This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

RCTs - Protocols/Proposals (non-eHealth) (311) Cost-Effectiveness and Economics (252) Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Medicine (226) Methodological Innovations (25)

Published on in Vol 10, No 11 (2021): November

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/29467, first published .
Comparison of (Cost-)Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Image–Guided High-Intensity–Focused Ultrasound With Standard (Minimally) Invasive Fibroid Treatments: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (MYCHOICE)

Comparison of (Cost-)Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Image–Guided High-Intensity–Focused Ultrasound With Standard (Minimally) Invasive Fibroid Treatments: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (MYCHOICE)

Comparison of (Cost-)Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Image–Guided High-Intensity–Focused Ultrasound With Standard (Minimally) Invasive Fibroid Treatments: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (MYCHOICE)

Authors of this article:

Kimberley J Anneveldt1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Ingrid M Nijholt1 Author Orcid Image ;   Joke M Schutte2 Author Orcid Image ;   Jeroen R Dijkstra2 Author Orcid Image ;   Geert W J Frederix3 Author Orcid Image ;   Erwin Ista4 Author Orcid Image ;   Inez M Verpalen5 Author Orcid Image ;   Sebastiaan Veersema6 Author Orcid Image ;   Judith A F Huirne7, 8 Author Orcid Image ;   Wouter J K Hehenkamp7 Author Orcid Image ;   Martijn F Boomsma1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (10) Tweetations (3) Metrics

Kimberley J Anneveldt   1, 2 * , MD ;   Ingrid M Nijholt   1 * , PhD ;   Joke M Schutte   2 , MD, PhD ;   Jeroen R Dijkstra   2 , MD ;   Geert W J Frederix   3 , PhD ;   Erwin Ista   4 , PhD ;   Inez M Verpalen   5 , MD, PhD ;   Sebastiaan Veersema   6 , MD, PhD ;   Judith A F Huirne   7, 8 , MD, PhD ;   Wouter J K Hehenkamp   7 , MD, PhD ;   Martijn F Boomsma   1 , MD, PhD

1 Department of Radiology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands

2 Department of Gynecology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands

3 Julius Center for Health Science and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

4 Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nursing Science, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands

5 Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

6 Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

7 Department of Gynecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

8 Department of Gynecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

*these authors contributed equally

Corresponding Author: