This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

RCTs - Protocols/Proposals (non-eHealth) (311) Cost-Effectiveness and Economics (252) Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Medicine (226) Methodological Innovations (25)

Published on in Vol 10, No 11 (2021): November

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/29467, first published .
Comparison of (Cost-)Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Image–Guided High-Intensity–Focused Ultrasound With Standard (Minimally) Invasive Fibroid Treatments: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (MYCHOICE)

Comparison of (Cost-)Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Image–Guided High-Intensity–Focused Ultrasound With Standard (Minimally) Invasive Fibroid Treatments: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (MYCHOICE)

Comparison of (Cost-)Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Image–Guided High-Intensity–Focused Ultrasound With Standard (Minimally) Invasive Fibroid Treatments: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (MYCHOICE)

Authors of this article:

Kimberley J Anneveldt1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Ingrid M Nijholt1 Author Orcid Image ;   Joke M Schutte2 Author Orcid Image ;   Jeroen R Dijkstra2 Author Orcid Image ;   Geert W J Frederix3 Author Orcid Image ;   Erwin Ista4 Author Orcid Image ;   Inez M Verpalen5 Author Orcid Image ;   Sebastiaan Veersema6 Author Orcid Image ;   Judith A F Huirne7, 8 Author Orcid Image ;   Wouter J K Hehenkamp7 Author Orcid Image ;   Martijn F Boomsma1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (10) Tweetations (3) Metrics
All Time | Last Month | Last Six Months | Last Year
There are currently no tweets available for this article within the specified range.