This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Non-Randomized Study Protocols and Methods (Non-eHealth) (697)

Published on in Vol 8, No 5 (2019): May

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/12039, first published .
Testing a Communication Assessment Tool for Ethically Sensitive Scenarios: Protocol of a Validation Study

Testing a Communication Assessment Tool for Ethically Sensitive Scenarios: Protocol of a Validation Study

Testing a Communication Assessment Tool for Ethically Sensitive Scenarios: Protocol of a Validation Study

Authors of this article:

Thierry Daboval1 Author Orcid Image ;   Natalie Ward2 Author Orcid Image ;   Jordan R Schoenherr3 Author Orcid Image ;   Gregory P Moore1 Author Orcid Image ;   Caitlin Carew1 Author Orcid Image ;   Alicia Lambrinakos-Raymond1 Author Orcid Image ;   Emanuela Ferretti1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (5) Tweetations Metrics

Journals

  1. Sullivan A, Cummings C. Decision making at extreme prematurity: Innovation in clinician education. Seminars in Perinatology 2022;46(3):151529 View
  2. Guindon M, Feltman D, Litke-Wager C, Okonek E, Mullin K, Anani U, Murray II P, Mattson C, Krick J. Development of a checklist for evaluation of shared decision-making in consultation for extremely preterm delivery. Journal of Perinatology 2025;45(6):732 View
  3. Soffer O, Newman L, Brennan M, Williams D, Cummings C. The Pediatric Ethics & Professionalism Assessment Tool (Pedi-EPAT): Development and implementation of a novel, competency-based assessment. PEC Innovation 2025;7:100433 View
  4. C. Moreira F, Leão C, Bessa J, M. Teixeira P. Adaptation and Validation of Ethics in Health Care Questionnaire Version 2 (EHCQ-2) to European Portuguese. Acta Médica Portuguesa 2025;39(1):14 View
  5. Jouin M, Sharvadze I, Fekete J, Longuépée H, Thomas H, Grados C, De Wever J, Gignon M, Hainselin M. The use of applied improvisation at university: a mini-review. Frontiers in Psychology 2026;16 View