit Learning Approach With Standard Care on Recovery of Mobility Following Stroke: Protocol for a Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparing the Impact of an Implicit Learning Approach With Standard Care on Recovery of Mobility Following Stroke: Protocol for a Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Journals

  1. Croucher C, Powell W, Dicks M, Stevens B, Powell V. The Use of Embedded Context-Sensitive Attractors for Clinical Walking Test Guidance in Virtual Reality. Frontiers in Virtual Reality 2021;2 View
  2. Johnson L, Burridge J, Demain S. Development of lower limb training interventions that promote an external focus of attention in people with stroke: a modified Delphi survey. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 2022;38(13):2998 View
  3. Johnson L, Mardo J, Demain S, Olorunlana A. Understanding implementation of a complex intervention in a stroke rehabilitation research trial: A qualitative evaluation using Normalisation Process Theory. PLOS ONE 2023;18(9):e0282612 View
  4. Johnson L, Burridge J, Ewings S, Demain S. A pilot cluster randomised controlled trial, of an IMPlicit learning approach versus standard care, on recovery of mobility following stroke (IMPS). Clinical Rehabilitation 2024;38(10):1346 View
  5. Prasomsri J, Sakai K, Ikeda Y, Keereena S. Effectiveness of implicit learning in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Physical Therapy Reviews 2024:1 View