Accessibility settings

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Non-Randomized Study Protocols and Methods (Non-eHealth) (755) Neurology and Neurosciences (312) Military Medicine (39) Cognitive and Neurorehabilitation (391) Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (149) Longitudinal and Cohort Studies in Public Health (450) Supporting Informal Care and Caregivers (423) Interventions and Support for Informal Caregivers of People with Mental Illness (141) Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) (444)

Published on in Vol 11, No 1 (2022): January

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/30975, first published .
Military Injuries—Understanding Posttraumatic Epilepsy, Health, and Quality-of-Life Effects of Caregiving: Protocol for a Longitudinal Mixed Methods Observational Study

Military Injuries—Understanding Posttraumatic Epilepsy, Health, and Quality-of-Life Effects of Caregiving: Protocol for a Longitudinal Mixed Methods Observational Study

Military Injuries—Understanding Posttraumatic Epilepsy, Health, and Quality-of-Life Effects of Caregiving: Protocol for a Longitudinal Mixed Methods Observational Study

Authors of this article:

Erin D Bouldin1 Author Orcid Image ;   Roxana Delgado2 Author Orcid Image ;   Kimberly Peacock2 Author Orcid Image ;   Willie Hale3 Author Orcid Image ;   Ali Roghani4 Author Orcid Image ;   Amira Y Trevino4 Author Orcid Image ;   Mikayla Viny4 Author Orcid Image ;   David W Wetter5 Author Orcid Image ;   Mary Jo Pugh4, 6 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (2) Tweetations (14) Metrics

Journals

  1. Bouldin E, Cheney A, Pugh M, Morales K, Delgado R. Home- and Community-Based Service Use and Preferences Among Post-9/11 Veterans With or at High Risk of Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementia and Their Caregivers: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Observational Study. JMIR Research Protocols 2026;15:e83629 View
  2. Bedrov A, Bouldin E, Delgado R, Pugh M, Putnam M. The “healthy dyad” bias in veteran-caregiver dyadic research: a methodological caution. Innovation in Aging 2026;10(5) View