Published on in Vol 11, No 3 (2022): March
Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are
available at
https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/34275, first published
.
![Creating Effective, Evidence-Based Video Communication of Public Health Science (COVCOM Study): Protocol for a Sequential Mixed Methods Effect Study Creating Effective, Evidence-Based Video Communication of Public Health Science (COVCOM Study): Protocol for a Sequential Mixed Methods Effect Study](https://asset.jmir.pub/assets/c72891eacbb985933920774a7eb03086.png 480w,https://asset.jmir.pub/assets/c72891eacbb985933920774a7eb03086.png 960w,https://asset.jmir.pub/assets/c72891eacbb985933920774a7eb03086.png 1920w,https://asset.jmir.pub/assets/c72891eacbb985933920774a7eb03086.png 2500w)
Journals
- Williams N, Haines T, Williams C, Bowles K, Hill K. Age Differences in Preferred Methods of Obtaining and Understanding Health Related Information During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Australia. Frontiers in Public Health 2022;10 View
- Berg S, Shortt M, Røislien J, Lungu D, Thune H, Wiig S, Andreu-Sánchez C. Key topics in pandemic health risk communication: A qualitative study of expert opinions and knowledge. PLOS ONE 2022;17(9):e0275316 View
- Berg S, Shortt M, Thune H, Røislien J, O’Hara J, Lungu D, Wiig S. Differences in comprehending and acting on pandemic health risk information: a qualitative study using mental models. BMC Public Health 2022;22(1) View
- Lungu D, Røislien J, Berg S, Smeets I, Shortt M, Thune H, Brønnick K. Assessing the Effect of Nonvisual Information Factors in Pandemic-Related Video Communication: Randomized Controlled Between-Subjects Experiment. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e42528 View